How the Flyers Just Saved $800k from Next Year's Cap
I have no faith that they were even aware they were doing this, since Holmgren didn't mention it today. But it happened.
I explained all of this back in September. I'm going to just copy and paste it over to here with minor tweaks:
I. Eligibility for Performance Bonuses
Only players over 35 years of age (Type A) and players on Entry-Level contracts (Type B) are eligible for performance bonuses in their contracts. Performance bonuses count against a salary cap for the team. One of the variables we have to determine is which salary cap they apply to.
II. Calculating Performance Bonuses
How the cap calculations of performance bonuses actually function is complicated.
A. Preseason
Let's set our scene in October of 200x. At this time, NHL TEAM has a number of contracts for players which include performance bonuses for the upcoming season. The total potential value of those bonuses count against the team's salary cap right now.
However, in consideration of the fact that not every performance bonus will be met, the CBA includes a "Bonus Cushion". This cushion amount is 7.5% of the year's salary Upper Limit.
Why? Well, for instance, let's say that both Chris Pronger and Kimmo Timmonen have a bonus clause in their contract for winning the Norris Trophy. This obviously can't happen, yet the Flyers would have to drag both cap hits all season because the award isn't handed out until July. With the bonus cushion, you can offer bonuses that conflict and not be penalized under the salary cap for it. You can also award highly unlikely bonuses (leading the league in goals scored, playing 82 games, etc.) and not be forced to eat that cap space all season. Keep in mind, this is only to the extent of 7.5% of the current salary cap, so you can't go crazy with the bonuses.
So, back to our NHL TEAM. How much room do they have under the cap for performance bonuses?
(Salary Cap Upper Limit) - (Salary Against the Cap) + (Salary Cap Upper Limit x 7.5%) = Room for Performance Bonuses
B. Midseason
As soon as a performance bonus becomes unattainable, it no longer counts against the team's cap. (For instance, a clause for playing 82 games is given to a player who has the flu and is scratched opening night. That bonus no longer counts against the team's cap. But a bonus for playing 50 games would be counted against the cap until the player missed his 33rd game of the season.)
C. End of Season
Okay, season over, awards show in Vegas over, now NHL TEAM has to pay out those performance bonuses. Makes perfect sense. Here's a check to our third line center for being better than +15 this year... here's a check to last year's 1st round draft pick for playing more than 40 games on the NHL roster...
What does this mean for the salary cap? Page 216 of the CBA, Section 50.5(h)(iii) reads:
At the conclusion of each League Year, the amount of Performance Bonuses actually earned... shall be determined and shall be charged against the Club's Upper Limit and Averaged Club Salary for such League Year.
So we go back and count all these bonuses achieved last season against last season's cap to make sure that, now that we know which bonuses were in fact achieved, our NHL TEAM didn't actually exceed last year's Upper Limit. Because we certainly can't be paying out salary to players and have it disappear into thin air; it has to count against a salary cap or else there's a wide open door for circumvention.
NHL TEAM never thought that much bonus money would have to be paid out and now that its retroactively applied to our salary cap, it turns out they were over the Upper Limit. Do they have to give the Stanley Cup back?
(continued from above section)
To the extent a Club's Averaged Club Salary exceeds its Upper Limit as a result of [bonuses] then the Club's Upper Limit for the Next League Year shall be reduced by an amount equal to such excess.
Looks like NHL TEAM needs to dump some salary this offseason.
The bonus cushion serves as both a protection from being screwed over by carrying unattained performance bonuses and a cap of 7.5% of the Upper Limit in order to keep this loophole under control.
III. JVR's Contract
So, to the topic at hand: What is JVR's contract?
No one knows. His contract is for a cap hit of $875,000. He then has Type B Performance Bonuses which can equal as much as $800,000 more. But no one knows what those bonuses actually are.
However, I'm assuming that JVR will attain all of his performance bonuses, and that $800k is going to be applied retroactively after the season.
IV. Conclusion
As a result of not making a deal today, the Flyers have more than $2 million in cap room this season, and will be able to apply the JVR bonuses to this year's cap.
This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by Broad Street Hockey.
0 recs |
22 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
question
Does JVR have a bonus for next year as well and if so he will still count as 1.6 against the cap, so have the extra money this year means JVR won’t count as 2.4 next year, am I reading that correctly.
Yes, he does still have a bonus next year, and the following year too.
It wouldn’t be so much that JVR actually goes on the books at 2.4 (that’s not the way it would actually appear on the chart). Effectively that would be what happens if his entire bonus rolled over, but on paper, if the cap were to stay the same as next year, the real answer is that it would reduce our cap ceiling from 56.8 million to 55.95 million. It is confusing, I know.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 4, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
what if that bonus is not attainable like winning the Calder trophy etc.. that would come off immediately at the start of next season, reducing his cap hit from 1.6 to 800K etc..
This is where we arrive back at the notion that cap hit is actually an average that includes the total possible bonuses. JVR’s bonus is not the same from year to year in this contract, it actually breaks down like this:
2009-10 Base: 875,000 + Possible Bonuses: 850,000 = Possible total: 1,725,000
2010-11 Base: 875,000 + Possible Bonuses: 637,500 = Possible total: 1,487,500
2011-12 Base:875,000 + Possible Bonuses: 850,000 = Possible total: 1,725,000
Because the bonuses are different for every year, it isn’t out of the question that the conditions are different every year. We can’t safely assume that the Flyers built winning a Calder trophy into every year’s bonus total. If they did so, that would come off at the beginning, but it’s very unlikely that that 637k of possible bonuses is ALL for a Calder trophy. I can’t find any breakdown of what JVR’s bonuses actually are, but it’s more likely they break down into smaller pieces. These are totally made up numbers but it could something along these lines: we’ll say 200k if he wins the Calder trophy, 100k if he makes the All Rookie team, 50k if he plays 50 games, an extra 50k if he plays 70+ games, then 25k if he scores 15 goals, another 25k if he scores 20, another 25k if he scores 25 goals, etc etc etc. Using my made up numbers, if he didn’t win the Calder this year, that 200k would fall of the cap next year on day one because he’s no longer eligible, but only that 200k portion, any bonuses he is still eligible for stay on the cap. Like I said, no one knows what these are, but 850k is the possible total, regardless of whether it’s made up of 1 big bonus or 20 smaller bonuses. We really can’t hypothesize at this moment what his possible bonuses will be, so we have to make our guesses based on the total cap hit of his contract.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 6, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Let me know if that wasn’t clear enough, I’m hoping it was but if not I can try to explain it better later.
by DragonGirl0583 on Mar 6, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe the Flyers should hire you to be their capologist. Do you know enough monosylallabic words to explain this stuff to Holmgren?
No, it's a media term
Different teams use different titles – the most common one I’m aware of is Director of Hockey Administration, which are the guys like Laurence Gilman of the Canucks or Ryan Martin for the Red Wings. From looking (briefly) at the Flyers’ front office, I have no clue who their capologist is, or if they even have one.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Ah, thanks. Officially, he’s just an Assistant Coach. I was looking at all the positions with actual titles.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Olympics and the Cap
Any chance the success of the Olympics will have a postive effect on the cap any chance next years cap goes up?
lastly
Chicago and Pittsburg are running into cap trouble is there any chance the cap goes up to help out Bettman’s personal favorites?
That team needs to move so bad they are winning and still can’t make money, hockey + desert = bad idea
They’re a team with a history of failure, though. They’ve never finished above 4th in the Pacific prior to this year, and who gets excited about crappy hockey? Frankly, I don’t understand how the Avalanche draw so poorly, but apparently Colorado’s not hockey country either.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 





























