Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Plus ca change / Rome wasn't built in a day...

Now that the Flyers are five games into the new season with a six-day break coming up, let's take a look at what's been happening.

The Flyers are 3-1-1 so far, for 7 out of a possible 10 points.  (They should have 8, but I'll take 3-1-1 over 0-3-3 any day of the week.)  They are 2-0 on the road and 1-1-1 at home.  They have outscored the opposition 19-14.  Their power play has been good and their penalty kill has been even better.

Since we've been all about the stats lately here at BSH, let's break down what the Flyers have done.  Here we'll see that there are some areas where they have excelled, and some where they need adjustments sooner than later.

 

 

 

Star-divide

1. The Competition: The Flyers have played 5 teams who all made the playoffs last year - Carolina, New Jersey, Washington, Pittsburgh, and Anaheim.  If you told me going into this stretch that the Flyers would come out of it with 7 out of 10 points, I'd be happy with that.  The last two games were disappointing, however: They did not show up for the Pittsburgh game and they blew a late lead against Anaheim.  Still, the Flyers have been playing well for the most part.

 

2. Team Scoring: Here is one area where the Flyers need some improvement.  By breaking things down period-by-period, we can see when the Flyers are at their best.  I did not include the shoot-out goal since it does not count in the standings:

Period     GF     GA

1st             3          2

2nd           11         5

3rd             4          7

OT             1          0

Totals:      19        14


The Flyers have been a patient first-period team, scoring on chances they've been given.  The only 2 first-period goals against came during the Pittsburgh game, when the Flyers had a bad night all around.  I'd like to see them get more goals early on to help set the tone for games, but for the most part they've done a good job starting games off.


It's the Lindros Era all over again!  The Flyers are a dominant second-period team.  They outscore their opposition by more than 2-1 during the second.  They can do that all year as far as I'm concerned.


But the problem lies in the third period, of course.  You're not going to win a lot of hockey games by being outscored in the third period.  The other troubling thing is that the Flyers give up more goals as the game goes along.  That trend needs to stop.


3. Team Defense: As we've said, this is an area where the Flyers have shown some growth but still need to improve.  Currently they're giving up almost 3 goals a game, which they need to cut down.  Even considering their being outscored in the third period, the Flyers have done pretty well in protecting leads by establishing a forecheck in their opponent's end of the ice.  As the team gels, watch for them to get better at that.


4. Individual Scoring: Just under 1/3 of the team's goals have been scored by Mike Richards - he's got 6.  Jeff Carter has 4, and Danny Briere has 3.  Other scorers include Pronger, Laperriere, Powe, Hartnell, Timonen, and Carle, all of whom have one goal apiece.  It's good to see our defensemen contributing early on, as they definitely need to score more than they did last year.  While Claude Giroux has not scored yet, he has set up a few goals with his passing, as has Simon GagneBut the Flyers really need to have players like Gagne, Giroux, and Hartnell putting pucks in the net if they're going to be successful.  Gagne in particular has been snakebitten, but something tells me he'll still get 30 this year.  Once he gets one in, he'll be more of a factor.


5. Individual Defense: Matt Carle leads the team in +/- with 4.  Offensively, he is tied with Richards and Carter for 8 points.  Chris Pronger has 5 points, is a +3, and has been playing well in Orange and Black.  Carle and Pronger have been logging big minutes too, and they seem to get better every game.  They could well be the most dynamic defensive pairing we've seen here since Howe/McCrimmon, but then again we have a lot of hockey left to play.


After those two, we've got some issues.  Timonen is having his usual production (5 points) but he is -2 in the standings.  This is in part due to the poor play of his defense partner, Braydon Coburn, who is -3 (worst on the team) and has not started the year off well.  Ryan Parent is also a -2, but I've begun to see some positives from his play.  I think Parent will be an effective "shadow" defenseman rather than a physical one; he seems to be at his best when he can keep an opponent along the boards.  Newcomers Danny Syvret and Ole-Kristian Tollefsen are each a -1; neither has stood out for any reason.  Timonen and Coburn - ESPECIALLY Coburn - need to step up their defensive play if the Flyers are to be successful.


6. Goaltending: The jury is still out here.  Ray Emery has looked good more often than not, but he is still readjusting to the NHL after spending a year abroad.  When Emery has had good games, the Flyers have gone 2-0-1.  When Emery has had off nights, the Flyers have gone 1-1.  As long as Emery plays to his ability and the Flyers make the most of his good nights, then starting goaltending should not be an issue.  Still, we've got a lot of hockey left to play and we have yet to see Brian Boucher start a game.  Boosh did not have a good preseason and needs to show the Flyers that they made the right move in signing him.


7. Coaching: John Stevens and his assistants have had the guys ready to play on most nights.  Stevens also seems to be implementing a more up-tempo system and a more aggressive way for the Flyers to protect leads (again, by establishing a forecheck in the offensive end).  The system has met with mixed results so far, but Stevens is trying to teach new tricks to his old dogs - the guys who played under him for the past several years.  Additionally, new players are trying to fit in, so there's a lot more adjusting going on than meets the eye.  We can only watch and wait to see how things progress overall.


Special teams have been very good for the Flyers.  Nine of the Flyers' 19 goals have come on the Power Play, so they're averaging nearly 2 PPG per game and scoring on nearly 1/3 of their chances.  (The Flyers are 9 for 31.)  The PK has also been strong, giving up only 3 goals on 27 chances.  Perhaps most importantly, the Flyers have given the opposition fewer power plays in each game.  Carolina had 8 chances; New Jersey, Washington, and Pittsburgh had 5; and Anaheim had 4.  If the Flyers continue to cut down on penalties and keep scoring on the power play, only good things can happen.


