Broad Street Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Carcillo acquisition a mistake

392holmgren_paul080512ap_medium
photo by Bradley C. Bower/AP via CBC

Paul Holmgren stepped in front of the media tonight at the Skate Zone in Voorhees and made his case for his deadline actions. He moved popular winger Scottie Upshall and a second-round pick in 2011 to Phoenix for tough guy Daniel Carcillo. Immediately, we all struck our palms to our foreheads.

Carcillo is a career tough guy with 174 penalty minutes this season. He's second in the league in fights, tied with Riley Cote's 18. His best offensive NHL season came in 2007/08 when he tallied 13 goals in 57 games. To be fair, Upshall's best year was last year when he notched 14 goals in 61 games, but Upshall has speed and an offensive upside. There is no doubt that Upshall is the better offensive player.

But, we still held out hope that something else would happen to make sense of this.

Then, it came. Kind of. Veteran defenseman Kyle McLaren, who hasn't played in the NHL this season, was sent over by the Sharks in exchange for a sixth-round pick. He's going to be a Phantom off the bat and he's really just a depth guy in case of injury, at this point. And that's all before we mention his $2.5 million cap hit.

Not exactly the move we were looking for. So we waited some more. It took two hours to hear from Holmgren, and when we finally did get his justification for the moves today, it didn't really calm us down any.

Holmgren said that Carcillo is going to be a fan favorite in this town. He's a cheaper version of Upshall that can fight and plays a very tough style of hockey - everything Philly is known for. But at some point, that gets old. Fan favoritism doesn't matter when your team gets weaker from the move.

The lines are shaken up with this deal. In a poll on this site last week, fans were most excited by the prospect of a Giroux - Briere - Upshall line. Last night, we saw the potential of that line, but now we won't get to see it grow. Instead, Darroll Powe will play with those two, or it'll be Carcillo. No offense to either of those players, but they don't have the offensive ability to keep up with Giroux and Briere. Upshall, while not as talented as his linemates, could keep up with them with his speed and his ever-improving offensive ability.

We've heard that this deal solidifies Giroux's spot on the NHL roster. Now, there's extra cap space and he won't have to worry if there's an injury on defense. Those who spread that opinion forget that Arron Asham can be sent down to make cap room as necessary. This past weekend was an odd situation and there is no reason, with or without the extra space the Carcillo trade brings, that Giroux should be sent down.

In the end, if we see Carcillo on a line with Briere and Giroux, we've got a problem. Yes, it will be good to see some toughness with those two, because they wont be messed with. But if that really becomes a problem, you can send someone to take care of it on a later shift without disrupting any potential chemistry or flow on the skilled line. Last night against Boston, the Flyers were able to roll three dangerous scoring lines. With the departure of Upshall, they can no longer do that, and they pick up a player who will be essentially useless come playoff time.

The last thing the Philadelphia Flyers need is another agitator or enforcer. This is the most penalized team in the National Hockey League, and that's something that coach John Stevens has tried to curb all season. Adding the most penalized player in the league regresses that substantially. Holmgren said that the Flyers will try to reign in Carcillo, but how well did that work with Steve Downie? How well has that worked with Sean Avery? Speaking of Avery, Forecaster calls Carcillo "potentially the next Sean Avery."

Fan favorite or not, this deal is a blunder.

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Reminds me of the Abreu Deal

Salary dump—that is all. How can you carry two enforcers and an agitator on one team—in effect, three players who can’t really play hockey all that much but can fight?

by doubleh on Mar 4, 2009 7:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The problem with that is Abreu was making $13.6 million and was traded for next to nothing. Upshall was making $1.225 million and the “salary dump” only netted the team $400k.

This was just a terrible move, period.

by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 4, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Especially when other moves could’ve been made, without getting rid of anybody, to clear up that cap space if it becomes necessary.

