Broad Street Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Chris Pronger opens up, reveals locker room problems?

"When you are not playing as well as we had been, and playing like crap on that road trip and losing and losing and then you are starting to come out of it, and playing a little bit better, you are still going to lose coming up that slope. You’re playing good enough to win, but you are still in the dump, you’re losing those games. At some point, that turns and you are winning those games. Then you’ve turned the corner. We’re losing games we should win right now, but hopefully, we’re over the crest, we can see the top and start scoring some goals and win. We need to make it [bleeping] happen on Thursday. It needs to [bleeping] happen now, so we can get over that hump and get this ship headed into the right direction."

>> Chris Pronger

These are things we know. The news, here? Someone is saying it out loud.

Yep, the Flyers are in a funk right now, and Chris Pronger spoke out about it today with CSNPhilly.com. In a 1,075 word article, just about all of them were quotes from Pronger. He spoke for a while and he spoke in a ton of detail giving us a glimpse into his role on this team, into Mike Richards as a captain, and partially into the dynamic of this Flyers locker room.

The biggest bombshell out of Pronger's interview? He respects Richards' captaincy but through the summer, training camp, preseason hockey, and now 24 games of the regular season, Pronger can't get a read on what type of captain Richards is.

"[Richards] hasn’t come to me [to] ask me anything, and it’s delicate because at the end of the day, it’s his team. He’s the captain. He needs to show the rest of the players that it is his team. I don’t want to be the guy that has to stand up every day and tell ourselves to look into the mirror and play better and all this stuff.

"I don’t know if he is ‘rah-rah’ type or talkative type. It is a difficult tightrope to walk. I don’t want to step on his toes. Maybe he is evaluating. You can’t just jump into a situation and ranting and raving without understanding what has gone on here in the past, as well.

It's great that Pronger is respectful to Richards and his captaincy. It wouldn't be right for an outsider to come in and take over, or "step on toes" as Pronger puts it. The problem I see here is that Pronger, a 16-year NHL veteran who has been certainly been around the block a few times, doesn't know what kind of captain Richards is. Shouldn't Richie be setting that kind of tone, as the captain, early in the season? In training camp? Certainly before the quarter pole of the regular season, no?

Every single player on that team should know what kind of captain Mike Richards is, regardless of the amount of time they've spent here. If a player with the resume and leadership qualities that Chris Pronger has can't step into his locker room and understand how the captain interacts with his team, then how is that captain truly a leader? There's a difference between being a quiet, lead-by-example type than having your teammates not understand that you're the quiet, lead-by-example type.

I'm obviously an outsider looking in. I'm not in that locker room on a daily basis, but this seems extremely problematic to me. We've all been trying to wrap our brains around the inconsistency issues surrounding this team for the last several seasons now. Could part of the problem be a leadership void amongst the players, starting with the captain and trickling down to the rest of the team?

What do you think?

0 recs  |  Comment 69 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think this is the area that needs to be addressed first.
Its not Holmgren, its not Steven’s.

You can see it on the ice that most of the guys don’t seem to have any heart. Your captain needs to solve that problem.

by ToddtheFox on Dec 1, 2009 5:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yes. Yes it is.

This speaks volumes about what’s been going on behind the scenes.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 1, 2009 6:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Leadership needs a good ol’ sitdown and discussion.

Lead topic – What the frack is going on here?

by ToddtheFox on Dec 1, 2009 6:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

you know what, good for pronger. i went back and read through the richards/PR post comments from October 28 and there are a few ‘you can’t just call people out or tell it like you see it’. when things aren’t working, you have to react in a way that will work. pronger is an experienced captain (former) and perhaps that’s what he thinks this team needs and maybe even what richards needs.

by beatniche on Dec 1, 2009 6:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I sense the parties from last year have carried over to this year.

"So basically, the Stats make no sense whatsoever."

by WebBard on Dec 1, 2009 6:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

When I mentioned a few months ago that the Flyers screwed themselves into not being able to make Pronger captain, the general sentiment was that Pronger doesn’t need a C on his chest to lead a team.

But it appears Pronger thinks he needs a C on his chest to lead the team.

Fucking give it to him already.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 6:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Stepping on toes though?