So let's be realistic here.  The Flyers are not where we'd like them to be yet, but as Chris Pronger said after tonight's tough loss, "We’ve done a lot of really good things... There’s certainly no reason to panic."  There is room for improvement, but I think Pronger is right.  The Flyers have made several strides in the right direction in these first five games.  If the positive trends continue and the negative ones are corrected, the best is yet to come.

This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by Broad Street Hockey.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

very good piece. i agree with all you have to say, especially about coburn. The big man needs to step up and not become the late randy jones. We all know coburn can be good, maybe this is just a phase for him. Goaltending will continue to unravel itself whether good or bad, but i think emery can play well most nights, well enough for us to come away with the w.

by phish'n on Oct 11, 2009 12:42 AM EDT reply actions  

nice analysis of the first few games….

by kristinshaw on Oct 11, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks. Five games in is not a huge sample, but I figured we could look at how things are transpiring at the first break.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Oct 11, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

very nice analysis can’t argue with you on that one

by chrislanci on Oct 14, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Similar to what I said on a different post, but I’m not too worried about the cold streak. Carter’s production rate dropped after the All Star break last year and Gagne ebbs and flows, but as long as the guys who are cold now keep the effort up, their luck will change and the bounces will start going their way. By the same token, the others will dip and come back up over the long run. As long as we have a few guys hot at all times and everybody keeps trying hard no matter how their luck is at the time, I think everything will work out fine.

by DragonGirl0583 on Oct 11, 2009 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I mean cold streak in reference to the specific players you called out, I don’t know if I was clear enough there.

by DragonGirl0583 on Oct 11, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Understood.

I’m not too worried either… I just put certain things in bold to stress their importance. Gags, Hartnell, and Giroux will all be fine.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Oct 11, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent analysis. I think regarding Parent and Syvret/OKT, more time for both of those pairings will only make things better, since that pairing is still a bit out of sync. Probably didn’t help that they didn’t get very much pre-season work in together, with OKT being injured and no one assuming Syvret would replace Jones.

And as you said, the Flyers’ competition wasn’t exactly inferior and regardless, we’ll take 3-1-1 (or 3-2-1, 4-1-1 or 3-1-2) over 0-3-3 any day of the week.

by Ben Feldman on Oct 11, 2009 6:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Regarding Parent, do you think there’s a chance he could be placed on a line with Timonen again? I thought last year when they played together Parent was improving throughout the year and they made a very good shutdown pair.

by Flyer Fan on Oct 11, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

This has been mentioned by JpH89 in the Anaheim game recap post as well as by others as something that would have more to do with Coburn being “relegated” to third pair duty until he’s playing to the level he needs to be playing at, but there’s certainly a lot of upside for Parent. Might help Kimmo get things together a bit as well.

by Ben Feldman on Oct 11, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hm...

I agree; Parent and Timonen did make a good pair last year.

From reading Braydon Coburn’s Pre-Season Blog Extravaganza, it seems like he got along really well with Syvret. Let the two of them play together and see what happens. This way you are spreading talent and experience over all three pairings; if Coburn and Syvret become effective, you could give them more minutes than you would a normal third pairing.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Oct 11, 2009 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also would like to see Parent move up, I think Coburn and Timmonen bring that same thing to the table as they are both puck moving jump into the play type of defensemen, who rely on their positioning and a nice poke check in the defensive zone. Why Coburn doesn’t play more physical with his big body is beyond me? Parent is a more stay a home pin you into the boards type of defender. He played really well paired with Kimmo last year and Kimmo wouldn’t have to think before he gambles offensively to make sure Coburn isn’t trying to do the same think. Coburn might have learned too much for Kimmo in his 1st year here and it looks like more than a couple times they have gotten their signals crossed and seem to be running into each other a lot. Parent play as much simpler game for Kimmo to work his magic around.

by chrislanci on Oct 14, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I read somewhere on Hockywriters that several people see Parent as an up and coming shutdown defenceman. I’ll try and find a link to that, but watching his progress I can see it.

But let’s be fair, nobody can play as badly as Coburn did against the Pens every night. one or two bad choices were magnified by some really terrible luck. Once he settles back down he’ll be fine, I have no worries about that.

I’m more concerned about the system or style of this team. Once again it seems that they are starting off a season trying to find an identity. This concerns me. The talent is there, player wise, for this team to be a force in the east. I’m not too sure of the direction they’re getting.

by Mike B on D on Oct 12, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Claude_doop_small
Max Talbot: Quietly Defying Your Expectations

Recent FanPosts

Small
Should the Flyers consider buying out Bryzgalov contract?
Nfs_pic_small
Bachelor Party in Philly
Small
Stop whining about shoot outs.
640_flypen_thrillainphila_small
PLAYING WITH CAPGEEK ROSTERS
Flyers_small
Shootouts
Small
What is the Flyers Defensive Philosophy?
Clarke-tee_small
Roller Pick-Up Game Feb 25?
Assholeheart_small
"Be Excellent to Each Other!" (in Keanu Reeves voice)
Claude_doop_small
Goalies and Back-to-Backs
Clarke-tee_small
BSH OPEN ICE 3/17

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Screen_shot_2012-01-09_at_12 Travis Hughes

Associate Editors

67865_878600804923_14200876_46395212_2220_n_small Geoff Detweiler

Headshot2_film_grain_small Ben Rothenberg

Soccer_face_small Eric T.

Contributors

163830_478172269164_824914164_5517468_4313370_n_small ToddtheFox

Clarke-tee_small KreiderDesigns

D150_small Teemu H