Meet Philadelphia Flyers Head Coach Peter Laviolette
Peter Laviolette was introduced tonight as the seventeenth head coach in Philadelphia Flyers history. He'll be behind the bench for the first time tomorrow night as the Flyers host the Washington Capitals. Right off the bat, what can we expect out of the new bench boss?
The first and most important thing to know is that he cherishes an aggressive offensive style. It's how his teams have always run, and it's one of the first things he mentioned to the Philadelphia media when introduced to them Friday evening.
"Moving forward, I'd like to see a very aggressive brand of hockey," Laviolette said. "Aggressive in the offensive zone. Get our D activated, get our D moving."
About an hour before the press conference in which the new coach made that statement, Broad Street Hockey spoke with Bob Wage of 'Canes Country, a man who has seen obviously a lot of Laviolette over the last decade, considering he led the Hurricanes from 2003 to 2008. Almost verbatim with the coach, Wage detailed the type of system he implemented when he joined the Carolina organization.
"Laviolette instituted a new system, an aggressive system," Wage said, "and the Hurricanes went from being the lowest scoring team in the NHL (before his hiring) to a high scoring team. He loves to chase the puck and play at least a two man fore check."
That type of up-tempo hockey clearly worked for Carolina and helped them win a Stanley Cup under Laviolette in 2006. When you consider the scorers that were on that team, beyond Eric Staal, they were relatively mediocre. Who would you rather have, Ray Whitney, Erik Cole, and Cory Stillman, or Claude Giroux, Danny Briere, and Mike Richards? The Flyers have much more talent up front than Laviolette ever had to deal with in Carolina, and this offense should absolutely flourish under his system.
Things weren't perfect in Carolina, though. Wage told us of the struggles Laviolette's Hurricanes had on the other side of the puck.
"The argument against him," Wage told us, "was that his system was weak defensively -- watch the odd man rushes coming at you -- and once the rest of the league figured it out, he did not have the ability to change it or adapt."
Fortunately for the Flyers, they also have a much better defensive squad than the 'Canes ever did. Let's play the game again: who would you rather have? Dennis Seidenberg, Joe Corvo, and Mike Commodore, or Chris Pronger, Kimmo Timonen, and Matt Carle?
With an up-tempo offensive style, the opposition is going to get breaks in the opposite direction. It happens to every team that runs that kind of system. What you need to be successful while playing that type of game is a very strong blueline. The Flyers have just that. But even with a run-of-the-mill defense, the Hurricanes were able to play Laviolette's system on their way to second place in the Eastern Conference during the 2005-06 regular season and a Stanley Cup that postseason. That simple fact makes me confident that this current crop of Flyers will be just fine under their new coach on the ice.
Off the ice, of course, is where bigger questions are raised.
It's obvious the Flyers have leadership issues. That very well may be one of the major reasons John Stevens is no longer head coach, as many believed he wasn't hard enough with his players or brutally honest enough or however you want to put it. It seems Laviolette is the polar opposite.
"I think you have to be tough on players," he said Friday night in Philadelphia ."I want players playing hard. I want them running out the door and to play the game hard in a system that attacks the puck in all three zones."
In what could be read as a passing jab toward the problems that have plagued this Flyers team in the past, stupid penalties on the ice and excessive partying off of it, Laviolette continued the sentiment.
"If you can get a team that works hard and if you can get a team that's disciplined, not only in the penalty box, but disciplined in their life, disciplined in the system you put on the ice. And if you can get a team that cares about each other, there's nothing you can't do. I truly believe that."
Laviolette is certainly more vocal and more outward with his emotions than Stevens, and maybe that's a change that this young, sometimes seemingly disobedient group of Flyers needs. He'll hold them accountable at every turn and he'll make sure that when one player makes a mistake, everybody knows about it.
Will he be the right fit in Philadelphia? From a hockey perspective, it seems so. From an in-the-locker-room perspective, it remains to be seen. But take it from a Carolina fan who's seen this trick before.
"He is certainly his own man and might have a bit of an ego," Wage said, "but... he gets things done. I think he's a great fit for you guys, but he seems to wear out his welcome after a bit. Will he be your head coach five years from now? The odds are, no."
If the Flyers can win a Stanley Cup or two in the interim, then Peter Laviolette will be a success here.
Thanks to Bob from 'Canes Country for taking the time to quickly and effectively answering our questions Friday afternoon. If you'd like an interesting take inside the firing of Peter Laviolette in Carolina last December, read this post over at his site.
0 recs |
20 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
First Comment
After hearing the news of Stevens’ firing I immediately turned on CSN-Philly and I got the opportunity to see the 8 o’clock press conference. Then John Boruk interviewed the new coach immediately afterwards and then Al Morganti and Michael Barkann made their comments.