The amount of people with experience in that locker room should mean that this kind of thing -
shouldn’t happen.

by ToddtheFox on Dec 1, 2009 7:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d say this is the perfect example of why Pronger doesn’t need a C on his chest to lead this team. I didn’t get that he wants it, just that he’s acting as if he is the leader of the team, whether he has a C or not.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 1, 2009 7:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think your post presumes that the rest of the team are regular readers of csnphilly.com.

I would guess that no one in the room knows about this unless a reporter brings it up to them.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 8:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As an addendum: Also, I don’t think saying it in the press carries nearly the same weight as saying in the locker room.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 8:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? Seriously?

First of all, my comment doesn’t presume they read csnphilly at all. It presumes that this is news, and that it will get around. Whether that be from a reporter, Homer, Stevens, another player, whatever, it will get around.

Second, as we discussed on the radio show, I doubt Chris Pronger would say this to the press first. He’s not the attention seeking, selfish athlete that would typically do this. My guess – and that’s all it is – is that he said something similar to this behind closed doors and either didn’t like the reaction or thought this would just reinforce what he previously said. Either way, I’d say it carries more weight going to the press than in the locker room. It becomes a multi-day story at that point. Not only will Panotch likely go to Mike Richards with questions, but so will most every other reporter in Philly. And then they’ll go to other players who now have to listen to these questions. It becomes a bigger deal.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 1, 2009 9:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously. I don’t think anyone in the locker room will read this article. I don’t think they’ll become aware of it unless the media presents it to them.


I doubt Chris Pronger would say this to the press first.

I don’t know what you’re basing this on. This line:


[Richards] hasn’t come to me [to] ask me anything, and it’s delicate because at the end of the day, it’s his team

seems to me that Pronger hasn’t spoken to Richards about it.

I really think you and Kanyad (below) severely overestimate these guys’ interest in reading about themselves. Frankly, if any of them are reading any hockey websites I find that to be cause for concern.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I already said I don’t presume they read at all. They don’t have to read this article to know what was said. Even accepting your idea that they won’t know about it unless the media tells them, how low are the chances the media drop this cause they don’t think it’s a story?

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 2, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was responding to both you and Kanyad. He’s the one who expects that they all follow hockey blogs.

I agree they will hear about it secondhand. (Though, Seravalli is in Boston covering Leclair, not sure if all the beat writers are up there. In which case they won’t see the players again until after tomorrow’s game… the story could die.) But don’t you think hearing about it from a reporter loses most of the effect?

by MarioD on Dec 2, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Personally, I don’t think it loses effect at all. If anything, I think it increases the effect. From other sports, teams are very protective of the locker room and handling things “in-house.” If JVR did this, the team would probably just be pissed, but when a guy like Pronger does it, I would imagine they have to take it seriously.

Again, all of this is speculation, but I’ve never known a situation where players brush off a respected teammate’s comments to the media.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 2, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t need to be a regular reader of csnphilly.com to read this. This is the third time I’ve seen this today and I’ve only just got to this site. First was facebook, so the story is getting around and unless the Flyers all live under a rock sooner or later they’re going to get wind of it. Richards needs to wake up and ask Pronger, a proven leader, wtf to do about this team because Stevens ain’t doing sh*t. That’s not saying Richards is a bad captain. It’s saying he’s an immature captain- his youth and inexperience is coming through, and having to live under the passive John Stevens system doesn’t help. Having read that Homer had a talk with Richards shows that he’s not as blind to the situation as he makes out, but he still needs to focus his attention on the one main problem with this team and that is the leadership behind the bench. Bottom line is fire Stevens and get a real NHL coach in there and I have a feeling Richards’ leadership will grow and this team will do a 180 in record time. Until then it’ll me more of the same and time’s a tickin. First the argument was “don’t worry, it’s only October,” then November. Well it’s now December and it’s the same old sh*t as last month and last year and two years ago. At this rate I hope we even MAKE the playoffs.

by Kanayd on Dec 1, 2009 9:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right now we sit in 9th, one f$cking spot behind Tampa. Something needs to happen soon, a coach fired, healthy scratch to an otherwise unthinkable player or reduced ice times to send a message. Pronger has come as expected, JVR has brought his game, for Christ sakes the Isles have as many points as us. My expectations we high for this year and we’re in a battle for a top ten draft pick.

