Report: Flyers showing Esche interest again; Coburn turns down contract talks
Two interesting bits of news tonight from Wayne Fish of phillyburbs.com. First, that the Flyers are interested in goalie Robert Esche. Again. He's currently playing over in Russia. Secondly, Fish is reporting that defenseman Braydon Coburn has turned down a contract extension, instead wanting to wait until the season is over to negotiate.
Let's get to the Esche news first. As you likely remember, the Flyers contacted Esche over the summer as a potential candidate to fill the vacant goaltender spot back then. Esche decided that he wanted to honor the final season of his KHL contract in Russia, though.
Paul Holmgren confirmed to Fish on Sunday night that he has in fact explored Esche as an option for the remainder of this regular season, but rules say that any goalie signed right now wouldn't be eligible to play in the postseason. If that's the case, it really doesn't matter.
Sure, the Flyers could use a backup goalie who isn't still taking college classes while Johan Backlund is out, but that's all Esche would be. If Boucher goes down as well, we're clearly effed beyond comprehension. Therefore, an Esche signing or any signing for the remainder of the regular season is really not too important.
Now, on to Coburn. Fish is reporting that the Flyers defenseman "directed his agent" to defer contract talks until the end of the season. He's a restricted free agent following this season and Flyers reportedly offered him a contract. The most intriguing part of Fish's report is the following quote from Holmgren.
"I don’t think he’s played as well as we would have anticipated,’’ Holmgren said. "And if you ask Braydon, probably not as good as he would have liked. He still logs a lot of minutes for us. I’m concerned that his production has dropped again this year.
"But I do think there are some variables here that are out of his control. Chris (Pronger) gets more power-play time now and Braydon is getting less this year. But we still consider him part of our future. We look forward to getting it (contract) done.’’
Holmgren also said that he "doesn't have any problems" with Ryan Parent, that Dan Carcillo's agent is waiting until the end of the year to start talks and that he's close on terms with Darroll Powe's camp.
109 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wouldn’t the NHL have to make an exception if even Boosh goes down?
Bettman's Nightmare: A Blog Where Hockey Aficionados Dismantle That Mighty Empire, One Balsillie at a Time
http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/
by Bettman's Nightmare on Mar 29, 2010 12:55 AM EDT reply actions
Would they? Do you know of that rule?
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 29, 2010 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, it was a hypothetical question.
Bettman's Nightmare: A Blog Where Hockey Aficionados Dismantle That Mighty Empire, One Balsillie at a Time
http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/
by Bettman's Nightmare on Mar 29, 2010 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions
If my interpretation is correct, I think they wouldn’t have to if Backlund got healthy before the playoffs, because Duschene would be playoff eligible since he had an NHL contract prior to the deadline and would be able to be called up through the playoffs under the emergency conditions rule. If Boosh goes down and Backlund is still out, I don’t know what happens… You can’t go over 50 NHL contracts (there’s no exceptions listed for that in the CBA), but you have to have 2 goalies on the active roster every night…. Would they make an exception, or make us put a real player on unconditional waivers to terminate a contract? I don’t think there’s a precedent for this, whether my impression is correct or not, so I have no idea how the NHL would really handle it.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions
16.4.b
Except in case of emergency, there shall be no reduction of the required
minimum Playing Rosters of the Clubs, below eighteen (18) skaters and two (2)
goaltenders.
Injuries count as an emergency, so (in my interpretation) we could dress fewer than 2 goaltenders if we keep having injuries.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
I guess the rules for eligible goalies in the event of injury might be a template. In the situation that you have both rostered goalies hurt, you still could only use “eligible” players. So it might have to be a skater dressed as a keeper. Wild & Crazy Kids.