Then I went on demand to see if Daily News Live had anything further on the situation (knowing that they cover the Flyers extensively) ….actually todays DNL was 80% Flyers, the Flyers firing Stevens even stole the lime light from Allen Iverson.
(I wonder if the Flyers made this move, because they were getting absolutely no headlines, even the lowely sixers with the A.I. move stole the spot light).
Anyway, on DNL..one of the panalists (I think it was Les Bowen) said that Laviolette does not tolerate fighting (good bye Riley Cote). I was surprised no one in the press confirence mentioned the “Flyers Tradition” to him.
How will he be able to deal with all the injuries the Flyers have at the moment? and if his aggressive offensive systems give up odd man rushes….do you think Boucher and/or Emery can bail the Flyers out when this occurs? The Goaltending will then be relied upon even more so than before. I mean what happens if it’s Malkin and Crosby that are on the odd man rush?
by FlyersGoalies1and27 on Dec 5, 2009 1:15 AM EST reply actions
Even if his teams give up a ton of odd-man rushes, they still have good even strength goals for/against ratios. His last full season, Carolina was 8th in that category. Yes, he had Cam Ward, but Ward’s numbers showed him average at best that year. So, did Ward bail his team out of the odd-man breaks, but then give up the soft goals? Did the team just score more often than they got caught? Don’t know. But I do know that his aggressive style led to a fantastic offensive team, a good 5-on-5 team, and a terrible PK.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 5, 2009 1:57 AM EST up reply actions
Again...
… that’s likely why they kept Berube and Mullen here. Once the Flyers get their power play and penalty kill back in order, they’ll no doubt be top-10 in both of those categories again.
Combine that with Laviolette’s system and you hopefully have a formula for…

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
Emery seems to do well when he’s peppered with a lot of shots, and he seems to let in soft goals when he’s been watching the game happen in the other end of the ice for long stretches. My guess is that Emery’s at his best when he’s needed most — this might be a blessing in disguise for him.
by memphisbrando on Dec 5, 2009 9:07 AM EST up reply actions
That's the risk you take.
Somehow Detroit managed to win a cup with Osgood while being aggressive on the puck. I think that Emery and/or Boucher can do just fine.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
While they were aggressive, they were also incredibly disciplined with regards to puck possession, and Ozzy is no slouch in net.
Even more encouraging (and discouraging to other teams and their fans)? Joe Corvo IIRC didn’t win a Cup with Carolina that year—it was Frantisek Kaberle as the #1 defenseman.
by red army line on Dec 5, 2009 6:37 AM EST up reply actions
“If you can get a team that works hard and if you can get a team that’s disciplined, not only in the penalty box, but disciplined in their life, disciplined in the system you put on the ice. And if you can get a team that cares about each other, there’s nothing you can’t do. I truly believe that.”
True, but Im not sure you can effectively house break the dog thats been pissin on the rug for years.
Careful what you wish for.
Well we have admitted we are panicked and we go after the coach. Just because the Penguins won last year with a coaching move does not mean it will happen for us. I was growing tired of the play out there but the coach can only do so much. Yes they have lost 6 of 7 but they also were without Gagne, Briere, Powe, and lets be honest a 50% kimmo T and a less aggressive Ian L which i can’t blame him. I hate to blame the GM because he has made some good moves, but Carcillo was a terrible move. He has done nothing for the team as far as I am concerned. He takes bad penalties and is not a threat at all offensively or to fight anymore since he barely does that. I am fine with keeping Asham and Ian L but lets let Cote and Carcillo go a waste of salary space.
Also enough with getting on Brier he has been good since he came back and getting back to speed he has shown frustration but that will happen. Hartnell is another one I love his heart but he definitely does not make Jeff Carter better. I also disagree with bringing Pronger here. Defense was our problem but now he is the captain and now there is tension in the dressing room and oh yeah the best part the last two games he has not done one thing to clear people from infront of the net. He has showed no urgency and to be honest has been lackluster and Eric Lindros Lazy at times. And Coburn what is the deal with him he has looked lost from the first day can we wait or should we go find a cheaper defensemen. We are known for holding onto players that never pan out and then trading them when they are worth nothing.
We have admitted the team is failing after every year shaking up the core team. Now you are shaking up the coaching I hope it works but something tells me there is a lot wrong with the players on the ice. Because again the coach can’t put the puck in the net for you and get you to play every night. A Pro hockey player should love the game and show up every night the way Sami Kapanan and Rod Brindamour did.
Pronger’s not lazy. He’s honestly so good that he just looks like he’s doing nothing, and has no urgency. Really. Did you see how he broke up a 3-on-1 against Vancouver?
