Danny Briere, Scott Hartnell, & Simon Gagne on the trading block?
From The Fourth Period...
It's believed the Flyers have been shopping the likes of Danny Briere, Scott Hartnell and Simon Gagne for some time. Forward Joffrey Lupul was also on the block, but he was packaged in the deal for Pronger.
...and from The Ottawa Sun...
If the Canadiens can't swing a deal for Tampa C Vincent Lecavalier, Flyers C Daniel Briere could be the prize behind door No. 2. While Flyers GM Paul Holmgren didn't get any bites as he shopped around his high-priced centre at the draft, it doesn't mean he struck out. Habs GM Bob Gainey could turn his attention to landing Briere, if his bid for Lecavalier fails. Sources say the Flyers would also like to trade W Simon Gagne. It's been reported before that the Canadiens have already passed on Briere once this offseason. But I don't think it's a surprise if Holmgren is still shopping him and his ludicrious contract. Offering up Gagne on the trading block, however, is a big concern. Gagne's excellent comeback from a concussion last season was, very quietly, one of the best stories of the year in the NHL, and taking his production out of the lineup could be a severe mistake. As for Hartnell, his chemistry with Jeff Carter was a major contribution to Jeff's 46 goal season last year. That shouldn't be overlooked.
0 recs |
50 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
I would trade Briere in a heartbeat. this sounds crazy, but San Jose is on the verge of blowing up it’s team. see if they’d be interested in a Briere for Marleau swap. otherwise, I’d like to see the Flyers trade Briere for help on the wings.
the upside of trading Hartnell is about 1234573482949 less penalty minutes, but I think his impact on the team in terms of chemistry and doing the dirty work is almost impossible to replace.
I would love to see the Flyers trade Briere. for someone who eats up a significant portion of our cap space Briere only plays on one end of the ice. I do not want to see them trade Hartnell or Gagne unless we get equal or greater value.
by njh3293 on Jun 29, 2009 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the upside of trading Hartnell is about 1234573482949 less penalty minutes
This made me laugh. Thanks njh.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
by mikefive on Jun 29, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Briere for Marleau made me laugh.
by Fehr and Balanced on Jun 30, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wtf
the article said they want to trade danny, gagne or hartnell to resign knuble and add additional benchers… not wise at all. let knuble go, anyone can camp out in the crease and score goals, but someone has to set em up…
by fitzy first on Jun 29, 2009 3:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hartnell
There’s no way the Flyers would get back everything that Hartnell brings to the team. The only reason that he’d be traded is because of his contract…. but at least he earns the money he makes. Id trade Briere for a bag of pucks before I’d trade Hartnell… he’s the kind of guy that gives the Flyers an identity.
The cap is obviously important, but its not the ONLY thing. You know, they could trade Richards too…. he has a pretty big contract? eye roll
Cheers,
Matt
www.viewfrommyseats.com
by Cheap Seats on Jun 29, 2009 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Briere being traded I could handle. Gange and Hartnell would just be depressing.
by michellemtsu on Jun 29, 2009 3:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Briere's my favorite player, of course I'm going to be biased..
Trading him away is an absolute mistake, in my eyes. While he’s one of the most injury prone players to ever lace up skates, when he’s on the ice, his level of effectiveness is so far above most of the players on this team.
Look at his stats in the few number of games that he played this season. To say he’s ineffective is absurd. Yes, he makes a TON of money and it’s not worth the numbers he’s producing, but how many times has he had a chance to showcase? He’s been hurt so much. If they can re work his contract somehow, I’d be all for keeping him, obviously. I don’t want to see him leave.
If you trade Hartnell, you piss off Carter and ruin SO much more chemistry that’s already been ruined when trading away Lupul and Upshall. Not that Lupul did much, but still. They’re a clique and it shows on the ice.
Why Gagne is even in the equation frightens me. I’ll be terrified for the Flyers future if any of these deals fall into place.
