Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

Rumors: Flyers Offered van Riemsdyk, Price Too Steep

Photo

A few weeks ago, Tim Panaccio reported that the Toronto Maple Leafs asked about James van Riemsdyk's availability.  A little more than a week ago, Anthony SanFilippo dropped some news that, while similar, was slightly more troublesome.

Back to the Zherdev thing. #Flyers are looking to move salary to get Leighton back on the roster. Zherdev is one name they're talking about.less than a minute ago via Twitter for iPad

 

He continued...

The others, I was told were/are Carcillo, JVR and Walker, but I've since been told Carcillo and JVR are not likely.less than a minute ago via Twitter for iPad

 

What's fascinating there is the inclusion of James van Riemsdyk in the list of names the Flyers were looking to move.  Because this was on a gameday (the Flyers were playing the Bruins), it tended to get lost among Flyers fans.  When SanFilippo didn't follow up, we all - including myself - forgot about it.

But then the Edmonton Journal came out with the story that was linked in this morning's Fly By, and it's time to address the rumor.

Star-divide

The Flyers were looking to dump salary, and - not-surprisingly - nobody wanted to trade for Matt Walker.  Somewhat surprising is that nobody wanted to trade for either Dan Carcillo or Nik Zherdev. But the fact that the Flyers were even offering up van Riemsdyk is surprising and troubling.

If it's true - as the Edmonton Journal reported - that the Flyers were looking for a first-round pick and another pick in return for van Riemsdyk, how mad should we be? If that trade happened, would you be upset? Obviously, we don't know what the second draft pick was (2nd round? 4th round? 7th round?) but van Riemsdyk is likely going to be a top-6 forward next year for the Flyers, unless they somehow find a way to sign Ville Leino to an extension.  The fact that nobody took van Riemsdyk for two draft picks should tell us something, shouldn't it?

But why was he even being shopped in the first place? If the team needed cap space that badly, why didn't they simply waive Matt Walker? More than that, was the team ready to give up on their former number-2 overall draft pick?

At the time of Panaccio's tweet, van Riemsdyk had 3 goals and 7 assists. Through 30 games, he's facing 4th-line quality competition with 2nd-line quality teammates, while starting in the offensive zone the 4th most frequently on the team. Not surprisingly, he is getting results in those fairly easy positions, having a plus/minus per 60 higher than anybody not on the LBH line.  In other words, he's being fairly sheltered and carried by his teammates, but he's performing in that situation.  Plus, he looked good for a stretch alongside Mike Richards and Andreas Nodl.

With all of that said, it is important to remember this is only van Riemsdyk's second professional season, and he's still far and above where Kyle Turris (the player drafted immediately after JVR) is at this point in his career.  And Turris even had a year in the AHL after a miserable first season. When you factor in his potential, his low cap hit ($1.65 million, including bonuses), and his RFA status after next year, it would be pretty difficult to get enough value in return for him.

So our questions to you are: First, is asking for a first-round pick and an additional pick in return for van Riemsdyk a sign of the Flyers giving up on him?  Second, regardless of your answer to the first one, is that fair value in return?

Comment 162 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

what in the hell is homer doing? Why are we moving offensive weapons to keep Leighton, get rid of Leighton, geezus.

JVR? Are effing kidding me?

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Dec 21, 2010 10:12 AM EST reply actions  

we should be trading Leighton, Shelley, Carcillo… im gonna kill homer if we lose 2/3 of zerdev/Leino/JVR

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Dec 21, 2010 10:14 AM EST reply actions  

Who would want Shelley, he offers little upside other then being an enforcer besides he’s highly overpaid, so other teams would only want to shed salary in return so there isn’t any point. I bet we could get some draft picks for carcillo. Really think trading zherdev would be a mistake, would rather see JVR go if I had to choose but obviously with the team playing so well to mess up any components of it would be a mistake, walkers hurt so he’s probably staying, leights just signed a new deal so chances are he’s staying, losing carcillo would be admirable and Shelley.

by ryanitus on Dec 21, 2010 1:18 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I would be very disappointed if they gave up on JVR.

If they did, I’d want two draft picks – including a high first-rounder – at the very least.

I don’t even want to think about this.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 10:19 AM EST reply actions  

I'm ignoring your questions

And answering with, trading JVR really solves almost none of their future Cap problems, and there were better ways to solve this years available to the team. If this was true, I have so little confidence in the FO to effectively manage the salary cap, that I don’t care about what his true market value would be.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

So you’d trade Dom Brown to keep Kyle Kendrick.

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

No, worse. They’re trading Dom Brown to keep Brian Bocock and Paul Hoover.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Dec 21, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I have less of a hatred towards 87 and the pens than i do GMPH/Flyers FO. this is getting incredibly hard to tolerate.

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 10:58 AM EST reply actions  

I personally think the JVR rumor is bunk—assuming the front office hasn’t lost their collective minds, they’d help their cap hit more by dumping Zherdev’s salary or waiving Walker and/or Leighton than giving up on a lottery pick winger with a year left on his entry-level deal. I have no doubts that other teams have asked about his availability, but considering JVR’s still developing and a relative bargain at <$2M, moving him makes no sense at all.

by memphisbrando on Dec 21, 2010 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

if they were really interested in fixing their cap problems they would have dumped zherdev, waived walker and/or leighton. they clearly have on idea wtf they are doing

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Dumping Zherdev is moronic.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

i agree, i was just repeating the OP’s ideas

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Also, it would only solve current cap issues. If this stuff is true, it’s further evidence that this management team has trouble looking forward. Everyone was willing to give them a pass with the whole, “they are all in this year”, but if there is any truth to these rumors, they clearly aren’t all in for this year, and have no foresight involving the cap.

Holy crap I need to punch something…or just keep repeating that these are only rumors…these are only rumors…they can’t possibly be this stupid, these are only rumors.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah im ready to punch something as well. wont be making it to teh gym till after work. its gonna be a long day.

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Happy Place?

These are only rumors. These are only rumors.

"In fact, it is probably safe to say, the statement "I am a hockey fan" is the same as "I hate gary bettman."- bfrank27

by Mike B on D on Dec 21, 2010 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Is that Laura Bush?

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

love me some happy gilmore

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Love me some Julie Bowen.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 21, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Dumping Zherdev would be equally idiotic for this years success as dumping JVR is to the teams future success.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I think he means at the end of the year. And yes, I think this could be a miss-hear rumor. I remember last year when the Canadians had a rumor that they wanted Carter and JVR for halak and some no-body, and I heard a lot of “Homer wants no part in trading JVR, who was his first draft choice, until after his rookie contract is up. A three year plan.” and others along those lines.

Samesis

PSN - philliesflyers89

by JpH89 on Dec 21, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Zherdev is up at the end of the year, they don’t have to move him.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

So is Carcillo.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 21, 2010 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

that what I mean, just not resign him.

