Homer smartly plays it safe: Flyers have verbal agreement with Sharks on Nabokov
The following comes from Tim Panaccio:
According to league sources, the Flyers have a verbal agreement in place with the San Jose Sharks to fork over a seventh-round pick next season if they can sign San Jose’s Evgeni Nabokov before July 1, when he becomes an unrestricted free agent.
Don Meehan, the agent who represents Nabokov, told CSNPhilly.com earlier that his client’s no-trade clause is not an issue. San Jose obviously has given the Flyers permission to get a deal done and Meehan is willing to engage the Flyers ahead of July 1.
What does this mean? The Flyers essentially have the rights to speak with Evgeni Nabokov before July 1 without the risk it takes to physically acquire those rights, as they did with Dan Hamhuis. In other words, it's brilliant.
The Flyers get all the gains of an upper hand in negotiations, and if they're able to seal the deal in the next five days, they'll throw their seventh round pick to the Sharks in 2011.
Does this mean the Flyers will agree to terms him before July 1? Well, like we said last night, it seems likely that Nabokov would want to test out the open market. Why would he sign a deal for the Flyers when he doesn't know what the market will be for him?
And if it's true that he's hoping for something in the four or five million range, why would he take less from the Flyers, a team he has no connection to? It seems unlikely that Nabokov will sign here before July 1, but that doesn't mean Holmgren isn't smart for getting this agreement done. There's no risk involved.
364 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Before people go wild says “I wanted a young goalie” Do the Flyers necessarily need a “young goalie” right now? I mean Bobrovsky is coming from Russia this year. How long would really take him to get used to the North American style? 3-4 years?
"Can Geico really save you 15% or more on your car insurance? Is Mike Green really a forward in defenseman's clothing"
We have several young guys who show at least a little bit of promise, not just Bobrovsky. If the Flyers sign Nabokov, it has to only be for a year or two. I don’t see him here any longer than that. He’s a stop-gap.
For that reason, Nabokov’s age doesn’t concern me. The only concern would be that he’s a over-35 deal, so there’s that concern with the salary cap. But I really don’t see the Flyers signing him any longer than two years, so it won’t matter anyway.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 26, 2010 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions
My biggest concern is that he’s a playoff failure, thought the flyers had had enough goalies like that just like Quick he has a team in front of him that inflate his numbers, he rarely can carry a team to victory and that’s what separates him from the Brodeurs and Haseks of the NHL.
by ryanitus on Jun 26, 2010 7:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Brodeurs and Haseks don’t grow on trees you are setting a pretty high standard wanting a guy comparable to the two best goalies over the last 10 years.
And Hasek had to go to Detroit to win. He didn’t carry Buffalo anywhere but the exact same point Leighton got us.
This is the NHL the standard has to be high. Look at Montreals history they constantly bring in great goalies, Plante, Dryden, Roy so while they are rare, to go 2 decades without a high caliber goalie is inexcusable to me.
by ryanitus on Jun 26, 2010 7:58 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Montreal had Roy until what, 1996? No good goalie since then if memory serves.
How many teams have had really good goalies? Not many.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Jonathan Quick, lifetime playoffs: 2-3, 3.50 GAA, .884 sv%
Jonathan “Somehow worth Jeff Carter even though he’s as proven as Backlund” Bernier, lifetime AHL playoffs: 0-3, 2.77 GAA, .908 sv%
Evgeni “Waste of Life” Nabokov, lifetime playoffs: 40-36, 2.29 GAA, .913 sv%
Has never had a post-season as bad as Quick
In fact, Brodeur’s save% is only .919
Brodeurs got 3 or 4 cups right? More then Bernier, Quick, Nabby combined. Nabbys playoff record means nothing when his name isn’t etched on lord stanleys cup.
by ryanitus on Jun 26, 2010 8:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
In the grand scheme of things? Maybe.
But when comparing him to guys who can’t even carry Leighton’s jock (Bernier) that half this board wants to trade Jeff Carter for, it is relevant.
Oh my bad, my bad, I agree there, I like bernier but no way do you trade a proven goal scorer like Carter for him.
by ryanitus on Jun 26, 2010 8:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Not that it totally changes your point, but Your numbers for Bernier are wrong. He led Manchester to the ECF in the AHL this year and they lost in 6 so he has to have at least 10 wins. He’s the only guy that played for MAN so he didn’t share those ten wins. He also won goaltender of the year in the AHL. He’s not proven by any means, but he still has a lot of promise.
I waited all year for this?
You are 100% right! I didn’t even notice that hockey-ref doesn’t have this year’s numbers. Incidentally, here’s two goalies:
Goalie A: 2.21/.926 (Reg season); 1.96/.933 (playoffs)
Goalie B: 2.29/.916 (Reg season); 1.88/.929 (playoffs)
Thats the AHL age 20 and 21 seasons for two goaltenders. I’m interested in seeing if anyone can guess who those two goalies are.
But overall it’s a smart move because Bobrovsky and Ericsson have potential and I thought Backlund was impressive with the phantoms last season and he’s only 28 or so isn’t he?
by ryanitus on Jun 26, 2010 7:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Right, but he’ll be 29 by the time the season starts.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 26, 2010 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions
How much pull does Geoff’s boy Boosh have with Nabby get Boosh on the phone.
Boosh: You only got nominated for the Vezina when I was opening the door for you.
this is funny
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 26, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
I hope Boosh is the backup next year, and backland is playing in the AHL (for experience).
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
I figure, assuming Nabokov is signed, Boucher and Backlund will be battling for the backup spot in camp. Boosh will have the upper-hand going into camp, of course, so Backlund will need to be simply outstanding while Boosh will have to be disappointing for Backlund to win that spot.
This gives the Flyers decent depth at goalie. Nabokov is clearly the out right starter backed up by Boosh. Hopefully its not the case but, injuries happen. I feel like Backlund may get a shot to backup or maybe even get a start here and there next season, especially seeing as the Flyers seem to be more comfortable with the idea of having him as in net for the big club. But, this also give Backlund a final season in the AHL to hone his skill to be a legitimate cantidate to take the Flyers starting job once Nabokov’s contract is up.
2010-2011 Season: Starter: Nabokov, Backup: Boucher
2011-2012 Season: Starter: Nabokov, Backup: Backlund
2012-2013 Season: Starter: Backlund, Backup: ??
