Broad Street Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Astros' fans react to Oswalt trade

Monday evening news! Versus back on DirecTV; Ovechkin suspended two games

After a ton of legal wrangling that has gone on for all of this hockey season, Comcast-owned Versus and satellite television provider DirecTV have finally (!) come to an agreement. Seriously, this time. Like, both companies announced it and everything.

Here's DirecTV:

DIRECTV and Comcast have reached an agreement to return VERSUS to the DIRECTV programming lineup today. Versus should be up on Channel 603 no later than 7PM ET/4PM PT.

And here's Versus:

DIRECTV and Comcast have reached an agreement to return VERSUS to the DIRECTV programming lineup today. The terms of the deal were not disclosed.

VERSUS will return to the same DIRECTV programming packages it was in at the end of August 2009.

It's happening. Tonight. Everybody can watch New Jersey vs Boston together, now. Hooray! The Flyers aren't on Versus again until the playoffs (knock on wood).

In other news, the NHL suspended Alex Ovechkin two games for his hit on Brian Campbell. Over at Japer's Rink, they're all tinfoil hatty, with J.P. saying such things as:

I've said it before and I'll say it again: these hits (Ovechkin's, Steve Downie's, Matt Cooke's, etc.) are Rorschach tests; people see what they want to see in them, be it a chance to critique the game, promote a hero by unfairly ripping apart a "villain," or what have you. Me? I saw a two-minute minor for boarding. Apparently Colin Campbell (whose son, incidentally, will face the Caps tomorrow night in Sunrise) saw it differently.

There's an arguable point in there somewhere I think, but it's all quickly lost in that ridiculous theory spouted there at the end. The fact of the matter is that yes, Matt Cooke's hit was much, much worse than the one Ovechkin put on Campbell. At least initially. In the end, both players are likely out for the year so from that perspective they are the same hit.

In any event, it's simple. There's a rule on the books for hitting from behind. There is no rule currently on the books calling what Matt Cooke did illegal. Period, end of discussion.

0 recs  |  Comment 61 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I wonder if the blinders would have stayed on at Jaspers Rink if it was another knee to knee hit? Or is this ok because it’s something different in boarding…not really, since this is Ovie’s second boarding incident this year.

by EREX21 on Mar 15, 2010 5:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe you could go join the conversation and find out instead of throwing stones from abroad.

Killer_Carlson and Steckel Me Elmo are like brothers to me. And when I say brothers I don't mean like actual brothers. I mean it like how black people use it, which is more meaningful, I think.

by Fehr and Balanced on Mar 15, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t need to join a conversation to read what those in that conversation are saying. It’s plain as day.

by EREX21 on Mar 15, 2010 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

With all due respect, Travis, you badly missed my point. Badly.

I don’t see anything that indicated I thought there was a conspiracy involved here (usually the implication of “tinfoil hatty,” and I’m not sure what you mean by “ridiculous theory.” Please elaborate.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 15, 2010 5:59 PM EDT reply actions  

By implying that Campbell’s decision is somehow complicated by the fact that his son’s team is playing against the Caps tomorrow night. That’s all I was getting at. I generally agree, or can at least see the argument, in the rest of what you said, but I think it’s overshadowed by that implication at the end there.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

But that’s a statement of fact.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club

by Ovechwin on Mar 15, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, it’s not. It’s a theory.

I’m gonna say this once, and I’m not implying that either of you are trolls or anything of the sort. In fact, I appreciate your responses. But if this turns in to a bunch of Caps fans coming over here to argue this point, I’m going to put an end to it. I’m not trying to silence anybody or anything like that, but a line has to be drawn.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you can say what you want about us, but we can’t respond. Nice.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 15, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m responding to you right now, am I not? I did not say that I won’t let you stay here and let you defend a criticism of your writing. Absoultely, positively not.

But this is not a Caps-fan forum, J.P. There’s a place for you to argue your points at your site. I’ll never silence you for coming here and responding to criticisms of your writing, but if the argument turns in to anything but a discussion of the criticism of you, I’m drawing a line.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was an added tidbit.

I fail to see how that constitutes a theory.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club

by Ovechwin on Mar 15, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

So it was unnecessary then?

Campbell may step away from decisions involving the Panthers, but I can’t see how he can completely say that his actions never have impact on them

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that’s why (among many other reasons) he shouldn’t hold that job. It’s a terrible conflict of interest.

Killer_Carlson and Steckel Me Elmo are like brothers to me. And when I say brothers I don't mean like actual brothers. I mean it like how black people use it, which is more meaningful, I think.

by Fehr and Balanced on Mar 15, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. That combined with the fact that he is awful at his job!