Samesis

PSN - philliesflyers89

by JpH89 on Dec 21, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Which is why these moves make no sense. Deep breaths, count to 10 slowly…

"In fact, it is probably safe to say, the statement "I am a hockey fan" is the same as "I hate gary bettman."- bfrank27

by Mike B on D on Dec 21, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

And who wouldn’t want Carter and JVR for Halak and a scrub?

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Dec 21, 2010 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Just want to stress that I’m not advocating dumping Zherdev — just that if your sole intention is to create salary cap space, you’d move the guy making $2M whose contract only runs through this year versus the guy making <$2M whose contract runs through next year.

by memphisbrando on Dec 21, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not advocating moving JVR in any sense, but his cap space is tagged for next year while Z’s is not. So moving Z helps more this year, but if they moved JVR his salary becomes available room for a Leino extension. I don’t agree with the moving of either one right now, I’m just pointing out the distinction.

by DragonGirl0583 on Dec 21, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

And this is the distinction I was trying to make as well.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If this team was really concerned about their cap situation they wouldn’t have resigned Carcillo, and signed Shelley. They wouldn’t have resigned Leighton for twice the market value. They would have waived Walker.

There are 100 things(maybe a slight exaggeration) they could have done to avoid the situation they find themselves in again for the third year in a row. How many years is this team going to have to dump good players simply because they can’t manage the cap? I doubt whatever happens this year will top the disaster of a couple years ago but it is getting ridiculous.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 21, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

They didn’t have much of a choice with Carcillo, they couldn’t have walked away from his arbitration hearing unless he was granted more than $1.6 mllion by the arbitrator. If he had been given 1.5, they had no walk-away rights.

by DragonGirl0583 on Dec 21, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Two sources saying the Flyers were shopping him, one with access to the Flyers front office and another with access to a team in rebuild mode, and you don’t believe it?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

This would be ok...

If it was like the Phil Kessel trade. JVR is good. Two consecutive first round picks from the Islanders would be better.

From Parts Unknown...
Currently behind enemy lines, plotting to blow up an Igloo.

by Dos Furioso on Dec 21, 2010 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

They were talking to Edmonton. Let’s say they are asking for this year’s 1st and next year’s 2nd. Would you pull the trigger?

by Snevik on Dec 21, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

At the very least, I would look into it.

Samesis

PSN - philliesflyers89

by JpH89 on Dec 21, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree if Edmonton gave us a 1st and say a 3rd, I would at least look at it. JVR has ben good, but he hasn’t been “#2 good” and probably never will be. We know Edmonton will be in the top 3 next year, its like a restart. The only problem is that you lose a clog in the lineup this year, but its a smaller clog then other names.

Samesis

PSN - philliesflyers89

by JpH89 on Dec 21, 2010 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

i think you mean cog not clog.

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Dec 21, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

If they get rid of Cillo who’s gonna start fights? Oh wait, I know………….NOBODY!!

Flyers games will cease to entertain, which, lets face it the only reason they do now (apart from Cillo) is because we’re still riding of the high of having been one of the teams to go to the Cup.

I could see Zherdev leaving. He could just be on a roll, and its a long season still. We obviously need JVR cause he shows promise, not just streakiness .

Shelly? Has he even been playing this season?—and why all the hate on Leighton? Oh, yea, we’re still pissed about the Cup which was entirely his fault. rolls eyes

Besides, I like the fact that Cillo is missing teeth!

by sophiejo on Dec 21, 2010 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

Flyers games will cease to entertain, which, lets face it the only reason they do now (apart from Cillo) is because we’re still riding of the high of having been one of the teams to go to the Cup.

I guess the whole being the best team in the entire NHL (let alone world!) isn’t a reason to go to games.

by lazerwolf on Dec 21, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

This is the dumbest thing I’ve seen/read/heard all week…thanks for the laugh.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I was confused for a second, mostly when someone says Cillo they are reffering to me haha.

Did I tell you about the dream I had about me and Carcillo on a swingset?

Laperriere is my hero
Carcillo's my lover
Bobrovsky's my savior
Hockeys my life

by Cillo stache on Dec 21, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, you certainly do entertain. But I don’t think you have a history of starting fights. And I don’t actually know anything about the state of your teeth, but I’d wager they’re intact.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Dec 21, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

They are quite intact. But apparently small (?? I never thought they were small…) The orthadontist told me if I were to get braces “I would reccomend also getting tooth implants to fix that….small problem” I didn’t know they made tooth implants

Laperriere is my hero
Carcillo's my lover
Bobrovsky's my savior
Hockeys my life

by Cillo stache on Dec 21, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

They do, I’ve got one replacing a molar I shattered a few years ago. But I’ve never heard of using them to correct for having “small teeth.” Unless he’s talking about something else, that would be insanely expensive.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Dec 21, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Who said anything about blaming the Cup loss on Leighton? Honestly, I’d completely forgotten about it until YOU brought it up. My mind is on this year. And this year, Bob and Boucher are looking like a good tandem. Where exactly do we need Leighton aside from filling in for an injury?

Clearly, Shelley has been playing. Not a lot of minutes per game, but he’s been in there. Hard to get a 2-game suspension (just last week!) if you’re not on the ice.

Your Zherdev/JVR comment doesn’t even make sense. I can’t figure out what you’re trying to say there.

If you think we’re all here only because we were in the Finals last year, then you don’t know us at all. True, there are bandwagoners and true, hardcore fans in every city, but judging by Flyers attendance over lifetime, I’d have to say Flyers fans are pretty serious regardless of how the team is doing.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Dec 21, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Calm down.

We all know that Holmgren can be an idiot at times, but notice the usage of the past tense in this article.

The Flyers were looking to dump salary

the inclusion of James van Riemsdyk in the list of names the Flyers were looking to move.

And, perhaps the one most important thing we’re glossing over (myself included) is this:

Tim Panaccio reported that the Toronto Maple Leafs asked about James van Riemsdyk’s availability.

What I’m taking from this:

  • Other teams knew that the Flyers were trying to move salary to get Leighton back on the roster.
  • No one was interested in Zherdev, for whatever reason (contract / prior reputation maybe).
  • Other teams WERE interested in JVR.
  • Unlike The Godfather, Homer made these teams an offer they COULD refuse. If he was going to lose JVR, he wanted to make sure he was going to replace him with a potentially high-level prospect.
  • No one wanted to give up a first- and later-round pick for a first-round pick who had played in college (as opposed to juniors).
  • When it became evident that Homer would not get what he wanted, he put Lappy on LTIR and went about his business.

Upon further review (in football referee voice), I don’t think we need to be concerned about this.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with you, but I think it’s important to at least discuss why the Flyers were looking to move two guys on one year deals, their uber-expensive and injured 8th defensemen, and… James van Riemsdyk.

One of these things is not like the other, so I think it’s worth discussing why the hell JVR is included in these “salary dump” attempts. Yes, they’re no longer looking to move him, but they were, which is still deeply troubling.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

but they were

 how can we take a rumor, and then decide that the tense of one word is now fact?