@Mitchman88 on Twitter
by Mitchell Green on Jun 26, 2010 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Let’s not predict that far. We have a LOT of potential goalie prospects that can possibly overtake Backlund in the depth chart. Bob might be ready by 12-13 as well.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions
All time leaders in save percentage for goalies with 50 or more playoff games:
1 – J.S. Giguere, .925
2 – Dominick Hasek, .925
3 – Miikka Kiprusoff, .921
4 – Ed Belfour, .920
5 – Martin Brodeur, .919
6 – Patrick Roy, .918
7 – Nikolai Khabibulin, .917
8 – Curtis Joseph, .917
9 – Chris Osgood, .916
10. – John van Biesbrouck, .915
11. – Evgeni Nabokov, .913
Not a terrible list….
nabokov
The fact that anyone clicked “no” on that poll is mind-boggling.. anyone who watched the Flyers all season, or even if you just watched the playoffs, you see what a difference a great goalie makes. Leighton played well enough but in the end you need a great performance out of your goalie to win the Cup.. Nabokov is one of the league’s best, and at the very least better than Leighton, Boucher, and Quick
"I'd like to thank my hands for being so great." (Freddie Mitchell)
by PhillySportsDave on Jun 26, 2010 8:35 PM EDT reply actions
If you like me.
You will love me.
Just saying…
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
by PatterPoet95 on Jun 26, 2010 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gcdcveFUJU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i81L9eKDnqQ
The third goal he gives up in the second link is my favorite.
I’m also impressed that Bernier went to the Michael Leighton School for Rebound Control.
Nabokov is good, above average, but not one of the best. He’s just played behind one of the league’s best teams for years.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
SJS was only a power for the last 3-4 years. Nabokov has been there for much longer and before Joe Thornton arrived the Sharks were always underdogs and relied on Nabokov a lot more. If his best years were paired with the Joe Thornton years they may not have been perennial playoff busts.
I waited all year for this?
I am not really a big Nabby fan but for the right price I would be excited to see him in net for the Flyers.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
Right. I think a better question would be “Would you be okay with Nabokov in net (assuming the contract is reasonable)?”
And more precisely, what is the reasonable contract? 4.5 million leaves you just over 6 to sign 3D and 2F, assuming you want one reserve player on the roster at each position. You can skimp on the forwards but you’ll end up spending the meat of that 6 on at least one D, whether it’s keeping Coburn or bringing in a UFA. It would be tight, but it can work. Going over 4.5 makes it much harder to fit all the pieces.
I waited all year for this?
Right, and to me, 4.5 is the absolute max I would spend on Nabokov. Honestly though, I would rather this team trade Carter for a goalie, thus freeing up money to spend on fixing the various holes we have such as our 3rd Defensive team and a solid forward.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
If Nabokov signs for 2 years, $9 million, I’ll be content (though it would be nice to sign him for less). As you say, that gives you 11 forwards (top-6, 2/3 of your third line with JVR and Giroux, and 2/3 of your checking line with Betts and Lappy, plus Cote), three of your top-4 D-men (Pronger, Kimmo, Carle), a #6 D-man in Bartulis, and an actual legitimate starting goalie and backup. Seventeen players and $6.9 million in cap space to spare, according to CapGeek. So you legitimately need to re-sign Coburn (let’s say he gets a long term deal with a $3.25 million cap hit? perhaps a bit much, but for the sake of argument…) and re-sign Powe (let’s say he gets a three year deal at a $650,000 cap hit). That leaves just over $3 million to sign a #5 D-man and either re-sign Carcillo or sign a UFA winger for that third line. And if that’s not quite enough, you can always put Cote through unconditional waivers.
For some reason they seem to want to keep Cote and I truly am dumbfounded as to why.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

"Can Geico really save you 15% or more on your car insurance? Is Mike Green really a forward in defenseman's clothing"
Did he make the save? That’s the real question in all of this.
by Ben Feldman on Jun 26, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
haha yes
"Can Geico really save you 15% or more on your car insurance? Is Mike Green really a forward in defenseman's clothing"
Im pissed we let it go into overtime. If the devils and the Caps can shut them down, so can we!
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 26, 2010 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s Crosby and it’s the Flyers, so unless it’s God, the real God in net, he probably scored.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
Not being able to see the puck brings back bad memories.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
If I was Nabokov I'd sign with the Flyers before FA
If he wants to get some revenge on the Sharks or SJ fans. He’s going to have a solid regular season no matter where he goes. But if he goes to a Tampa or another borderline team with Talent needing a goalie, as soon as its the playoffs it’ll be the weight of the world on him again.
But if he comes to the Flyers, he finally has a defense that can not only block shots but actually keep the front of the net clear during the playoffs. All the Flyers needed from Bouch/Leighton was for them not to give up weak goals. Nabokov should not only be able to do that, but also put the Flyers in a position to get home ice during the playoffs. No one wants to play 4 games in Philly during the playoffs.
If Nabokov wants to win he signs here now. If he doesn’t care about winning let him sign with another middle of the road club and be blamed when they lose in the first or second round again.
The Swiss are Coming, The Swiss are Coming!
i agree, im not saying nabokov is the end-all-be-all.. but he is definitely an improvement in net
"I'd like to thank my hands for being so great." (Freddie Mitchell)
by PhillySportsDave on Jun 27, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
If we can sign him to a max of 2 years and not pay through the nose for him then it’s ok, but to have him 3+ years at his age at 5+ million a year= big mistake. You can compare him to Brodeur in terms of great goalies currently playing, but the Brodeur of today isn’t the same Brodeur than won all those Cups and age is a large part of that, which is my biggest concern with Nabokov. My other big concern is SJ’s playoff choke history, but I think that’s more a team choke all these years than solely the responsibility of the goalie. On the plus side, given our strong D and how well they made Leighton look, all Nabokov has to do is be better slightly than Leighton was, which isn’t that hard. I didn’t want Nabokov at first, but the more I think about it the more I like it, but a lot will depend on what the terms are, assuming he doesn’t sign with another team for more money. I think at his age he wants a Cup more than a few more millions of dollars and there are only a few teams that could be considered serious contenders, and from those teams even fewer who are in the market for a goalie so he’d be wise to take a pay cut for a serious chance to win it in Philly. Just my .02 worth.
short term, max 4 million deal
if you can get him for that kind of deal, then do it. anyone who doesnt want to do this makes no sense to me. There’s no one else to get. Im sick of hearing about Bernier, he’s a minor league goalie, it guarrantees nothing in the NHL. Nabokov is proven to be able to play, he’s an improvement over Boosh and Leighton. We’re not going to be able to sign Brodeur or Hasek in their prime or Ryan Miller, people need to give up that there’s some fantasy goalie out there right now.