Let's go Flyers!
by OrangeAndBlackk on Jun 29, 2009 3:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You can’t rework deals in the NHL. Contracts are final. Briere is tied to that anchor for the next 35 years.
by Fehr and Balanced on Jun 30, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point I don’t think I am interested in trading any of these guys – especially not Gagne. Yes, yes, Briere is overpaid and hurting our cap space but one of the Flyers biggest advantages last season was depth. I am fairly certain that, if Briere had not been hurt ALL last season, that he would have had decent numbers. Briere is a good player and if put on a line with Giroux will explode in offensive numbers. Now, if Montreal is willing to give up Carey Price and someone, I wouldn’t be too upset. I just don’t want the Flyers to trade Briere just because of his salary. He is here, let him prove himself and give him a chance to be the Danny Briere we all know is in there.
As for Gagne and Hartnell . . . Gagne, no way they should trade him. Considering his incredible comeback and the two way player that he is, the Flyers need him. Plus, he is the longest tenured Flyers on the team. Hartnell, I don’t want to see him gone because of the grit he plays with. He has great chemistry with Jeff Carter, works hard and has a chip on his shoulder. I like that. What he brings to the team more them outweighs his PIM. Dependng on what they could get for Harts, I wouldn’t be comepletly opposed.
What I do not like about the idea of trading players is that by switching players in and out and bringing new ones in the team begins to lose the cohesiveness they have been building over the last two seasons. Chemistry takes time to build. Why take away from that just because of the salary cap and PIM? Ahhh, stop Homer!
by flyrsfrk05 on Jun 29, 2009 3:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Truer words have never been spoken.
I agree 100% with every point you’ve just made.
Let's go Flyers!
by OrangeAndBlackk on Jun 29, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lets face it
all 3 of those guys are more valuable then knuble
by fitzy first on Jun 29, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What would we want from the Habs sans Price? Or do they really want to dump Briere’s contract that bad?
Our only current needs are a backup goalie (should be cheap), a 4th line center (also cheap), to resign or replace Knuble, and to replace Lupul. Then if we make a move we need to replace whoever we deal.
We have Giroux who can move up to either of the top lines if we want.
Not sure how much money we need to clear, but dumping a really good player sounds excessive, to do so just for the sake of clearing space. If we got something back, especially Price, that’s a different story.
Speaking of replacing wings, are we still interested in Clowe?
by FredEx on Jun 29, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think the possibility of clowe would involve moving one of those three guys, which is a no go after we acquired pronger… sj wanted claude or hartzy, right?
by fitzy first on Jun 29, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I think so.
How much more money do we need to clear to make room for Knuble, a goalie, and ‘additional assests’? It says we have close to 5 mil? Can we give Jones away?
And every time I give up on the possibility on the Flyers getting Price, something like this pops up again. I’d love to trade Briere for him. Solve the short term and maybe long term goalie issue, and clear cap.
by FredEx on Jun 29, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont see it happening...
price wont be moved, especially after we acquired emery. no one wants briere’s contract… jones and carle make up the 3rd pair of d guys… who takes jones’ place? resign alberts and dump jones or carle? we still need a 7th guy. i dont think there will be a need for knuble, hartnell takes his roll which adds a little grit as well. stick briere on a wing and sign a defensive center that wins face-offs… and like everyone has been saying, we can get a good deal on a back-up goalie since its a signers market with tons of options…
by fitzy first on Jun 30, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand Price probably won’t be moved, and we no longer need a starting a goalie, by in the fantasy rumor mill realm where the Habs are interested in Briere, we’d be crazy not to take that deal. Get a young blue chip prospect in net, and clear salary to the tune of 4.3 mil. I don’t think its at all likely, but every time I completely give up, more (unsubstantiated) rumors with the Habs come up.
As for Jones, I was in clear cap mind set, and didn’t really think it totally through. The contract would be nice to get rid off, but we would probably then need two more defensemen. Possibly if Syrvett was ready, him and a resigned Alberts could be the 6 and 7 guys.