Bettman's Nightmare: A Blog Where Hockey Aficionados Dismantle That Mighty Empire, One Balsillie at a Time
http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/
by Bettman's Nightmare on Mar 29, 2010 1:24 AM EDT up reply actions
There is that provision for a skater dressing as a goalkeeper mid-game if both goalkeepers are incapacitated, but I guess if you dressed a skater as a goalie at the beginning and put him on the lineup card in that spot he could be considered eligible. Maybe we should find out if any of our skaters on the 50 man roster have ever played goal in juniors or something…. This is way too scary to think about at this hour though. I don’t know how the NHL would handle such an embarrassing situation being a long-term problem as opposed to a mid-game emergency procedure.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I could see it as a potential catalyst for adding an emergency goalkeeper extension to the 50 contract limit in the next CBA anyway, no matter how it shakes out right now.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess it would be like in those blowout baseball games where they put infielders as pitchers and they give up tons of hits. In this case I’m guessing tons of goals.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
by Christopher A on Mar 29, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Still scary, definitely. One inning of baseball with a guy who may have been a pitcher at some point is way easier to take. Sometimes that’s successful in a one or two inning situation (as in that guy doesn’t get hit, not that the team necessarily wins), but going forward into the playoffs with that as a permanent solution? That’s just frightening.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
That is kinda what I ment.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
by Christopher A on Mar 29, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Years ago the Flyers had a game where both of their goalies were temporarily out of action. Scott Mellanby actually started to put the goalie pads on but one of our goalies (either Ken Wregget or Pete Peeters) shook it off and played the rest of the way.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
So wait: is there any downside to signing Esche? I’d assume Doosh would start over Esche in case of an injury to Boucher, since they’d have to turn to Doosh in the playoffs anyway. But we have the cap room and the contract room, and we still have to make the playoffs.
It would be a little weird to sign him for like 6 games though, since Homer would have to think of him as a really reliable long term solution or backup, or else we’re really up against the contract limit for next year which could handicap our offseason moves. Esche hasn’t played in North America (and therefore a different speed game) in what, 3 years? Seems to me like that would be at least a 4-6 game readjustment period, and then what have we gained? And if Doosh is gonna play the Caps or Penguins or even Devils in the first round, shouldn’t he have seen NHL action at least once before that? I’d rather take my chances with Boosh and Doosh on those terms. Capgeek is down, but I’m pretty sure we already have about 3 or 4 entry-level contracts that we’re completely dependent on them sliding to next year, which means we have to let at least that number of RFAs and UFAs go without replacing them, or make several multiplayer trades where we give up more people than we get, to get back under 50. I don’t know if that will actually motivate him to be careful right now, but I’m certainly concerned.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Why did the Flyers quit on Esche in the first place? I didn’t follow as closely back then
"NZFlyerfan"
I’m 99% sure there were injuries involved, as well. I don’t think he ever played a healthy season in the NHL after that cup run in 04. But he has been healthy over there, for what it’s worth.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Not sure how I feel about the Flyers almost agreeing to terms or whatever phrase was used with Powe. I like him and all but I don’t think he is very good.
Not sure how I feel about the prospect of resigning Coburn. I guess at the end of the day, for the right price he can be a very good 4th or even 3rd defensemen. I say get it done. This is hopefully just a down year for him.
As for Carbomb…we need him back. Period.
Im perfectly fine if Coburn never puts on a Flyers sweater ever again.
Yes, I’m using the Ben Boost on Braydon.
"Sugah n' rainbows"
"We will steal the show, jolly Rogers go, we are wolves of the sea."
If he didn’t get hurt in 08 I’m feeling like we would have beat the pens and went to the cup to face detriot.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
by Christopher A on Mar 29, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Some people here have speculated in the past that his play hasn’t been the same since that hit. There could be something to that theory.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Holmgren better not think that he is going to get Esche for the goalie position next year. Enough with this out the box throwing shit against the wall and seeing if it sticks. Enough! And I would not mind if Coburn was signed and we got the draft picks and cap space for him at this point. Why sign him now let it play out in time.
Just Call Me "M"!
I agree, but I guess Homer was trying to get Coburn to sign now while his value is pretty low. But I agree with you, i’d rather the picks and cap space.
And they have to decide who they are keeping on this roster after Timonen, Pronger and Carle. Because after that they are all the same. Sort of like our forwards situation. If Coburn brings picks and the most space you still have Parent, Bartullis, Krajicek and Syvret. And I believe they really could use a serviceable veteran that is in the 5/6 matchup.
Just Call Me "M"!
I like Bartulis, in principle anyway. He’s still very green, but I haven’t got a real problem with him hanging around.
But we already gave him a 3 year extension. I feel like it’s kind of a moot point, because I really thought I remembered hearing that. Besides, he’s cheap, 3 years, 600K flat every year from 2010 – 2013. It’s just that it’s one way, not two way, meaning he gets his NHL salary in either place, but he can still be sent up and down so I’m not too worried about it. They can afford it at that price.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Out of all the defensemen that have played for us this year, the only ones that aren’t some sort of free agent are Timonen, Pronger, Carle, Bartulis, and Bourdon.