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

By adding an e3 to it?

by bfrank27 on Dec 21, 2010 11:50 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Because you have two published reports?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

but they are still rumors. the rumor is that they were shopping xyz, so there is an inherent chance that they werent shopping xyz at all, or else it would just be a fact that they were. the same applies to all the content of the rumor, thus giving some probability that they are still currently shopping or were never shopping xyz players.

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

So you don’t believe any rumor?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

all im getting at is i dont see why we should think this situation is over as it can very easily be ongoing and we dont know about it.

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay, I just read that as “we never know”

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah exactly. a little bit of devil’s advocate there i guess. but i just have no faith that GMPH wont try to bone us several more times before his tenure is up

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

but they are still rumors. the rumor is that they were shopping xyz, so there is an inherent chance that they werent shopping xyz at all

There is also the possibility that they still are shopping xyz.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 21, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

that was the entire point of that post

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

the same applies to all the content of the rumor, thus giving some probability that they are still currently shopping or were never shopping xyz players.

by BobbyDucati on Dec 21, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

But see, here’s where we differ in opinion.

I think the Flyers were ASKED about Van Riemsdyk. I don’t think they were actively shopping him, as they were Zherdev. Since the Flyers were ASKED about JVR, they presented a fairly stiff counter-offer. If someone took them up on it, they’d be replacing a first-rounder with another first-rounder (and a later-rounder). If not, they’d end the conversation right then and there.

It’s important to note, I think, that the Flyers fielded offers for JVR and presented a somewhat stiff counter-offer; I do not think they were actively shopping him. That is an important distinction to make.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

What do you base this on?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

As I said:

here’s where we differ in opinion.

So I’m giving my opinion, based on my interpretation of what you wrote. Also:

the Toronto Maple Leafs asked about James van Riemsdyk’s availability.

As opposed to, “The Flyers asked the Toronto Maple Leafs if they were interested in JVR.”

I understand your concerns, especially since the Flyers didn’t say “No, we’re not trading him at all” like they did for Carter. But at least they presented a counteroffer that a) was tough for others to accept, and b) would have given the Flyers another first-round choice.

Here is the blurb from the Edmonton Journal:

- Faced with a serious cap crunch, the Flyers reportedly tried to move Daniel Carcillo, Nikolai Zherdev or James vanRiemsdyk with no takers. They apparently wanted two draft picks, including a first-rounder for JVR, who has 15 points in 29 games and is no better than the seventh best forward in Philly.

Reportedly – according to report or rumor
Apparently – according to appearances, initial evidence, incomplete results, etc.; ostensible rather than actual

This rumor is based on three tweets and a paragraph in a blog (albeit all from reliable sources). Even if it’s true, the Flyers made a pretty tough counter-offer. Honestly, if you’re Toronto and you don’t have a first-round pick till God-knows-when, and you DESPERATELY need first-round picks, and you’re being asked to give up yet another one for JVR, are you going to do that? Probably not. I think Homer made that offer knowing that Toronto wouldn’t bite.

If there is another silver lining to be had from this – assuming it’s all true, of course – it’s that the Flyers used Lappy’s LTIR as a last resort. We’ve been saying all along that LTIR was NOT the solution to their problems. And Holmgren obviously sees enough value in Walker that he feels he can get something in return for him instead of just waiving him outright. (I don’t necessarily agree with that, but whatever.)

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

So I gather that you don’t believe the Flyers shopped JVR, despite two separate reports saying that he did. Because there’s one report saying that a team asked about him. But if an Edmonton journalist has it, that means either a) more teams asked about JVR; or b) The Flyers shopped JVR to teams that actually had a first-round pick.

That’s fine, you don’t believe it. I think you should, but I’m not going to convince you with anything not posted above.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

But if an Edmonton journalist has it, that means either a) more teams asked about JVR; or b) The Flyers shopped JVR to teams that actually had a first-round pick.

I agree with a). I think it was more of a case of teams asking about JVR than it was the Flyers actively shopping him. I think b) could be a possibility, but I really doubt it. If Holmgren was shopping JVR to teams with high first-rounders, and ASKING for those high first-rounders PLUS other picks in return, he was either not thinking clearly or expecting to quell the trade talk. He had to be. If you are Toronto, Edmonton, or the Islanders, are you giving up 2 picks (including a high first-rounder) for JVR? Doubtful.

Wasn’t the league abuzz with Carter-for-Kaberle rumors a couple years ago? And weren’t those rumors strictly Carter-for-Kaberle, as opposed to “The Flyers are actively shopping Jeff Carter?” I only remember “Carter-for-Kaberle” talk, though I could be wrong.

My questions are not rhetorical, by the way. I’m legitimately asking because, if I’m wrong, I want to know. If I’m right, it proves the point I’m about to make – Rumors can happen when there exists one potential trade between two teams. Were the Flyers actively shopping JVR, or were they just presenting counteroffers to teams who asked about him? We may never know. But while I’m not disagreeing with what you say, isn’t it possible that ONLY ONE TEAM asked about JVR, and the word got out (i.e., Carter for Kaberle)?

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way, I’m not trying to “move the goalposts” or change my position. I think it’s probable that more than one team asked about JVR. And I think the Flyers would have traded him if they got a high first-round pick (plus another pick) in return. But I also think that they were very firm in that position and that they didn’t want to move him if they didn’t have to. If it came down to that, I’m sure they would have accepted a first-rounder from a team like Toronto or Edmonton. But seeing as how Zherdev was the most-head-about name being bandied about, that tells me that moving JVR was not as high a priority.

Would they have done it for high draft picks from a bad team? Sure. But I think they ONLY would have done it for that deal.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

most-head-about

Er, most-heard-about.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Or, “most-headcase about” ?

by mtitanic on Dec 21, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

All I can say is I believe these rumors to be 100% accurate. You don’t. Fine. I can’t change your mind.

But what I don’t understand is why the Flyers get the benefit of the doubt here. We have a Flyers beat writer who doesn’t venture into the rumor world often at all. We have a separate report from another beat writer across the country. The Flyers needed cap space. JVR was under-performing. People were calling for him to be sent to the Phantoms. The guy was a healthy scratch on multiple occasions. Numerous reports had come out saying he didn’t have “the heart” to win, or that the Flyers weren’t happy with his work ethic, or demeanor.

And yet, with all of that, you refuse to believe that the Flyers could have looked to trade him. What has this organization done to deserve the benefit of the doubt?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re missing the point of what I’m saying. I’m not saying I don’t believe it at all, and I’m only giving the Flyers the benefit of the doubt to a certain extent. Not to be all Mario / Tim Jong D, but let me stress the important parts of my P.O.V. below.

I think the Flyers would have traded [JVR] if they got a high first-round pick (plus another pick) in return. But I also think that they were very firm in that position and that they didn’t want to move him if they didn’t have to… Would they have done it for high draft picks from a bad team? Sure. But I think they ONLY would have done it for that deal.

