Who Will Take Laperriere's Shorthanded Ice Time?
With yesterday's news that Ian Laperriere will miss the second round at least, and likely the rest of the season, the news is felt far and wide. Obviously, his loss isn't looked at in the same way as Jeff Carter and Simon Gagne, but Laperriere is important - possibly just as important - to the success of the team as those two are.
Laperriere's importance cannot be looked at simply through on-ice success. His role off the ice could be even more important, as he's a veteran leader on a team that desperately needed more veteran leaders. The problem is that those of us outside the locker room are unable to tell just how big of an impact his loss will have in that respect.
What we can look at is his on-ice importance to the team. Since he isn't exactly an offensive powerhouse (he had 3 goals in the regular season, one more than David Laliberte), Laperriere's on-ice loss will be felt in the defensive zone. More specifically, Laperriere will be missed on the penalty kill.
In both the regular season and the playoffs, Laperriere has averaged the second most short-handed time per game. Those are a lot of minutes - and important minutes - that need to be replaced. Who will do it?
Jump for a look at the Flyers PK.
We'll start with a table (LOVE tables) that shows who is on the ice while the Flyers are short-handed.
| Player | RS SHTOI/G | P SHTOI/G |
| Blair Betts | 3:08 | 5:14 |
| Ian Laperriere | 2:50 | 4:27 |
| Mike Richards | 2:09 | 3:55 |
| Jeff Carter | 1:47 | 0:08 |
| Mika Pyorala | 1:37 | --- |
| Simon Gagne | 1:28 | 2:51 |
| Darroll Powe | 1:09 | 1:41 |
| Andreas Nodl | 1:00 | --- |
| Claude Giroux | 0:53 | 1:51 |
The first column is Regular Season Short-Handed Time on Ice per game, and the second is for the playoffs. As you can see, the Flyers' top three penalty killers have stayed the same from the regular season to the playoffs. Their time on ice, however, has increased dramatically. This can be due to the small sample size (5 games), the large amount of time the Flyers spent on the PK against the Devils (6.4 times SH/G vs. 4.1 in the regular season), and the need to have your best penalty-killers out there in the playoffs.
Entering the second-round, the Flyers are without four of their top six regular season penalty killers. Only Blair Betts and Mike Richards will begin the second-round. The Flyers will also enter the second round with only 3 players who averaged more than one minute in PK time per game. This all adds up to a massive hole in the Flyers penalty kill.
So far, Claude Giroux has stepped up and taken more of the penalty-kill responsibility, which he'll need to continue doing. Having Mike Richards and Claude Giroux be the second PK-unit will work out fine, since Giroux is basically replacing Gagne's minutes. Also, Darroll Powe has taken on more of a role on the PK, which goes a long way toward helping out.
Will it be enough? Betts, Laperriere, Richards, and Gagne totaled 79:31 minutes worth of SHTOI in the playoffs. Take out Laperriere and Gagne's minutes - since neither will play in at least the first two games of the second round - and the team has 33:43 worth of SH time to fill. Giroux, despite playing in one extra game, still has over 2 minutes less than Gagne. On average, Giroux is one minute-per game behind Gagne. Not bad, and definitely able to be closed, but what about Laperriere?
If Darroll Powe can step up and eat some extra minutes, he'll still come far short of what Laperriere did. The more you look at the numbers, the more you realize there isn't any one guy who can replace Laperriere. When you also have to replace Gagne, it becomes even more difficult. It becomes painfully obvious that the Flyers need to find somebody who can play on the penalty kill, and they likely need to find more than one.
This brings us to the injury replacement. If Mika Pyorala was healthy (and with the team), he'd be the obvious choice. He averaged more PK time per game than Gagne in the regular season, so he is clearly able to fill in. Unfortunately, Pyorala has a broken collarbone and is unable to play. After that, the only player to average more than 20 seconds of PK time per game this season was Andreas Nodl. Yes, that Andreas Nodl.