If we don’t trade anyone else, I can definitely understand Knuble being expendable. If Giroux and Briere both move up to be 1st and 2nd line wingers, the top two lines are set. I’m fine with Carcillo and Powe as 3rd line wingers. We do need sign that defensive 3rd line center that can win draws then. Then on the 4th we could use Ross, Asham, and Cote, although I’d rather not have Cote. Then obviously we do need that 2nd goalie, and if the reports on the market are true, we should be getting a good deal.
by FredEx on Jun 30, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no more splashes.
no more trades, let briere come back, he puts up stats when hes healthy, i dont touch the roster and I add a defensemen in alberts, and try to sign a faceoff guy, otherwise leave the roster till we play 20 games in.
by kolparty on Jun 30, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Canada
Trade Rumors from the Canadian Press about French Canadian players going to the motherland of Montreal our almost completely unfounded. They only wish they could get their frog eating hands on our Frenchies.
by chrislanci on Jun 29, 2009 5:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree to an extent… but TFP is a solid site and they don’t report just any rumor. And Garrioch is from the Ottawa Sun. He’s a tool but he he has no French Canadian bias.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 29, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree his reports are probably legitimate but his source is most likely Montreal and therefore completely biased. Also what the hell are we going to do with all that new found cap space and a complete lack of scoring forwards. I said it before and I will say it again the Stanley Cup does NOT go the team with the most cap space and the best pool of prospects. Unless we are trying to beat the Eagles in the cap some kind of cap management of year voting I don’t see why you trade away good players for cash if nobody is available to sign with said money.
by chrislanci on Jun 29, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looking in the wrong direction
None of these guys are the issue. The flyers are approximately $5mil under cap and need a pair of right wingers and a backup goalie. Trade away Randy “I’m borderline useless” Jones, hell give him away to clear cap space. With Jones gone that brings us to approx $7.75mil to spend. Knuble made $2.8mil last year, Nitty made $1.5mil. Both are worth those dollars. If they’ll re-sign for those amounts I wouldn’t waste time anywhere else. That’s $4.3mil gone from the $7.75 leaving approx $3.45 mil to wrap up 1 or 2 young defense men and pay either Nodl or Van Riemsdyk to fill the vacant RW spot. Done.
Any decent young defense man is going to be able to learn a hell of a lot from both Pronger and Timonen.
But if one of these guys did absolutely have to go I’d say Briere just because we’re deep at center. But there is no way I’d trade him for Price. Personally I think Emry is a better goalie. A bit unstable, but better. And there is no need to go through what the Flyers always go through and that’s the “Who’s going to be the starting goalie tonight?” debacle.
by fractionofawhole on Jun 29, 2009 5:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Please not Gagne, I just got that jersey…
by Ben Rothenberg on Jun 29, 2009 5:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not to one up you, but I got a Gagne jersey his rookie year (99-00). It was for my 14th birthday. I’ve always been ecstatic that he is under-appreciated, since I hate having the star-player/most popular player on my back.
Broad Street Hockey -
Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 29, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a signed old black Gagne jersey. But yeah, I totally agree… it’s nice having the slightly underappreciated players on your back. I guess that’s why I want a Timonen jersey.
Of course, I have a Richards in orange and if we wear old school whites in the Winter Classic, I’ll get a Pronger one.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 29, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I caved and got a white Rbk Richards. Definitely worth it.
I’d love to get a Parent jersey and an old school white one, not necessarily a Parent old school white.