The benefits of the doubt that I’m giving to the Flyers are as follows:

1. If they were going to trade JVR, they ONLY would have done it for a high first-rounder and another pick.
2. While the Flyers were open to the idea of trading JVR, it must not have been an extremely high priority. They had other options – which they followed – and JVR is still on the team. If they were that disappointed with the kid, they’d have found a way to trade him by now, viz. being more flexible in their asking price.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 22, 2010 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m personally more disappointed in the organization for thinking moving Carcillo or Zherdev will help with anything meaningful. Those are only one year cap fixes, and losing Zherdev means losing one of your best scorers. That type of thinking is so short sighted in terms of cap management, and so blind to the whole this is our year theory that it’s infuriating to think they were considered. Moving Carcillo I can handle, but that’s just short sided in terms of cap relief since it does not help for next years cap situation in anyway.

I know you were focused in on JVR, and how it wasn’t that upsetting to you given your reasoning, but I don’t see how the Zherdev/Carcillo thing can’t irk you front a management POV.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 22, 2010 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

That type of thinking is so short sighted in terms of cap management, and so blind to the whole this is our year theory that it’s infuriating to think they were considered.

Which is exactly why we find ourselves having to discuss this every single year.

It’s exactly why I want Homer gone. I personally want someone who can think outside of the box and is willing to consider and even build with an actual plan in front of him. Not this year to year crap.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 22, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

This goes beyond my typical level of frustration b/c even if I by in to the year to year crap, and every year is a win it or nothing year for Homer, the whole possibility of trading Z or JVR is ridiculous to even consider b/c you aren’t improving your chances to win this year. So if someone wanted to convince me to give Homer a pass b/c he is all in this year, then why the F was he even considering these moves. Argh haha.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 22, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I’m glad they didn’t move anyone, believe me. I could have lived with JVR if and ONLY if they got exactly what they wanted in return, but I’d still be pissed off about it.

Dumping Zherdev or Carcillo for cap relief would have been extremely short-sighted. If they got what they wanted for JVR you could have made an argument that there was a long-term benefit to the team (potentially), but short-term it would have been stupid.

I’m fine with this roster as it stands. Clear space at the trade deadline if you have to. Get picks for people like Leighton. Walker may finally prove himself expendable if Bartulis does well in Pronger’s absence… that’s what I’m hoping, anyway. So keep the roster as is, make moves at the deadline, and go from there.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 22, 2010 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Because right now they have a good enough team, I think. No need to mess with it if you’re trying to win the Cup, which they are (ostensibly) trying to do.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 22, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, I just wanted to give an explanation as to why I haven’t completely calmed myself down over this since that’s where this started from in your initial comment. I think it’s b/c so many people around here who try to justify the cap hell the FO has put themselves in by saying they are in a win it all this year mode, and yet you see these things out there that would significantly hurt the teams chances at that goal.

I just can’t grasp the thought process used by the FO, unless they were that ready to give up on certain players based upon their internal evaluations. But then at the same time, how have they not given up on Walker, argh.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 22, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

You can’t calm yourself down because this team does things that are so contradictory to themselves that you have no way of really knowing where there head is at. Are they planning for the future? Where here are X number of examples to show that is true. Or, are they going all out this year? Well here are Y number of examples to show that is true. Perhaps they just take it year to year…here are Z number of examples for that.

That is the problem. It doesn’t seem like they have a plan. Maybe they do, I am sure they probably do, and they certainly are under no requirement to blueprint it for us, but most of the time one can piece things together based on how a team operates but this team operates without any hint of logic that it truly is mind blowing.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 22, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

oh noes! block quoted rebuttle -Tim Jong D

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true Geoff I think the only way JVR goes is for a scorer now or for 2 high draft picks but I don’t see them trading him. Only way they make a deal is to help win now. Maybe a 3rd line or 4th line guy who can kill penalties and chip in 10-15 goals a season. I still wish they has tried to sign someone like a manny malhotra instead of Jody Shelley.

by ryanitus on Dec 21, 2010 1:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I completely disagree…everything you listed are the reasons why I am concerned about it. The fact that these WERE considerations doesn’t make me have much faith.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

This is where SanFilippo and Matheson are just stirring up the pot. It’s not true journalism, they just need to fill column inches for their respective employers. I’m sure that Homer has had converstions w/ other GMs and when they ask Homer about JVR he tells them 2 1st rounders just to shut them up. They approach Homer, not the other way around. But if one of them said they can do that, then I think Homer would talk some more and make a deal.

by mtitanic on Dec 21, 2010 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

SanFilippo never wrote about it, so he wasn’t “trying to fill column inches”.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Can we ask SanFilippo to write about it, and tell us what he is really hearing, in full technicolor detail?

by NickFotiu4HOF on Dec 21, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I told him he should write about it last week. He never did.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, if he knows more then I would like to read it.

by mtitanic on Dec 21, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe he doesn’t know any more than what’s been reported.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably waiting until this long break. 8 days off leads to a lot of slow Flyers news days. They won’t even be practice for the holidays to come up with something as a journalist to write about.

by chrislanci on Dec 21, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Just dump Leighton, admit you don’t need him and he was a waste to sign for TWO years Homer.

by Ant on Dec 21, 2010 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

That was probably more of the contract negotiation. “I took you to the SCF and I want a little security that if I fall back a little next year that I won’t be completely out of a job”

by bfrank27 on Dec 21, 2010 11:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

curse of the small sample sized post season success

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

He was hoarding goalies

I did not mention Leighton in my post below, but we are quick to forget that Nabokov’s contract was predicted to be in the order of $5M prior to July 1. The goalie market fell apart after July 1.

I admit, I have faulted Homer for Leighton, and to some extent still do. But it makes sense if he is a scavenger/hoarder (see my post below) that he wanted to make sure he had goalies available. It also thus makes sense (in a positive way) that he would sign Bob for the same reason.

Maddox, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery. Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Lee. We win.

by Bud in TN on Dec 21, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

If the farm is barren I think a first rounder and a second pick would be reasonable. Is the current class of draft canidates a good one? If it’s meh then maybe not.

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 12:26 PM EST reply actions  

Don’t think it’s going to be exceptional. Really it’s been a while since we’ve had a really strong draft year.

Part of me looks back at that amazing draft year of 03 and thinks about the other variable they had going for them. The lockout. In 03-04 they were all playing in juniors etc. In 04-05 teams, including the Flyers with Richards and Carter, may have been looking to bring some of the draft year of 03 guys up to the big team. Instead the lockout happened. Those guys spent another year refining their skills in the minors. In Richards and Carter’s case, they won the Calder for the Phantoms. Then those players came out of the minors and turned into the greatest draft year of all time. Just something that I find interesting.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Dont forget that year was also a step up from the normal AHL level competition because there were a lot of borderline NHL ready prospects stuck playing in it.

