Wrap-Up: Coverage of Thursday's Stanley Cup Final Media Day
Media day has wrapped up at United Center in Chicago. SB Nation covered the event, so head over to relive the coverage. Here's a breakdown:
- 5:48 PM: Paul Holmgren on the importance of the Ville Leino acquisition.
- 5:41 PM: Peter Laviolette talks about the adversity the Flyers have faced this season.
- 5:10 PM: A few Chicago players talk about the atmosphere on media day.
- 5:02 PM: Patrick Kane tries telling the media that he hasn't studied the Flyers yet.
- 4:46 PM: Peter Laviolette talks about Chicago's Dustin Byfuglien.
- 4:41 PM: A few photos from the event.
- 3:57 PM: Hawks GM Stan Bowman on the growth of Patrick Kane.
- 3:51 PM: Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville discusses Rocky Wirtz's impact on the franchise.
- 3:24 PM: An update on Andrew Ladd's status for Game 1.
After the jump, complete transcripts of media availability with Danny Briere, Simon Gagne, Jeff Carter, Mike Richards and Chris Pronger.
Danny Briere:
Q. How much do you expect to see of Campbell this year? I would imagine you might draw him.
DANNY BRIERE: To be honest, I didn't even think about that. Yeah, I'm sure they'll probably try to match up Seabrook against Richards; that would be my guess. So after Seabrook, it seems the next four kind of mix and match the way they play them.
So I wouldn't be surprised, yeah, to play against Brian.
Q. You were pretty close to him.
DANNY BRIERE: Yeah, we were good friends.
Q. I remember you talked a lot with him before you signed in Philly. Can you talk about that?
DANNY BRIERE: Yeah, we talked when it was his turn to ?? about the process of going through it, because he was kind of going through it the year after me. But this is the Finals. So at this time, just like the previous round with Montreal.
I was good friends with Spacek. And every time we would travel we were always sitting together on a plane, playing cards together. But if it's the Playoffs, you have to leave that friendship aside there for a little bit.
And I think everybody understands that part, too. We're so close to our goal, I do not expect Brian to back off in any way on me when I'm out there.
Q. I just talked to Hitchcock for a while. One of the things he said is the Flyers are going to scare the hell out of this team. He said they're not used to a team that they get up a couple of goals and come back on them. And he said this will be the first time they've seen an opponent probably since Nashville that's not afraid of them and will strike fear. Can you talk a little bit about that, just the psyche of this team?
DANNY BRIERE: Well, you know it's tough, because the tough part is we don't know them as well. It's kind of where I guess it's like that in every Finals. You don't really know much about the teams you're facing. You face them once, maybe twice a year. Obviously we know they have a good team and we respect that they have a good team.
But we can't give them too much respect. We still have to go out and get things done.
Q. Would you agree with his assessment, though, that you guys come at teams, you come back from any deficit, and it's a little bit different than other teams in the Playoffs. You're scoring a lot of goals and plays. Players, usually like one? or two?goal games.
DANNY BRIERE: I mean, I don't know. I think that would probably be a better question to ask them. I'm not sure that we strike fear in them.
Q. There was a time when this team couldn't score a goal to save its life, if I remember.
DANNY BRIERE: You're right, you're right. Coming down the stretch we gained a lot of confidence, and in the Playoffs.
I mean, that's one thing now, we do know that we can come back. And I remember there was stats, I think we finished close to last in the NHL when we fall behind, after a period, after two periods. I think we were last coming into the Playoffs or the bottom of the League anyway. And for some reason, you know, in the Playoffs it's been a total turnaround.
I think that goes back to the character of the team, the no?quit attitude that we've had since the Playoffs began. I don't expect us to back off from that at any point, no matter what happens from now on.
Jeff Carter:
Q. I just want to know how the foot is feeling.
JEFF CARTER: It's feeling good. It's obviously a work in progress, every day. Even just walking around, it feels like it's getting better. Getting stronger as I skate every day. It's looking up.
Q. Would you categorize yourself as 100%. I know it's hard to say you're 100% now. Are you physically fit to go attribute everything you've done during the regular season?
JEFF CARTER: I think so. At this time of the year there's lot of guys that are playing through injuries, bumps and bruises and stuff like that. Something you have to put on the backburner. At the end of the day you have to go out and play hockey.
Q. Do you need to change ? does the team need to change their game at all when they go up against a better offensive team like the Chicago Blackhawks?
JEFF CARTER: They have a lot of skilled players there. A lot of guys that are dangerous offensively. I wouldn't say we need to change our game plan. I think we've been really good defensively the whole Playoffs.