Broad Street Hockey -
Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 29, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
parent is my next jersey.
i got a carter orange jersey last year, and have 2 gagne ones(from the early 2000’s), a tocchet siged by schultz, and a leclair signed by him. but only one gagne and the carter fit me.
by JpH89 on Jun 29, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i also want to point out that i was so close to getting a sbisa for the deadline deal last year, now glad i didnt
by JpH89 on Jun 29, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
heatley isnt a free agent on july 1st, he’s signed for 3 more years
by JpH89 on Jun 29, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Flyers would be stupid to trade away Gagne. He’s only 29, has recovered wonderfully from his injuries, and although it may sound a bit strange I think he may be the player who has kept this team together. Although we don’t know what he says in the locker room in between periods, he seems like a quiet guy who goes on the ice, does his job (and does it well at that), gets off the ice, leaves and prepares for the next game. Talk about a good role model. In 2006-07, despite everything having fallen apart around him, he still scored 41 goals and had 27 assists. He’s going into his tenth season with us and he’s still as consistent as ever. No matter the situation (Eric Lindros, 2004 playoff run, worst season in franchise history, significant injuries), Gagne’s been the constant and it’s clear that he does his best every single day and he doesn’t have an attitude or ego. A model player whose ethic I’m sure has influenced the development of some of our younger players. I want him to finish off his career in Philadelphia, and I’m sure he does too (especially given the size of his house and what he’s built into it).
I agree with the conclusion that Hartnell’s personality and chemistry would be too much to give up unless we’re getting back a can’t-pass package, and that trading Jones for something like a few later-round draft picks next year would make me and everyone who’s complaining that we mortgaged too much of the future happy.
by Ben Feldman on Jun 29, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There have been a lot of Jones comments...
And while I am well known for despising Randy Jones, losing Sbisa has caused me some concern. It is unlikely Alberts is resigned, leaving our 7th defenseman to be Danny Syvret. While Syvret can be a capable bottom half D-man, what would happen if any of our top 6 goes down to injury? We’re again close to the cap with no depth. At least Jones can step up and play.
Broad Street Hockey -
Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 29, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
okay
but how do you leave a $3m player scratched? is there really no other 7th d-man that could be cheaper? why can’t we dump jones, resign Alberts with a 50% raise (still would be cheaper than Jones!!! with the ridiculous 50% raise!!! he wouldn’t need a tenth of that) and spend the extra $$ elsewhere or even on a better 8th defensemen if depth is the concern? You could get 2 equivalents to Randy Jones for the price of 1 Randy Jones.
by Alon on Jul 1, 2009 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I wasn’t suggesting scratch Randy Jones. I’d love if you could trade him and sign Alberts, but my point is that if you trade Jones, you have to add somebody. My “7th defenseman” comment was speaking about currently. Without Jones, Syvret becomes our 6th defenseman leaving noone even capable of playing in the NHL behind him.
I would love to lose Jones’ salary, but when you do that, you absolutely need to add a capable D-man. Preferably, Dennis Seidenberg.
Broad Street Hockey -
Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 1, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hartnell
He shouldn’t be on the trade block nor should gagne at this point Briere yeah because he has the most money and is older then both of them gagne makes up by playing defense when he can’t score hartnell is truley what his name is the hart the only thing he needs to work on is his discpline and work on getting faster gagne might be a good player to trade next year not this year
by tjflys10 on Jun 29, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Briere
I like the speed Briere brought to the table a couple years ago, but his contract is going to come back to bite the team very quickly, if they don’t make this thing work next year. The Pronger deal was a good deal, expensive but good. They need to free up some cap space to give the team options. Danny has to be the first place they look. It’s only logical.
Hartnell needs to stay. He just needs to use his head. He’s a tough, gritty player, but he can score goals too. He stays out of the box and he’s a good player.
They can’t dump Gagne. Too good of a player. Unless you’re going to get someone like Heatley in return, that’s not a wise move (and it wouldn’t be anyway since Heatley will be a free agent come Wednesday).
by flyerboom_6 on Jun 29, 2009 8:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If any of these trades go down for lousy returns...
… I will personally grab Homer by the lapels and say this.
Actually I won’t, but I’ll sure feel like doing it.
What good could possibly come out of any of these trades? If we get rid of one more of our scorers for someone who plays a different role, we are not going to be the deep offensive team that we were over the past two years.