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Dec 21, 2010 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

There are a few that could turn out well, but I’d pretty much want a top ten pick to feel confident I was getting someone worth getting. The names I’ve seen come up (organized by league):
Sean Couturier (Drummondville – QMJHL)
Tomas Jurco (Saint John – QMJHL)
Ryan Nugent-Hopkins (Red Deer – WHL)
David Musil (Vancouver – WHL)
Brandon Saad (Saginaw – OHL)
Matt Puempel (Peterborough – OHL)
Gabriel Landeskog (Kitchener – OHL)

And a couple internationals I occasionally hear mentioned:
Vladislav Namestnikov (Khimik Voskresensk)
Adam Larsson (Skelleftea)

Right now, I expect Couturier and Nugent-Hopkins to go 1-2 in some order. Musil is one that interests me, though. 17 years old, 6’3" and 191 pounds, plays defenseman and has 17 points in 30 games so far this year.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Dec 21, 2010 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve heard a lot of good things about Larsson, and he could even go in the top 2 if his name starts getting mentioned more.

But yep from what I’ve heard and read I would want a top ten pick in this draft to be confident. And I’m not sure this is one of those drafts where you can clearly say you would love to have the #1 or #2 picks (minus the sucking of course) because there’s plenty of indecision there too. Overall I’d be happy to head into this draft at #30 and hope that we have a Giroux/Richards/Gagne moment and get a great player from the last first round.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s no way I’d trade JVR for picks right now — the only way I’d consider trading JVR is to get a position player of similar value in return. The Flyers desperately need to revamp their organizational depth, but draft picks do nothing to win you the Cup this year … unless you go ahead and move them for other players.

by memphisbrando on Dec 21, 2010 12:52 PM EST reply actions  

The keyword here is Toxic Assets

Players like Carcillo are a dime a dozen. Remember, we traded for him to dump cash. I don’t see another team actually looking at him as a player, but rather as a salary dump. So we’re expecting another team to come to us about Carcillo, looking to dump cash by giving us a more talented player, with a salary cap that is at it’s limits. In other words, Carcillo isn’t going anywhere. Homer, don’t resign players that have no value outside of your organization.

Replace Carcillo with the name Shelley, there’s Shelley’s analysis.

Michael Leighton is a career backup that can be a spot starter here and there, but the whole league knows that the only way he can function is with a defense around him. Add on top of this his salary of 1.5 million dollars, and we have another Toxic Asset. Homer gave Leighton too much money

Boucher is an asset that actually has value. His backup status and low salary make him an attractive backup to many teams in the league. But because he has a low salary, it makes no sense to dump him.

Zherdev does have value, at the end of the year. The whole league knows that the Flyers won’t be bringing him back next year due to the salary cap, so teams are just waiting. Think of Niemi last year. The Hawks had horrible cap issues, and San Jose just waited around until Niemi became a cap casualty, and picked him up. Zherdev will follow the same fate

JVR has a low salary, so automatically it makes no sense to move him in order to manage the salary cap. The picks are the best way too go, and the Flyers need to replenish the farm system, because man do the Phantoms suck.

The players you’re looking to trade?
Carle, Coburn, Hartnell, Briere, Timonen

Seeing as you need a defense in front of whoever the goalie is, those are your options. You could also try and throw in Carcillo or Leighton, but the other team will want more in addition to Carcillo or Leighton. Essentially, you’re paying assets to the other team to take your toxic asset. You lose a lot, and gain only relief.

This sucks

inter arma enim silent leges

by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Dec 21, 2010 1:13 PM EST reply actions  

if the farm is that fallow does it make more sense to go for quanity for quality ? like try to get a handful of mid tier guys instead of a two picks kinda thing.

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

This unintentionally supports my post’s view of how Homer is thinking.

Maddox, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery. Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Lee. We win.

by Bud in TN on Dec 21, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

True, but in hockey I would never trade a top 5 pick to get more depth.

inter arma enim silent leges

by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Dec 21, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, I was just asking, not knowing how it works in hockey. In baseball the failure rate is so high for anything but top tiers I usually go quality over quanity eventhough the sport has large enough roster demands to support the quanity over quality approach.

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree but Homer doesn't.

No asset is toxic according to my view of Homer the Scavenger/Hoarder.

Thus, I think you are right that all of these assets are toxic. But I think Homer believes none of them are. Thus, all should be kept unless forced to otherwise.

Maddox, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery. Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Lee. We win.

by Bud in TN on Dec 21, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Homer’s got sorta the right idea there then (if he is going for the scavenger/hoarder thing deliberately), but he needs to know when to get rid of them at the top of their value. There’s no point simply keeping them.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

As I have been arguing for some time – TRADE HARTNELL. I reallize that many seem to think the LBH line is sacrosact, but really? $4.2 million for a guy that gets penalized at least once a game, can’t pass or skate, and only scores because a Labrador on that line would get some trash goals and tip-ins? That huge salary could easily be replaced with a good player for half the amount.

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by MaximumTalbot on Dec 21, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

you fergut the falling down

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Doesn’t he have a NTC? I’m pretty sure we can’t trade him.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Dec 21, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty sure we couldn’t trade Gagne.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Hartnell, Briere, and Timonen all have NTCs. I don’t think Carle or Coby have them.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Dec 21, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Missing the point: Homer as scavenger/hoarder

I don’t like, at all, the idea of JVR or Zherdev being shopped. That said, even if the rumors were true, it appears that they are dead now, thanks to those players’ resurgence.

The more complicated point, which I have now tried to make on multiple occasions, is that Homer appears not really willing to trade ANYONE unless “NECESSARY.” And necessary typically means, “the cap is forcing me to.” This is why Lappy is on LTIR. Even assuming that the rumors were true, in fact, Homer did not pull the trigger. Thus, either the rumors were false, potential trades were not getting perceived value in return, or perceived value changed after the facts on the ice changed. Again, even if the rumors were true, Homer felt that he’d rather hoard those players, ignore the cap torpedoes and full steam ahead. Thus, Homer seems to be a “collector of players” who fill roles that he seems to want. He signed Shelley because he thought a fighter role was necessary. He acquired Meszaros and O’Donnell because he perceived that defense was important. He signed Zherdev because he wanted firepower.

Now, the cap is perceived not as a budget or a “framework” but as a constraint to be overcome. It’s a hill to be taken, in military terms. The problems come when that cap hill is Pike’s Peak, and you get Umbergerian trades, or when it is Mount Everest, and you get the Gagne debacle.

Thus, our natural point of view of the cap (and my natural strategic way of looking at financial resources) is absurdist from Homer’s point of view. Homer will hoard talent until forced to get rid of it. The fact that we will complain that he hurts the team in the long run with this approach, and be forced into Hobbes’ choice decisions, is irrelevant to him.

Maddox, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery. Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Lee. We win.

by Bud in TN on Dec 21, 2010 1:51 PM EST reply actions  

Hobbes’ choice decisions? Are you coining a new term? Didn’t he make Hobson’s choice this time, i.e. make a trade (take it) or stay put (leave it)?

by Snevik on Dec 21, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

But I agree this is being overblown. I think GMs are constantly talking to other GMs about the possibility of anything.

by Snevik on Dec 21, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sure this is true. You never know what you can get if you don’t ask.

