Refs aid third period comeback, but Flyers fall to Preds in shootout, 4-3
[Corsi and Fenwick] - [Head-to-Head TOI] - [EV Face-Offs] - [Shift Charts]
After essentially owning the action for, oh, the first five minutes of the first period, the last five minutes of the first period, and the entirety of the second period, the Philadelphia Flyers still had nothing to show for their efforts. They were down 3-1 on a few unfortunate goals against an injured Michael Leighton -- who left the game in the first -- and a defensive breakdown in front of his replacement, Brian Boucher.
A whopping 17 first period shots didn't work. 12 second period shots didn't work. Completely outplaying the Nashville Predators just didn't work. But about halfway through the third period, something finally gave. Matt Carle should've been called for a hooking penalty, but the whistle stayed silent. Claude Giroux kept the play alive along the boards in the Nashville end, and before you knew it, the puck was bouncing around in front of the net. The Flyers couldn't finish all game long, but a bounce finally went their way when Simon Gagne banged the loose puck home to cut the deficit to 3-2.
From there, the Flyers really stepped things up. They controlled the play even more. They put the Predators on their heels. As a result, the referees wound up helping them as well. Several calls should have probably been made against the Flyers during this stretch, but when you're dictating the course of the hockey game, it becomes easy to get away with more things. On the other hand, it also forces the other team to make more errors, and that's exactly what Dan Hamhuis did with 12:43 remaining in the third.
With the Flyers swarming in the Nashville end, Hamhuis intentionally knocked the net off of it's moorings. That's a delay of game penalty and the officials called it properly. Chris Pronger, quickly becoming known as the clutch scorer apparently, blasted a slap shot by Pekka Rinne to tie the hockey game. You have to feel bad for the Nashville fans, but you also have to give credit where it's due to the Flyers for taking advantage of their breaks.
The good guys would dictate the play for most of the remainder of the game following Pronger's goal. They held the puck in the Preds end, they cycled well, they forechecked hard, the defensemen pinched effectively, and the forwards backed them up when necessary. It was, simply put, very solid hockey, and exactly the kind of hockey that Peter Laviolette wants this team playing.
Unfortunately, despite several chances once the game went into overtime, the Flyers couldn't put one home. They'd go on to lose in the shootout on one measly goal from Martin Erat, but it's tough to be too mad about this game. The Flyers seemed jinxed in the first period with the weak goals against and the Leighton injury, but the fact that they wound up putting 45 shots on Rinne and controlled the entire game is a very strong sign.
It's easy, of course, to sit there and say that this happens all the time. It does seem like the Flyers do this kind of often, losing games they should win. But how often do they literally completely control the game against a very solid team like this and still lose? Like I said, tough to be too mad.
After the jump, questions with answers and the comment of the night.
Questions with Answers
- Does Scott Hartnell build upon the solid games he's put together recently in his Nashville homecoming? What about Kimmo Timonen? Both players were pretty solid, but Hartnell in particular looked good. He's really improved in the last three games and it continued tonight. Strong forechecking, never giving up on the play, all that stuff.
- It's the token question, really: Michael Leighton? Yeah, uh, tough to answer. In the, what, 10 minutes he played, he allowed two goals. It's tough to say if either were his fault, but it was less than good. Hopefully he's not out too long.
- The Nashville PP could hurt the Flyers tonight, according to reports from the Music City. Can the Flyers stay outta the box like they have in recent games? They took penalties but none were called against them. Last time they went a whole game without going on the penalty kill? January 11, 2006.
Comment of the Night
Hey, I was expecting him to pass.
>> KreiderDesigns, on Richards' shootout move
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Last time they went without KILLING a penalty???? Don’t you mean taking? Because if they haven’t killed a penalty since 2006, thats horrendous.
"NO HONOR"
"We will steal the show, jolly Rogers go, we are wolves of the sea."
Should be more like ‘being forced to kill a penalty.’ It’s not taking, either, because there could’ve been a game in there where there was a fight (like tonight) or a four-on-four coincidental situation or something.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 17, 2010 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Thats true, but the fix makes it a lot clearer.
"NO HONOR"
"We will steal the show, jolly Rogers go, we are wolves of the sea."
Yep, agreed. Fixed it.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 17, 2010 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions
hard to be mad? No, it really isn’t. Remove the god damned shootout already. It has no purpose in the NHL.
by StarbladeMKIII on Mar 17, 2010 12:29 AM EDT reply actions
Any word on what happened with Leighton?
A weird, weird game tonight for sure.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
High ankle sprain, day-to-day. Good news is he can walk/skate and put pressure on it.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 17, 2010 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Leighton said he heard a pop on his ankle…
The best thing that could happen to his free agent status is to not play another game this year. He looked like crap in New York Sunday and was about five minutes from getting pulled tonight. The play he was injured on, all he had to do was catch the puck in the air and there’s no contact from the Predator player.
Similarly, the best thing the Flyers can do is shelve Leighton for the rest of the season so Laviolette doesn’t have the opportunity to play him.
Oof, yeah I just saw word of the pop.
I tend to agree with you, especially on the notion of free agency. Whether sitting him is in the best interest of the team has been debated around here hundreds of times, but I do think we can all agree that getting Boosh some time here is certainly a good thing. That’s the clear, non-debatable (IMO) plus side of this injury.
Broad Street Hockey - SB Nation's Philadelphia Flyers Blog. Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 17, 2010 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree sadly.
I didn’t see the game, but I did catch the replays. On the first preds goal, I was “ok, there’s the weak goal that trickled through the 5-hole”. On the second preds goal, I was “ok, there’s the – I’m down way to early and giving the guy the whole top half of the net to shoot at-goal”…I was almost glad to see him get hurt (not in a bad way, but just because he was giving me a heart attack and I was just watching the highlights).