by Crosby sucks on Dec 1, 2009 6:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why isn’t Pronger the captain? I know this is “Richie’s team,” and it’s not right to just take the C from him. But perhaps to find out the true person we have here, we need to see how he would react to that sort of situation. If all he does is sulks, why the hell do we want him to be the captain anyway? If all it does is make him more motivated, give it back to him in a year or two, when he’s shown he can captain this team like we’ve always known he could! It really sounds like making him captain last year was a mistake and he needs/needed another year or so.

by Ben Feldman on Dec 1, 2009 7:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i can’t agree more. richards may embody what people who love about flyers hockey, but that doesn’t mean he can guide his teammates naturally in the nhl with little experience at that level.

there shouldn’t be discussion about stepping on toes. if richards allows someone else to lead the team while he takes a back seat, he’s not worthy of his captaincy. if richards gets irritated by another veteran member of the team stepping up and trying to provide some leadership, he’s not worthy of his captaincy. this team needs a cohesiveness, consistency, and direction. anyone not willing to fill their roles properly needs to have their roles reevaluated.

i don’t care who wears the C as long as some people are leading the team as a team. remove all the Cs and As if you want, people will fill the roles. if pronger is letterless, does he still act the way he does? would richards? those letters mean nothing if you aren’t acting the part.

by beatniche on Dec 1, 2009 9:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

NHL requires either one C and two As or no C and three As. If the Flyers feel they’ve reached some kind of breaking point, they should try the three As — and they shouldn’t rotate them depending on whether it’s a home or away game.

by Ben Feldman on Dec 1, 2009 10:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i was more pointing to the fact that if no one was wearing one, leaders would emerge without ‘stepping on toes’ and its sort of bogus for someone who wants to step up as a leader to feel they may jeopardize team unity because another guy wears a letter.

by beatniche on Dec 1, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The construction of this team is fundamentally flawed. Pronger and Lappy are strong leaders, but are new to the team, so regardless of how much experience they have, it’s not yet “their” team, so the direction has to come from the guys with the letters on their chests. I don’t think Homer’s the worst GM, although he has hamstrung himself a bit with his terrible mismanagement of the salary cap. Stevens is not a bad coach. The problem therein lies with the players. If they don’t improve their play soon, the coach could be the sacrificial scapegoat. If Stevens doesn’t want that to happen, he and the GM may have to do something drastic. Lockerroom shakeup, perhaps? Trade? I’m for anything at this point.

Things aren’t getting better from last season as there appears to be too much carry over of all those bad habits.

by doubleh on Dec 1, 2009 8:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Maybe this is the lockerroom shakeup…

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 1, 2009 9:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm…could be. It’s not exactly TO-level of shake-up—not that that’s something I’d want, mind you—but I’m not sure Richie even gets it. I don’t feel like he has a very good pulse on the team or the city for that matter. If he did, he never would have said the things he said to the press last season. Now that Briere is back, he’s always the one being interviewed. Richards seems to be secondary in terms of sound bites. He’s not engaging at all. He really reminds me of a Chase Utley type who would just rather go out and play. Might be better suited for it, too.

by doubleh on Dec 1, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve always liked the Utley comparison, personally. I also thought Utley was the leader of the team – which many would disagree with – but that he absolutely needed Jimmy, Shane, and Ryan to also lead.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 1, 2009 9:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Utley leads by example on the field. In the lockerroom and especially the media (good heavens, we know Utley hates the media) he needs Jimmy, Ryan and Shane to carry the load with the cameras. Otherwise, just how many more f-bombs would we have on celluloid? (Secretly, I love this about Chase, but most of the adult types don’t particularly care for his colorful parade and ASG language.)

by doubleh on Dec 1, 2009 9:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Haha, what about Shane’s “F—- yeah, Jimmy!” on national TV during the Colorado series? Loved that.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 2, 2009 9:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As doubleh said, Utley leads on the field. Richards doesn’t even do that.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1,00000

by JpH89 on Dec 1, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But I can remember not long ago that Richards did, which is so disconcerting to me. Since the captaincy he is a changed player. Since the Booth hit, he also seems to be playing with hesitation.

by doubleh on Dec 1, 2009 11:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i think its absurd to think of this as anyone’s team unless they have earned it. i haven’t really seen great leadership. i’ve seen a lot of talent flashing it from time to time. they are all in the locker room together, they all put on the same orange and black and everyone needs to look at this as a unit rather than one of the player’s team. it isn’t the name on the back, its the front of the jersey that matters. captaincy provides no ownership. you live up to that leadership role, you earn it, and you keep it by proving you are that leader. you don’t get the captaincy until someone else has been their long enough to take it from you. you are the captain as long as its there, so you need to live up to it.

