Ousting John Stevens: Too soon, or a necessary decision?
The sole reason for this website is to mobilize the Flyers fan base and send a message to the Flyers organization. That message is that Head Coach John Stevens has had enough time to hone his coaching skills and mold this Flyers hockey team into a legitimate Stanley Cup contender.
Instead, inconsistencies continue to plague Stevens and his players. And we're not talking about big name players going in and out of the lineup with injuries. We're talking about just about the entire squad falling asleep for 1-2 periods at a time, and then suddenly waking up in time to muster a late 3rd period effort that still falls short. They are the same issues from 2-3 years ago that still haven't been addressed, and they are reasons why this Flyers hockey team will not be able to contend with the NHL elites like the Pittsburgh Penguins, who have been desimated [sic] by injuries all year long, yet still are sitting atop the Eastern Conference. It's called a "60 minute effort", and Stevens has yet to show that he can get that concept across to his team.
>> Newly founded FireJohnStevens.net
In professional sports, the coach is always the scapegoat. No matter what the team or the situation, if a team is under performing, it's easier to say goodbye to one guy than to do so with a whole case of players. If the Flyers continue to play inconsistent hockey as they have over the last, oh, 100 regular season games or so, it's perfectly plausible to think John Stevens could be gone as the bench boss of this club.
And these rumors have circulated in the past, like when the team opened the season winless in their first six last season, or when they lost 10 straight the year before, or when the Flyers fell to Pittsburgh for the second season in a row. But never have the waves of discontent seemed as violent as they do now. The dissent seems louder now among Flyer fans, here on this site, in other places on the web (as evidenced by the above quote), and even in the media.
Over the weekend, Sam Carchidi of the Inquirer penned an opinion article that questioned Stevens ability to mold the Flyers into Stanley Cup contenders, using those same Penguins as an example.
If this inconsistency continues, the calls for coach John Stevens' job will grow louder. Last season's Penguins are the model franchise for getting results with an in-season coaching change. The Penguins were 27-25-5 and 10th in the Eastern Conference when coach Michel Therrien was fired in mid-February. Therrien's replacement, Dan Bylsma, led the Pens to an 18-3-4 regular-season finish, the fourth seeding, and the Stanley Cup.
It's a different situation here in Philly, though. In Pittsburgh, Therrien had lost his team. They simply didn't want to play for him and his defensive style was not suited to their talent. It would be a lot like if Ken Hitchcock were still around coaching this Flyers bunch. Carchidi even mentions that "the Flyers love playing for the hardworking Stevens," so how can a parallel be drawn here?
That's not to say there aren't legitimate questions to ask. The fact of the matter is -- and we all know it -- that this team has been unacceptable inconsistent since the start of last season and even before then. John Stevens has been the coach the entire time. But Mike Richards has also been captain the entire time. And Jeff Carter has been his wing man. And Kimmo Timonen has been an assistant captain. And... well, you get the point. Could it be the players, not the coach?
It seems Daily News beat writer Frank Seravalli believes so. He wrote an opinion piece today defending Stevens, but it was one quote from an unnamed Flyers player that stands out.
"It's not Johnny," the player who asked not to be named told Seravalli. "We have a lot of problems right now. He's not one of them. His systems work. He is in our face when we're not doing what we're supposed to. He has a lot more fire than people know about. For whatever reason, we've let him down."
What could those reasons be? The injuries are the most obvious problem. Danny Briere, Simon Gagne, Darroll Powe, Blair Betts, and Ole-Kristian Tollefsen have all missed considerable time, forcing players like Jared Ross, David Laliberte, Andreas Nodl, Oskars Bartulis and Danny Syvret into the lineup. Some of those players have stunk up the joint while others have been serviceable, but it's still a dramatic drop in NHL talent.
The power play has failed them lately. The penalty kill has been terrible, too. And one could argue this team is built around superior special teams ability. When those units don't click, success probably isn't going to come. How is that Stevens fault?
The argument could be made, of course, that the inconsistency was there before the injuries and the recent struggles -- it's been here for years now. But who knows how much of that is truly Stevens fault. Could the team be too comfortable playing for Stevens? Could they need a shakeup in the so-called leadership group? Could the front office be the real problem, not giving Stevens the proper tools he needs?
I don't know if we'll ever know the answers to these questions. I just hope we don't toss out another coach just because it's the easy way out.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Funny you mentioned Seravalli’s piece. I just wrote a FanPost slamming it. I really don’t like him.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Nov 30, 2009 12:05 PM EST reply actions
in general the hockey writers in this town suck, they rarely write anything positive, didn’t hear anything during the nice run the Flyers were especially the big win against the Devils to stop their undefeated road winning streak. They just try to stir up controversy every little slump you are going to have a piece about firing the coach and as soon as Emery has a bad few games, you will have to your old controversy stories rehashed all over again especially after the All-Star game. The themes of Flyers pieces are more reliable than Punksatony Phil.
