Johan Backlund: Quality Behind Phantom Defense
Earlier in the year, we looked at why the Flyers didn't play in front of Brian Boucher. In that article, I used findings from Rob Vollman to show that Brian Boucher was a hard-luck loser. It's worth taking another look because it shows how little the difference was between Michael Leighton's amazing regular season and Boucher's terrible regular season.
Since then, Vollman took his findings and tweaked them. He determined what would be considered a "Quality Start" in the NHL. Basically, a Quality Start is where the goalie has an in-game save percentage above the league-wide median save percentage. Now, to compile this, Vollman takes the starting goalie for all 30 teams in all 82 games (2,460 games) and only considers the starter's save percentage. In the NHL last year, that number was .917. To have a stronger correlation to winning percentage, Rob rounded up to .920.
There is a small caveat though - having a save percentage between .885 and .919 while only allowing 2 or fewer goals is also a Quality Start. So a Quality Start in the NHL during the 2009-10 season was any game with a .920 save percentage or higher, or a .885 save percentage or higher while allowing no more than 2 goals.
Rob posted his findings on this past season here. It's worth looking at if for no other reason then to see that Brian Boucher had the fifth highest number of Quality Start losses of anybody in the entire league. Earlier this week, Japers' Rink looked at all three of their goalies and posted the findings there. After seeing the post over at Japers', I decided to look at the Flyers potential backup goaltender next year, Johan Backlund.
It wasn't easy, so humor me with a jump.
In trying to determine what a Quality Start is in the AHL, I had to create a spreadsheet for all 133 goalies who played in the AHL last year. It turns out, only 111 goalies started games in the AHL. But then I had to go through every goalies' game-by-game stats to eliminate the games they came in on relief. One hundred and thirty three game logs. Yes, it took me two days.
But it was not at all in vain! Well, except for the fact that I can't draw any further conclusions because I couldn't bring myself to create a massive spreadsheet with all of the data. Instead, all I have is 111 AHL goalies save percentages in games they started. Seriously, ask me their goals against average, I have no clue. Ask me what former Flyers draft pick Rejean Beauchemin's save percentage was in games he started (one) and I have it.
So without further ado: a Quality Start during the 09-10 AHL season was a .904 save percentage. Just in keeping with Vollman's numbers, I rounded to .907 and called that a Quality Start. Just shifting numbers from the NHL, rather than .885 to .919, the "2 goals or less" caveat is .873 to .906. This caveat doesn't really matter, since there was only one game that got the caveat.
Teaser! Just for fun - seriously, FUN - I did a full chart of Jonathan Bernier to compare Backlund too. But first, the serious information.
First, a key: SOL - Shootout-loss; QS - Quality Starts; QS% - Quality Start percentage; WQS - Wasted Quality Starts; WQS% - Percent of quality starts the team lost; BO - Bailouts; BO% - The percent of non-quality starts the team won.
Another important reference point - since I didn't calculate the quality starts for the entire AHL - is that Backlund's percent of quality starts would have ranked 4th in the NHL. Obviously, that's not a direct comparison, but it gives you a hint of how impressive that number is.
Sixty-three percent of the time, Backlund gave an above-median performance in the AHL. Unfortunately, the Phantoms were pretty bad and couldn't take advantage nearly a quarter of the time. What does surprise me though, is that the Phantoms overcame a poor performance by Backlund three times. This is probably just the law of averages, but still. In each of the three bailouts, Backlund only gave up 3 goals.
All-in-all, Backlund proved pretty consistent in the AHL. Considering how poor the team was (they had a minus-52 goal differential, third-worst in the league), Backlund was pretty solid.
Now, what I'm sure most of you have been waiting for, Jonathan Bernier's numbers.
Even more impressive. Bernier had a great year, and it's easy to see why he's considered the best goalie in the AHL. Making them even more impressive is the fact that the Monarchs outscored their opposition by a mere 13 goals this year.
Also, it would appear as though the Monarchs lived and died with Bernier as they were only able to bail him out once. It just so happened to be a game where he gave up 5 goals, one of the six times he gave up five or more. (For comparison sake, Backlund gave up 5 or more seven times in 17 fewer games).
Yeah, Bernier is very good. But Backlund is a decent replacement. All the more reason to get excited for Johan Backlund.
4 recs |
26 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Awesome article Geoff !
QS% is my favorite goalie statistic it because it shows who is consistent, which is the most important quality for a goalie. And it fits my favorite saying in hockey score 3 and you should win.
Any chance you complied Leighton’s QS percentage from last year I would like to see the numbers for the guys we have a realistic change of landing that aren’t listed in the puck prospectus article, Harding, Ellis, Nitty, Biron, Quick, Mason you know the list well by now.
Funny that everyone’s favorite Vokuon didn’t make the top 10. His is list at 34 QS and 63 GP not sure how many starts that is but based on those numbers that is 53.9%, 5% from 10th place. Still better than Boucher by a long shot 33 GP 14 QS for 42.42 % also not sure how many starts were in those games played numbers but you get the point.
Leighton had 17 QS in 31 games, 54.8%.
I could go through the list for all those guys, but I just don’t have time. It’s not really hard though.