But we definitely need to be on top of our game defensively. They have a lot of guys that can hurt you. We have to be ready.
Q. I was wondering when you first got hurt you probably wondered if your Playoffs were over or not?
JEFF CARTER: Yeah, I was told they were done. So to be honest with you, it was four weeks without putting pressure on my leg; was told the Playoffs were done. I wasn't rehabbing. I wasn't doing anything. I was just kind of hanging out, watching a few games and laying on the couch, and did absolutely nothing.
I got a call basically a week ago, I guess, from our trainer that there was a possibility that I might be able to start skating again. Next thing you know, I'm back in the lineup.
Q. It's kind of surreal, isn't it?
JEFF CARTER: It is. I was pretty down when they told me that I was pretty much done for the year. I was obviously really happy for the guys the way it's going. But it's tough to sit there and watch knowing you're not going to be able to get out there and watch. I'm definitely excited.
Q. It looked on TV like you jumped in with the same rhythm you had before.
JEFF CARTER: Yeah, I was actually surprised. I skated ? I had two full practices, I guess. Not even two practices. Two decent practices before I played Game 4 (against Montreal), I guess. I surprised myself with the way I felt. I tried to keep the shifts as short as possible and roam all over. The game in Philly, Game 5, I felt like I had an extra jump than did I in Game 4. I was happy with the way things went.
Q. I was talking to Dave Bolland when the Hawks were here. I don't know if you've seen what he's gotten under the skin of the Sharks and the Canucks pretty good. What do you expect from him in this series?
JEFF CARTER: I know Bolland really well. He played in London, and I'm from London. I got to know those guys a lot. He's doing a great job for them. …
He kind of gets in your skin. I watched the Sharks' series a bit, and he got under Joe’s (Thornton) skin quite a bit. That's what he's doing. He's doing a good job of it. You know we're going to have to keep our cool and just worry about playing hockey.
Mike Richards:
Q. There's been a lot of comparisons between you and Jonathan Toews. What was it like playing with him on Team Canada?
MIKE RICHARDS: He's a great player. He makes his line mates better, makes his teammates better, and I learned a lot from him at the Olympics. I enjoyed my time playing with him, and obviously he's having a great Playoff right now.
Q. Did you guys have a chance to become friends?
MIKE RICHARDS: Yeah, we're friends. Talk to each other a little bit. He's from Winnipeg, and I'm from Kenora, which is pretty close.
So we're friends now. We talk. But, obviously on the ice, you know, it will be a little different. We'll play hard against each other, but I think that's expected.
Q. What made that line click the way it did?
MIKE RICHARDS: I'm not sure. I mean, he's easy to play with. He makes, like I said, the linemates better and he's always in the right position. He's great defensively, and he's got great offensive skills.
So he's easy to play with, just supporting him. And I enjoyed my time with him.
Q. You see the similarities, we talk about similarities between the two of you, do you see them when you're actually playing, do you see something about him that maybe is in your game, too; do you see that?
MIKE RICHARDS: I don't really look for that when I watch him. But I'll take that as a complement, if you see that. He's a great player.
I mean, he's so tenacious on the puck. He works hard. He's a great offensive player, and I think just his competitive level on the ice, I think, is what makes him a great player.
Q. He talked about what he wanted to do in Olympics as far as the leaders in that room. Did you feel the same way, being captain of your own team and going there and seeing everybody, did you take a lot out of it as well?
MIKE RICHARDS: Yeah, I did. And it's funny how different people handle pressure situations, and that many leaders who have been in so many different situations to handle it differently, and you obviously grab some things; and Chris was there with me, kind of guiding me through a lot of it, too. It's nice to have those leaders around and somebody's who's been through it before to help you out.
Q. Comparisons with these two organizations, three years ago both last place in the division. What does it say about the league.
MIKE RICHARDS: I think if you look at the lineups are very similar in defense and come from a lot of draft picks and obviously a couple signings too. But I feel on paper we're very similar. So I think it's just going to come down to who plays the best the longest.
Q. You obviously played with Toews, do you think you'll get to play against him a lot? Do you think the match ups will go that way and if so how will you play?
MIKE RICHARDS: I'm not sure. I'll play him hard if he's matched up against us. They obviously have the last change. So we won't get to decide that. But I will see how the first couple games go, and then I guess we'll make adjustments when we get to Philadelphia.
But I'm sure, I mean, he understands and I understand it's going to be competitive out there, and we're probably going to play each other tough.
Simon Gagne:
Q. What kind of impact do you think Chris Pronger has had on this team? He has a lot of experience in the Finals and won the Cup a few years ago.
SIMON GAGNE: I think Chris brings a lot to our team. He's a veteran. He played big minutes for us every night, and he had experience to be where we are right now, twice, actually.