Coburn, Parent, and Syvret are RFA, and Krajicek and Mormina are UFA.
We’ll need to keep using Bartulis, and I think we’re also going to need contribution from someone coming up from the Phantoms if we can’t re-sign our FAs, since I doubt we can pick up two FA d-men this offseason. Between Bourdon, Marshall, and Lehtivuori, hopefully at least one can become a permanent fixture, and we can bring Bertilsson over to the AHL.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
By all accounts, Lehtivuori has been an unexpected surprise this year. Not sure if he’s NHL ready by next year though.
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 29, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions
It might be worth setting up Pronger, Timonen, and Carle as 1, 3, and 5 for early games, with Bourdon, Marshall, and Lehtivuori rotating through the 2, 4, and 6 to see if any of them have good chemistry with one of the veterans.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Err…for early preseason games.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Haha, much better, yes.
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 29, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Well that gets even clearer that Bartullis stays. Hopefully someone signs Coburn so we get picks and cap space and they resign Parent, who still has the most upside regardless of the injuries and bad play. Then they need to walk on the rest and get a serviceable affordable veteran.
Just Call Me "M"!
“He’s still very green” makes you sound like an NHL-scout type or something. That’s really excellent.
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 29, 2010 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions
I think everyone needs to quit hoping for Coburn to sign an offer sheet in the off season.
Since the lockout, there’s only been five players who have signed offer sheets. They are Ryan Kesler, Thomas Vanek, Dustin Penner, David Backes and Steve Bernier. In each case, the player was coming off of a career year — something that Coburn most certainly isn’t. In fact, Coburn is coming off of two straight regression years.
You also have to remember the compensation. If Coburn signs an offer sheet for the same cap hit that he has now — $1.3 million — the Flyers will only get a single 3rd round pick back. If he signs for a cap hit of up to $2.6 million then the Flyers will get a 2nd rounder.
Even if Coburn does sign an offer sheet, I doubt it would be for more than $1.5 to $2 million, which would only see the Flyers getting a single 2nd round pick back. If you’re looking for a way for the Flyers to get cap space AND draft picks this offseason, a Coburn offer sheet isn’t going to accomplish that.
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."
by Grp_Cpt_Lionel_Mandrake on Mar 29, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
We have to offer Coburn at least $1.3 million to get the compensatory draft pick, so we will receive at least a 2nd round pick if he signs elsewhere. Also, if the average league salary has declined, the limits decline as well.
There are a lot of teams that couldn’t sign Coburn right now, because they wouldn’t have their own 2nd-round pick to give up (it must be the team’s original pick, not a 2nd rounder they picked up from someone else):
Atlanta (belongs to NJ)
Buffalo (Carolina)
Calgary (Chicago)
Nashville (Edmonton)
NJ (Atlanta)
Ottawa (Carolina)
Pittsburgh (Florida)
San Jose (NYI)
Tampa (Florida)
Toronto (Boston)
Vancouver (Columbus)
Washington (Minnesota)
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Did you get that from 2010 or 2011 numbers? I’d be shocked if that many teams already gave away their 2011 pick, and that’s the one used for RFA compensation.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
headdesk You’re right. I was looking at this year’s picks instead of next year’s. For 2011, the teams with a second round pick are the Flames, Wild, Habs, and Caps.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Here are some really encouraging quotes from SanFilippo:
Source 1 (who is “someone within the organization who has full knowledge of what the team’s personnel decisions and plans are”):
We can’t go into next year with the same situation or a similar situation in goal that we have right now. What happened this year is really nobody’s fault. Ray (Emery) came in here and did everything we asked and was good until he got hurt. We got lucky with (Michael) Leighton, but we can’t expect to win doing things this way in goal.
It’s already been decided that our No. 1 priority for next season is to get a goalie. We have to go out and get that player and commit to him as our guy.
It’s probably going to mean somebody is going to have to be traded away, especially if we go after a young goalie on another team, but that’s what we’re going to have to do. We can’t keep going the way we have been. The goalie has to be the most important target and we don’t want to keep replacing one veteran with another. We want to get a guy who can be our goalie for several years…. We have to go in another direction.
Source 2:
A number of these guys (on the Flyers roster) won’t be back.