On the subject of Vokoun: It certainly is interesting, but in 12 of his non-quality starts he gave up 2 or fewer even-strength goals. It’s not an excuse, it’s just worth noting. The Panthers are really, really bad. 2.85 GA/G, 19th in the league (Vokoun’s GAA was 2.55), they were 23rd in 5-on-5 goal ration with .90, their PK unit was 23rd at 79.4%, and they gave up a league-worst 34.1 shots against per game. He played on a really, really bad team. Is that an excuse? No. But it’s worth noting he got hurt by his team, specifically the defense.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 24, 2010 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, I guess I should say that all 17 of Leighton’s QS came in the 26 games he started for the Flyers.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 24, 2010 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Funny that everyone’s favorite Vokuon didn’t make the top 10
Don’t be posting that, man. You know who’s reading it right now.
January 11, 1976
This is amazing
After I went to bed last night, I was actually thinking about this very thing. Looking at Backlund in the AHL and comparing him to Bernier. I’m starting to feel better about going with him now for next year, especially considering how the Phantoms were and some of the reports we heard out of there.
Rec’d and +1. I don’t think I can offer much more than this
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
Me thinks a group of BSH folks discussed this Tuesday night.
Glad to see it in writing.
This is the new/current account of RyanGiggs11
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
haha, I was already compiling the data for it when the discussion started. it was strange.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 24, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
The headline to this article could be really interesting with a well placed comma.
Mancrushin' on Geoff since April 20
"Good night. Good hockey."
haha, I see what you mean.
I was going for the pun on “Phantom”. Did it work?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 24, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah i got that. Well played…well better played than the defense. OOOOOOOOHHH!!!!
Mancrushin' on Geoff since April 20
"Good night. Good hockey."
by KreiderDesigns on Jun 24, 2010 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 24, 2010 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Am I the only one that feels like they re-signed Backlund to have him contend for the starting spot?
As an aside, I think the Phantoms should fire Gilbert and replace him with Tocchet. Watching him comment during the playoffs he impressed me with his hockey sense, and he seems to understand what Laviolette is doing on the ice.
by A Flyers Phamily on Jun 24, 2010 8:30 PM EDT reply actions
Well, if the other goalies under contract (or training camp tryout) are Leighton, Boucher and Bobrovsky, then yes, he’s going to be competing for the starting spot. And not only will he be competing for that spot in September, but in October, November, December, January…
And I agree; I’d love to see Tocchet back in the organization in one way or another. Gilbert’s team certainly was not cohesive on or off the ice. And there will be an influx of new players in Adirondack next year — do not want that terrible work ethic and attitude to rub off on them as well.
Got to see Backlund play all year down with the Phantoms. It’s been said time and time again but if the Phantoms won games, it was because Johan was a brick wall. I wanna be selfish and hope for Backlund to be in the AHL next year so I can watch him shine, but he deserves to move up to the NHL.
Also….it would be a dream come true to fire Gilbert. How he could turn a team affiliated with the Flyers so soft is beyond any human comprehension.
Wow, I was thinking this about him already, and this confirms very well what I think. I am liking having Backlund more and more, and I’m glad I’m right with what I’m thinking and not looking like an idiot when I’m saying he’s good and I think will be the starter by the start of next season (unless we get somebody like Bernier or Quick or some great goalie, but then again he may impress).
And remember, this was his first season playing on North American sized rinks, I know it’s an adjustment to do, but he has done very well. If he kicks ass for the Phantoms again this year, we’re set in goal.
#1 Flyers Fan in New York
I’m pretty sure this article took you over your allowance of working hours per week Geoff. I appreciate the article and your renegade attitude toward your capped work hours.
haha, it most certainly did. But it kept me busy.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
And remember, this was his first season playing on North American sized rinks, I know it’s an adjustment to do, but he has done very well
This is exactly the reason I don’t see the necessity to trade a top 6 forward to get Bernier. When all is said and done, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Backlund had a career as good or better than either Quick or Bernier
by Pocono Flyers Fan on Jun 25, 2010 10:52 AM EDT reply actions
Oooh. I wouldn’t go that far, if only because Backlund will be 29 when this season starts. His career will be significantly shorter than Quick and Berniers.
But yeah, people don’t realize how good he actually is.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
What if you trade Carter for a goalie and top 2 line winger?
Though at this point my dream scenario still revolves around a Carter for Ryan type deal. I’m fine with the tandem of Boosh and Backs. Unless there is a bargain basement deal left sitting at the end of free agency like goaltending was last season.
Great job and kudos on taking two days to do this. Just a quick question: Does the QS stat take into consideration the quality of competition? And would it be a worthwhile to calculate the average QualComp that each goaltender faced? Or does the SV% sufficiently take the QualComp into account?
by Giroux-ling for Cheese on Jun 25, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions
I’ve never seen a QualComp for goalies, so I don’t even know how that would work.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Okay maybe I shouldn’t have said QualComp. Was just wondering if there was a way to evaluate the average quality of the teams each goalie faced in their starts and if that affected their performances. Or am I an idiot and missing something completely common-sense here?
by Giroux-ling for Cheese on Jun 25, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not familiar with one, but the only time it really becomes a problem is comparing teams outside of the conference, since all the teams in the East play almost the exact same opponents. I mean, this problem is inherent in every sport: Did Donovan McNabb face better defenses than Phillip Rivers? Did Roy Halladay face tougher teams than Cliff Lee?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 27, 2010 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 





