"In fact, it is probably safe to say, the statement "I am a hockey fan" is the same as "I hate gary bettman."- bfrank27

by Mike B on D on Dec 21, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Overblown? This “story” got absolutely zero paragraph space in print and zero words written about it outside of twitter in this town.

As far as GMs constantly talking, then how does the inclusion of JVR (let alone Zherdev) make it okay for the Flyers to talk to other teams about them, just to clear cap space?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Hobbes. I just got a mental image of Homer sitting at a table trying to prove you can square a circle using a compass and straight edge.

by mtitanic on Dec 21, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, this is wrong

According to wikipedia, I am actually thinking of Morton’s fork

Maddox, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery. Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Lee. We win.

by Bud in TN on Dec 21, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Although, technically, Hobson's choice also works

Maddox, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery. Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Lee. We win.

by Bud in TN on Dec 21, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it’s distinctly not Hobson’s choice.

by Snevik on Dec 21, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

According to su estomago, you are thinking of Morton’s Steakhouse.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I love this. Good job.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d be totally okay with letting JVR go, if the price was right. i was expecting much more improvement from him after hearing about his off season workout practices. He’s a big guy that can’t/doesn’t know how to hit. Doesn’t have much of a shot, and i’m still waiting to see his supposed great passing. He was the #2 pick for christ’s sake! I’m not expecting him to be as good as Pat Kane, but he’s gotta be much better than this! Let’s look at the top 2 picks of the past 10 years…
2000 – DiPietro, Heatley
2001 – Kovalchuk, Spezza
2002 – Nash, Kari Lehtonen
2003 – Fleury, Eric Staal
2004 – Ovechkin, Malkin
2005 – Crosby, Ryan
2006 – Erik Johnson, Jordan Staal
2007 – Kane, JVR
2008 – Stamkos, Doughty
2009 – Tavares, Hedman

Look at those names. When you take in the top 2, those guys should be just about NHL ready on the spot, but he goes to college for another year or 2 which is fine (i think he should have gone to the canadian juniors, but hey). He just isn’t coming along and I would for sure take a first round pick and as low as a 3rd rounder.

I agree that trading him won’t help that much for the cap and Z will probably be gone at the end of this year, but man, i’ve had it up to here with this guy.

by DieHardFlyersFaninChicago on Dec 21, 2010 1:51 PM EST reply actions  

If it means anything, Kari Lethonen just got good this year, Hedman doesnt look like hes gonna live up to a #2 pick, and Ryan took 3 years to become NHL ready.

Samesis

PSN - philliesflyers89

by JpH89 on Dec 21, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Hedman doesnt look like hes gonna live up to a #2 pick

He just turned 20… how did you come to this conclusion?

Kari Lethonen just got good this year

He wasn’t bad in 2006-07 or 2007-08… he just gets hurt a lot. If he can stay healthy he’s pretty good.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

intuition.

Samesis

PSN - philliesflyers89

by JpH89 on Dec 21, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus, it helps if the team in front of him is decent.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 21, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Hedman reminds me a lot of Pronger, only without the inherent nastiness. Pronger was a bust at 20 too.

JVR reminds me a lot of Bobby Ryan, right down to the New Jersey roots. He’ll be good in time.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

This means absolutely nothing about JVR. Just because past Number 2 picks were good doesnt really mean JVR will be good. It would be better to compare JVR with other players drafted early in 07 and with other recent high picks who played college. Heatley in 2000 has no bearing on JVR.

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Dec 21, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

And anyway, as I brought up at the end of last season. Go look at Rick Nash and Eric Staal. They had pretty disappointing rookie campaigns too. But look at them now. It’s way early to judge a guy.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Whether or not these rumors are true, you need to ask yourself what are the Flyers looking for? Are they thinking short-term or long-term? I believe after that crushing loss last year, that they are thinking short-term. Now that doesn’t surprise me for a franchise located in Philadelphia because this town expects a championship every year. The Flyers organization is no exception. From the top-down, the expectations are extremely high and there are some players who avoid this city because of it (I recall reading that Joni Pikanen complained how much pressure there was playing in Philly). My long drawn-out point is that I don’t believe the Flyers have patience to develop JVR and it would not surprise me nor would it bother me if he was jettisoned. I think a player like Giroux for example is more naturally gifted and has developed faster than JVR. Look fellas, this isn’t Columbus or Phoenix…the time-table here is much shorter, especially when victory was so close, we could have tasted it.

"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky

by Nico97 on Dec 21, 2010 2:00 PM EST reply actions  

Moving JVR doesn't help the short term either.

How does moving JVR help with the short term? The only way which it would help short term is if you got a player back that would out perform JVR this year, and that player will not fit under the Flyers cap, making any short term trade involving JVR impossible.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Cap space…my understanding was that the Flyers weren’t looking for any player in return, only draft picks. And I don’t believe the Flyers need any further offense. If I had a choice between Carcillo and JVR, I would give up Carcillo of course. I was never a big fan of his and I think between the two, JVR shows more promise, discipline, and talent than Carcillo. But it appears from the article that teams are not interested in Carcillo or Zherdev.

"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky

by Nico97 on Dec 21, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

reply fail sorry…see below…

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

so Carcillo has promise?

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Did I say Carcillo has promise? I did not.

"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky

by Nico97 on Dec 21, 2010 2:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

kinda, though I was just goofin'
I was never a big fan of his and I think between the two, JVR shows more promise, discipline, and talent than Carcillo.

more promise implies each have promise

by j reed on Dec 21, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha, I guess I should say Carcillo shows less promise but let me qualify that in saying I think he’s peaked already. Good point…

"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky

by Nico97 on Dec 21, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe after that crushing loss last year, that they are thinking short-term.
My long drawn-out point is that I don’t believe the Flyers have patience to develop JVR and it would not surprise me nor would it bother me if he was jettisoned. I think a player like Giroux for example is more naturally gifted and has developed faster than JVR. Look fellas, this isn’t Columbus or Phoenix…the time-table here is much shorter, especially when victory was so close, we could have tasted it.

Then how does trading JVR help with the Flyers short term needs. You are saying you the Flyers are looking at the short term, and aren’t patient to wait for JVR. My question to you is how in the world does trading JVR fall in line with the Flyers thinking short term? You are trading a top 9 forward future prospects in what you are saying (since at first I assumed that when you said Flyers think short term, and could jettison JVR, I assumed you meant for a short term return), that addressed long term needs, not short term goals.
s long term.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 2:31 PM EST reply actions  

Response for Nico97

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought I did answer that…cap space. They also, if the rumours are true, receive draft picks. Yes, future draft picks are, by their nature, long term goals, but I never said that the Flyers were never interested in long term goals. They were patient with Richards, weren’t they? They didn’t give up on Carter either. Now I’m reacting to what this article states…my question to you is where does JVR fit with Flyers? And who would you give up? It’s lovely to think we can keep Lappy, three goalies, Walker, etc but realistically, someone has to go.