SanFilippo speculates they’ll go after Price, seeing as Halak has won the job in Montreal. It would be a big risk hoping that all he needs is a change in environment, but I don’t see that as more of a risk than going into a “win-now” season with an Emery/Boucher tandem, so…
Personally, I would rather have Esche over Price. Why should the Flyers settle for a guy who lost his starting job? And after the goalie mess this town has had over the years, playing goal in Philly will be every bit as challanging as playing goal in Montreal. Not exactly the “fresh start” Price would need. He is broken in the head.
by SanDiegoScraps on Mar 30, 2010 6:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, why should the Flyers settle for a guy who has lost his starting job when they can settle for a guy who lost employ by the entire NHL?
by Snevik on Mar 30, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well, step 1 is admitting you have a problem, right? Okay, we’re finally there if this is all true.
Second source is sketchy since there’s no hint as to the accuracy of the information, but it’s logical to say that it’s possible.
I can live with going after Price, because Montreal is a rough town on goalies (not that Philly isn’t a rough place to play too). It’s just that crummy bit of RFA compensation picks that could screw us if we don’t get the dollar amount right. I expect Montreal to give him an offer sheet at the dead minimum they can that I’m sure he’ll refuse, just so that they’re entitled to the picks. They know people want him, I can’t imagine that they’ll forgo their chance at those picks.
If I’m remembering right, we have no second round pick in 2011 because it went to Phoenix for Carcillo. The last time I checked the updated RFA compensation numbers (they get adjusted as salaries rise, with the percentage increase matching whatever the percentage increase of the league’s average salary is), this is what I think the numbers for last summer were (if they’re not perfect I think they’re close):
$994,433 or below – No Compensation
$994,434 – $1,506,717 – 2010 3rd round pick
$1,506,718 – $3,013,433 – 2010 2nd round pick
$3,013,433 – $4,520,150 – 2010 1st round pick, 2010 3rd round pick
$4,520,151 – $6,026,867 – 2010 1st round pick, 2010 2nd round pick, 2010 3rd round pick
$6,026,868 – $7,533,584 – 2010 1st round pick, 2011 1st round pick, 2010 2nd round pick, 2010 3rd round pick
Over $7,533,584 – 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 1st round picks.
Numbers above are the cap hit. Except in the cases where you owe more than 1 pick from the same round, the pick has to be available for the very next draft, 2011, which was noted above in the numbers calculated for this year. Oh, and they can’t be picks you’ve acquired in a trade, they have to be the ones the NHL awards to you.
That means, that by last year’s numbers, our only cap hit options are: a) Less than 1.5 million, b) between 3 and 4.5 million, or c) greater than 7.5 million. If his market value is between 1.5 and 3 million or 4.5 and 7.5 million, it’s a no go. If we don’t have the picks available for the right years, the NHL voids the deal under 10.3.(h). We might be able to squeak him into the 3 – 4.5 million mark, but if somebody outbids us there and goes to 5, we’re kinda out of the running.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
We lost our 2010 2nd rounder to the Kings in the Hersley & Lukacevic for Gauthier deal. The 2011 2nd rounder is the Carcillo pick.
Also, if you owe multiple picks in the same round, you get one additional year, so the two first rounders for $6-7.5M could come from 2010, 2011, or 2012. The four first rounders for a really expensive guy would have to be by 2014.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
But if you have one pick in each round, you need to give those up the correct year. So we get 3 years to give up the two firsts in the 6 – 7.5 bracket, but the 2nd rounder absolutely needs to be 2011.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
do you really thing those goalies are going to get offers for over 6 million per year I certainly do not think so 3-4 maybe but that is it but if I am MTL, CHI and VAN I would rather have players than picks, VAN and CHI are really good teams competing hard out west and MTL is Montreal and they are under lots of pressure to win now going after Gionta and Gomez in previous offseason they are going continue to do so if not they are wasting a lot of money, plus their new GM is going to want to make his mark and the Halak or Price decision is going to be a big one.
All I was saying is that the money has to be exactly right to make it fit because we don’t have the pick. Under those numbers, which will change, we can do 4.5, but if somebody bids 4.55, then we’re out. Likewise, we would still have a problem if we want to give him only 2 million; we’d be forced to overpay and up our bid over 3 since we wouldn’t be allowed to do anything between 1.5 and 3. My point is that we can’t just do whatever we want to get an RFA, we are restricted in some ways.