If we carry Carcillo, Cote, and Asham in the playoffs… well then Holmgren has lost officially lost it.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog
Because the Broad Street Subway is orange for a reason.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 4, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

id be interested to hear exactly what the asking price for bouwmeester was. if the flyers said it was too much it had to have been something ridiculous.

i was really hoping today would have a christmas like feel to it with me waking up to news of Jay bo joining the flyers, guess not.

i really hope we can go after him this off-season. only problem is in order to do that wed probably have to dump lupol and/or jones/carle for draft picks and then theres no gurantee hed sign with us. hopefully we can swing a draft day trade for bouwmeester when the price will go down and then lock him up long term. lupol+jones+1st rounder would probably get the job done after the season has ended.

by njh3293 on Mar 4, 2009 8:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The last I recall hearing was the the Flyers were going to have to increase their offer of JVR, Lupul and a 1st. So, something more than that, probably those three in addition to Coburn or Carle, and that’s why the Flyers dropped out of the running.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog
Because the Broad Street Subway is orange for a reason.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 4, 2009 8:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

they should have just offered lupol/carle/draft pick. i know we didnt wanna give up carle but he has not performed up to his contract and bouwmeester is a lot better.

although I heard holmgren wanted to negotiate a long term deal with bouwmeester, maybe he refused to do so until the summer and that was the kicker. in that case maybe its good we didnt pull the trigger.

by njh3293 on Mar 4, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think the Panthers really could even do the J-Bo trade at this point, because the team has a legit shot of making the playoffs. To get rid of one of their best players in a cynical fashion having to do with what you won’t get when the season is over is tantamount to a giant FU to the fans who pay to see the team play. The only way Florida could do that deal was if it was so lopsided in the panthers favor that people would excuse the fact that they’d arguably be dismantling a playoff run.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 4, 2009 9:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trade

I don’t think it was a salary dump. Honestly, I think it was Holmgren making a mistake., although he’ll never admit it. Upshall AND a 2nd round pick for Carcillo? C’mon, that’s way, WAY too much. Either one could have gotten him here. But both? I like the McLaren deal at face value but when you look at his salary then you realize it’s not such a good trade. I wish I could’ve been a fly on the wall at the Wachovia Center when these phone calls were going down because neither one makes a whole lot of sense. I mean, I’m not going to cry over losing Upshall. He really didn’t fulfill his potential with us and most likely won’t with Phoenix but I wish him all the luck in the world. He’s a good player but that’s all. Carcillo, if nothing else, will bring excitement to the Waco Center and maybe, hopefully, instill some fear into the other team. Let’s give it some time to see how the Carcillo deal pans out.

by BEEFSBUMS on Mar 4, 2009 8:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Horrible trade

Truly bad. People have given Homer way too much credit in the past. Let’s not forget that only a year ago, circumstances conspired in such a way that Jeff Carter is still a Flyer. Let’s call that dumb luck.

Now I have my suspicions about what this trade was really about. Clearly the salary cap was a small factor as the miniscule amount of room it provided couldn’t possibly justify trading Upshall away at a loss for a player that at best is redundant when the flyers already have 2 enforcers.

On the negative side, you had a fledgling line (Upshall, Briere, Giroux) that was getting a lot of people jazzed up with its potential in making the Flyers the most dangerous offensive team in the NHL, and you had a guy who was liked by the fans, was only 25, arguably is geting better, and who fit in perfectly with the Flyers young core. Upshall was an energy player who went out and banged people, attacked the defense with speed, and managed to produced goals and assists even amidst the turmoil of injuries that meant a constantly changing third line.

Stevens just didn’t like Upshall for whatever reason. He benched him last year, and if you recall, it was when Upshall was reinserted into the lineup that the Flyers started to make their run, in part to some of the energy that Upshall brought back to the lineup. I think I really saw this coming during the NJ game, when Upshaw drew a dumb hooking penalty, and they cut to the Flyers bench, where Stevens and Berube appeared to be having a rather animated discussion (especially for Stevens) where you could tell that Stevens was annoyed and frustrated.

I can’t help thinking this is one of those things that can really come back to haunt you. I also feel really bad for Upshall, who gets dumped from a Stanley cup contender to a last place team. Apparently the Flyers cared so little about this, that they didn’t even bother to tell Upshall personally - he found out about it from a REPORTER.