Listen I have seen Pronger play good games
He has stepped into what this team is some games they show up and some games they play a strong 2 minutes. Last night wow he cleared the net in the beginning and then guess what some poor discipline from Carcillo and Pronger looked like a different player. It is not solely on him I know but it definitely has complicated a team that was young. And has made the salary cap even tougher if that is believable. Bottom line no one is safe until they start winning.
by whosyourjockey on Dec 6, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Semi unrelated...
Is it just me or does Laviolette look a lot like Sean Hannity? Ugh.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
I was about to write something based around that entire idea. It’s the first thing I think of every time I see him.
The Daily Forehand -- SB Nation's Tennis Destination.
Broad Street Hockey.
by Ben Rothenberg on Dec 5, 2009 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting move. Fun for the Atlantic
If a coaching change needed to be done, this is one that will certainly make your team a more entertaining one. Lavi really never should’ve been fired by the Isles in the first place; his exit in Carolina is another story (but I do wonder about the quality of team he had at the time; the Canes have shown little the past 1.5 years save for a hot streak under Maurice).
What I love about this is the Atlantic now has 4 of 5 teams that are going to systematically play aggressive on the puck. Maybe Lemaire’s way still comes out on top … during the regular season, at least. But if nothing else, Atlantic matchups should be even more fun to watch.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Incredible, somehow you forget to mention:
Who would you rather have? Cam Ward or Ray Emery?
And that’s why this team is still wrongly constructed. Holmgren brought in the coach to play the system he tried to force Stevens to play. But that system is still ill-suited to this roster. It was never a problem of implementing the system, its been a problem of the system not working.
Laviolette is going to further insist that the Dman join the rush?
That’s a system you play when you have an elite goaltender to erase mistakes. This roster is modeled after the Red Wings but they want to play the style of the Sharks/Penguins. Its just stubborn and moronic.
Cam Ward and his career .903 S% and 2.82 gaa? Not exactly “elite” numbers. Especially compared to Osgood’s .906 and 2.48, or Fleury’s .916 and 2.45, or Pascal Leclaire’s .906 and 2.81.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 5, 2009 5:17 PM EST up reply actions
I’m supposed to take this post seriously? You really want to compare Cam Ward and Chris Osgood as equals?
You understand you’re making my point for me, right?
Clearly, Cam Ward is way more talented than Chris Osgood. But as a result of their systems (Ward left on an island while his team was “attacking”, Osgood with a wall of teammates around him) they turn out similar numbers.
Unfortunately, the Flyers are mixing the worst of the two systems, which will result in disaster.
I didn’t compare them as equals at all. You said Ward is an “elite” goaltender. Chris Osgood is not. But how are Osgood’s career numbers – he has played in St. Louis and on the Isle too, you know – better than Ward’s? And Osgood isn’t the only example there. Pittsburgh plays an attacking system – which is what Lavy brings – and yet Fleury’s career numbers are FAR superior. That isn’t making your point at all.
Laviolette’s 01-02 Islanders just happened to have Chris Osgood on their team. His stats that year were a 2.50 GAA and a .910 save percentage. That put Osgood at 23rd in the league in GAA and 13th in the league in S%. How about his 02-03 Islanders? Garth Snow and Osgood split the duties, with Snow starting 43 to Ozzy’s 37. Surprisingly, Osgood fell back to Earth (2.92, .894), yet Snow had a great year (2.31, .918) ranking him 13th and 10th respectively.
Too far back? Different game back then? Maybe, but his team had some shitty goalies, yet they still played well. Either way, I’ll humor you. 2006-2007, Lavy’s Hurricanes the year after they won the Stanley Cup.
Ward was their starter, and he put up awesome numbers at 2.93 and .897. Your theory is that Ward “bailed” his team out because he’s a superb goalie. Well, their backup, John Grahame can hardly be considered in the same tier as Ward. Grahame put up very similar numbers at 2.85 and .897.
Of course, your next argument will be, “See, it’s the system! Even Ward can’t make up for his terrible system which leaves his goalies vulnerable.” Except if Ward was an “elite” goalie, as you posited, he would be able to “erase mistakes” caused by the system. He didn’t. So, we can at least agree that Emery v. Ward isn’t the issue. You can now go back to blaming the “system”, at which point I’ll then compare the team’s defenses, and note that Carolina had terrible D-men, while Philly has much better and smarter defenders. How much will that change the results? We don’t know, but I’m sure you’re absolutely positive that our defense sucks, Laviolette’s system sucks, and Homer sucks for doing all of it.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 5, 2009 7:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 