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Conflict or no conflict, he has proven he is incompetent. He needs to be reevaluated.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that was the “(among many other reasons)” part.

Killer_Carlson and Steckel Me Elmo are like brothers to me. And when I say brothers I don't mean like actual brothers. I mean it like how black people use it, which is more meaningful, I think.

by Fehr and Balanced on Mar 15, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Precisely. If he’s to recuse himself of anything and everything that effects the Panthers (or whatever team is son is on), he needs to quit his job. Every decision he makes indirectly or directly impacts the Panthers, including this one.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

At least we can all agree on that.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club

by Ovechwin on Mar 15, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

But what’s the point of throwing it in there if not to allow readers to draw their own conclusions and come up with possible conspiracy theories?

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

It wasn’t intended to lead anyone to any conclusion – it was a mere statement of fact, of interest, in the decision.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 15, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s not a luxury that we have.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, hit POST too soon.

That’s not a luxury we have. We don’t get to pick and choose the consequences of what we write. It came off to me and others as a conspiracy, and if you read the comments at Japers’, there are tons of conspiracies being floated around there as well.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the lesson in new media, Travis. I will stop picking and choosing the consequences of what I write going forward.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 15, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t this just a disagreement about perception?

Personally, I read it both ways. That it could be either a “conspiracy theory”, or that it is a legitimate point of interest. They sort of trend together a bit though.

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s why I say it’s a “pregnant” statement. Lots of people can read it very different ways unless the writer specifically points out the meaning he intends to infer.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting, then, in that it makes my exact point (the only one that I put forth in the quoted text): people see what they want to see.

I certainly didn’t mean to imply that Campbell suspended Ovi to protect his son. I meant to imply that Campbell shouldn’t have been involved in the decision because it would directly impact his son’s team. Guess it could’ve been more clear, in retrospect, but I honestly never even considered that first possible interpretation.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 15, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s where the written word gets us all into trouble. Without vocal tone and inflection, sarcasm is difficult to detect, too. Blah.

In the end, though, I love a good conspiracy theory! As I said below, Flyers’ fans will always find that angle—if it’s there. It’s ingrained in us from birth.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I certainly didn’t mean to imply that Campbell suspended Ovi to protect his son. I meant to imply that Campbell shouldn’t have been involved in the decision because it would directly impact his son’s team.

Same thing? If by protect, you mean protect from having lots of goals scored against his team.

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or to protect from his dirty, reckless play!

Go flyers! Or something…

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club

by Ovechwin on Mar 15, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t even consider that, but thanks for being original.

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just saying :)

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club

by Ovechwin on Mar 15, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

In your opinion, are the Flyers really that much dirtier than any other team in the NHL currently so that the phrase “Go Flyers” has been warped from something we use in support, to something other teams fans use as a slight.

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s more directed at the fans who can’t see past their fandom. Blind support. Every fan base has it, y’alls just got stuck with the meme.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club

by Ovechwin on Mar 15, 2010 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that’s fair, I think.

My tinfoil hat comment is more in response to the general tone I’m seeing from the DC crowd on this one, in that “how did they suspend Ovi but not Cooke, must be a conspiracy.”

By saying that they’re getting all ‘tinfoil hatty’ over at Japers’ is to say that Caps fans are, well, experiencing what just about every fan of every team feels at one point or another when these suspensions come down. It wasn’t a direct implication on you per se, so I do apologize if it came off that way as welll.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Cooke one is easier to ignore because of the Richards hit. It would literally be ridiculous to punish them differently. That said, there is no way that Cooke hit deserved zero PIM and zero games suspended. Ridiculous. The bigger issue for me is the Downie slew foot. Same day. More egregious. More dangerous. Dirtier player. No league reaction?

Killer_Carlson and Steckel Me Elmo are like brothers to me. And when I say brothers I don't mean like actual brothers. I mean it like how black people use it, which is more meaningful, I think.

by Fehr and Balanced on Mar 15, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely agree with you in that Downie should be suspended. Rest of the season-plus, IMO.

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uh, OK, whatever. I didn’t fail reading comprehension, so I know a pregnant statement when I read one. And you should know that Flyers’ fans, of all people, are the champions of conspiracy theories.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Campbell recuses himself from all decisions involving the Panthers. I don’t see how a possible suspension when the Panthers are the offender’s next opponent shouldn’t be something from which he should recuse himself as well.