Sometimes we forget that these are human beings, and personalities and grudges and preconcieved notions come into play.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 4, 2009 8:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

if the upshall vs. stevens reports are true that really bothers me. sometimes it seems like this team plays favorites like a middle school teacher. upshall plays his ass off night in and night out and he is rewarded by being shipped to hockey hell in phoenix. randy jones fucks up night in and night out and his reward is 3 million dollars and twice as much ice time as he deserves.

by njh3293 on Mar 4, 2009 8:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trade Thought

I know there’s a lot of speculation that this is a cap move, and that may be true. However, something to think about is the fact that last year Rile Cote didn’t play in the playoffs at all, which meant the Flyers didn’t have a true “enforcer”. (Of course, fighting is rare in the playoffs, but the Ducks did plenty of fighting on their way to the cup in ‘07). I saw the TSN feed today and based on some of their comments (especially Darren Pang who does color for the Coyotes), this guy has some skill and therefore seems much more likely to see action in the playoffs. That may not provide too much consolation for people who are pissed about the trade, but it’s something to consider.

by CT Flyers Fan on Mar 4, 2009 10:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That’s a good point, but I’m of the opinion that Asham fills that role on this team.. a tough guy who actually has some hands.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog
Because the Broad Street Subway is orange for a reason.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 4, 2009 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From the other side

Let me start by saying that I’m not a “fan” of the Upshall trade – as I’ve said elsewhere, there were likely better deals around. But we’ve got what we’ve got, and there’s no point in throwing a fit. Here’s how I’m seeing the deal.

Upshall is a decent, young player with no major “breakout” season. No great historical line of great production in the NHL. And until this season, struggled with injuries of one sort or another. Good, but on a team deep with scoring talent, he was easily expendable.

Danny Carcillo, well, I don’t know about him because I haven’t seen him play. Fact is, I don’t think anyone has, including Wayne Gretzky. (Because lets face it – nobody really wants to watch the Coyotes.) So I’ll have to base everything off of various reports – good energy guy, good in fights, offensive skill lacking.

So, there’s a drop in offensive talent – not sold there will be a definite drop in numbers. Phoenix has about 3 decent scoring players, and I’m guessing Carcillo didn’t play with them all that often (I could be wrong – again, I somehow missed most/all of the Coyotes games this season). Upshall had a much deeper set of skill around him, but lets face it – the numbers aren’t amazing. Can everything be told in numbers alone? No – but I can’t overlook Upshall’s mediocre numbers while lambasting Carcillo for his. (Yes, I know – this is no time to be “fair’ or "logical”, but I digress…) I think the energy will still be there, just in a different form. I’m curious to see how a a player who is a bit more of an aggressor plays on a line with two skilled players like Briere and Giroux. I’ve seen it work in other situations. Is he going to put up huge numbers magically from day one? No – that’d be insane expectation. Will he be able to fill the role decently enough – I believe so, but only time will tell.

So, I’ve talked up Carcillo a bit now – why don’t I like this trade? Well, I’m not sold he’s the best fit, nor the best value out there. As has been mentioned before, we already have 2 fighters on the roster, so adding a third seems a bit redundant. I understand the breathing room with the salary cap, but I don’t think it’s a big enough swing to make a major impact. Helpful, yes. Problem solver, no. My other beef is the draft pick – I understand why it was needed, but I think it was too high of a pick. Of course, being the 2nd round of the 2011 makes it a bit more stomachable. The entire trade just seemed a bit forced.

For those wondering, here’s the logic whether you like it, or agree with it, or not – just means you’re more greedy and this deal likely doesn’t happen. :) While not completely negligible, neither player involved is a top talent (at this point). There are enough ways to swing this to where neither has a huge advantage over the other (remember that Carcillo was a 3rd round draft pick – so he was/is viewed highly somewhere by someone). Phoenix then has to take a more expensive player who becomes a RFA at season’s end, and give up a cheaper player they just signed to a 2-year deal this past off season. They’re taking the bigger hit in cap, and possibly even losing the player in full for next season. So Phoenix is taking the cap hit and the risk of either paying more in the offseason to keep Upshall, or basically give up a young player for a 6 week rental. To compensate, the Flyers gave up a draft pick – no extra salary concerns for Phoenix, and a way to compensate for a future young player. Again, agree with it or not, that’s the mindset behind the draft pick.

As for McLaren, I like it. He’s a solid defensive d-man – something that is still valuable in the game. No, you don’t want an entire team of them anymore, but his style of play will allow a more offensively minded player to jump up, and cover others’ mistakes. If he was our 3rd or 4th of this style, then I’d be scared. But the majority of the defense is younger and faster – so i’ll take the veteran depth (if at a slightly steep cost). Of course, flipping McLaren in for Randy Jones keeps that whole salary thing equal.

by IcersGuy on Mar 4, 2009 11:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Great post.