He's been on both sides. So that's a plus, I think, for us. And for a guy like me, I've been in the league now for 10 years, I never had a chance to be here. It's all new for me.
And for most of our team, it's new. So having Chris around, if it's going to help us to know what to expect and definitely is going to help to have him on the ice.
Q. Has it sunk in you guys are in the Finals? The flight out here, anything like that, sink in that you're in the Stanley Cup?
SIMON GAGNE: I think it just started, just getting here, to see all the media, the attention, and having to do that, now have a special place for each player, could be here for 90 minutes and answer questions and stuff like that.
So you realize that we're here right now and we're getting closer to Game 1.
Q. Now that you guys are here, a lot has been made that you guys barely made the Playoffs, and we know what you guys have been through. Is it good enough just to be here, or is it still unfinished business?
SIMON GAGNE: It's unfinished business. Yeah, we are happy with what we accomplished so far. But we still want more. We want the big trophy at the end. And now, like I said the other day, we've got two weeks left in our season, basically. And so we just have to put everything out there. And now we've got plenty enough time after that for rest.
So we want the big trophy in the end, and that's what we're here for.
Q. Coaching change mid?season, guys injured, get into the Playoffs the last day of the season on a shoot?out, down 3?0 in the series. Has it sunk in what you guys have accomplished to get here?
SIMON GAGNE: It's hard to believe a little bit. But we're here right now. You know what, from day one at training camp even with John Stevens, we had to believe the team was good enough to be where we are today.
And unfortunately we didn't have the start we wanted. We had a coaching change, having Lavi brought in a new system, and it took us a while to learn what he was trying to bring for that team.
But at one point you kind of see that everything would start to click as a team with Peter Laviolette's system, with the coaching staff. And from there we start to play some good hockey. Went back into the Playoff race, and now took us right to the last game of the season, even shootout, to clinch a Playoff spot.
So it's amazing, if you think about it. But the whole time we believe that team was good enough to be here.
The transcripts were provided by the NHL.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes, thank you! :)
Also, watching this reminded me why some reporters shouldn’t be invited to these things…can you imagine going to this media day and asking a question about how many Canadians are on both teams?!?!
WTF?
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on May 27, 2010 5:07 PM EDT reply actions
I sincerely hope it wasn’t a CBC reporter, but, if so, that’s doubly embarrassing.
Paul Holmgren absolutely nailed the response, though – he answered it politely, while at the same time made the one who asked look a bit foolish in the process. Lavvy was so impressed with his answer, he basically said “Ditto.”
Somehow, these guys should be vetted before the interviews. I wonder if some of the players, coaches, and/or GM’s are ever tempted to smack these guys on the side of the head because of their questions (of course, Pronger does give amusing verbal slapdowns when he is on the receiving end of inanities from the reporters).
Otherwise, they were great interviews.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on May 28, 2010 4:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Discounts at Shop.NHL.com
Just noticed that there’s some decent Father’s Day – 15% off deals at shop.nhl.com and it stacks with a 20% AFFTP7 coupon for some really nice deals. Just got a Flyers sweatshirt for $17 before shipping.
Top 10 list, er... make that Top 19
John Buccigross (from ESPN) picks us to win it all. And unlike many mediots out there, he actually has some damn good reasons:
1. Marian Hossa plays for the Blackhawks. June has not been kind to him. Do Penguins fans root for Hossa to win or the Flyers to lose? This is not really a tough call. I would guess the SportsCenter poll results on such a question would be “75 percent Flyers, 25 percent Hossa.”
2. Philly cheese steaks could wreak havoc on the Q-Stache; it would like hair.
3. Barry Melrose picked Chicago.
4. Rocky (Philly) beat Clubber Lang (Chicago).
5. Payback for the 1988 NFL fog game.
6. Shjon Podein never played for the Blackhawks.
7. Brotherly love doesn’t mess up your hair like wind does.
8. Casey Kasem told me if the group was called Philadelphia, Peter Cetera never would have left the band. I’m not saying that. Casey is.
9. No Jim Belushi cutaways during Flyers telecasts. Which begs the question: Who is the celebrity Flyers fan? Richie Sambora? Ron Jaworski? Placido Polanco? This is actually an advantage for the Flyers. Celebrity hockey fans tend to be bad luck. A Sabremetrician told me that.
10. The Flyers have better playoff beards. Hands down.
11. Elton John hasn’t sung a song about Chicago freedom.
12. Keith Jones’ head is bigger than Ed Olczyk’s.
13. Chris Pronger might put Patrick Kane on a hot dog bun and eat him. I don’t mean that metaphorically. I mean that literally. Relish, mustard, the whole thing. Advantage Flyers.
