Broad Street Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Pros and Cons of an 18-game NFL Schedule

Schedule leak: Flyers vs Rangers 2009/2010

According to SNY Rangers Blog, the six games between the Philadelphia Flyers and New York Rangers for the upcoming regular season have been leaked.

A source close to SNYRANGERSBLOG has let me know a day early of when the Rangers will take on their longtime rivals from Philadelphia.

The six games are as follows:

  • December 19th, 2009 @ Philly
  • December 30th, 2009 @ Madison Square Garden
  • January 21st, 2010 @ Philly
  • March 14th, 2010 @ Madison Square Garden
  • April 9th, 2010 @ Madison Square Garden
  • April 11th, 2010 @ Philly

The two teams closed the regular season against each other this past year, and it looks as if they could again in 2009/10. The entire NHL schedule, including the 2010 Winter Classic at Boston's Fenway Park which is reportedly between the Flyers and Bruins, will be announced tomorrow.

Broad Street Hockey can be found on Facebook and Twitter.

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Broad Street Hockey

Comments

Display:

distribution

Hopefully they distribute the games more evenly this year. We played all our games against the Canes in two weeks in November (luckily we were hot at the time and took all 4 (2 in OT)) and the Rangers twice in early October and the last 3 or 4 games in the last weeks of the season. I fear the Pens opening up against our Flyers forcing us to watch them raise the banner on Versus, my head might explode.

by chrislanci on Jul 14, 2009 5:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll just watch Jeopardy until the ceremony is over, in that case.

Alex Trebeck is the man.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 14, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he’s slowly becoming senile. His stories and jokes are getting a bit ridiculous.

by SJPhillyVT on Jul 14, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good thing he has Colonial Penn life insurance.

Man, those commercials are all over daytime TV.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 14, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

"I'll take 'The Rapists' for $100!"

That’s THERAPISTS.

Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?

by mikefive on Jul 14, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

hasnt anyone else realized what i have?

 When cable first came about in the mid 70s it was designed as a comercial free television. You were supposed to be able to watch MOVIES and SPORTS shows UN interrupted. thats what cable was all about and got people to sign up to it.
 at the sme time there werent banners and advertisements all over the place .As well OWNERS pair for THEIR OWN stadiums. All they(the owners asked for) was land to build on). since the flyers inception
 tickets have went from 7 dollars to average 100.00
 A new stadium has been built on city owned land with TAX PAYERS MONEY .(btw when do i get my free pair of tickets to a game in the stadium that my tax dollars helped build)
 who i have to pay to watch the games on CABLE when i used to be able to watch all games on channel 29 for free in the 70s,now they have those SPORTS packages where they want me to pay more on top of the cable bill to watch them now .
 I refuse to give the flyers and money hugry FLYERS and EAGLES any more of my money.
 They got free stadiums(with tax payer money, they get revenue sharing money and cant bring a cup home,80 percent of team is foreignors making more money in 1 yr than i do in 20(talk about exporting goods and services. also making a killing on advertisements in the stadium which should go to the city of philadelphia as TAX revenue,seating license revenues,and concession revenues and even parking revenues go directly to the OWNER and PLAYERS POCKETS.
 I say next time teams want new stadiums and revenue deaqls and threaten to walk LET THEM

by rasnap1 on Jul 15, 2009 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

btw i havent watched a flyer,eagles,phillies,or sixers games in the last 5 years i could care less about the money hungry/greedy owners,and players.my money is my money and now my wife and i go out to dinner more,movies,more and we each just purchased new*american cars with our own monies)( what did you think the flyers,eagles,sixers,or phillies were gonna offer to pay my down payment for me as a rebate lol lol lol) hold your breath and wait

by rasnap1 on Jul 15, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are three breaks each period (at the first non-icing stoppage after 5:00, 10:00 and 15:00) and the 17 minute intermission between periods. The TV breaks really are necessary — you can’t expect these guys to play like they do for 20 minutes straight + game stoppages. They’re annoying, but there’s a reason besides commercial interest why every sport (except soccer) has them: the players need to catch their breath.

You get no free tickets because you didn’t pay for the Wachovia Center. Ed Snider and Comcast did (along with CoreStates/First Union/Wachovia/Wells Fargo/whoever’s next). The only thing the city paid for was to setup utility infrastructure, so the Wachovia Center could make use of and pay for city services. I watched an interview with Snider by Larry Kane a few weeks ago that was on CSN and he wasn’t exactly blunt about how he’s upset that everyone else (including the Phillies, Eagles, Pirates, Steelers and now Pens) got the government to pay for their new stadiums, but he had to pay for his.