I must say I pretty much agree with everything you’ve said. So much for debate.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog
Because the Broad Street Subway is orange for a reason.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 5, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

thank you

I was reading this article and comment section and getting angrier and angrier (for no reason). I mean, I really liked the way Upshall played the game- shifty, speedy, an agitator, intense- but that said, all I’ve heard the last day is how much we’re losing offensively. I really don’t see that as the case at all. Scottie had 7 goals this year. Seven. And LOTS of good opportunities to score with no finish. And while I wouldn’t call Carcillo next year’s candidate to have a Jeff Carter breakout, I will say that he had 13 goals in 57 last year, while spending 325 minutes in the box.

I’m not saying Carcillo’s a better or worse player than Upshall, I’m just saying that it seems like people are giving Upshall way too much credit for his offensive abilities.

Again is exact accordance with IcersGuy, I will say that the Upshall vs. Carcillo debate aside, I don’t like the trade because what’s the point except to lose a 2nd round pick? Maybe they really want Powe on this team and it’s Cote’s time to go back to the Phantoms? For my money, though, it will be nice to have someone on the ice who will actually win fights. Cote’s face after the two Brashear beatings? Ugly. Watching him get punched repeatedly on the side of the head by Eric Boulton a few games later? Painful.

Maybe we should all (myself included, of course) reserve our judgment on the Upshall vs. Carcillo debate until after Carcillo actually plays a game or two.

Sorry this post was so full of ADD.

by eeeeee on Mar 5, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s get real here. The Flyers just traded a 2002 first round player for a 2003 3rd rounder. Explain to me how Philly had to throw in a 2nd rounder so we could get fleeced???

I guess it comes down to your opinion of Upshall. I’ve thought for along time now that one idiotic element of fantasy hockey is that PIM’s generate points but there’s no stat for drawing penalties. Upshall drew a lot of penalties. He was a 3rd line player who actually scared other team’s D. What Upshall was missing was the scoring touch that differentiates great players from average ones, however even if Upshall will only ever be an average player, he provided the element of speed that helped open up the ice for the other players on his line. Carcillo is going to do that at 6 ft 200 lbs? Upshaw had double the offensive numbers of Carcillo. In what universe is this a plus for the Flyers?
What Knuble and Hartnell do for their respective lines with size and strength Upshall did for his line with speed. There is no way that a guy Carcillo’s size is going to do for Briere and Giroux. Other teams will pinch on the line - wait and see. Stevens will need to find a place for Briere in the top 6 now. My guess is we may see a rebuilt 2nd line, because the Flyers brass doesn’t appreciate Lupul that much, and he’ll be the guy they’ll move around.

Let me be the first to predict that they move Briere to wing on the Carter line and move Lupul to 3rd line.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 5, 2009 12:28 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Let’s get real here. The Flyers just traded a 2002 first round player for a 2003 3rd rounder. Explain to me how Philly had to throw in a 2nd rounder so we could get fleeced???

Yeah…problem is that those drafts are closer to a decade old than we realize. And with both players having NHL experience, where they were drafted years ago really doesn’t matter – their perceived value at that time is quite different than their perceived value now. It’s like using the draft rounds when trading Nitty for Kari Lehtonen. (Based on your theory, we’d have to give up the high draft pick since Lehtonen was a 1st rounder but Nitty was just a lowly 6th rounder.)

Again, the draft pick was added as insurance for Phoenix. They were taking a cap hit now, and would either face a bigger cap hit to resign Upshall in the offseason or lose him, ultimately getting nothing out of the deal while losing a young player. And remember – this is a 2nd-round pick in the 2011 draft. So if they don’t resign Upshall, they still have to wait 2 years before they can even draft the “replacement”. And as far as we know, that could be a late 2nd round pick in a thin draft class. There’s a lot of risk involved in draft picks.

by IcersGuy on Mar 5, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s total exageration. 6 years is not a decade. Furthermore, while you can always find exceptional players who exceed their draft positions and become diamonds in the rough, we have enough history on both of these players to know that Carcillo is not that player. Meanwhile I have watched two years of Upshall creating opportunities and generating offense, hitting people, agitating, drawing penalties and actually putting points on the board as a 3rd line player. The more I think about this trade, the more I read people struggling to find a way to explain it, the more I’m convinced this is one defies any type of logic. I just hope Upshall doesn’t end up on Pittsburgh next year.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 5, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Strange...