14. Only 25 teeth to go and Duncan Keith will be left with nothing but gums. And I hear he adores cashews.
15. The Flyers have played in New Jersey, Massachusetts and Quebec. Their chartered plane still has a quarter tank of gas in it since they filled it up April 13. They are airline fresh.
16. The Flyers have beaten goalies from Canada, Finland and Slovakia so far. Not satisfied with first bringing shame to cuddly Finland and their population of 5.3 million, the Flyers, in true Broad Street Bully fashion, will try to kick Finland when they are down. That’s cold.
17. The Flyers have not scored a goal on the power play in their past 12 opportunities. They are due.
18. I don’t have to bet my mortgage, right?
19. In Chicago, you get Toews, bro; in Philly, you get tased, bro.
I love nos. 4, 13 and 19. Anybody got some additions?
http://espn.go.com/nhl/notebook//page/buccigross100527/my-reasons-why-flyers-beat-hawks
No additions at the moment
but number 6 is very convincing.
John Grigg picked the Flyers too
http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/33825-THNcom-Playoff-Blog-Why-the-Flyers-will-win-and-the-Blackhawks-wont-be-back.html
You know why they call you LU? Because you're retarded. And you're ugly. You're an ugly retard. And they call you LU because you're ugly and retarded.
And you'll always be LU... LU, LU, LU. And that's what I'm gonna call you for the rest of your life, is LU, LU, LU, LU, LU, okay? So fuck you.
Updated with transcripts from Flyers media availability today.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
So, my son sees the picture and asks who it is, and I say, “Chris Pronger.” And he asks, “Is he is a good guy or a bad guy?” And, me, being who I am, says, “He’s a good guy, but he’s really big and the very definition of bad ass.”
Cut to…my husband comes home from a golf tourament with a Pronger Flyers SC tee (because he knew I would love it) and my son asks, what number is on the shirt. When we sound out 2-0, and my husband says it’s Chris Pronger, I ask Lucas who Chris Pronger is. He says he’s a Flyer and that he’s a “bad ass”. My husband is hysterical.
I am soooo going to win Mother of the Year.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
haha, that’s awesome
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on May 27, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Awesome first step. Now to get him to this level – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2HVvc-2acA
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
Opinions seem to be shifting
Has anyone noticed that in the last 24 hours, the hype about Chicago’s dominance has considerably died down and we’re hearing a lot more people saying the Flyers aren’t looking so bad after all. Heck, even the Chicago hockey bloggers are starting to let doubt creep in to their predictions. I’m seeing a trend, including this one from everyone’s friend, Don Cherry:
Wonder if they are Cub fans...
If so then there is always a lot of doubt hanging around. My prediction is anything can happen, it’s the NHL playoffs, a couple bounces this way and a couple that way, so on and so forth.
The best way to make the other side nervous
is to appear calm, confident, and in control. They start worrying about why you’re not worried.
Honor is no substitute for victory.
The best way to make the other side nervous
Is if the other side is Chicago.
Watch it with the jinxing!
Time for some thrillin' heroics!
by shinkicker on May 28, 2010 10:38 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
If a black cat comes out on the ice
Will the city collectively crap itself or what? I though Philly was negative until I went to Chicago to catch a Cub game.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
we're cursed, cursed I say
damn goat
I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out.
- Rodney Dangerfield
Seriously
I went to a Cubs-Cards game and the Cubs were up by 3 runs and all the fans around us were shitting themselves. I’m, like, you’re not going to lose, man.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
we could be up by 10 runs and still lose
Chicago sports fans are a very paranoid bunch. We know that no lead is ever safe. Hold your breath until the last out. We’ve been burned too many times.
I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out.
- Rodney Dangerfield
Jim Rome from ESPN did an inteview with Pronger about the cup finals, check it out:
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=5223696
He seems very relaxed and confident – just like he is on the ice.
Hey, a bit off-topic, and a tad premature, but does anyone know who exactly gets a ring for winning the cup? Would (hypothetically) Backlund get a ring? He’s dressed for a bunch of games, but hasn’t played. Carcillo, even though I imagine he will be sitting for the series?
There’s a discussion in one of the fanposts about who gets their name on the cup, and I would imagine those same people would get rings. The rules are having played 40 regular season games and/or in a cup final game, though you can petition for special cases. Carcillo would get one, and Backlund will if he door-minds for at least one game this series. If Boosh does come back for game one though, I don’t know. He certainly hasn’t backed up for 40 games.

by 

