Yeah, it isn't impressive. But, there's really nobody else capable of playing on the PK. This team cannot get by with Betts, Richards, Giroux, and Powe on the penalty kill. Besides Nodl, Scott Hartnell has averaged the most SHTOI/G with a whopping 0:20 p/g in the regular season and 0:10 p/g in the postseason. Maybe he can up that to 45 or 50 seconds a game, but do you really want to saddle that guy with more responsibility? Not right now.
Without Nodl in the lineup, the Flyers only have 4 guys who can go out on the penalty kill. That's not nearly enough. Five guys probably isn't enough either, but when you lose your second best penalty-killer after already losing your 4th (Carter), 5th (Gagne), and 6th (Pyorala), how can you not replace him with a guy who can kill penalties?
Maybe hearing the name Andreas Nodl makes you shudder, but if there's one thing he's proven he can do at an NHL level, it's kill penalties. If ever you should be glad to have Nodl on your team, that time is now.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t know how much this matters, but Nodl didn’t play for Laviolette.
Having Richards and Giroux play more on the penalty kill is going to hit their offensive numbers.
Richards has been playing on the PK anyway, and Giroux should only need to up his PK time by one minute per game.
But you’re right, that’s why they need guys like Powe and Nodl to eat some minutes.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Nodl sounds good for me the guy is good to really good Defensive specialist. Just plug him into to Lappy’s role and minutes and hope for the best. The only time Nodl makes me shutter is when he was mentioned to be called in to replace Carter. Nodl has less offensive upside than Powe so basically Boucher has a better chance of scoring a goal than him.
I think you are way off base with the offensive upside between Powe and Nodl. Granted, Nodl has been a disappointment, but he has 55 points in 107 AHL games (0.51 ppg) compare to Powe who has 34 points in 95 AHL games (0.36 ppg). In the NHL Powe has had better production (0.21 ppg in 123 games versus 0.1 ppg in 48 games for Nodl), but he has also had much more of an opportunity. I’ll rely on Geoff for better stats, that was just a quick look up on hockeydb b/c I really feel the whole less offensive upside than Powe is a complete joke (and I think you were making one there). Also Nodl is 2 years younger and hasn’t played under Lavy yet. I’m not saying Nodl will add anything to the Flyers scoring in these playoffs (or ever for that matter) and he clearly is in there for his defensive game, but come on, Powe, please.
I get defensive with Nodl, he is to me what Boosh is to Geoff.
When speaking of “potential”, anybody who says Powe has more offensive upside is tarnished by Nodl’s NHL performance to date. He was a second round pick for a reason:
2003-04 (Age 16): Various levels of play in Austria, 45 GP, 63 pts
2004-05 (Age 17): USHL, 88 GP, 32 pts
2005-06 (Age 18): USHL, 58 GP, 59 pts
2006-07 (Age 19): College, 40 GP, 46 pts
2007-08 (Age 20): College, 40 GP, 44 pts
2008-09 (Age 21): AHL, 39 GP, 20 pts
2009-10 (Age 22): AHL, 65 GP, 34 pts
Yeah, he’s struggling at the AHL level (and even worse at the NHL level) but it’s normal for a player to struggle his first year after jumping up a league (Austria to USHL; College to AHL; AHL to NHL) and his status as a prospect is vastly diminished, but Powe’s best seasons were 28 points in 34 games at the college level (Age 21) and 23 points in 76 games at the AHL level (Age 22). Nodl is a better AHL player than Powe was, but Powe has a (poorly defined) role on an NHL team. Nodl doesn’t really have a role anywhere (yet).
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow. That was a terrible sentence…
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
haha, I’m glad you have such a high opinion about him. There’s only one thing nice I can say, and it’s that he can kill penalties. To me, his ceiling is 30 pts/yr, good fourth-line checker and penalty killer. If he becomes a third-line player in the NHL, I’ll be surprised.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah at this point I’m hoping he can still become a solid 3rd line contributor. I’d like to see how he does in any consistent role on the Flyers in the new system, with out having constantly different linemates…though I fear he has lost that opportunity.
