Broad Street Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

To continue the discussion on illegal hits the head . . .
Chris Drury is blindsided by Curtis Glencross but, at first glance, it really doesn't seem bad. The angle of the video is poor and doesn't really provide much evidence for how Glencross hit Drury. However, it was bad enough to sideline Drury with a concussion. This has been a topic of conversation all year and I think we should compile a list of all the hits to the head that have occurred so far this year, here at BSH, and take a close look at what the NHL needs to do to confront this issue.

3 months ago 12071009841437855293_tiny flyrsfrk05 8 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Broad Street Hockey

Comments

Display:

That’s weird. It really doesn’t look like much at all; the only guess I have is that Glencross’ elbow or forearm maybe clipped Drury in the right side of his face very quickly but with a lot of force?

And Glencross got three games, while Richie got nothing? Granted, Drury hadn’t played the puck nor was he all that near to it while Booth had just played the puck, but still … that’s some maddening inconsistency.

by Ben Feldman on Nov 9, 2009 5:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That was a point of intrigue for me too. I truly do not understand how Richie was not suspended! Was Richie given the “star” treatment that we all complain about in regards to Ovechkin, Crosby and Malkin? I sure hope not but I really cannot explain it any other way.

The NHL’s inconsistency boggles my mind at times. Unless they get this under control now, things are only going to get worse. The players don’t fear suspension. They need to be able to police themselves in order to revive the sense of respect that players used to have for one another. 2 minutes in the box is hardly a determinant for slowing up before checking someone from behind into the boards or leading with an elbow; knowing that the opposing team is going to hound you for the rest of the night is.

Also, the NHL’s intention for speeding up the game may be coming back to haunt them. Because they have emphasized a faster form of hockey the speed of the game has picked up considerably. But because of that, players are hitting each other at higher speeds, increasing the danger and chance of injury (Read: Richards’ hit on Booth or this hit in the OHL). A serious issue . . .

by flyrsfrk05 on Nov 9, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At the :08 mark, it looks like the hit is either elbow or upper arm to the head. It’s almost definitely not forearm, and is definitely below the shoulder. Glencross definitely does not leave his feet. The replay at :40 is at a very poor angle.

It doesn’t appear Drury was skating particularly low, and he never had the puck. The fact that he didn’t have the puck and was moving in a straight line is why I think Glencross was suspended – it was already an illegal hit (interference), and he could easily have aimed for the body. Richie’s hit came right after Booth dumped the puck off and was adjusting body position. Additionally, Richie’s hit looked normal. Glencross’ looked a lot closer to an elbow.

"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"

by The Dark on Nov 10, 2009 1:33 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think the suspension was primarily for the blindside. It’s one thing if a player gets hit because he wasn’t paying attention when he has the puck, but without the puck is just dirty, pathetic, and ridiculous. I mean, it’s never even close to Drury, save the half a second when the cross-ice pass goes behind him.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Nov 10, 2009 4:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well...

… if you watch it at regular speed, it looks as if the Ranger player is going to pass to Drury. I think Glencross was anticipating that Drury was going to receive the pass. Still though, it was dangerous and unnecessary.

I’ve always liked “Glengarry” Glencross’ play. He is who Scottie Upshall would like to be – a pesky defensive forward who can score fairly consistently, and a sparkplug even when he does not put the puck in the net. While Glencross isn’t afraid to mix it up, I would not call him a “dirty” player by any stretch of the imagination.

Regarding the “star” treatment, Flames fans are addressing it at Matchsticks and Gasoline. Most find that the hit was worthy of a suspension, but for no more than two games.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Nov 10, 2009 8:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As this trend of injuries continues, I think the thing that disturbs me the most is how long it takes for the officials to stop play. The official rules are:

When a player is injured so that he cannot continue play or go to his bench, the play shall not be stopped until the injured player’s team has secured possession of the puck. If the player’s team is in possession of the puck at the time of injury, play shall be stopped immediately unless his team is in a scoring position.
In the case where it is obvious that a player has sustained a serious injury, the Referee and/or Linesman may stop the play immediately

But I haven’t seen the refs exercising that second, “serious injury” clause (except maybe when there’s obvious blood, as in the case with Cam Ward). What are they choosing to define as serious, if concussions don’t count? As a hockey player myself, it’s hard for me to watch any guy be down for 10 or 20 seconds without a stoppage in play. We’re seeing all these questionable hits and all these players going down hard, and yet the refs don’t seem to be paying any better attention to the guy on the ground. I don’t want there to suddenly be a trend toward milking injuries with players staying down when they’re not really hurt, either, but I’m getting pretty mad at the refs. Most of these guys are crumpling to the ice in ways that are pretty hard to fake convincingly, and while the league seems to be happy to hand out suspensions after the fact if it’s a non-superstar players, no one seems to give a crap about the guy on the ice as it’s happening. I’m sorry to be repetitive, but it can’t be good for the game when my 9 year old niece is on the couch asking her dad “why aren’t they helping him?”

by DragonGirl0583 on Nov 10, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It’s because it’s a reviewable play that has no consequence.

Seriously, Imagine all the dives made by Dovechkin and Criesby. Now double them for every bump, blocked shot (Ha!), check, trip, etc. And there’s nothing to say that after play is stopped, that the player can’t play his next shift.

Seriously. Bad ref calls are fucking the game up already. I don’t want to see it doubled because of the rare injury.

by BroadStreetBully on Nov 11, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was a little more impassioned that I wanted to be in my comments since I had just been having a conversation with my brother on the topic. The hits that don’t look bad on first glance, it makes sense for play not to get stopped because those are the rules. I’m upset by the ones that are obvious, where you can see there was intent to injure without a review, and many of those aren’t getting play stopped either. There is definitely a line that gets crossed, but I just don’t see the refs ever bothering to make the judgement call. Like you, I’d much rather than the bad calls across the board go away, since the refs already do a terrible job. But they’re calling a lot of things they shouldn’t, and overlooking some calls that they should, so they’re wrong on both ends. I don’t expect you to agree with me, I just wanted to clarify that I’m not upset about every little tiny check.

by DragonGirl0583 on Nov 11, 2009 9:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.
Start posting about the Flyers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Assholeheart_small
Calling Time Out.

Recent FanPosts

Flyers_small
My Bi-Polar Hockey team
Small
MarioD's Soap Box
Small
Changing the points system
Flyerhomer_small
Tired & Confused
Watchmenfacebutton_small
Fantasy Hockey Shout Out
Flyers_small
Bitter Bitter Bitter.
Yaiso_small
Problem solving, angry blogger style.
Flyerhomer_small
Lines
Small
I was right and wrong.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 58 36 20 2 74
Pittsburgh 59 35 22 2 72
Philadelphia 57 29 25 3 61
New York Rangers 59 26 26 7 59
New York Islanders 58 23 27 8 54

(updated 2.9.2010 at 9:00 AM EST)

29 - 25 - 3

Won 1


Managing Editor

Travis_headshot_2_small Travis Hughes

Staff Writers

Think_sc_cropped_small Geoff Detweiler

Me_minus_kbond_small Ben Rothenberg

Adirondack Correspondent

Small Dan Morency