Oh and if we trade Carter for a goalie, Im going to kill Paul Holmgren. Carter is not worth an all or nothing deal. If we trade him for a goalie, and the goalie isnt awesome, the whole thing is a giant waste.
Signing Nabokov for a reasonable deal and not trading away any key players is the obvious best move.
How people are against this I have no idea.
Nabokov’s has a 2.29 save percentage in the playoffs, so frankly I dont want to hear about playoff failures. The sharks players in front of Nabokov are terrible in the playoffs.
Somebody explain to me how this is not a good enough combination:
Pronger+Timmonen+Carle+Coburn+Nabokov.
please. opponents and fans will hate on the surface, but underneath they’ll just be scared because the combination of the Flyers defense and Nabokov is certainly Stanley Cup worth.
Frankly I think having Nabokov coming in here with a chip on his shoulders is just going to help the situation.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 26, 2010 9:40 PM EDT reply actions
Everyone wants an upgrade in goalie. Guess what? Nabokov is an upgrade from Boosh and Leighton. People say they want an upgrade in net, and then they complain about Nabokov. I dont get what goes through some fans minds a lot of the time. Bernie Parent is coming back, hate to break it some fans.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 26, 2010 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions
*isnt coming back
lol, whoops. freudian slip, guess we all wish he would in the back of our minds.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 26, 2010 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions
no one is complaining
as long as it is at the right price & term
same as with carter… no one wants to trade him unless the price is right, and the price is high
I agree with most of what you’re saying, except when it comes to trading Carter. I can see trading him for a goalie, or to get a good 5th D-man and a winger, but perhaps the best reason to trade Carter is to clear some cap space. Signing Nabokov at the numbers people are suggesting is doable, but I’m worried about not being able to fill the other needs we have (short term and long term).
I’ve said this before but I’ll say it again and again here if I have to.
You don’t trade your leading scorer to clear cap space.
coughrobertlang2003cough ;)
I thought the whole reason Carter became expendable is because you got little from him if anything and still made the SCF…
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions
The whole reason Carter has become expendable is because this team is over loaded with Centers…Richards is not going anywhere, Briere pretty much can’t go anywhere, the city will revolt if Giroux is traded so that leaves Carter as the odd man out. He doesn’t have an NTC/NMC. His contract is not really cost prohibitive and on this team, he has made it clear he does not want to play wing, and pretty much stinks at it when he does play wing.(I question his effort) So all of that is why he is expendable. Plus he should net a pretty good return.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
yep yep yep
but careful with the use of the word expendable. Someone with Carter’s talent is never expendable, but given the situation, while he isnt necessarily expendable, he is most reasonable to move.
Pretty much agreed with what was said above – Briere’s contract makes him pretty much unmoveable, unless we were to workout some deal where we split the remainder of his contract or something. Additionally Briere does seem to perform much better in the clutch and seems to “make goals happen” more than Carter.
No chance in hell we’re trading Giroux since his ceiling right now is – anywhere from best player on this team to one of the franchise’s best ever – i realize that’s saying a lot this early – but Giroux is essentially Mike Richards plus some of Jeff Carter’s scoring prowess + incredible ice vision, so I’m sticking to that statement.
As far as moving Richards to wing and putting Carter at center. I dont like it. Richards is a guy who you dont want to limit to one side of the ice. His two-way play is way better than Carter and the energy he plays with, he’s a guy that needs to have maximum use of the ice.
So essentially that leaves Carter on the outs.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m stoked! I think he’s a very good goalie. And if they can sign him and not mortgage the house then it’s all good.
Not sure why they’d keep Cote if he’s never going to play. They could keep Carbomb for around the same price (if not less) and he has some offensive ability and can skate.
Now we just have to work out what the top lines will look like. And that 5th dman. Although, has anyone given thought that with some more ice time, a few of the guys here right now may just start to grow into more solid d men?
"In fact, it is probably safe to say, the statement "I am a hockey fan" is the same as "I hate gary bettman."- bfrank27
I think they want to keep Cote, because he’s basically like a loyal dog. He wants to play here, he’ll do whatever the organization asks of him, take as low as salary as necessary, and he’ll play his heart out when he goes out there. Also Cote’s wife might be performing sexual favors for the front office.
I still think we should trade Carcillo to clear some more cap space, I want Powe on the 4th line with Lappy and Betts, Powe can bring more to the table since he can penalty kill in addition to play 5 on 5. Resign Asham if we want to try to get some more cap space to go after a top right winger or go after a guy like Recchi for the 3rd line at 1 mil (slightly more expensive than Asham).
If we’re not going to move Carter I dont see much choice than having to move Richards out on the wing with Carter at center. The combination of Briere and Carter just has never produced like it should. And I think it’d be a mistake to break up the Leino-Briere-Hartnell line at least for now. So I guess…
Gagne-Carter-Richards
Leino-Briere-Hartnell
JVR-Giroux-Asham/Recchi
Lappy-Betts-Powe
Pronger-Carle
Timmonen-Coburn
?-Bartulis
unless we move Carter for a winger and defenseman, like the deal ive seen here many times, pretty much a fantasy, but I would make out with a Carter for Bobby Ryan-Lucas Sbisa deal. They would get the right winger they need and a serviceable 5th defenseman, then you’d have
Gagne-Richards-Ryan
Leino-Briere-Hartnell
JVR-Giroux-Asham/Recchi
Lappy-Betts-Powe
Pronger-Carle
TImmonen-Coburn
Sbisa-Bartulis
G1 Nabokov
G2 Boucher
…. Id love it.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 26, 2010 9:59 PM EDT reply actions
Recchi resigned with Boston so count that option out.
by ryanitus on Jun 26, 2010 10:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
If you can win a cup with Nabokov and HAVE to give him 1 more year to get him, isn’t it worth it?
The Swiss are Coming, The Swiss are Coming!
If you can win a cup
I like the sound of that. Say it again.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 26, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I find it hard to believe that Homer would be burned twice. He talked to Meehan extensively (it seems) at the draft. He HAS to have an idea that he’ll sign there.
@philatticus on Twitter
Even if he doesn’t, I would hardly say he got burned. He lost nothing.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I was talking more “PR” than actual burning, which is impossible with this deal.