But name-call and insult if you will.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 15, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I might just be stepping on a landmine here, but I think the statement that his son’s playing Ovechkin’s team tomorrow is completely irrelevant unless you’re insinuating that had some impact in his decision making. And if you are insinuating that had some impact in his decision making, you are formulating and promoting what I would say is a ridiculous conspiracy. I mean no personal insult, and I respect you and the work you’ve done putting your community together, but I do think it’s true.

And when you read me come up with a similar conspiracy theory on Silver Seven, call me out for it: We’re all fans of our respective teams, and that does colour the way we comment on the events they’re involved in.

by Peter Raaymakers on Mar 15, 2010 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

to my mind, there’s a pretty clear distinction between “insinuating” and pointing out a conflict of interest. the conflict of interest exists in absolute terms. the NHL acknowledges as much by preventing c. campbell from issuing rulings whenever the florida panthers are involved. legally speaking, i think it’s something worth noting. the reader can run with it however s/he wants to run with it. but having read JP for years now, that’s a pretty innocuous statement coming from him.

by Natty Bumppo on Mar 16, 2010 4:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is the important thing
but having read JP for years now, that’s a pretty innocuous statement coming from him.

That’s just his style. Seems a little funny to a person who doesn’t read JR religiously, but to us who do, well, at least I hardly noticed it.

Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans no more intelligent than myself

by red army line on Mar 16, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

the fact remains though, that Jasper’s is 100% correct, whether he’s willing to throw stones or not. The Panthers catch a huge break, however, you want to spin it.

Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com

by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 16, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah and this decision is going to save the Panthers season, NO

also being that the Caps and Panthers are in the same division couldn’t you then extend this argument than any decisions involving the Caps can potentially effect the Panthers, and going a step further since the Caps are in the same conference as the Panthers doesn’t any decision involving an Eastern conference rival have potential impact on the Panthers even more indirectly

say the Panthers are chasing Tampa Bay for the division title something that won’t happen probably in the next 20 years but for arguments sake the Panthers are chasing Tampa Bay in a close race. Maybe now Colin Campbell will suspend Downie for the figure four leglock takedown to help his soon catch Tampa. You can extrapolate these conspiracy theories forever and go on and on to places of extreme absurdity.

by chrislanci on Mar 16, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good. AO does have a dirty element to his play, much like many other good hockey players—but the rules exist for a reason. If you have a history and you keep doing the same thing, I don’t care if you are Wayne Gretzky reincarnated, your ass needs to sit in the press box.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:02 PM EDT reply actions  

And that includes the Flyers players, to all you Caps fans who think I hate Ovechkin. Couldn’t possibly be further from the truth. I very much like his style of play.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Mar 15, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think ovechkin deserves a suspension. He gave the player a push from behind. It appeared Campbell lost n edge which made the hit 10x worse. It seems Like this is only a penalty when a player is falling awkwardly when there hit. People will get hurt playing hockey. Always will. Injury does not equal automatic suspension or penalty

by MadmanSamCarcillo on Mar 15, 2010 6:22 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Lost in all of this, VERSUS IS ON DIRECTV AGAIN!

Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Travis Hughes on Mar 15, 2010 6:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Hooray! Oh wait…

This is a good thing if it means more streams to choose from!

"NZFlyerfan"

by ToddtheFox on Mar 15, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d like to think the agreement for Versus has something to do with this:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118016405.html?categoryid=14&cs=1

by Boog609 on Mar 15, 2010 7:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I wouldn't get to upset

by F & B and JP getting all riled up by criticizing their beloved AO. Caps fans practically stamp their fan cards with it. I made the mistake of wanting to talk hockey w/ other fans at Japers Rink. When I defended my team or disagreed w/ anything that the high and mighty had spoken, they subsequently banned me from their site. I see what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Noting their whining responses to your rational blog post has made me feel better about not taking part in their “discussions”.

by miah on Mar 16, 2010 2:28 AM EDT reply actions  

I have too much respect for Travis et. al. to get into it on their site, but you know why you were banned, and it wasn’t because you defended your team or disagreed with people.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 16, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

as do I...

but I really have no other forum to “get into it”, do I?

by miah on Mar 16, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Regarding the CC suspension

and whether he is implicated by the fact that his son happens to be playing the Caps the next night…that is laughable. Where do you draw the line on when he should “recuse himself”? Does he happen to know a person who knows a person who used to referee minor league games with a former player who has a kid in the front office of the next opponent? It’s completely ridiculous, irrelevant, and I agree with you that it makes his entire statement devoid of merit and “tinfoil hatty”.

by miah on Mar 16, 2010 2:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Please read above ^

Interesting that the Caps have played three games this season already without Ovechkin (one due to suspension). Today will make it four.