I thought I outlined everything pretty nicely a few posts ago…

Digressing, you’re making all the points for me, but you’re letting your personal bias get in the way. (And when it comes to the business side, personal connections usually get you less.) As you mentioned, we have a history on both players in the NHL. Not an amazing sample size, but it’s comparable enough for now and it works. Because both have played in the NHL for some time, their perceived value going into the draft is now null and void – we’ve put that speculation behind us because we now have actual data at the NHL level. So, once again, where they were drafted 6-7 years ago doesn’t matter because we are trading them today based upon their skill and value at the NHL level. So it doesn’t matter that Upshall was a 1st rounder and Carcillo was a 3rd rounder – both have played in the NHL and their NHL experience now the basis of evaluation.

Again, the draft pick wasn’t added because the teams felt Carcillo was better than Upshall. It was added to even out the burden/risk Phoenix was picking up. That being the jump in financial burden, and the risk of either paying even more for next year or losing the player completely (whereas the Flyers get a cheaper player for this year and next). In the business world, we call that hedging.

I’ve seen other trades defy logic (I like to use the Giants-Chargers trade of Eli for Rivers as point of reference for that one), but this one isn’t off beat. Again, I don’t think it was the best trade – I think we didn’t get the best value out of it – but I see how the pieces involved make sense.

"I'm a man, and I can change, if I have to, I guess..."

by IcersGuy on Mar 5, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with NJH

If the upshall vs. stevens reports are true that really bothers me. sometimes it seems like this team plays favorites like a middle school teacher. upshall plays his ass off night in and night out and he is rewarded by being shipped to hockey hell in phoenix. randy jones fucks up night in and night out and his reward is 3 million dollars and twice as much ice time as he deserves.

Definitely agree. Couldn’t have said it better.

by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 5, 2009 12:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

yup

that’s about right.

this was a horrible move by the front office, and i kind of get the feeling that the front office is starting to realize this.

any chance there will be some clerical error and we “have” to take upshall back.

World F#$king Champions

by psudrozz on Mar 5, 2009 9:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, let’s not forget that Upshall got the goal tender interference penalty in Montreal in OT. Crappy call btw.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 5, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Last option

you know while I think you’ve made a bunch of good points, along with some good ones in the comments, I really think this boils down to homer’s last choice. He knew he couldn’t afford Upshall come summertime, due to his shopping needs defensively and in the goal.. that he reallywant to try and use him/loopy in some deal for Jay bo.. but when that didn’t happen I think he tried to shop upshall for somenoe who could still semi fill the role, and be around/affordable for the next few years.. in comes phoenix firesale, someone who would fit the role, but they pinned homer to the stump and squeezed out the draft pick as well.

I think this was a semi shrewd move on homer’s part, better longterm maybe, worse shortterm definately. We can only hope that he gels nicely and is all the cotes fans seem to talk up.

Or you know.. maybe I’m just in denial and forcing myself to imagine that this is a good thing.. cause I know I always liked wtching lil scotty play for us.

by DarkNewton on Mar 5, 2009 1:22 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think that's part of it

The fact that Upshall was a RFA at season’s end probably helped with the shipping. We’d struggle to either afford him, or be able to afford him but at the cost at other positions. So instead of fighting that, Homer got what he could now. Good/bad/otherwise, that’s the beast of the business today.

by IcersGuy on Mar 5, 2009 9:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

time for Homer

It seems like Most Flyers fans are not happy with the trades today, especially since losing both Upshall AND a 2nd round pick appears stupid. And picking up an expensive defensman for the minors doesn’t seem like a freat idea. However, I’m willing to give Holmgrem a chance (say 2-3 weeks) to prove this was a good deal. Remember last year’s draft, when people though he was crazy for taking Sbisa with the traded pick (not me but other ppl), and when he made another draft pick trade to take eminger, who he dumped this year for carle (turned out to be a good move IMO). therefore, although this sounds like typical Clarke stupidity, I, unlike most Flyers fans, will NOT be calling for Homer’s head until it’s clear that this trade was pointless and costly. Perhaps with the 400k Giroux will be seeing more ice time, and I personally think Giroux for Upshall is worth doing since Giroux seems to have more upside than Upshall did.
Now if only Holmgren will rid us of Hartnell and Cote and their stupid penalties…

by samiam on Mar 5, 2009 1:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

*sigh*

This is what saddens me. That fans will be willing to forget all other positives that the GM has done – all the work behind the scenes that none of us know or truly understand (myself included) – for one trade that isn’t popular. “He made a bad trade, he’s got to be the worst GM ever – let’s get rid of him and find someone better.” (Note – I’m not pointing this at you samiam. You seem to be taking this in the right mindset. There’s a large faction, however, who is once again going to the extremes.) Except for the fact that good GM’s aren’t just sitting around, waiting for a phone call to be promoted. Sometimes you get lucky, sometimes you don’t; sometimes you make a steal, sometimes you look like a dolt.