@philatticus on Twitter
by Dylan Marck on Jun 26, 2010 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I mean he’s basically blueballed us once. Can’t do it again. I’ve literally watched Nabby’s saved on Richards about a hundred times today lol
@philatticus on Twitter
by Dylan Marck on Jun 26, 2010 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions
To get just two games away from the Stanley Cup, the Flyers aren’t far away at this point. The team only needs a little improvement to win next year (especially considering the ’Hawks are taking a backwards leap because of cap constraints).
What are the two areas all Flyer fans know need improving? 1. A solid, steady netminder and 2. a third quality defensive pairing. Everything other than that is icing on the cake as far as I’m concerned.
Is Nabby the best goalie in the league? Nope, not really. Is he an improvement over what the team had at any point last year? Absolutely. So the team only needs another dependable D-man or two to finally hoist the Cup.
Hmm I hope the organization isn’t buying all this “two games away from the Stanley Cup”. Yeah we got close, but we were also one shootout goal away from not making the playoffs for only the second time in the last fifteen seasons. We also finished with the second lowest number of regular season points in the last fourteen seasons. I get what you’re saying: that we just need to fix up a few holes and we’re ready for the cup. And I agree, we have a loaded offense and defense that probably doesn’t need much fixing. On paper. But for some reason that loaded offense and defense failed miserably for half the regular season. I hope the front office knows why and are ready to fix it.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That’s just how tightly packed the NHL teams are at this point. And PHI was only so low in the standings because of the rough start. If you told people that PHI was going to play for the Cup last September nobody would doubt it. They’ve had the talent without a doubt. They, like several teams, are going to contend for the Cup and really are only addressing issues around the edges. Luck is always going to play a role in a regular season and playoffs, but at the end of the day you know the Flyers are one of the best teams in the East on paper. They don’t have to get all that much better.
I waited all year for this?
Well I still remember a poll here where a large number of people wanted us to miss the playoffs so that the front office would gain the impetus to make some wholesale changes. So people had a feeling that this team needed to completely rebuild. I didn’t agree with that.
But now there’s this overriding perception that the team’s generally great, and the same team can go forth and make the same impact in the playoffs as they did last season. I’m just a bit bemused about what people were thinking when they were calling for a rebuild and what parts of that have changed between then and now.
But then again, Briere being moved to center, Leino’s emergence and Hartnell’s slump-breaking did make a huge impact in the playoffs. Perhaps there’s a case to be made saying that the scoring issues in the regular season are already resolved there.
And you’re right: on paper this team is pretty elite. Add Nabokov and it definitely looks even better. That would give us 8 top 6 fowards, 2 stud no. 1 defensemen, 2 potential top pair defensemen and 1 very good (the jury’s still out on the elite question) goaltender.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Fortunately during the playoffs some people (Hartnell)finally bought into Lavys system 100%
Also some players finally got their Mojo back, and the Team got it for the 1st time!
I truly think we are a better Team b/c of what we did in the playoffs
Because of that, Homer dosent have to make wholesale changes
We are not 2 wins away from our goal
But we are definitely on the right path ……for now
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 26, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions
exactly
Every team has a hole of some kind. For years, that was goalie. With Nabby now, the only hole is the #6 D. Which, is very minor, considering Lavy runs a defensive system, and we have tons of defensive forwards.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
Style of play is different in the playoffs than the regular season. It’s why the Devils can win the division and then lose in five games to a team that was a shootout-loss away from missing the playoffs. In the playoffs, I don’t think you saw quite as much pinching in by the D-men (but when they did pinch, they were generally smart pinches and the forwards generally covered well). What we kept hearing from MarioD during the regular season is that Laviolette’s system sort of depends on having that top-tier goalie who can make those big saves in case a pinch goes wrong and you have an odd-man rush or breakaway against. Potentially enter Evgeni Nabokov…
by Ben Feldman on Jun 26, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions
To be fair, we were 5-1 against the Devils in the regular season too. I don’t think that’s the best example of there being a different syle of play in the playoffs and regular season.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough. I’ll try again: Montreal was the 8th seed but beat both the Capitals and Canadiens because they actually played defense, blocked shots and had a goaltender who made the saves he needed to make.
by Ben Feldman on Jun 26, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Caps were destined to fail. they have 1 good defender, and two awful goalies. Now, Pitt is a different story.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
But that’s exactly what I’m saying. That style of play worked for Washington in the regular season to the point of them winning the President’s Trophy, and I’m pretty sure it’ll work again this regular season. But it hasn’t worked thus far in the playoffs for them.
by Ben Feldman on Jun 26, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions
MTL also got a good goalie ridiculously hot at the right time. If Halak vs Pens shows up against WSH WSH wins. If Halak against PHI shows up against either WSH or PIT MTL loses.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions
That’s not even close to an accurate statement. If you want to knock the Caps, there are definitely areas open to critique. 1 good defender and two awful goalies is just false. Varlamov is better than anyone that the Flyers had in net last year, by a healthy margin. Theodore is at least as good as anyone PHI had.
I waited all year for this?
I would say varlamov is just as good as Leighton and Boosh, not as good as Emery. and only slightly better then Theo. The only reason Leighton was so good was because we have a great defense. Mike Green is a beast, but hes only sub par at real defense. and your only real shut down guy is Poti. I agree that an average goalie can win a cup for a team, just like an average QB can win a super bowl for a team, but the goalie needs a more shut down style defense to succeed. Either revamp your D, or get a top Goalie. Like i said below, not being disrespectful, just the way I see it.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
Yeah, you just don’t watch enough Caps. Varlamov is far and away better than any of those goalies, it’s not even a real debate; there isn’t a single GM in the league that wouldn’t take Varlamov first off that list. Jeff Schultz is the Caps’ best defensive player. Mike Green is above average in his own end but still needs work. Tom Poti blows. You’re also overlooking the addition that John Carlson and Karl Alzner are going to have. That’s a huge upgrade on our D but I don’t expect many outsiders to recognize it until at least the halfway mark of next season.
I waited all year for this?
I would take Varlamov over those guys too, but there are lots of guys I’d take over all of them. I really do like the Caps, Green is one of my favorite players, same with Backstrum. I’ll admit that I dont watch every caps game, but I watched enough to make my own opinion about Varlamov.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
You like the Caps? Are you a Flyers fan or not? :P
Quite honestly, Varlamov has played so few games it’s tough to judge where he’s at, but he generally plays really well (like sv% above .920 level) after a two or three game warming up period, so far at least.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
You like the Caps? Are you a Flyers fan or not? :P
The two are mutually exclusive?
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Aren’t they supposed to be?
