Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Inconsistency defined: Flyers lose, fail to gain ground

[AP Recap] - [Boxscore] - [Extended Stats] - [Highlights]

There has been one glaring problem with the Philadelphia Flyers all season long: inconsistency. Everybody has been guilty of it: the goalies, the offense, the defense, the power play, the penalty kill, the coaches -- everybody. And if you want to win in the playoffs, above all else, you need to play consistent hockey.

Tonight in Toronto, the Flyers showed that they are still unable to do so. For two periods, they were absolutely terrible. They came out with no fire, no determination, and no heart. They played like you would've expected the Maple Leafs to play, like a team going through the motions in the stretch run of a lost season. The Leafs, on the other hand, played like a team with something to actually play for, something to look ahead to, and something to prove.

Philadelphia decided to get things going a bit in the third period, but while they were dicking around during the first forty minutes of the game, their goalie was pulled and they were being outworked by a team that is much, much worse than they are. It wasn't really Biron's fault, either. The goals he gave up were certainly weak, don't get me wrong, but there is no way to pin this loss on one guy. Every single player on the ice was at fault tonight. Throw the coaching staff in that fire too.

This team was simply not ready to play tonight, and that blame falls on everybody. There's never an excuse for that, although in a situation like Sunday against Boston, where you're not rested and you've just played 15 games in 29 days, some leeway can be given (not that the Flyers weren't prepared on Sunday, I'm just making a point). But tonight, when you're well rested and you're playing in arguably the hockey capital of the world, not being prepared is completely, 120 percent unacceptable.

We can sit here and break this loss down -- why it happened from a hockey standpoint: the power play didn't click, the goalie gave up terrible goals, etc -- but it's really part of a bigger problem. The Flyers are a better team than they played tonight. The real Flyers are the ones that are in fourth place in the Eastern Conference, the team that beat New Jersey last week and the team that played in the final five or ten minutes tonight.

But for some reason, the Flyers feel like they can get away with playing just those ten minutes. Or twenty, or anything that's not a full 60. Games like Saturday night on Long Island, where the Flyers battled back from a three-goal deficit to take the lead and eventually win in a shootout, or games like a 6-5 win over Carolina on December 11, where the Flyers scored four in the third to tie it before winning in a shootout, don't help.

Sure, they're plenty fun while they are happening. The roller coaster is always fun when you don't throw up afterwards. But in the long run, those sorts of games are damaging to a team. It puts the thought out there that they can just flip a switch and turn on the jets and still win, and it doesn't matter how late that switch is flipped.

Of course it's nice to have a team as talented as this one, so that when you're in the game, you can be down two goals with five minutes to play and still feel like they have a legitimate chance to win the hockey game. And tonight, they probably should've at least tied the game in the final period. Claude Giroux was alone in front of goalie Curtis Joseph and he flipped it over the net while on a shorthanded three-on-one. Jeff Carter was robbed by Joseph in the waning seconds. But it shouldn't take a mad dash at the finish to win. The inconsistency has got to stop.

Is this all a little harsh? I don't think so, and when you look at the scores from the Eastern Conference tonight, it's hard to argue against that. Pittsburgh absolutely manhandled the Devils tonight by a score of 6-1 [Pensburgh, In Lou We Trust], which means that a Flyers win would've put them just four points behind New Jersey with a game in hand. A Philadelphia win would've also made Pittsburgh's win moot from our standpoint. But instead, the Penguins are now tied with the orange and black in points, and they still sit six points back of the Atlantic lead.

Better win that game in hand, boys.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Broad Street Hockey

Gameday: Oh Canada

Apr 2009 by Travis Hughes - 62 comments

Comments

Display:

Goalie

I am mainly a sixer fan but ofcourse love watching the Flyers. As I watch the goalies, I believe Nitty is the better of the 2 overall. I expect and often see Biron giving up atleast 1 “dumb, easy” goal every game. That is not a sign of a dependable goalie. I am not saying Nitty is better than Biron (don’t know enough) but he is definitely a more consistent goalie. Last night, the 2nd and 3rd goals were an example of it. Biron maybe able to do more awesome saves but I believe Nitty would be more consistent and more than likely win more games than Biron for us this year. Just a thought from an “outsider” that likes watching the Flyers.

by DeanH on Apr 2, 2009 10:26 AM EDT reply actions  

both flyer goalies have faults

nitty only took 10 shots last night while toronto was playing a defensive minded game…

my biggest complaint and this falls inline with what the commentators were harping on last night… marty and nitty let go rebounds consistently- juicy rebounds to boot… our goalies should get assists for the other team on some of the shots they direct…

anyway, flyers need to take care of the goalie situation soon or we will have a short playoff run…

by fitzy first on Apr 2, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Next year...