It happens to all GMs in all sports – Gillick put the pieces together to take the Phillies to the promised land. But it was only a few days ago when the Phillies released Adam Eaton – one of the most useless signings ever. I’m kinda glad we didn’t axe Gillick after that signing, and I’m willing to bet there are a few other Phillies fans who’d agree.

So let’s take what we have and see how it works. Holmgren is still feeling out the whole process a bit – he’s still new to the world of being a GM, and the salary cap is still a fairly new beast to be dealing with. Other teams have had to deal with it already, so Homer isn’t in uncharted waters.

Now let’s put down the pitchforks and torches. (NO! NO! EXTINGUISH THE TORCHES BEFORE PUTTING THEM DOWN!!!) One deal does not a bad GM make. If a trend starts up, then perhaps I’ll be okay with the torches being relit. But for now, we’re still a contender for the Cup – something largely due to Homer’s previous positive moves.

by IcersGuy on Mar 5, 2009 9:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Upshall is an RFA!

A lot of you seem to think that the Coyotes will get Upshall and a measly draft pick. That’s not quite the case. We also have to remember that if Upshall gets a raise, they will be compensated accordingly should they chose not to match another team’s offer sheet. And with Kevin Lowe as a GM, he’s shown us that anything can happen.

Secondly, while I hate to see Upshall go, I also see no need mourning the lost potential. Upshall is 25, and I can’t imagine him jumping leaps and bounds developmentally at this age. He still has some upside, certainly, and maybe he’ll do better with increased ice time in Phoenix like Patrick Sharp did in Chicago. This is something you can’t immediately judge. Well, you could judge it, but unless you can see into the future, it’s not going to be an accurate assessment.

What I would have liked to have seen was Holmer keep Upshall the whole season— and get a pick in return if a high offer sheet came in. Then we wouldn’t have lost him for anything if we let him go. I’d also like to see the Flyers stop pissing draft picks away, since the cap will continue to come down and they’ll no longer be able to afford bringing players in. The new NHL is a league that rewards organizations that draft and thoroughly develop their own players. It’s not the “go out and sign any marquee name penalty free” league that it used to be. And for that I’m grateful.

Another thing that will soon no longer exist: pure pugilists. I’m definitely an advocate of fighting, but I’ll be happy when players that score 5-10 points while racking up 250+ PIMs are out of this league. Come on, we all love guys that can score and fight. Lucic, to me, is one of the more exciting younger players in this league, and he’s had to work hard to get where he’s at. That the Flyers added another fighter didn’t please me off the bat, but take away the PIMs and on the score sheet, he and Upshall are similar players. Upshall has a load of speed but doesn’t have the skill to constantly convert. And while his speed creates opportunities, his lack of polish doesn’t allow him to consistently capitalize on them.

We’ll just have to see how this one plays out. As Billy Clement said when he heard about the deal: “I think there’s more to this.” Did anyone else notice how instantly annoyed he seemed? Because I pretty much had the same reaction.

by S R on Mar 5, 2009 10:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Upshall was out the door next year anyway, so we got something for him… Don’t be so quick to category Carcillo as a fourth liner, yes that was his roll this year in phoenix… but the year before he played a different role on the second and third line and scored decent numbers… maybe his upside is his ability to bang up the middle and pot goals… let’s wait and see if this move works. I don’t think Upshall was as consistent as his skill and ability show, granted he was held back with ice time…

by fitzy first on Mar 5, 2009 12:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I disagree. I thought he was incredibly consistent. Given the turmoil and rotation on the 3rd and 4th lines, he was probably the most consistent thing the Flyers had on the 3rd line.

Also, last year he put up 30 points on the 3rd line whereas Carcillo put up 24 while getting 2nd line time? If Carcillo had so much potential why did they move him back into the goon role?