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Well I definitely prefer the Caps to the Pens…and respect Ovechkin while plainly disliking Crosby
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Honestly, I think you all hate us much more than we hate you.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 28, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
We’re the red headed stepchild of the Patrick teams, aren’t we? :(
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Mostly because we always lose to you guys (and everyone else) when it matters. I bet most Caps fans and most Flyers fans don’t remember the Dale Hunter goal, and I think that’s the last time we’ve done anything that would upset the Flyers fans.
I waited all year for this?
I remember it too. F*&^ing Dale Hunter… ;)
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 28, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I hate all things Dale Hunter
Fu@k Hunter and that stupid dam helmet 
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 28, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
You and Pierre Turgeon...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xte-Vtxg-m8
You're living in a parallel universe. Do not attempt angle parking.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 28, 2010 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions
so true!
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 28, 2010 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions
John Carlson and Karl Alzner
Bingo. Especially Carlson.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions
there isn’t a single GM in the league that wouldn’t take Varlamov
In a heartbeat.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
If he came for free, yes but if I was a caps fan, I’d be excited about Neuvirth and Holtby, I think they have much more upside then Varlamov but they have done a good job with young goaltending talent and John Carlson is one of my favorite young defenseman.
Varly is supposed to be more explosive and Neuvirth more technically sound and consistent. Holtby is supposed to be a bit of both, a hybrid. Too early to tell.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Either way though, thats 3 very talented young options in net and thats fantastic drafting by the Caps. I think they need to pick a starter, enough of this Varlamov one game then Theo after one bad loss, stick with a guy, give Varly 60 starts and the rest to the backup, the Caps got smashed in one game in the Canadiens series, first thing the Caps do is swap goalies, have a little faith and give the guy a chance to redeem himself.
Well Varlamov needs to stay healthy before they give him the net. They tried to last year and he got hurt and that’s when Theo went on his long run.
the Caps got smashed in one game in the Canadiens series, first thing the Caps do is swap goalies
Did you watch, or are you just regurgitating random crap you’ve heard? The Caps lost the first game 3-2 (OT), which is not getting “smashed” and they started Theo in game 2. In game 2 Theo let in 2 goals on 2 shots in 8 minutes despite the Caps carrying the play. It was pretty demoralizing and that’s why BB changed goalies. Then Varlamov won the game so he just kept riding him. Varlamov didn’t have any bad games, so there was never a reason to go back to Theo.
I waited all year for this?
That’s not even close to an accurate statement. If you want to knock the Caps, there are definitely areas open to critique.
Of course, but don’t be thinking they can’t possibly be there for the ECF this year JPH.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Exactly you can only outscore your opponents for so long and the canadiens didn’t beat the capitals, Halak beat the capitals and that’s why, the caps finally got stuffed by an opponents goalie, while they can score, they aren’t that good on d. Green keeps getting considered as a Norris trophy candidate, well that’s bull. He is nothing but a scorer with the d man label and would simply be better suited as a wing and a pp specialist then on defense.
by ryanitus on Jun 27, 2010 12:12 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Not really accurate, but Green tanked in the playoffs so I’m not going to bother sticking up for him. Check the scores, the Caps D wasn’t all that abused. Pretty much one ES goal against and one PP goal against per game and that’s all she wrote.
I waited all year for this?
scoring without defense and two bad goalies will always equal a fast playoff exit. Two straight years they have swapped from one goalie to a new one in the playoffs, from theodore to varlamov, it’s not a good thing if your teams first thought going from one playoff game to the next is who is our goalie tomorrow night? Heres an idea, get an established goalie and kick Theodore to the curb or push the progression because Varlamov should be ready to start 60 games a season by now.
Theo is gone. They’ll let Neuvirth and Varlamov fight it out. I don’t know why a Flyers fan, of all people, would insist that you need an established goalie to get to or win the Cup.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on Jun 27, 2010 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think he was saying you guys need an “established” (I’m hearing pretty good in my head when I read established) goalie, along with a big improvement in defense before you guys can be a real contender. There’s no doubt you guys can score, but you can also get lit up pretty easily too. From Heut to Theodore to Varlamov, none of them will make much of a difference (unless they get Halak hot) until the defense improves substantially.
…and Niemi, Halak, Boucher, Leighton, Howard are all established in what sense? Didn’t this year debunk the “you need a good goalie to win” myth?
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Howard...established in what sense?
Holland and Babcock seem to think he’s a NHL starter.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
But for 5 years before that he wasn’t. The point is, that especially with young guys, you can go from “not established” to “established” in a pretty short time.
I waited all year for this?
You mean like when they were in the finals 2 years in a row and one it with…what was that guy’s name?
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Both with Osgood starting. First one had Hasek too, second one Conklin.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks RLS. I was trying to be funny believe it or not saying Osgood has disappeared now that Howard (by situation or design) is #1.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Green tanked in the playoffs
Biggest factor was he ran out of gas. He’ll learn/is learning how to pace himself.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m sure he shares the blame for his conditioning, but I’d put much more blame on BB. How do you keep skating him so many minutes in meaningless regular season games? So dumb.
I waited all year for this?
I meant more in terms of his management within each game than over the season. It takes more than physical abilities to know when to go on high and when to be patient and simmer. Niedermayer, Lidstrom, and Pronger are vets who have that sense, but they weren’t born with it. It comes with experience. Sometimes a coach will play a guy more minutes for the sake of confidence. It shouldn’t be assumed that Green has all the self-confidence in the world just because he has a load of talent. A lot of stars are far and away their own worst enemies because they’re so hard on themselves. Also, some players just plain thrive on minutes. I get the sense that Green fits both of those categories. What do you think?
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Green is definitely too deep in his own head, but I don’t know how much of the conditioning stuff is on him or BB. It’s not just that BB gives him tons of ice, he gives him ridiculously long shifts. He routinely skates a full 2 minute power play and he basically always skates 25+ minutes, even in meaningless games or games that are out of hand. BB needs to shorten his shifts and learn to cut his minutes when games are decided or unimportant. I just don’t see it happening.
I waited all year for this?
Exactly you can only outscore your opponents for so long
And then if you’re the Hawks this year, you win the damn Cup. Two of the four W were 6-5 and 7-4.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
To be fair, MON was a nightmare for us in the regular season and was the worst possible match up. It wasn’t about playoff hockey being different as much as it was MON having our number and Halak going on an insane 3 game streak.
I waited all year for this?
Don’t agree with the Umberger theory then?