How did Boosh play the rest of the game?
I was happy obviously for the charity point, but aren’t we now in 7th?
Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com
by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 17, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, we are in 7th, but we have two games in hand on Montreal and one more game against them. I’m happier to see the teams behind us lose (especially when those teams are known as the New York Rangers). We have one game in hand on the Rangers and 2 games against them.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
So I hope that doesn’t translate into he’s good to go….Not that I want him to be hurt but I don’t want him to have army commandoed it to get Dr.‘s approval and still be hurt. He wouldn’t be the first athlete to do something with good intentions or out of some misguided machismo which turns around to bite him and his team on the ass. I think it is also particualr tough on some back-up players whose desire to play and prove themselves will push themselves in stituations like this. The worst has to be back -up quarterbacks unless your name is Tom Brady. You gotta feel for Kevin Kolb (other than the paycheck) esp as 2 round pick. I know football doesn’t really have a minor league so he had some years of preening but man, he aint getting any younger. At the very least and I’m no judge of goalie skill, I think Leighton has demonstrated his worth as a dependable back-up but if he is is more injured then he’s letting on and then performs horribly because of it , his value will plummet.
Well here we go again. Another year another Goalie issue.
I love this team, but sometimes it really sucks to be a Flyers fan. :(
So if Leighton is hurt and Boosh is in net who will be brought up for a backup for Boosh?
With the way this year is going that might just happen.
by LegionofDoom on Mar 17, 2010 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Backlund? I don’t think we’d call up Duchesne.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Seravalli says Duchesne, since Backlund is apparently hurt.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 17, 2010 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions
They just called up Michael-Lee Teslak. Who will sit on their bench, I’m not so sure.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 17, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Well fudgemonkeys. Five goalies between the NHL and AHL, and three of them are hurt simultaneously.
How long until we can get Eriksson? (No, I’m not serious…though if we have another injury or two, it may be that bad)
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
He basically was one of the best goalies in Sweden’s AAA last year. When he gets to the Elitserein next year, he’ll probably stay there for a year or two (or more) before coming to the AHL for a year or two…
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 17, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, his play (as well as the play of others) will hopefully get Leksand through Kvalserien till Elitserien. If it doesn’t, apparently Hakan Loob’s team has been courting him for next season. I was being somewhat sarcastic about how deep into the goalie pool we’re having to reach with all these injuries. Frankly, despite how well Eriksson’s playing at his current level, he wouldn’t be ready for the NHL.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Eriksson and/or Riopel (or anyone else) would need an actual NHL contract before they can join the team. We own their rights, but under Article 11 of the CBA, no player can play in a game in the NHL without an NHL contract. While that could be a 1 day try-out contract under emergency conditions, that provision wouldn’t really help us here, so they’d need a real contract and therefore count against our 50 contract limit (which has 1 open slot).
However, there is the ability to call a guy up to the NHL level at the same time as the contract is being filed with the NHL. But it’s not a decision they’re likely to make without a little more than 5 minutes to think about it. It still may happen before the end of the season, I just mean that it wouldn’t have happened last night.
I can provide an example of a club issuing an NHL contract to a player at the same time as the call up:
"The coaches told me to go talk to Hubie and he told me that I was called up to the Kings and they were going to sign me to an NHL contract," explained Zeiler.
Given the fact he was with the Monarchs on an AHL contract, a fax containing an NHL contract had to be transmitted to Rochester and signed on the spot to facilitate the call-up.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 17, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Karma?
There was talk in the game thread about the Flyers’ lucky non-calls against “coming back to bite us” one day.
If this were November instead of March, I’d agree with you. But have we forgotten about all of the unlucky breaks, bad bounces, and horrible calls (or non-calls) that victimized the Flyers for the better part of November and December? True, the team was playing some lousy hockey then, but they were also Team Murphy’s Law – Anything that could have gone wrong DID go wrong, adding to the team’s struggles.
In short, I think this game was karmic repayment for all of the bad stuff we went through earlier. It cost the Predators and their fans some consternation, but they got the win anyway and the Flyers earned a well-deserved point.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
This condensed schedule is getting ridiculous. The Players have been noticeably exhausted in the last two games. you can physically see that the game is happening a second slower.
I’m all for NHL players in the olympics dont get me wrong, but there’s a better way to do this. Like for example, why not schedule some of these march madness games during that two week vacation the Flyers had at the beginning of the season? maybe extend the season an extra calendar week during an olympic year? there are plenty of possible solutions out there.
refs and the color black
apparently the refs are getting tired too from all these games it looked like they didn’t have the energy to blow the whistle we got the calls in the 3rd but there were some calls they didn’t want to call in the beginning as well, like when Carter had his stick grabbed or when JVR had his stick slashed from his hands, we earned that point stupid shootout though doesn’t make sense without a 3pt regulation win I just don’t get it
on a side note what is with us and these damn Black Jersey’s I hate the Black I don’t think we play well in the Black, strange shit happens when wearing the Black. I am also still pissed that the Chicago comes to town what like every 5 years or so and has probably the nicest jersey in professional sports and every time the come here they were some weird 3rd jersey when they should be wearing those beautiful away white jersey’s or at least the red ones not the retro throwback all black jerseys. Screw Black jerseys. Black is for mini-skirts and short dresses not hockey uniforms.
There’s an old study from 1988 (available here [PDF file]) that shows teams wearing black get penalized more and are seen as more aggressive, even when carrying out exactly the same actions.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"

by 






