by beatniche on Dec 1, 2009 10:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Smith was the Captain his first year, and a good one at that.

by JpH89 on Dec 1, 2009 11:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

God I miss Keith Primeau!

by flyrsfrk05 on Dec 1, 2009 9:59 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

+ 1,000,000

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 1, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

captaincy

richie is signed, as the captain, for 11 more years. What about stripping Gagne of his “A” and giving that to Pronger for the time he is here. You can’t strip the C off Richie but you can let Pronger teach him as an assistant for the years he is with us. I am sorry to say it but Gagne is going to be plagued by injury the rest of his career giving us a silent, non-playing AC for many games. Let Prongs partner with Timonen as AC’s to teach Richie the way & light the fire under his backside. In fairness, Richie’s on ice role changed with the supposed balancing of this team through all lines – he was supposed to play less minutes to preserve himslef for his line assigment and PP/PK time. Believe me, I loved it when Richie had to hit, fight, play PP/PK, play his own line, etc… he was as dynamic a young player as they come! It is clear though that he needs guidance – the only way to get him leading now is to let Prongs and Timonen bring him up to speed.

by hjken on Dec 1, 2009 10:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They alternate who wears the As. Some combination of Gagne, Timonen, Carter and Pronger (and if there’s an injury to one of those four, Briere) wear the two As at home and the other two wear the As on the road. The two that wear them at home now will wear them on the road in the second half, and likewise the two that wear them on the road now will switch to wearing them at home.

by Ben Feldman on Dec 1, 2009 10:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How long do you think it took to explain that system to a bunch of hockey players? Two hours? Three hours?

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 11:13 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

haha

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 2, 2009 9:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Timonen

I love Timonen as a player, but not as a leader. I almost feel as if he has one of the A’s out of respect. He always has the stock hockey-player comments but no real solutions.

Last year when the team struggled and there were rumors of Brendan Shanahan coming on board, Timonen’s response was essentially, “Well SOMENONE’S gotta lead this team. Ownership has to do SOMETHING to help us out of our funk.” And during the late-season struggles, he offered the usual platitudes of “We have to get it in gear; the playoffs are just around the corner.”

This is not a criticism of TImonen, just an observation. To me he was a great player but never leadership material.

Contrast this approach to what Pronger essentially said today: “We’ve been playing like crap and losing. And usually when you play like crap, you lose a couple of games even when you start to play better. Well guess what? We’re fucking done with that. We’re going to win our next game and keep getting better from there.”

Nothing open-ended. Nothing generic. Straight and to the point, and most importantly decisive. A leader has all of those qualities.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 1, 2009 10:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think its really really hard for a European to be a fiery leader because of lingering bias.

I also think what you’re describing is just Kimmo’s personality. And I’m not being critical of his personality. He seems like a calm, analytical guy. You need guys like that in the locker room and on the ice. And you need guys like that in leadership positions.

I think that the 2007-08 playoffs showed his leadership. When he was injured in that Pittsburgh series:


MOMENTS BEFORE the start of what could have been the Flyers’ final game, injured defenseman Kimmo Timonen was led into the locker room by coach John Stevens.
 “John told us Kimmo was going to take over for him,” said center R.J. Umberger. “He stepped into the room and read our starting lineup. The way he did it, with the emotion he showed, it gave me goose bumps.”

Thats a guy who commands more than his fair share of respect in the locker room.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right.

I also think what you’re describing is just Kimmo’s personality.

That’s exactly what I was doing. His personality – to me anyway – is not one of a natural leader. Like I said, it’s not a criticism; just an observation.

I think its really really hard for a European to be a fiery leader because of lingering bias.

I don’t follow you here. Please explain.

Thats a guy who commands more than his fair share of respect in the locker room.

And like I said in my original post, Kimmo likely has one of the A’s out of respect. I have all of the respect in the world for him; I just don’t think he’s captain material is all. An emotional moment during a playoff series does not a leader make.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 2, 2009 12:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My point is that leader’s don’t have to have the attitude of Chris Pronger. You need leaders with Kimmo’s attitude just as much as you need someone with Pronger’s attitude.