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions
No, not really. MON didn’t shut down or control the Caps offense. It wasn’t a change in the style of play. The Caps biggest problem was the PP, and that doesn’t have much to do with “style of play.” It was a failure to adjust by BB, but when we talk styles and systems we are talking Even Strength. At 5/5 the Caps dominated the play. If you think it’s a sound defensive strategy to let the Caps have the puck for 2/3 the game and take 40 shots a night, then fine. But the Habs didn’t shut us down or give up all harmless shots.
I waited all year for this?
its the caps lack of attention on their defensive end that was their undoing, tha habs’ good defense caused turnovers resultin in goals while cherry pickers like semin and ov got caught
by fitzy first on Jun 27, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions
But did you watch the series? That’s not how the Habs scored. The Habs got 2 goals a game for the most part; anyone would agree that the Caps should win those games handily if they can keep a team to 2 goals a game. Halak keeping the Caps to 1 was an insane individual feat and the reason the Caps didn’t advance.
I waited all year for this?
If you get 40+ shots a game you should be scoring 3-4 goals per game unless you get up against a really hot goalie. That was Halak.
There’s a difference between Lemaire esque scoring on transition and MTL scoring on transition. The real trapping teams (Lemaire and Hitchcock implement it beautifully if I were to ever describe the trap as beautiful). MTL allowed a ton of shots and also had a really good shooting percentage themselves. The real trapping teams don’t allow shots and counterattack when you press, but do it a lot better as well.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Exactly. A good defensive team that keeps you to the outside and clogs the middle, the kind of play Umberger was talking about, isn’t letting up 40 shots. They are letting up 20-25 shots. We’ve seen teams do that (though not really post-lockout because the trap is antiquated, Huck), and that ain’t what MON did.
I waited all year for this?
It was a failure to adjust by BB
BB was the perfect coach to take over from GH at the perfect time in the season and with the young talent: do you think he’s the one to lead then to the promised land? I wonder. I think this season will be the clincher for him and the Caps. They both need to take the next step but there’re one or two others looking to do the same.The top coaches adjust on the fly. Will he? I hope he does if only for his great one-liners and pressers. For the Flyers sake…
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree with you. He needs to take another step in terms of coaching development. I can’t say that I’m very hopeful based on what I’ve seen, but I’m positive GMGM is going to give him the season to figure it out unless they completely crap the bed out of the gate.
I waited all year for this?
I’m thinking they’re going to be there with or without BB. I hear/read people saying what chokers they are etc etc. That would all disappear in a nanosecond if they won the Cup. Don’t be too hard on them. Looks from your name and comments you’re a Cap man. Hang in there. I look forward to some good battles.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
The choker stuff is historically accurate, but irrelevant for this team. It is way overstated as applied to this team. They lost to the Flyers, a team that had as many or more points in the regular season. That wasn’t a real upset and that was the year the Caps core had their first taste of playoff hockey. It took them almost half the series to figure out how to play, so I chalk that up to growing pains. They came back from 1-3 to beat the Rangers and then lost to the Cup champs in 7 the next year. Not ideal, but not exactly a choke either. They almost choked against the Rangers because they didn’t take them seriously enough (among other things), but they won. Losing to PIT in 7, aside from the embarrassing game 7, isn’t really a choke or a huge collapse. This year is the first time you could really say they vastly underperformed, but the common narrative is way overblown. They didn’t disappear or play terrible hockey. They had a few problems (PP, 2nd line) but at the end of the day they dominated that series, but couldn’t beat Halak. They have plenty of time and have even more talent on the way. I’m not worried about the Caps disappearing. The Sharks comparisons are easy, and expected, but the Sharks have been competitive for much longer, have been a more veteran team, have less help from the farm on the way (so have a smaller window) and have one HUGE problem the Caps don’t have: unlike the Caps, SJS can’t count on their highest paid player to be their best player. AO has never pulled a disappearing act like Joe Thornton routinely does (and Nick Backstrom is also 100% reliable).
I waited all year for this?
I waited all year for this?
Agree with every point. Does that tag line refer to this season’s playoff exit?
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Time to move on. Last season is last season. It’s not anywhere soon enough but there’s a new one coming. Not to go all Pollyanna on you but…
You're living in a parallel universe. Do not attempt angle parking.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I know. I just haven’t thought of a better sig line, to be honest. I put it up after my immediate two week mourning period but haven’t even thought to change it since. When I think of something that I like I’ll change it.
I waited all year for this?
Fehr enough. What’s Japer’s like for a “foreign” poster?
You're living in a parallel universe. Do not attempt angle parking.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m biased but I think we are a pretty welcoming group. If you come and try to be intentionally inflammatory you’ll get pounced pretty quick but we welcome outside perspective and have quite a few regular posters from other SBN sites. A lot of it comes down to tact. If your first comment is “AO is dirty and he sucks” then you probably won’t have a good experience. But valid criticism is fine, and we routinely rip on the Caps so it’s not just a “congratulations Caps!” atmosphere.
I waited all year for this?
Nah, I don’t do inflammatory. I had to copy/paste it because I don’t even know how to spell it. I love hockey (always have), just happens my favorite team is Philly. Maybe see you over there.
You're living in a parallel universe. Do not attempt angle parking.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
One of the On the Forecheck authors actually posts a lot more at JR than at his own blog OTF.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
InPursuitofLappyness has been over a few times. You can ask him his opinion but I think we’ve been pretty cool with him.
I waited all year for this?
Yeah the people at Japers are cool. If you feel like discussing Caps, or talking to the Caps fans if they happen to be discussing Flyers, then there’s no better place to do it.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Go home troll! Why do you have to come over here on our site?! You ignorant bandwagon jumper.
(I figured you miss hearing that every time we see you, so I decided to don my mask)
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 27, 2010 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I can’t even pull one single quote out of that one, it was too epic.
Good times.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 27, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey Geoff, Green came in 2nd! :P
Guaranteed, Green comes in third.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions
“And I stand by every single thing I wrote there. They are all still true.”
Except I don’t, because I can admit when I was wrong.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
haha, oh man that was epic. “But you’ll keep responding like a child, Huck.”
(He responds “Grow up.”)
“Make me.” hahahaha
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 27, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m sure there were more. I only found those two by searching comments for “Huck” from author ’Fehr and Balanced."