I wonder though, how much does CC really think about it? His son is a hockey player, there’s always a ton of risk out on the ice. If he and other players just cover the basics (don’t face the boards, keep your head up, lean into hits, don’t leave your feet) then I think many of these questionable plays—even ones where the attacker was almost entirely at fault—would not have happened.

Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans no more intelligent than myself

by red army line on Mar 16, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dude that sucks that when VS. comes back on of course they won’t be showing any f’ing Flyer games before the playoffs! At leat NBC will be showing them against the Red Wings on April 4th.

by The Legend on Mar 16, 2010 2:42 AM EDT reply actions  

you missed the bigger picture, which is that those of us with DirectTV don’t have to worry about finding a local bar to go watch the playoffs.

Awesome.

Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com

by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 16, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

True...

I just wanted to catch the Flyers before the playoffs

by The Legend on Mar 16, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is good that VS is back for Direct TV subscribers...

But I was getting used to ppl NOT complaining about the VS production and/or commentators. I guess we should just be thankful that it’s back and not bag on it so much, eh? Also, I was wondering how and if the Flyers being owned by Comcast played into or didn’t play into this whole controversy. What do the fans think?

by miah on Mar 16, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like bars, tho. :)

by stubborne on Mar 16, 2010 11:01 AM EDT reply actions  

damn, they have 1000 comments over at Jaspers!

Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com

by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 16, 2010 11:02 AM EDT reply actions  

They get 1,000 comments for “Caps reassign Alzner to Hershey” stories.

Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 16, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

wow, that’s impressive

Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com

by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 16, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.
Start posting about the Flyers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Flyers-orange-crush_small
12 For The Memories: A Tribute To Simon Gagne (Part 1)
Picture_032_small
Pick Up Game-August 8th

Recent FanPosts

Small
You know it's a slow day when the biggest news is..."Douchegate 2010"
Quadrophenia__album__small
Flyers Recruiting Drexel Students to Build Flugtag Flying Machine
Small
Penalties and Guidlines for Excessive Length Contracts...
Small
Niemi said no!!!
Philadelphia75x75_small
Home Sweet Home
Carcillo_small
I Don't Understand.
Philadelphia-flyers-logo_small
Kovalchuk and Devils - A Bettman Conspiracy?
Carcillo_small
Goalie Situation
Small
What Can $59.4 Million Get You in the NHL?
Pelle_small
A proposal to prevent Kovalchuk-type contracts.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 82 48 27 7 103
Pittsburgh 82 47 28 7 101
Philadelphia 82 41 35 6 88
New York Rangers 82 38 33 11 87
New York Islanders 82 34 37 11 79

(updated 4.12.2010 at 9:21 AM EDT)

SBNation.com Recent Stories

NEWARK NJ - JULY 20:  Ilya Kovalchuk of the New Jersey Devils poses for photographs following the media opportunity announcing his contract renewal at the Prudential Center on July 20 2010 in Newark New Jersey.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) +9 updates

With Arbitrator And Hearing Date Set, Is Kovalchuk Contract Mess Set To End?

In this photo taken on Monday, July 19, 2010, Atlanta Thrashers forward Andrew Ladd, formerly of the Stanley Cup champion Chicago Blackhawks, spends his day with the Stanley Cup atop Crown Mountain, British Columbia., north of Vancouver. Ladd, a two-time Stanley Cup champion, was flown by helicopter to the top of Crown Mountain to watch the sunrise. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press,  Mark L. Johnson) +54 updates

NHL Free Agency: Andrew Ladd Avoids Arbitration, Signs With Thrashers

FILE - In this May 7, 2009, file photo, Milan Michalek, front left, of the Czech Republic attacks Swedish goalie Jonas Gustavsson, right, during a quarterfinal at the Ice Hockey World Championship in Bern, Switzerland. Sweden's Carl Gunnarsson is seen behind on left. The Toronto Maple Leafs landed Gustavsson with a one-year contract on Tuesday, July 7, 2009. The 24-year-old netminder, nicknamed "The Monster," was also heavily pursued by Dallas, San Jose and Colorado. (AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus, File) link

Euro Hockey For Dummies: A Primer On How European Hockey Leagues Work

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

Headshot-phillies_small Travis Hughes

Staff Writers

Think_sc_cropped_small Geoff Detweiler

Me_minus_kbond_small Ben Rothenberg