In the example I cited, Kimmo didn’t come into the room and call them all assholes and challenge their manhood. But it was great leadership nonetheless.

by MarioD on Dec 2, 2009 1:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

gagne and carter should never wear letters – let them do what they do without the burden! Those who wear the letters have been through wars, and Pronger far more that Kimmo fits that bill. Also, like someone said earlier, ban this home/away crap -those who wear letters should lead in all situations. Do top companies switch their hierarchy based on ever changing variances? Let the leaders lead and the players play without the added burden. It will strengthen this organization in the long run.

by hjken on Dec 1, 2009 10:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I brought this up on the Steven’s firing post the other day, but I think its more relevant for this post now. My biggest problem with this team is our star players, Richards and Carter. Two years ago, They were both promising young players who played with emotion and hustle, now I look at the games and can’t even tell if those two are trying anymore. I don’t know what the problem is, maybe they got everything too early in there careers(Richie’s huge contract), or that they set standers that they themselves never should have set(Carter’s “fluky” 46 goals last year), or maybe Ownership/Coaching is too afraid to get down in the dirt with them.

Ever since Richie got the “C”, he has been a shadow of the player he was. I remember a time when he played hard and had some emotion in his game, when he took on Ovie early in his career was one of the best moments of recent Flyers history. Now, i just don’t know what to say of him, its painful.

Another thing about the attitude problem is that its contagious. when i look at the players who hustle anymore, I see Powe, Carcillo, Lappy, JVR, Asham, and Danny. Why don’t I see Carter, or Giroux, or Hartnell, Coburn, Kimmo, or Gagne playing with intensity? These are the players who I should notice, but they are ghost on the ice this season.

When we first got Pronger, i was against the idea of giving him the “C”, just because I though it would upset Richards and he’d cause a “scene” over it. But now, i give up, strip the asshole of the “C”, let Pronger take over, Im sick of watching my favorite team play like shit ever night. And if Richie wants it back, he better damn well play like his did two years ago, because his shits gotta stop now.

by JpH89 on Dec 1, 2009 11:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don’t like commenting on locker-room stuff and who should be captain or who shouldn’t be Richards has worn the C at every level of competition he plays the way every player on this team should. Us fans are not in the locker room anyone who says this guys shouldn’t be an alternate or should be captain is just speculating basing their opinion on 2 minute clips and sound bites. Pronger has a much more dynamic personality that Richards, he is new in town and future Hall of Famer and is a great interview. The writers love him and they should but they also love to stir up trouble and controversy. Flat out nobody asked Richards these questions and therefore we have no idea what he would say. Also Richards did diss the press early this year in response to all the party party questions they kept asking. You know what happens when you hurt the feelings of a beat writer well now you are in for and in the crosshairs.

by chrislanci on Dec 1, 2009 11:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

your right, he has been a captain in every other level, but this is the only level that he gets paid to play. Its a lot easier to care when you play for fun, but true character come out when you play for a living. Richards got the money, and now he looks like one of us, he just treats it as a job, he lost all emotion to even try.

by JpH89 on Dec 1, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A good example would be Crosby, the duds been handed everything to him on a silver platter. But did he slow down, did he stop trying? No, he still plays 110% every shift. I know its blasphemy, but I wish Richards was half the captain Crosby is.

by JpH89 on Dec 1, 2009 11:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Part of being the captain is the responsibility of dealing with the media. There are going to be questions that you don’t want to answer. He didn’t have to accept the C. He’s a young captain, but he’s got to learn. If Crosby can do it, he can for sh*t’s sake.

by doubleh on Dec 1, 2009 11:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I love how he handled the media then, the captains job is to lead the team and do what is best for the team. The notion the captains job is to handle the media is utterly ridiculous. Wearing the C means you gotta be the bad guy and protect your teammates, exactly what Richards did he didn’t throw his teammates under the bus and became the media bad guy to protect his fellow teammates and now he is paying for it because he has the media target on his back. Primeau did same thing when you spoke out against Bill Barber, Primeau was crucified by the media for backstabbing his coach, who happened to a Flyers legend, but in the end his viewed one of the greatest captains the Flyers had. Primeau totally turned his image around he never performed as well as we all hoped, he was traded for an extremely popular player in Brindamour, and got Bill Barber fired but all of that is long forgotten with the way he put the team on his shoulders for a couple of playoff runs.