I don’t know about 6, but I do think there is a non-zero chance that Price could get an offer from somebody for 4.55, it’s hard to say what his market value will actually be. I highly doubt we’re going to be the only team looking at him, if we do actually look at him. But these numbers apply to any RFA player, not just Carey Price.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for the info Ben. I am not directing this towards you, the messenger. Emery did everything they asked. After only playing 30 or so games the year before in the KHL, a substandard league, the Flyers played this guy 21 straight starts with two back to back games and wondered why he broke down. Then proceeded to play him 8 straight starts after surgery with on back to back and wondered why he went down to injury. And it’s nobody’s fault a guy ended his career here. These guys are boobs.
Just Call Me "M"!
I don’t think being over played had anything to do with his genetic based, necrotic hip disorder that is not something you get from playing too many games.
I am no orthopedic surgeon, but the first injury was caused by over use and fatigue. And the second seemed to be from being overused immediately after recovery and led to the misalignment created by the weakness from the surgery. Ever notice after people have hip or back surgery and they start feeling good all of a sudden the knee goes or vice a versa. Either way Emery was not in top shape or health or form to be a 60 to 70 game #1 goaltender in the NHL. Bad choice by Homer
Just Call Me "M"!
I’m not entirely sure that’s an accurate depiction of Emery’s injuries. He has avascular necrosis, which is the destruction of bone tissue due to a lack of blood getting to the bone.
When asked to describe his injury in layman’s terms, Emery said:
"Basically, there’s no blood getting to the femoral head or the top of your femur. Normally, that bone is regenerated and it has a blood supply to keep it healthy. Mine has stopped somewhere along the way, so it just doesn’t get any blood. Basically, it is just a dead bone at the top, and slowly it starts to deteriorate."
Not seeing how “over use and fatigue” caused his bone to die.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 29, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Not caused the problem, but I might say it caused the injury to get noticed earlier than it might have previously. But if it had gotten found maybe 3 months later, we wouldn’t be in that much better of shape anyway…
It’s kind of like Jonesy’s knee surgery….. in 90+% of people, the tendon should have grown back and his body didn’t. There’s no fix, nothing that can be done. Jonesy tried to play in a brace for too long and it hurt his body even more. Emery really shouldn’t try to play again, if he cares about his quality of life after the NHL.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Well how do you miss a bad hip like that on a physical. And something like that doesn’t pop up over night. You have to admit the work load was ridiculous though.
Just Call Me "M"!
Well, not to beat the same example to death, but it took 5 or 6 doctors and like 4 or 5 years to figure out what was wrong with Jonesy’s knee.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Jonsey’s is a wimp. Haha. Actually Bill Barber played a large part of his career without ACL’s. They worked on his quads nonstop to keep his knee stable and he was fine.
Just Call Me "M"!
DeJuan Blair—San Antonio Spur—plays with no ACLs. I forget the quote, but he said something along the lines of “They work fine, but this could end badly.”
I think the down side is the pressure on the medial and lateral co-laterals, which end up being a harder surgery to recover from. And back in the day knee surgery was a crap shoot and Bill was afraid it would definitely end his career rather than just being prudent about what his situation was.
Just Call Me "M"!
Here’s what I got. http://www.slate.com/id/2234460/
“Harder to recover from” might mean “career-ending,” right?
It’s all about the structure of your knee, and what the actual problem is that determines whether you can function or not. Everybody’s knee is so different, some guys can do that, some can’t. Barber was able to do it because his quad was strong enough, but to jump up to your previous statement, same thing doesn’t apply to Jonesy because his ACL wasn’t the problem. Especially with knees, so many people’s are messed up just normally without having done anything; heaven forbid you add a major sports injury to that. With knee injuries you’re basically playing with fire. Hip can be pretty much the same deal; there’s just too much that can go wrong.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
And to add, most hockey players have strong quads as a basis to being a skater, plus skating doesn’t lend itself to the lateral motion say football and basketball player put on the knees. I have to say this because I have been operating for 15 years now without an acl and I continued to skate and work construction.
Just Call Me "M"!
Understood. But if we’re continuing my example (and I wasn’t trying to go this far with it, originally…), I’m going by the information in his book, Jonesy’s problem was made far worse due to his quad muscle not being strong enough. That version of the events in the book plays out as: Tore ACL, had ACL surgery, ACL surgery was successful but it used part of his patella tendon which was supposed to grow back, his patellar tendon did not grow back (actually shrunk instead), which caused there to be significant bone on bone contact in his knee, which prevented him from working his quad muscle so it continually got weaker and he could never strengthen it again. It mentions that he hoped to play with a brace (a la Ray Ferraro, who also never had surgery), but that wouldn’t work since he was bowlegged and had a different knee structure. That’s why I said it’s not the same problem as Barber, who had a very strong quad muscle and as far as I know, wasn’t severely bowlegged.