Look at the potential top two lines:
Gagne – Richards – Giroux
Hartnell – Carter – Briere
So any one of three more scorers could be gone for good, without a suitable replacement. I’m not even going to get started on Gagne and Hartnell. I identify those two with the Flyers, and I want to see them both raise the Cup here. Plus, guys like that are not easily replaceable – both offensively and character-wise. Gagne has obviously been with us through thick and thin, and let’s not forget that Hartnell was the team’s mouthpiece during our 2008 run to the ECF.
Trading Briere would only be good from a monetary perspective. Since the cap is likely going down next year, his contract will be even more of an albatross than it already is. Still, if you ditch him for Price and a 4th-line center, neither of them will make up for the lack of Briere’s point-per-game production (when healthy).
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
by mikefive on Jun 29, 2009 8:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I doubt the cap goes down next year
The worst of the economic crash is over, and the cap went up in spite of it. I don’t think we’ll see the $5m gains from the first couple post-lockout years, but I think a cap increase of $1-2m will be reasonable, particularly given the extensive profits associated with TV ratings during Olympic years & post-record-setting-playoffs. Hockey is getting more popular & watched, and that will be reflected once again by another salary cap increase.
by Alon on Jul 1, 2009 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Briere being traded I could handle. Gange and Hartnell would just be depressing.
This. If we were to trade Gagne I would have to go to a depression clinic but if we were to trade Briere I would be estatic. Also if Homer wants to win now you don’t trade Gagne!
fightlockdown.com
by The Legend on Jun 29, 2009 10:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t understand how there is even the tiniest possibility of Gagne being traded…. I mean, I like Briere when he’s healthy, but Giroux is going to be almost exactly the same player in the near future. But Gagne would be an incredible waste… 1) His contract is reasonable, we would be paying someone more to replace his numbers and experience. 2) He proved he’s healthy, so I think he has several great years of production left in him. 3) Not only is he the longest tenured Flyer, but he’s the most likely “mentor” figure on the offense. Richards may be the C, but he’s not really older than a lot of the young guys for them to look at him that way, he’s too close in age to “peer”, so he falls in the middle of the two roles. Briere may help, but I think Gagne is the driving force on that front. (sorry that I’ve said that on a different post and repeated myself) 4) If we remember the horrible hit to the team chemistry when Upshall was removed, I expect that to be magnified incredibly if Gagne goes, and that would be a very bad thing. 5) On a selfish personal note, I too, will be in a depression clinic if he’s traded.
I’m scared to death about this however, because I’ve been dreading this as a possible doomsday scenario…. there’s a fanpost on here about how we need veterans (even though there is discord over how many to get); why are we dangling the few good ones we have?!?!?!
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 29, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but Giroux is going to be almost exactly the same player in the near future
dont insult Giroux like that. Giroux plays both ways and isnt afraid of the corners.
by njh3293 on Jun 30, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No offense meant on Giroux in my wording, my intention was to say that Giroux will be able to do everything Danny can do (and quite possibly more, as you rightfully point out), and that we wouldn’t be losing that skill-set in the long run because Giroux can/will match or exceed his playmaking ability.
If Briere is healthy and can stay that way, we’re not going to get much value back in a trade for him now no matter what, and it would be nice to see him earn his $8M actual salary this year if he’s going to stay. He needs a very long time to develop chemistry with linemates (which does not seem to be a problem for Giroux), so for Briere to be effective he needs to stay healthy for a long enough stretch to do that, and we haven’t had the opportunity to see that from him. I know he had this great potential when Homer brought him here, but it’s hard for me to rationalize paying someone 8 million dollars to center our third line. Believe me, I would love for him to have a breakout season and be an asset, I’m just saying it needs to happen and it needs to happen now (at least if it’s going to happen for us).
(Interesting note though that Danny Briere is in the top 8 players selected for the buyout calculator on www.capgeek.com, I guess a lot of people are wondering what it would cost us and wanting to see the numbers for themselves.)