by chrislanci on Dec 2, 2009 10:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

richie’s an asshole now??? man, this stuff gets peeps messed up. jph89, richie’s essentially been asked by mgmt. to do less physically with the signings of Carcillo, Asham, Lappy, Betts etc… These are their checking/fighting guys now. Richie has 22 points in 24 games and is a +7, all while many guys are in/out of the lineup. This guy is a stud, perhaps not the best leader yet, but a stud. When the lineup was full, the Flyers rattled off 5 straight victories. Banged up as they are now, they are inconsistent at best. Ultimately, blame will end up on mgmt shoulders bc given their cap situation, they brought on players, some of which are now injured or rookies, so on and so forth. The blend isn’t bad but it isn’t great yet either, frankly it is below expectation. It needs time to lick its wounds. Don’t rip Richie who is clearly one of the best, young two way players in the NHL. Have we forgotten his 2nd/3rd place finish in last year’s Selke? He hasn’t suddenly forgotten how to play – he needs to be led by Pronger, the team to be healthy for continuity’s sake, and he’ll be the great player you have come to know.

by hjken on Dec 1, 2009 11:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This doesn’t even make sense.

He’s a good captain, he just needs to be led by Pronger?
And the Flyers are great as long as they suffer no injuries?

Awesome.

by MarioD on Dec 1, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Its not the physicality thats the issue, or the fact that he puts up good numbers, Im pissed because he stopped doing the little things that he used to do. When do you ever see him fight along the boards, or stand up for another player, or HIT in general( I believe that he was in the top 5 in hits last year or at some point). When do you see him lead the rush, or make a sweet pass anymore. And yes, he was a finalist for the Selke, LAST YEAR. Where has he been this year, does he even play on the PK anymore, before the injury, our top PK line was Betts and Lappy, and our #2 was Carter and GASP Danny!!! So yeah, I do have a right to be pissed at Richie, its called being a fan, and if I feel as though a top player is being lazy, Im gonna call him out on it.

by JpH89 on Dec 1, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FYI: Richards is 5th on the team in hits this year (behind Carcillo, Lappy, Powe, and Hartnell), and he’s averaging the same amount of PK time per game as Lappy (2:13 per game), second highest among forwards.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 2, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FYI....

i not trying to sound like an asshole, but don’t put words in my mouth. In my post, i didn’t once question Richards numbers, or say he needs to fight more often, or his ability to play, or that he is an up and coming star. I only questioned his captaincy, and your post barley touches that point, and when it does, you say that he “needs” Pronger. So I don’t get it, your saying Im wrong but you seem to be agreeing with my point, that Richie isn’t ready to be a Captain.

by JpH89 on Dec 2, 2009 12:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pronger is a bona-fide genius!

Notice how all we were talking about yesterday is “Fire Stevens!”

Now all we’re talking about is what the players need to do to get their house in order.

Shame on us for losing perspective like that. We’ve all been Philly fans for too long and, like it or not, have succumbed to the usual media treatment of our coaches, regardless of whether or not we as individuals support Stevens or call for his head.

Here we are now, discussing what the players need to do in order to set things right, and which players are best suited for the tasks at hand. And really this is what we should have been doing all along.

Talk about a wily veteran move by Pronger. Bravo, #20.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 2, 2009 12:15 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I still don’t like Stevens, but thats mostly due to his coaching strategy, not because of leadership roles.

by JpH89 on Dec 2, 2009 12:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s like the Iverson move for the Sixers. Bring in AI; it’ll make everyone forget about how horrible Eddie Jordan is.

by doubleh on Dec 2, 2009 12:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Urgh, don’t even bring up Eddie Jordan. With the Flyers’ recent skid and the fact that Liberty Ballers is already talking about who to draft this summer, needless to say, my psyche is not in a good place right now.

by flyrsfrk05 on Dec 2, 2009 12:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hear you. I’ve quit posting over there; I just lurk. There’s really nothing to say at this point. When they hired Jordan, I knew the team was doomed. I’m just not a fan and so far he’s done nothing to change my mind.

by doubleh on Dec 2, 2009 12:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But hey, we are getting A.I. back! That is exciting!

The Sixers are still gonna suck, however :(

by flyrsfrk05 on Dec 2, 2009 1:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But... but...

Eddie Jordan CURSED at the team during training camp! He’s got fire in his belly! And he’s STILL got Samuel Dalembert to contend with! Eddie Jordan is awesome!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!