Headline reads Goalie Controversy in Philly:
Winter must be over
Who Was That Masked Man?
The “mystery player” has to be someone who’s been here a while – long enough to comfortably refer to Stevens as “Johnny” and smart enough to understand that “his systems work.” My money is on Timonen. He seems to be the kind of guy who says and does the right things but has no actual solutions to problems such as these. He spoke similarly during the early- and late-season struggles last year.
That said, I wonder what the problems are right now, specifically because there are “a lot” of them. If this player is referring to mechanics and game play, that’s one thing. But if there is serious discontent in the locker room between players, then that is something which can only be addressed through trades.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
While I do believe that we need to be a more disaplined team and stevens is not the right coach for us, I always wonder why richie gets no blame for the struggles this team has with hustle. I get he feeling I’m gonna get slammed, but does anybody else feel as though richards isn’t the captain we hoped hed be?
by JpH89 on Nov 30, 2009 1:50 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I wouldn’t entirely disagree, but I do think he gets criticism. Maybe not enough in your opinion (probably not enough for me either), but he certainly gets some.
Someone else said – and I echoed – that if he played the way he did when an ‘A’ was on his chest now that he’s wearing a ‘C’, this wouldn’t be a problem. He’s definitely calmed down and stepped back a bit – he can’t and shouldn’t be fighting as much, which he isn’t – but sometimes, just sometimes, I want him to step back and be who he was a few years ago. The example of Giroux fighting in Colorado is perfect. He stepped up, pounded some guy, and said after the game that he didn’t like the way he was playing, whereas Richie said the team didn’t play well. I get that Mike has to talk for the team now, but I miss the days – maybe unreasonably – when Richie stepped up and showed through his fists and words that things needed to change, rather than his diplomacy and play.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Nov 30, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions
Pronger should be steering the ship. The whole rotating alternate captaincy thing is a joke, and to me, proof that:
1. The Flyers are afraid of stepping on the toes of last year’s team captains with a demotion.
2. Providing Richards with a chorus of “leadership” behind him (in the form of Timonen, Gagne, Carter AND Pronger on an alternating home/away basis) says everything you need to know about #18’s ability to inspire players.
I honestly don’t put a lot of stock into the effectiveness of the Captain on a locker room, but at this point, couldn’t hurt to try something new.
Pronger, with Lappy and whoever is best from the rest of the collection of captains would be my vote. Not that I have one.
For my daily hockey thoughts, visit http://ronnybrook.wordpress.com
by ronnybrook.blog on Nov 30, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
Stevens
I am calling for Stevens head. I have not liked the line combinations (i do understand injuries play in the lines) Why aren’t Hartnell and Carter together? They had great chemistry that worked for both last year. Lets get the lines matched to last years(or if a new line combo) and let the players learn each others styles and build a comfort level. there are too many changes of line combos even without the injuries.
Too early for this talk, while I definitely fault stevens for a lot of the things that plague this team, its not all on him.
For one, Injuries have hurt our consistency and chemistry. Beyond that, I think were beginning to see the areas of the game where some of our guys need work. Carter is a phenomenal offensive talent but he is a very one dimensional player. He uses his speed to go north-south then he uncorks that lethal shot while flying up the wing. Other teams know this and they defend him accordingly. I will say that Carter has improved his overall game this year, but he still needs work. Giroux burst onto the scene last season using his raw skill to rack up points. Now that teams know who he is they prepare for him a little more thoroughly. It’s easy to forget that Ray Emery is still getting into the swing of things after spending 2 seasons away from the league.
The bottom line is, its not even December 1. Ive always felt that you cant make a serious assessment of a team until january-february. Firing Stevens may be necessary as the season rolls on, but its way to early to take drastic action. tahts one nice thing about hockey, its never really too late to fire the coach.
I do however agree with many of the above posters that certain things have continued to plague this team since Stevens got here and at a certain point you realize that people simply wont change (andy reid still hasnt figured out how to manage the clock after 10+ years). were not at that point with stevens yet, but its coming.
Too soon? Are you kidding? He needed to be fired two years ago, but that’s all water under the bridge now. We’ve brought in new players to address problems like heartlessness and defense woes, so the main problem remaining- inconsistency- has to fall on Stevens. There’s no other way around it.
“the Flyers love playing for the hardworking Stevens,” …and I can see why. Our “leaders” have played a system of being on a decent team and getting by, so aside from the urge to win a Cup there isn’t much more to really work for. They’re still getting by. Personally, if I was getting paid like those guys then my ONLY objective would be to strive to win every game and eventually win the Cup, but I just don’t pick up that same sense of urgency from Richards and Carter. They’re very skilled players, and Richards can put it on with the best of them, but more times than not there seems to be nothing there, no sense of urgency. Nada.