That said, I am interested to know what his opinion on Carter, Nabokov etc. is. All said and done, he knows his hockey.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree
but I still didnt see you guys as being a real threat. Not being disrespectful, just true.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
Hmm I thought the Caps were one of the teams that could have ended our run in the playoffs. Just because Leighton was good for making the saves he had to make (most of the time) but he wouldn’t go and do something flashy and absolutely rob a shooter. But with guys of the calibre of Ovechkin and Semin against you, you need a goalie to be able to rob the shooter.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s fine. You don’t have to consider us a real threat, and historically you’d be right. It doesn’t really matter because they have to play it on the ice. Funny about that. Who saw PHI as a real threat a week before the playoffs?
I waited all year for this?
nobody
But any team with a hot goalie or a shut down defense has a shot. Im honest enough to admit that we had a very easy schedule to get to the SCF’s. But you see how much trouble Boston gave us, its because Tukka was playing out of his mind.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
And any goalie can get hot. If Tukka can get hot, so can either Varlamov or Neuvirth. It’s just a matter of which goalie gets hot in a given year.
I waited all year for this?
I agree
but better goalies have the better chances of getting hotter. I wouldnt say either Boosh or Leighton were “hot” in the playoffs, they made some great saves, but also let in some bad goals. they were average, but our D played so good, it didnt matter.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
I don’t even know with goalies anymore. In so far as both Boucher and Leighton looked like actual NHL starters, I’d say they were hot. There’s a reason they are career backups.
I waited all year for this?
So yes, you need a ‘hot’ goalie to win the playoffs. It’s just not possible to figure out who’s going to be ‘hot’ until after the fact.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
LOL @ a Canucks fan calling him overrated. I wonder if he knows Luongo is on his team…
@philatticus on Twitter
…statistically Nabokov is easily overrated and Luongo, at least over the regular season, is not. Playoffs are a different issue.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Extremely OT
There seems to be a frighteningly large number of dramatic Nabokov photos. (see: Puck Daddy, Fear the Fin)
Need examples lol
@philatticus on Twitter
by Dylan Marck on Jun 26, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Dramatic photo?

Oh wait…that’s Vesa Toskala.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I think I’ve seen a Nabby one like that. Not gonna lie, sorta want it for my wallpaper.
@philatticus on Twitter
by Dylan Marck on Jun 26, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Couldn't find it, found another dramatic Nabokov one though

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Big question if Nabby comes, what number does he take seeing as Pronger has 20?!!>!>!?!
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
Maybe the 49 is a good luck charm? (assuming Leighton leaves)
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Random Thought #1: I like this. (He likes it! Hey Mikey!) Seriously though, if we can sign this guy for 2 years at like $4 million per, that would be perfect.
Random Thought #2: I guess if Homer was planning to spend that $4 million on Hamhuis, that would have meant another year of Leighton in the nets? As has been pointed out in this thread, signing Nabokov for $4 – 4.5 million would only leave so much to go around in other areas of need.
Had that money been spent on Hamhuis, one of those other “areas of need” would have been goaltending, which very likely would have meant another year of Leighton, barring a trade.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
@mikefive
yeh exactly. it was either make a major upgrade at defense to hide the goaltending problem or go this route.
this route is better. we get the upgrade our goalie, which ultimately is more important than any defenseman upgrade. Also we can still get a 5th defenseman type guy with the money we’re giving Nabokov. Hamhuis was more than what our defense needed, and at his asking price wasnt worth it. It would have been great, but there just was no way we were going to have a super stud type defense with Pronger/Timmonen/Carle/Hamhuis/Coburn and upgrade at a goalie. Not in the salary cap era.
Now we get an upgrade at a goalie and still can get a reasonable priced, serviceable 5th defensemen that will more suit our defensive needs.
smart move all around.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 26, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions
hearing something about..
the flyers believe they can make a “salary cap” friendly deal with Nabokov, so hopefully this is all what we’re hoping for.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 26, 2010 11:07 PM EDT reply actions
OT: and some of you may have already seen this
But it seems Bobby Ryan isn’t taking somewhere between 20-25 million for five years. Murray says he’ll match any offer sheet he’ll get, but could it be possible that he just doesn’t want to be a Duck?
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:26 PM EDT reply actions
This is pretty interesting too. Especially some parts:
"Not even close," Ryan said of seeking comparable or better salaries. "I completely understand that nobody makes more than Getzlaf and Perry. I have no problem with that. I never expected that. I know those are the two guys and we build from there. I also feel like in the past couple of years, I played in a position where I can be mentioned among them."
The winger is well aware of the speculation that he could be dealt away, whether it’s to places like Toronto (where ex-Ducks and current Toronto GM Brian Burke resides) or Philadelphia (near his hometown).
"I know the Toronto for one is whatever reason people say because of the Burke connection," Ryan said. "I’d be very surprised if I were moved before I signed or before July 1. I just work out and I try to enjoy Southern California.
"If I were traded, I know there’s places I’d like to go and places I wouldn’t like to go. That’s something that still out of my hands. But if someone e-mails me another Toronto article, I’m going to lose it."
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
After we get our goalie, Then I see Homer going for Checkmate!
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 26, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Bobby’s RFA. Seeing how little Halak got traded for, a straight swap for Gagne is too much. Carter for Bobby + Fowler.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 26, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
fowler has a great future. only the ducks like us are strong in the middle… yes, carter and gagne should go but who will want them>?
by fitzy first on Jun 27, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Goalies have much lower value than skaters. No way you get that kind of haul. I don’t know if you were throwing sarcasm in on that but ANA would never go for that.
I waited all year for this?
No I don’t actually believe we can get Fowler of them. But if we were to trade Carter for RFA Bobby Ryan, then something else would have to come back I feel.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions
No way the Ducks are giving up Fowler after he dropped into their laps at #12. Hope you’re right about Ryan’s trade value being low — I’d love to see him in orange and black.
by memphisbrando on Jun 27, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
After hearing that they’ve already given Niedermayer a special assistant coaches position to tutor/mentor him, I agree that Fowler’s not moving anywhere.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 27, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Anyone here read Lolita and think it was an absolutely incredible book?
I have sting singing in my head on an infinite loop
“just like that,…old-man in…. that book…by Nabokov”
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
I prefer the misheard lyric version
Just like the… old man in… that big pineapple cart.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
nabby is a playoff disappointment year in and year out… same old same old here, throw away the future for the now. but, i have faith in this organization. we might need to dump some salary and rebuilt sooner or later
See above. Ben (or someone) posted his career numbers.
Regular season: .912 SV%, 2.39 GAA
Postseason: .913 SV%, 2.29 GAA
Nabokov has been playing 65-70 games a year for Caps West. He has the benefit of a high-scoring regular season team in front of him. As his numbers state, he steps it up in the playoffs, but the team in front of him does not. See the above debate between Fehr and Jph89. What Jph89 is saying about the Caps can also apply to the Sharks.