The Sixers are depressing. My brother and I were at the Black Friday game and we lost track of how many “Please Come See Us!” promos the Sixers had to offer.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 2, 2009 9:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The C

Maybe we need to do what San Jose did when they flopped last year in the playoffs. They took the C from Patrick Marleau and now he’s tearing it up. I know Richie is doing well right now but if you want to shake things up and not fire Stevens, then giving Pronger the C and Richie and A is probably the best thing. That or make a trade. Don’t get me wrong i hope Richie steps it up and leads the team. The Flyers are in a ‘funk’ right now and they are a better team

by SkookFlyerfan on Dec 2, 2009 8:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

This team has FOUR alternating A’s behind a captain with the personality of a wet blanket. I think that says it all.

Pronger + Lappy + whoever the players like among the remaining Captains.

Mike Richards = Bobby Clarke mold. I laughed when they said it then, and I wish I was still laughing about it now. Kick Richards down to an A, or take it away all together. He’s at the center of a team that has been wildly inconsistent for going on three seasons now.

I don’t care who’s toes get stepped on.

For my daily hockey thoughts, visit http://ronnybrook.wordpress.com

by ronnybrook.blog on Dec 2, 2009 8:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Here's something interesting:

Another Panaccio piece:

One player said Richards was going through "a rough time." This is just the second year of captaincy for the 24-year-old centerman from Kenora, Ont. "He’s still learning on the job," the player said. Holmgren said the same thing, admitting Richards needs to mature in some areas on how he handles the team in the dressing room. "He is not the most vocal guy," Holmgren said. "He leads our team very well by example. When he puts his leg over the boards, we pretty much know what we will get every night – good effort. It’s the little things away from the rink he needs to get better at, maybe in the locker room he has to get better. That’s part of the learning curve. We all expected that and knew that going into this when we named him captain. He’s continuing to get better on a daily basis."

Not exactly ringing endorsements there from a teammate and your GM.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 2, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

But honest natheless.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Dec 2, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How much difference does a letter on your jersey make?
Can no one else say anything in the locker room if they don’t have a C or A?
Does Pronger or Lappy need a flipping special little patch on their sweater to tell people how much this team needs to do something about winning?

by ToddtheFox on Dec 2, 2009 3:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I hear ya – your pissed off like like all of us, this team should be better. I’m agreeing that Richie needs a jump start in leadership and who better to tutor him than Pronger. Give Chris the co-C or the full time A so he can provide the vocal woop ass when Richie chooses not to. He’ll be a quick study – he has that killer element in his approach to the game. It sucks because in the off season Holmgren talked about not accepting losses & being a relentless puck pursuing group. Lots of hockey left – I never get too down this early especially given the current standings and our games in hand. It will soon be time though for the smelling salts to come out and take a lasting effect!

by hjken on Dec 2, 2009 5:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.
Start posting about the Flyers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Q741887935_4955_small
Chris Pronger Facts
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Soccer_face_small
Goalie rest: how needed is it?
Richards_small
Gagne back for good?
Photo_3_small
The Michael Leighton Story
Small
Backlund
Hologo_small
My Panther Experience
Small
How the Flyers Just Saved $800k from Next Year's Cap
Small
Looking at the Flyers Draft Results (First Three Rounds) 2000-2007
My_eyes
Why USA must win

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Pittsburgh 72 42 24 6 90
New Jersey 71 42 25 4 88
Philadelphia 71 37 29 5 79
New York Rangers 71 31 31 9 71
New York Islanders 72 29 33 10 68

(updated 3.21.2010 at 8:42 AM EDT)

37 - 30 - 5

Lost 2

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

An Interview With Islanders' Prospect Travis Hamonic

Phoenix Coyotes Adrian Aucoin points following his shootout goal against Dallas Stars goalie Marty Turco during an NHL hockey game, Sunday, March 21, 2010, in Dallas. The Coyotes won 3-2. (AP Photo/Amy Gutierrez)

Coyotes Make It Nine In A Row, Beat Stars 3-2

Joe DiPenta won a Stanley Cup with the Anaheim Ducks in 2007. link

An Interview With Portland Pirates Defenseman Joe DiPenta

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

Headshot-phillies_small Travis Hughes

Staff Writers

Think_sc_cropped_small Geoff Detweiler

Me_minus_kbond_small Ben Rothenberg

Adirondack Correspondent

Small Dan Morency