"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky

by Nico97 on Dec 21, 2010 2:46 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Realistically no one has to go, that’s why Lappy and Walker are on LTIR and they will take the hit on next year’s cap with the penalty from the bonus cushion…b/c they are thinking short term in a win it all sense. Would you really rather keep Leights or a healthy Walker when he comes back and trade JVR in order to solve their cap issues. Don’t get me wrong, they have royally f’d themselves with their cap situation, but they have no immediate need to move any players right now. If their only goal is to create cap space for only this season, they have several better options than trading JVR for both the short and long term.

JVR fits in as a top-9 forward this year, and a top 6 forward next year given who they will likely lose over the summer to FA. JVR will need to be a key contributor to the his line with Carter and Zherdev if this team wants to win a cup this year. This team is all in for the cup this year, it’s completely screwed itself with the cap moving forward, so why move an asset that will help you win a cup right now (Leighton, Walker, Carcillo/Shelley are not key cogs in this team that would be better choices to move) just for cap space the team doesn’t currently need. Andit seems when these players were being “shopped” it was during the time when they could have waived Walker, which is a much better short term move for a cup run then getting rid of JVR.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Dec 21, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that if they need cap room, JVR shouldn’t be on the top of list. The Zherdev-Carter-JVR line looks like a winner. And your absolutely correct with Carcillo/Shelley….they being released wouldn’t affect our team although its always nice to have a heavyweight on your team. I have long argued though that Carcillo isn’t necessary on the ice. Maybe he’s a cool locker room guy, I don’t know.

"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky

by Nico97 on Dec 21, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

chrislanci rule to life #8817

Don’t pay any attention to trade rumors coming from Canada.

This is easy rumor to come up with same as the easy rumor that the Phillies are trying to move Blanton. We have a glutton of talent and not cap room. These players have all been healthy scratches so of course they are shopping around. If anything I hope these stories light a fire under these guys because you don’t want to be the player who was traded at the deadline and missed out on getting your name on the cup.

by chrislanci on Dec 21, 2010 3:39 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you for ignoring the part about the Flyers beat writer coming with the rumor ten days ago.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 10:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Except that the Phillies are trying to move Blanton.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Dec 22, 2010 7:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Where does this leave Powe? Another guy who seriously needs to be resigned right now. Another? O’Donnel. Which is more important?

Think of it this way, would you rather have a team without Ville and Powe, or just JvR/others being shopped? If dropping someones salary is the way it has to go, pick the one that will effect you on the scoreboard the least. I’m not saying we should get rid of JvR or that he sucks or to get rid of anybody (except Walker and Leighton and Shelly) but if it is deemed nessicary, at least use common sense. Trading JvR would not be the end of the world, he still needs to grow as a player so let him try elsewhere and have him come back.

Honestly, what the hell were they thinking by signing too many forwards? If Lappy could play, there would be yet another person getting scratched each night. There is one too many players on this team, soon to be two if Walker comes back. Another thing, there is also to many goalies. There are 2 in ADK but 3 here, if Leighton hadn’t got hurt or Bob discovered, there would be 3 ADK goalies, 2 regular.

AGHH

Laperriere is my hero
Carcillo's my lover
Bobrovsky's my savior
Hockeys my life

by Cillo stache on Dec 21, 2010 3:43 PM EST reply actions  

I’m not sure I get you here, but do you think JVR is the odd man out in the team? Because we aren’t exactly dominating the league in LW quality now that Gagne has left.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you kidding Scott Hartnell is good enough to play on all 4 lines they just don’t make him.

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Dec 21, 2010 9:09 PM EST up reply actions  

O’Donnell definitely picked the right number because he is like Chris Therrien reincarnate.

by DieHardFlyersFaninChicago on Dec 21, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Scuttlebutt!

Just ’cuz I like that word.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Dec 21, 2010 4:30 PM EST reply actions  

I wouldn’t die if JVR was traded for a 1st(provided its for whats expected to be a top 10 pick) and another pick(provided it’s a 2nd or 3rd). That would be a fair trade in my eyes. Id be pissed that we gave up on him just because of the salary cap though. The trade would obviously hurt the Flyers this year, while the future benefits wouldn’t be known. That being said Id rather just keep JVR and let him develop.

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Dec 21, 2010 9:11 PM EST reply actions  

Geoff I get the feeling that you think we’re not bashing management enough about this. But I am inclined to agree with mikefive in saying that there’s no way we’ve got the full picture.

See we bash management if the full picture is: “we need to get Leighton back, we need roughly 1 and a half million in cap space, who’s got that, JVR, let’s try move JVR”

That’s so incredibly inane it’s not true. OK as much as we bash Homer, he’s not that stupid.

So you move on to the more likely option: none of the sources know the full story. This may or may not be something to worry about, but in all likelihood Homer thought he’d check what the market’s like for JVR, maybe made a couple of calls seeing whether teams were ready to give him a Kessel trade, but didn’t actually go around sending a bulk email asking for what people would give him for JVR. I like ASF but just because he says something doesn’t mean that’s 100% correct all the time.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

Geoff I get the feeling that you think we’re not bashing management enough about this.

This is a story that nobody is talking about.

there’s no way we’ve got the full picture.

Certainly. But if people would talk about it, maybe we could get it. How do you get people to talk about it? Write about it.

OK as much as we bash Homer, he’s not that stupid.

What if he is? What if ASF got this information directly from Holmgren? What if he got it from Peter Luukko? How about John Paddock? Barry Hanrahan? Holmgren’s secretary? Brian Burke? Steve Tambellini? van Riemsdyk’s agent?

If the argument against the rumor is “we don’t know it’s true”, what would make it true? What if ASF didn’t reveal his source, but 10 minutes before tweeting that, Travis, ASF, Panotch, Seravalli, Gormley, and Carchidi were in a meeting with Holmgren? Is it more likely that the rumor is true? Why?

More than anything, why are people suddenly “Holmgren would never trade JVR, he’s not that stupid”? We know the organization has it’s doubts about him (staying in college, questioning his work ethic, desire, heart, and benching him. Twice.), so why does the thought that he was shopped mean the organization is stupid?

Just because trading him might seem stupid to me and you doesn’t mean it actually is stupid in the organization’s eyes, but more importantly, it doesn’t make the rumor any less true.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 21, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Certainly. But if people would talk about it, maybe we could get it. How do you get people to talk about it? Write about it.

I don’t have any problem with this story being written or the Flyers fanbase being made aware of JVR being potentially traded for the right price. In fact, as much as I am a fan of JVR, I don’t even have any inherent problem in the idea of JVR being shopped around. If we get a Kessel-like return then it might end up being a good trade for the future.