Can I be done with this now? All I tried to do was a make a multiple year / multiple doctor example.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s hard to diagnose. In early stages, only bone scintigraphy (using radioactive material to test bone density) or an MRI will detect it. It doesn’t show up on X-Rays until the bone actually starts deteriorating.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Well, the next part of the blockquote is:
“Three weeks ago they noticed that there was some deterioration and they thought that this is what it was. Then, you have to wait three weeks to see how fast it’s progressing. Just yesterday, they did another MRI, and it has progressed to the point that any athletic activity they think that it’s going to collapse."
So if they notice deterioration, I’m assuming they didn’t notice that even at the time of his first injury, let alone when they gave him a physical before signing him. It doesn’t appear to be something that pops up during physicals, but obviously, I’m not a doctor.
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 29, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
did you stay at a holiday inn express last night?
Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com
by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 29, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
haha, no. I stayed at a Motel 6…
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Mar 29, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
we’ll leave the light on for you
Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com
by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 29, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Please, for the love of the Flyers, DO NOT SIGN CARY PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That bum is never going to be more then he is now, a good backup or a below average starter. I would rather Cote play Goalie then him.
"Sugah n' rainbows"
"We will steal the show, jolly Rogers go, we are wolves of the sea."
This quote from the Daily News on Hutton:
“Under the terms of the amateur tryout agreement he signed with the Phantoms on March 20, he is only permitted to be in the NHL for one game.”
So Thursday, who will be backing us up, assuming Backlund is still hurt?
Well there are three other guys in town that have nothing else to do right now so I am sure between Emery, Leighton and Backlund they could find someone.
Just Call Me "M"!
I have to believe it’s Doosh, since they might have just been holding off calling him back up while they had Backlund looked at by a doctor.
But please don’t tell me they’re going to work their way through everybody in the CHL signing them all to 1 day tryouts for the next 6 games. That might put me back in the hospital for another headache.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not really sure how to take that…. not that it matters.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
I have no problem with Robert Esche as the starting goaltender next year IF they build the team around him correctly.
In your opinion, how do they “build the team around him correctly”?
by Ben Feldman on Mar 29, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
But since we know they aren’t blowing this team up, why bring it up?
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Mar 29, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
And you win every game 2-1 in the regular season, only to lose 3-2 in the playoffs.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
that’s a terrible idea. There are some other KHL options that would make a lot more sense if you must go that way, but how about we pursue a legit NHL goalie for once. That might be a novel idea.
Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com
by HockeyOutsiders on Mar 29, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Could the Flyers, say, trade a top liner for a mid-late 1st, and take a goalie? Like a Hartnell or Danny or Carter? Im down for trading these guys, just not for Vokoun.
"Sugah n' rainbows"
"We will steal the show, jolly Rogers go, we are wolves of the sea."
There better be something else in that deal if any of those guys go, otherwise my first thought of trading Carter for nothing but a first round draft pick (used for a goalie with a very small probability of ever working out) was my heart skipping a few beats….
Lets say mid-late first is 22nd overall (exact same position as Gagne & Giroux, btw) = 1995, Brian Boucher, who took several years in the develop and played 1999-00 as a rookie.
This helps us for next year, how? Flower, the very rare exception who jumps straight from the Q to the NHL with no time at all in the AHL, was drafted first overall. We can’t pull that off with anything between 15 and 25….
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 29, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
The only real goalie prospect I’ve read about for this year’s draft is Jack Campbell, who did well for the US in the WJHC the past few years but I don’t think is worth trading Carter away for.
by Ben Feldman on Mar 29, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think they are going to trade a proven goal scorer in this league (Carter) for a young unproven goaltender like those list, Nemi, Schnider, and Price. I could see Coburn being traded along with Boucher and maybe a 3rd rounder for a guy like that, or even trading one of our young goalie prospects like Riopel to get the rights to one of these guys. Hopefully Danny will waive his NTC for Montreal they were on his list when he was a free agent and will be in a more of a win now mode. Come to think of it VAN and CHI are probably also in win now mode and would like a NHL caliber guys over 2nd or 3rd round draft pics. I wouldn’t mind a young goalie and Backlund as his backup for next season. Vancouver is going to move Schnider they have Luongo locked up until 2022.

by 
