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 30, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s the thing, though: Trading Briere now will most likely not net you a good return. He’s coming off a down season, filled with injuries and has an enormous contract. Could his value be any lower? I’d rather start the season with him, give him time to show how good he can be, and then trade him at the deadline if something good becomes available. You sell now; you’re selling low. Plus, look at the guy’s postseason stats. Aside from this season (because he was injured), his postseason numbers are insane. If the whole point is to win the Cup—and I think we can all agree that it is—we want veteran guys who can produce under the brightest lights.
I really feel trading any of these players would be a mistake. Hartnell is invaluable to Carter (and even Briere when he played on his line, I remember it was pretty effective) in that he plays the boards and does all the dirty work. He also scores quite a few goals himself. Gagne is a 2-way player. They don’t just grow on trees. Unless the Flyers know something about Simon that we don’t know, I really question moving him. Do they feel his value won’t get any higher than it was this last season? He’s been one of the most consistent players on this team for several seasons, save his injury-plagued one.
Salary dumps never work out.yield good returns. We Phillies fans know this all too well.
by doubleh on Jun 30, 2009 12:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade
Get rid of Briere
Hartnell is all to valuable for Carter’s line………………….
AND NEVER NEVER TRADE GAGNE……………the team will miss him for years to come…………
Here’s a thought get rid of STEVENS…………………………..
I thought you were suppose to better the team, NOT DESTROY IT………………………..Mr. Snider…………………..
GET RID OF COTE…………………………………..
by geegirl on Jun 30, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
After re-reading the story on TFP
I don’t think they have any sources naming Hartnell or Gagne on the trading block other than Lupul’s quote. In the post, there are no quotes other than that one, and nowhere do they say “sources”. Only the Ottawa Sun throws in “sources” and “Gagne” in a single sentence. Here’s Lupul’s quote:
I figured something was going to happen with one of our forwards [during the draft], whether myself, Briere, Gagne or Hartnell.
Basically, I think this was just lazy rumor reporting and there is no need to worry about the Flyers actively shopping Hartnell or Gagne. But, that’s what I took out of the story.
Broad Street Hockey -
Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 30, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I want to believe you, Geoff...
But it’s more likely that someone will “take Gagne off our hands” for 5.25M than take Danny off our hands… He’s only 6.5M against cap but they gotta pay him 8M even if he gets hurt. That’s 8 is a really hard pill to swallow for another team. Never mind the fact that the world would be a fairer place if they exchanged paychecks from last year…
(And fairer still if Holmgren learned how to not overpay people… It’s almost like Gags’ contract is only reasonable because Clarke made it before he left, and OMG is that a scary thought.)
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 30, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I completely agree Gagne is more attractive than Briere. I’m simply saying that I don’t believe TFP’s report at all. I still find it odd that TFP names all of and only those players that Lupul named in his quote. Now, the Ottawa Sun might have something, but one newspaper printing “sources say” doesn’t convince me.
Broad Street Hockey -
Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 30, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stuck with Briere still....
Rangers beat us to the deal…. sent Gomez to the Canadiens
by Ant on Jun 30, 2009 5:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How the hell did the Rangers pull that off? A worse player and contract than Briere and they got stuff back in return.
by FredEx on Jun 30, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only Briere...
I’d only trade Briere….maybe Hartnell if the deal is right. Gagne, in my eyes, should stay with Philly til he has nothing left in his tank. This season is proof that the man can still play and produce no matter how many knocks to the noggin he gets. Gagne stays….Briere and Hartnell would be missed but I’m sure we could get some decent trades for them. maybe?
by PhillyPhan85 on Jun 30, 2009 6:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
keep the roster, give it a chance, dont mess with too much of the team, we did in fact take the stanley cup champs to 6 games, i wouldnt exactly move our forwards around anymore, let them get back in stride and healthy.
by kolparty on Jun 30, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 

