St Cloud St is my favorite college hockey program, and I was a huge fan of his there, so I’d like to see him have some success, I just don’t know if he has any opportunities left. Although, after the disappointing year from just about every Phantoms prospect (on offense), he may still have some opportunities left.
Great point about the Phantoms this year. I wonder how much stock the team will put on individual performances since everybody had a really awful year. The leading scorer was Matsumoto with 62 points in 80 games (0.78 pt/g). Only one other forward cracked 0.70, which was Laliberte. Danny Syvret (15 GP, 0.87 pt/g) and Erik Gustafsson (5 GP, 1.40 pt/g) were the only other players to do so.
The team also only had two 20-goal scorers – Matsumoto and Stefan Legein. Really, nothing good came of that season, outside of Johan Backlund.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, their system saddens me right now. I’d love to see some creativity this offseason to bolster our prospects instead of raping our system to get that missing piece. And that’s not a shot at the Pronger trade, I am happy to have him; it just seems every year we are this piece or that piece away and it’s frustrating to see the current state of the farm system coupled with our traditional philosophy.
Well, it appears as if they’re strategy is to bring in as many new guys as possible. They already signed a lot of guys out of college for next year (Testwuide, Holmstrom, Gustafsson, Wellwood, Harper, Stewart, Pither, etc.) so I’d imagine a lot of the Phantoms FAs won’t be resigned.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Everyone is down on the Flyers system but it is the system’s success that has depleted it not trades, coupled to the fact that the Flyers drafted lots of D-Men and goalies over the last two – three seasons whom take longer to develop.
What I mean by that our team is really young still we have Parent and Bartuilis up here with JVR and Giroux all of those guys are 22 and under. There aren’t many roster spots opening up after this season either all only Carcillo, Asham, Powe are in need of contracts at the forward position. Even with we had some better prospects there is really anywhere to put them especially on the top two lines.
I see what you’re saying, but Parent wasn’t a product of the system, and if the only players you can point to are JVR (who spent all of 7 games in the AHL), Giroux, Powe, and Bartulis, that’s not a good system.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah I was exaggerating in my above statements and I actually like Nodl as fourth line guy. We are going to need guys like that in the system our current checkers/role players/ pk specialists are Lappy and Betts but are way up there in age. Nodl and Powe can be young replacements for those guys if we are able to keep them in the system long enough for Betts and Lappy to retire. Not that I want them too but it is inevitable in the next 2 – 3 years.
Nodl vs. AO (should it come to that) makes me poop my pants
Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com
by HockeyOutsiders on Apr 28, 2010 12:54 PM EDT reply actions
Laviolette after practice today...
Laviolette expects the bulk of Laperriere’s minutes, including those while the team is shorthanded, to to be eaten up by committee.
“A piece goes out but a piece has to go in,” said the head coach of the penalty-kill. “You might see [James van Riemsdyk] out there, or [Andreas] Nodl, or [Scott] Hartnell. But, certainly, [Claude] Giroux and [Darroll] Powe, their roles probably go up a little bit.”
In line rushes today, the fourth line consisted of Nodl and Powe as the wingers to Blair Betts.
http://flyers.nhl.com/club/page.htm?id=35835
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
Wow. JVR??? Color me surprised.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
why not?
hitchcock taugh gagne how to play defense, so it can be done.
although gagne wasn’t a rookie at the time.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
And Lavvy is the exact opposite of Hitchcock. The “anyone can be taught to play defense” route only works if Rabbit has been taught to play defense.
Because I figured he’d be getting more PP time with Carter and Gagne being out, not PK time with Lappy being out. I mean, I’m not surprised he’d be used, but I’m surprised he’d be used in the same sentence as Nodl and Hartnell.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Apr 28, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions

by 



