Comcast owns the Flyers. They own Comcast SportsNet. Of course they want to have the majority of games on their cable channel that’s exclusive to their network. But it’s not like the Flyers are never on MyPHL17 or were never on UPN 57. And if you live in the Philadelphia area and have Comcast cable, you shouldn’t have to pay extra to see any Flyers game. Even the most basic cable packages have CSN and the Comcast Network/CN8. Are there even any NHL teams in the US that play the majority of their games on over-the-air stations anymore?

The Flyers certainly do not get revenue sharing from the NHL (or the government, if that’s what you were trying to say). If anything, they pay into that pool. You’re free to go make your argument on Phillies and Eagles boards, but the Flyers and all of their assets are privately owned and paid for. If they want to put ads along the boards or show ads on the scoreboard during games, that’s their choice, and they reap the benefits — not the city.

You’re acting like having a professional sports team is a bad thing for a city, and all it does is create harm. If you don’t like the NHL because the majority of players aren’t from this country (but instead from a country who we share an open border and great relationship with), that’s your problem, not Ed Snider’s, not the Flyers’, not the NHL’s and not the city’s.

by Ben Feldman on Jul 15, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

And I forgot to add this: while I’ve seen many people agree with your comments regarding the use of government dollars to build new stadiums that ultimately they don’t own (the teams do), I’ve never seen anyone else say something quite that brash. If there was wide-scale belief in what you said, the Flyers wouldn’t sell out every game, wouldn’t have the second or third largest TV audience in terms of number of viewers in the US for every regular season NHL game despite not being the largest market, and wouldn’t have gotten forced into the Winter Classic by NBC because of the high ratings they knew they would get.

Also, a dollar in 1967 is worth $6.39 today (also, $1 in ‘74 is $4.55 today). The rise in ticket costs aren’t proportional, but $7 then isn’t $7 today. In 1967, the Flyers were trying to get as many people to come as possible because those early years weren’t exactly attendance successes. Today, the Flyers know some 19,600 people (give or take) will come to any given regular season game. If they can sell the building out every night with those prices, why lower them? Yeah, it may be ridiculous, but what’s the first rule of pricing for entrepreneurs? Charge as high as your customers will pay. Snider isn’t stupid; he’s not raising ticket prices for this season because he knows people have less money to spend and doesn’t want to have empty seats.

by Ben Feldman on Jul 15, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wow Ben,
Great response. You covered every part of that argument and I actually learned a lot from what you wrote . . .

by flyrsfrk05 on Jul 15, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

In case anybody was ever wondering, posts like that are what the “rec” function is all about.

Great response, Ben.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 16, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.
Start posting about the Flyers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Headshot-phillies_small
2010/11 BSH Fantasy Hockey Details
Carcillo_small
Solution To Long-Term Cap Issue
Self_portrait_avatar_small
UPDATE: BSH vs. Japer's and Flyers Prospects Game
Photo_3_small
2011 and Carter
Small
QOD Reflection Time
Carcillo_small
Do The Flyers Have The Best Defense?
Self_portrait_avatar_small
UPDATE: BSH vs. Japers' and Flyers Prospects Game
Subgenius_small
The Flyers 09/10 Stanley Cup Playoffs, expressed through the CotN
Assholeheart_small
Off-Topic: The Garrett Klotz Argument Thread
Carcillo_small
All-Decade Flyers Team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 82 48 27 7 103
Pittsburgh 82 47 28 7 101
Philadelphia 82 41 35 6 88
New York Rangers 82 38 33 11 87
New York Islanders 82 34 37 11 79

(updated 4.12.2010 at 9:21 AM EDT)

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PHILADELPHIA - MAY 16:  A fan of the Philadelphia Flyers holds up a sign reading "Next Goalie" behind goalie Carey Price #32 of the Montreal Canadiens in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Wachovia Center on May 16, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Habs Finally Lock Up Carey Price, Sign Goalie To Two-Year Deal

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +25 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

Photo +1 updates

Report: Donald Fehr Hands NHLPA List Of Conditions On Becoming Union Leader

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

Headshot-phillies_small Travis Hughes

Staff Writers

Think_sc_cropped_small Geoff Detweiler

Me_minus_kbond_small Ben Rothenberg

D150_small Teemu H

Designer

Self_portrait_avatar_small KreiderDesigns