More than anything, why are people suddenly "Holmgren would never trade JVR, he’s not that stupid"? We know the organization has it’s doubts about him (staying in college, questioning his work ethic, desire, heart, and benching him. Twice.), so why does the thought that he was shopped mean the organization is stupid?

It isn’t. It is normal if an organization is dissatisfied with a young player and tries to see what the market is like. I don’t have much issue with the Flyers organization doing that. I don’t have a problem with Holmgren receiving phone calls from Toronto and telling them bluntly that he wants a 1st and another pick. I don’t even have a problem with Holmgren sending off a call to Edmonton and asking them whether their potential lottery pick is up for grabs.

What I do have a problem with is the link ASF has made between salary dumping to get Leighton on the roster and trading JVR. It may well be true that Homer is looking to salary dump JVR to get Leighton on the roster. But it is my belief that it is unlikely, because no-one in their right mind would dump an entry-level deal with 1.5 years left on it for a 3rd goaltender. No, not even Paul Holmgren.

In reply to that you can (and have) said that ASF could have got the information directly from Holmgren, meaning that it’s irrelevant what I think about the stupidity of such a deal. But do you really think that Holmgren would tell ASF that he wants to get Leighton back on the roster and to do that he’s thinking of moving a number of players including JVR? Do you think Holmgren would even ring Brian Burke to say:
“Hi Brian. So Leighton’s coming back onto our roster and we don’t want to be over the cap. I was wondering whether you’re interested in dealing for James van Riemsdyk to help us clear cap space”

It is one thing for Homer to move JVR to clear cap space for Leighton. It is another thing entirely for Homer to shop JVR to clear cap space and then go and tell the league and the journalists about it. And that is where I say, no-one involved in front office management, can be that stupid.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Dec 21, 2010 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t think Brian Burke could connect the dots with Leighton coming back from LTIR and the Flyers shopping players with affordable cap hits? In other words, Homer doesn’t have to say “So Leighton’s coming back onto our roster and we don’t want to be over the cap…” All he has to say is, “Brian, can I interest you in taking an affordable, attractive player in return for draft picks?”

No matter how he phrased it, any offer of JVR, Zherdev, Carcillo, or Walker for draft picks clearly screams salary dump, since you’re trading salary for nothing. And if any journalist asked a generic question of “How do you expect to fit Leighton onto the roster?” or “Are you looking to move anybody?”, you get your answer.

So I fail to see a distinction between shopping JVR for cap space and telling the league he’s shopping JVR for cap space. The league is pretty smart; they can put two and two together. I mean, this is the same organization that shopped Gagne for cap space and the entire league knew about it. Including the media. So… if you think that makes the organization stupid, they’ve proven themselves stupid.

I’ll continue to believe the team did this, then JVR started performing and they stopped shopping him.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 22, 2010 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Well Geoff, you got a lot of people worked up for over 14 hours now. Well done! After last night’s debacle I guess I can’t blame you for starting something but I’m just too old to get excited about this.
Back in the late 80’s, Stan Fischler, the self-proclaimed “hockey maven” (and first class d-bag) was a commmentator on ESPN broadcasts. Every week for about a month or so he kept reporting that the Flyers were trading 2 or 3 players to the Caps for Kevin Hatcher. Each week he’d name different Flyers, but the deal was always imminent, any moment we would here it from the league office. In fact it never happened, not even close. But it got everyone in the Flyers world worked up. It wasn’t until I was older and wiser that I realized what that jackass was up to. To wit: create as much chaos in Philly as possible for the benefit of his beloved Rangers. I’m not suggesting that anyone here is trying to do this at all w/JVR, I’m just saying it’s not worth investing my time chasing rumors. Although I must confess that when I see Fischler on the occasional MSG broadcast I still feel the urge to choke the living shit out of him. Anyway, thanks for the entertaining post and all the comments.

by mtitanic on Dec 22, 2010 1:08 AM EST up reply actions  

To play devil’s advocate why even read this blog/post if

it’s not worth investing my time chasing rumors
? why not ignore it and move along?

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Dec 22, 2010 1:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I mean, this is the same organization that shopped Gagne for cap space and the entire league knew about it. Including the media. So… if you think that makes the organization stupid, they’ve proven themselves stupid.

This is a different situation than Gagne. The Flyers clearly painted themselves into a corner there. But as far as THIS situation goes, if the whole league knows everything about the Flyers’ roster and cap, they must have known that the Flyers had the option to put Lappy on LTIR if they needed to. Homer certainly did, and JVR stayed.

"Darroll can't see it, blind to the eyes;
He came up in your face OOPS POWE SURPRISE!"
Man-crushin' on #36 since he hit his "absolute ceiling" as a rookie in 2008.

by mikefive on Dec 22, 2010 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree. But my point there was simply that the organization doesn’t have to say “we’re looking to clear cap space” for the media and other teams to know they’re looking to clear cap space.

Saying that the organization wouldn’t inform everybody they’re looking to clear cap space because they aren’t that stupid is ignoring the fact that they did exactly that a few months ago. Are the situations the same? No. But in the “they wouldn’t tell the league/media” sense, well, they a) don’t have to; and b) they already did that.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Dec 22, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally understandable

Dont get me wrong people I love JVR, I think he has tons of upside and potential, hell I even own a St Pattys day jersey with his name on the back. Having said that if homer could have pulled off a trade for JVR and got up into the upper part of the first round (which I assume is exactly what homer was doing since he didnt find a willing partner) and then also got possibly a 2nd or 3rd rounder too, well then Im sorry but the value is there guys. The draft class this year is very good through the top 10. On top of that JVR was struggling at the beginning of the year, so, not only would this be potentially a way to improve the team with yet another group of younger players but it would also serve as a wake up call to James. And would you look at now how the kid turned it on in the second half of the year? Hes arguably been our best player outside of Mr. Briere. FANTASTIC JOB HOMER. Now lock him and giroux up for the rest of my life HAHA!

by kckrebs on May 2, 2011 1:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Flyers-orange-crush_small
NHL Draft 2012: Options on defense in the first round
Copy_of_137494800_slide_small
The 2011-12 Philadelphia Flyers season in GIFs
Small
The Beauty of Being a Sports (And Flyers) Fan.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Could Parise and Weber be in Flyers' future?
Mick_jagr_2_small
SB Nation app
Small
Hockey Stick Help
37938_10150235117290484_539355483_13709206_6888144_n_small
Ilya Bryzgalov has chance to take shot at Flyers fans, does
Small
Can the Flyers win the Cup with Bryz?
Carcillo_small
Flyers in the Off-Season
Small
Flyers West

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Screen_shot_2012-01-09_at_12 Travis Hughes

Associate Editors

67865_878600804923_14200876_46395212_2220_n_small Geoff Detweiler

Headshot2_film_grain_small Ben Rothenberg

Soccer_face_small Eric T.

Contributors

163830_478172269164_824914164_5517468_4313370_n_small ToddtheFox

Clarke-tee_small KreiderDesigns

D150_small Teemu H