This right here epitomizes what’s wrong with this team: “It’s not Johnny,” the player who asked not to be named told Seravalli. “We have a lot of problems right now. He’s not one of them. His systems work. He is in our face when we’re not doing what we’re supposed to. He has a lot more fire than people know about. For whatever reason, we’ve let him down.” If this guy think that Stevens’ system works then he’s on the wrong team. In Philly, we demand excellence, not mediocrity. Give us your all and we’ll still love you when you suck, but play your heart out for us. Instead, we’ve got a team of turn it on/turn it off guys, old and new, who think this is acceptable? Go to another team then. Stevens may have the intention of getting these guys to do what they need to win, but the bottom line is simply that it’s not getting done, so if head office wants to keep him then I wish they would let us know now because with Stevens behind the bench we will never win anything, and I suspect most of us would rather not watch another season of mediocrity go down the drain with a first round playoff exit to, most likely, Pittsburgh- who seems to play quite consistent despite injuries and suspensions (when they get them).
But man do I live and die with this team so I hope they’ll do the smart thing and fire Stevens. Keep him in another position if you want him to remain in the organization, but an NHL head coach he most definitely is NOT.
Interesting point.
If you keep him involved, where do you put him? I don’t know if he’d take being demoted to an assistant coach. Even so…
Special teams? Nah. The power play and penalty kill are in a funk right now, but I have faith in the two-headed monster of Craig Berube and Joe Mullen. Once they get their act together I have no doubt that they’ll finish in the top 10 in both PP and PK.
Defense? Maybe? John was a defenseman. He can’t do any worse than Jack McIlhargey, but that doesn’t mean he’ll do any better.
I’d think they’d have him as Homer’s assistant or in another position away from the players. But I don’t know.
If this guy think that Stevens’ system works then he’s on the wrong team.
I think this player’s point is that, when the players actually play according to Stevens’ system, they are successful. Remember when we won 7 of 8 not too long ago? We were playing complete games then. We were moving the puck as a unit, we were establishing a solid forecheck, we had excellent support along the wall and on the backcheck, etc. That’s all Stevens wants them to do. When they do it, they win games because they are talented and can suffocate teams. But the issue is that they have stopped playing Stevens’ system, for God knows why.
Stevens does not deserve to be fired, but he likely will be, essentially because the players have let him down. It’s not fair to him.
That’s our coach! That’s our leader! It’s not fair!
![]()
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
While the inconsistency has certainly been an issue for as long as Stevens has been coach, it really has very little to do with why he has to go.
There are a handful of reasons why Stevens is an ineffective coach, but the biggest one is lack of improvement in problem areas. The last three years, the most frustrating thing about watching the Flyers is that as a team, we have no ability to pass out of our offensive zone. 90% of the time whoever has the puck waits far too long until a backchecking forward has descended on them, and then tries to force a pass through that forward, inevitably turning the puck over. The other 10% of the time is spent blindly flinging pucks or trying to force a clear down the boards. It is painful to me that after all this time Stevens hasn’t worked with his players to design fast breakout schemes, or at least educate his forwards that when trying to break out of the offensive zone, it’s not a good idea to bunch up in the neutral zone.
If an utter inability to pass out of our defensive zone is our biggest problem, then backing up at the blue line is our second. I can’t remember the last time I saw a team not wearing orange and black consistently give up their own blue line to streaking forwards, but the Flyers have done nothing but for years and years now. It’s really sad to think that if Chris Pronger stood up at the blue line and forced the puck carrier to a quick decision, that every single time he would get skated around, creating a 2 on 1 in our defensive zone. But this must be John Stevens mindset, because I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Flyers defenseman not skate all the way down below the faceoff circle before thinking to challenge the opposition. And allowing teams all the space that the Flyers defensemen do has cost us countless shots/chances/goals against.
Since I’ve already rambled on way too much, I’ll say that this is a partial list of small things that our team does way too much, that consistently hurt us, that coaches are supposed to work with their players on, helping them get better. Other problems including our inability to EVER carry the puck into the offensive zone, our defensemen being way too lax about opposition players camped out in our slot, our players getting caught entirely too often wildly out of position (most easily noteable when there are three or four Flyers on one side of the ice, covering one small zone, allowing for opposition players to sneak in behind us really really easily. and yes, this happens a lot.). And that’s not to mention the problems that he has directly created himself over the years, such as a goalie controversey every year of his own doing because he decides to start the hot backup in 9 games out of 10 for a month, and all the players that have wound up in “his doghouse” over the years who have completely not earned it, and even if they have, why is he calling them out in front of the media like that? Who does that serve?
There are things that Stevens has done right this year that I’ve liked (the 3:22 of pulled-goalie time, the skating drills on an off night, the demotion of Syvret), but that doesn’t take away from all the fundamental things that he is not teaching this team, and the total lack of effective “schemes” that he puts out there. I have believed for two years now, and continue to believe, that this team is a better team with a real coach behind the bench, but that without serious public backlash, he’ll never leave the bench, because he’s real tight knit with Holmgren and Clarke and all of them.

by 


