The Flyers as an organization are moving in the right direction, but this inconsistency is the main reason why they won’t get very far in the postseason – assuming they wake up in time to make it. If they get to the second round of the playoffs I’ll be surprised.

The thing that drove me the most crazy last night was the collective standing around. Literally. There were plenty of times where the Leafs put on pressure, and the Flyers just stood there like they never played a game in their lives. I don’t know what the hell that was about, but it was horrible. I know it’s a young team (relatively speaking) but they should know better. Can you imagine if that game were played at home, and the Flyers came out that way?

Goaltending needs addressed in the offseason; defense needs to be shored up; and good role players need to fill out the roster. Aside from that, Stevens needs to come up with more ways for his team to move the puck. Everyone has figured out by now that the Flyers clear along the walls in the defensive zone, so opponents always stick two guys on the wall. Hence all the failed clears, scoring chances, and goals against.

Apparently the players were having a meeting today to hash out some of this stuff. They better get things sorted out, and quickly at that. Otherwise, they’ll be booking tee times on April 13.

by mikefive on Apr 2, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

I think this is an overreaction

A) our defense has been solid-to-great all year, B) we have tons of ways to move the puck and score (we’ll have like 5 30 goal scorers by the end of the year), C) our role players, as in what? What roles do you mean? Each player has a role on the ice (Hartnell, for example, crashes boards and wins pucks, and scores in front of the net. That’s his role, and his stats are evidence that he excels at it). Sure, we drop a dumb one every so often (our average age is ~26 years old, after all), but all in all this is a very good, very balanced team. I’d love a dominant goalie (who wouldn’t?) but as Brodeur and NJ have shown recently, even having the best goalie in the world doesn’t mean an otherwise also-incredible team won’t go through bad stretches once in a while.

Better now than in the playoffs.

by Alon on Apr 2, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Allow me to clarify.

I may be overreacting a little bit, but I’m a jaded Philadelphia fan. (The recent successes of the Phillies and Wildcats give me hope for the other teams as well, but I’ll believe it when I see it.) But to answer your questions, I’ll use your letters as reference points.

A) Our defense is decent, but it gives up too many shots against. Plus, it would be nice if they could get another proven guy back there like a Komisarek or a Bouwmeester. Aside from the shots against, my main concern with the D is when Timonen is not in the lineup. They are a much different group when he’s there than when he’s not. Heaven forbid they keep this group, and Timonen suffers a severe injury. You’d like to think that guys such as Coburn, Carle, and Parent will continue to improve, but if they can get another big name back there to really solidify things they’d be a very tough team to beat on most nights.

B) I was unclear here… I was specifically referring to when we attempt to clear our own zone. Our default pathway out is along the walls – both when we’re skating, trying to clear the puck, or trying to ice it on a penalty kill. Other teams have figured this out and are outnumbering us there. We need to have several ways of moving up the middle of the ice as well.

C) I was again unclear here. I was referring to 3rd and 4th line guys for the most part. It’s likely that guys like Knuble and other UFA’s will be gone, and we’ll promote players like Giroux to higher lines. This will leave some gaps in the lower two lines. This is not a major concern – the Flyers have always done well with bringing in lunch-pail guys who work hard and bring energy. (Last game I went to I saw a guy in a Kent Manderville jersey… when I say “role players” I mean guys like him.)

D) I know that not every team can have a Brodeur or Kiprusoff, but we have to try to improve somehow back there. I like both guys, but I’m not sure that either of them can take us to the promised land. Holmgren probably isn’t sure either, hence his signing of Backlund.

With the exception of the 2006-07 season, I’ve always had the utmost faith in the Flyers organization’s desire to compete and succeed year in and year out. It will be an interesting offseason, but I hope it’s not here for a while yet.

by mikefive on Apr 3, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Flyers-orange-crush_small
NHL Draft 2012: Options on defense in the first round

Recent FanPosts

Patal_small
Andrew Johnston Scouting Report: A first-hand look at the Flyers newest prospect
Small
What being a Hockey fan means to me.
Small
Could Parise and Weber be in Flyers' future?
Mick_jagr_2_small
SB Nation app
Small
Hockey Stick Help
Copy_of_137494800_slide_small
The 2011-12 Philadelphia Flyers season in GIFs
37938_10150235117290484_539355483_13709206_6888144_n_small
Ilya Bryzgalov has chance to take shot at Flyers fans, does
Small
Can the Flyers win the Cup with Bryz?
Carcillo_small
Flyers in the Off-Season

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Screen_shot_2012-01-09_at_12 Travis Hughes

Associate Editors

67865_878600804923_14200876_46395212_2220_n_small Geoff Detweiler

Headshot2_film_grain_small Ben Rothenberg

Soccer_face_small Eric T.

Contributors

163830_478172269164_824914164_5517468_4313370_n_small ToddtheFox

Clarke-tee_small KreiderDesigns

D150_small Teemu H