So what if Upshall was an RFA and so what if he didn’t resign. The only thing that matters is what can be done this year. If you’re out of it, then you do what you need to. If you’re in 4th place in the conference what you’re looking to do is win the Cup.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 5, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think people are mourning Upshall’s lost potential. Upshall was already producing for the Flyers. What was exciting was the possibility of taking two lines that were already working well without Briere, and being able to bring back Briere and add a 3rd line that could actually add to the offense. I don’t see that happening without a player who brings something to the line like Upshall did.

The other reason I think it’s a huge mistake is that using that combination afforded Stevens a way of letting Briere play himself back into NHL shape without having to insert him and disrupt the top 6.

Lately the power play has really struggled so hopefully Briere will be able to come in and help get that back on track, but Stevens is going to have to mix him into the rotation somehow. It looks like it will probably be in the Carter rotation, which is also a problem because Stevens wants to go with the Richards line first.

Bill Clement is a pretty savvy analyst, who also played with the Clark/Holmgren era Flyers. When you see him in an unguarded moment going - WTF? Ok… there’s gotta be something more here, and then we find out -- nope that’s all folks. That should tell you everything you need to know about this Trade, as Clement sees all the NHL players via his ESPN gig, so you know that Carcillo isn’t someone that Clement expects to surprise people with his hockey skills.

by Gizmoitus on Mar 5, 2009 12:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Shot ourselves in the foot . . . ?

Honestly the only thing that bugs me is that we can no longer run 3 dangerous lines. This is a different NHL. You can get away with not having a true “fighter/enforcer” let alone 3! This degrades the Briere/Giroux line. We do not need Carcillo to “protect” them or anyone else and imagine putting Carcillo, Cote and Asham on line together! It will look like the Bash Brother from the Mighty Ducks! You might as well just put one of them in the box automatically.
I think the worst part is the fact that the Flyers, at the end of the day, did not get another legitimate defenseman. Maybe Mclaren will be but you’d think the Flyers would have learned their lesson with big, slow defensemen in Hatcher and Rathje (who, by the way, are still sitting on the IR collecting money and hurting our cap).
The Flyers biggest weakness is definitely their defense. Say what you will about the goal tending but you can afford to have two decent goalies if you have a good defense. Their defense is okay but they give up to many shots, are forever positioned poorly. If they had a better team defensive system they would be the most well rounded team in the NHL. A veteran defender who actually plays stay-at-home, safe defense would have been a huge addition for their defensive corp. I am sick of this “quick, puck moving” defensemen crap. Defense wins Championship!

This is hockey, and toughness is an important part of the game. However, the kind of toughness that flourishes in this league is much different and has evolved from what it used to be. You can’t go around beating teams up anymore. (For example, we all miss the Flyers/Senators brawl that set NHL PIM records.) The rules have changed that and the toughness that works in this league is epitomized in guys like Mike Richards, Jerome Iginla and Alex Ovechkin.

I will give the trade a chance but I am not optimistic and will be questioning Homer’s direction for this team from now.

by flyrsfrk05 on Mar 5, 2009 12:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Actually, Flyrsfrk05, Hatcher and Rathje don’t count against the cap because they are on LTIR. However, I definitely agree with you. My first response to the McLaren deal is: “I didn’t even know he was still playing!”

We have to take the trade for what it’s worth, giving up nothing to get nothing. He’s an emergency Dman at best and he comes off the books after this season. What I don’t get is why give up Vaananen for nothing and then trade to get McLaren?

by S R on Mar 5, 2009 1:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.
Start posting about the Flyers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Assholeheart_small
Calling Time Out.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Changing the points system
Flyerhomer_small
Tired & Confused
Watchmenfacebutton_small
Fantasy Hockey Shout Out
Flyers_small
Bitter Bitter Bitter.
Yaiso_small
Problem solving, angry blogger style.
Flyerhomer_small
Lines
Small
I was right and wrong.
Joe-carter-1993-world-series_small
Dan Carcillo on TSN's 'Off the Record'
Photo_3_small
Playing GM part III: Deadline Acquistion

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 58 36 20 2 74
Pittsburgh 59 35 22 2 72
Philadelphia 57 29 25 3 61
New York Rangers 59 26 26 7 59
New York Islanders 58 23 27 8 54

(updated 2.9.2010 at 12:41 AM EST)

29 - 25 - 3

Won 1


Managing Editor

Travis_headshot_2_small Travis Hughes

Staff Writers

Think_sc_cropped_small Geoff Detweiler

Me_minus_kbond_small Ben Rothenberg

Adirondack Correspondent

Small Dan Morency