Put Nabokov on a team like the Flyers with good individual and team defense. Play him 10 fewer games every year. By the time the playoffs come, chances are Nabokov is more rested and more confident. The Flyers can concentrate on playing good team D and not worry about cleaning up sloppy rebounds should the opposition get a shot on goal.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
exactly
we may not have the greatest D, but its defiantly in the top 10. Add on a top 10 goalie, and (hopefully a back to form) top 10 offense, and that should put us along the elite.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
certainly within the all around top 10 of the League!
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 27, 2010 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions
They really are Caps west, right down to the terrible ice. I honestly hadn’t thought about it but it makes so much sense.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 27, 2010 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions
The caps D might be god awful
But at least they refrain from scoring on their own goalie

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
by JpH89 on Jun 27, 2010 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2K2-WSMWo
I think that puck actually went off of the stick of what’s his face from the Avs, though (O’Reilly? I forget).
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 27, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Truth.
A fluke goal is a fluke goal. You can’t point to it as evidence of anything other than this: “Anything can, and does, happen.”.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 27, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
If that potential 7th rounder EVER makes the NHL, then becomes a star. Then yes, by all means, loose faith.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
Henrik Zetterberg has already been drafted, thank God.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
Yeah, besides unless they sign Nabokov they don’t even lose a pick smart move after failing to once again make Hamhuis a Flyer. So basically they gave Ryan Parent and Dan Hamhuis for a 3rd rounder, sorry but that was a bad choice Homer. hamhuis would of been the 4th defender and still would of gotten good minutes alongside Timonen.
Pronger-Carle
Timonen-Hamhuis
Bartulis-Coburn
Would of been a good defensive unit.
It would’ve been the best. But they didn’t give Ryan Parent and Dan Hamhuis for a 3rd rounder. Flyers lost Parent, Flyers gained 3rd rounder. For all we care, it was a three way deal in which the Flyers get a 3rd rounder, Nashville gets Parent and Pittsburgh gets the rights to Dan Hamhuis.
The fact is that Hamhuis didn’t want to sign here. Losing him for nothing would’ve been worse.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Id love it if he said, “Get a goalie, and then I will sign with you guys”
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 27, 2010 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions
From what’s being said in the press, you don’t have to convince Homer of that — you have to convince Hamhuis.
by memphisbrando on Jun 27, 2010 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions
i think going for nabby over solidifying the defense is a big mistake… give Leighton another year and resigned emery, remember folks, he was pretty good for us before the injuries. this is the mistake the flyers org. makes over and over again through the years. they go for these proven veteran players, give them boat loads of money and before you know it, we get screwed because they’re over the hill. pronger is an exception but do you really expect prongs to play 30 minutes every game for the next 6 years… coburn is a strong skater, a little disappointing on the scoring but is anemic in front of the net, i would take hammer over coburn any day… i dont understand why but whatever, you all watched the series, it was either the D or the G, which one needs to be addressed more?
Emery
You forget that Emery will not play next year, and is ver unlikely to play hockey ever again right? And who is a proven veteran player? Emery wasnt, Esche wasnt, Biron, Nitty, Burk, Check, Boosh, leighton, all no. This is the first time in a long time that we are actually getting a proven player. And if your talking about non goalies too, I still dont get whos you consider a bad signing. Not pronger, Kimmo, Betts, Lappy, or Danny. Gagne was signed years ago, and every body else is younger then 30, so they arent “over the hill” by any means. Finally, if your not talking about the Homer era, then it has to be Clark. So then your points are valid, they went for the older, proven players. But at the same time, we were in the playoffs every year with him too. So, what about this organization really makes you lose faith in them. ohh…. and G is more important. Why? Because our defensive prospects are by far some of the best of all the teams in the NHL. we have some decent goalies, but they wont be ready for some 3 more years, so with an offense that will last about 7 more years, we have a D and G now that will be ready for the next 3 years, and then we’ll have 4 years with the next crop. so my vote goes to G
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
emery was good last year, im not saying anything more than that. the flyers org dumps goalies every other year. it’s abnormal and obviously the sun shines on a dogs ass every now and again by signing a journeyman in Leighton to ride us to the SCF. yeah, of course i was talking about the clark era, but was warning the fact that we tend to go down that road of bringing in the big names. i havent lost faith in this org. by the way, im just not a firm believer in dumping a guy like 49, for all he’s done without giving him an opportunity in the future. sure, but seriously; who is going to step up next year? we still have yet to see a strong homer draft… still waiting. maybe we’ll have some picks next decade
Didn’t Homer have a major role in drafting before he became GM?
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 3:30 AM EDT up reply actions
goalie is more of a priority than Defense.
and riding Leighton is a mistake, staying loyal to him wont make him stop soft goals. And Emery is done in the league, he might not ever play again because of long termness of his injury and the condition of his hips.
i get your point about changing goalies every year, but you have to find a goalie worth sticking with first. Sticking with Leighton would be a mistake. We didnt ride Leighton to the stanley cup, we rode our defense. When our defense broke down Leighton was exposed.
Nabokov for a reasonable salary without giving up any key players is the right move.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 4:00 AM EDT up reply actions
This. Someone said in a thread a while ago that Leighton is a $900,000 backup, and isn’t worth more than $900,000, despite what he did for us this season. For the money I expect he’ll be looking for, we can improve the team a hell of a lot more by using that money elsewhere (e.g., for a 5th D-man or a winger).
Nabakov at $4 million and no player trades is a much better deal for us than Leighton at $2 million, or even $1.5 million, even if it means we can’t make all the moves we want at other positions (barring a trade of Carter, but that’s another story).
goalie is more of a priority than Defense.
Exhibit A: Chicago, 2009-2010
Exhibit B: Detroit, Osgood years
Wait, what?
Wasn’t the issue that the Flyers rode their top-4 too hard out of necessity and couldn’t keep up with CHI would were more balanced in defenseman TOI distribution?
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
I think what he is saying is that we have a good defense corps already. I wholeheartedly agree that defense is by far the most important thing for any team, but we are pretty set at the blue line, and not at all set in goal. So for right now, with this team as it stands, goalie is the priority.
Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"
by Ed Van Chimp on Jun 27, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed.
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
by PatterPoet95 on Jun 27, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
CHIwouldwho were more balanced in defenseman TOI distribution?
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 27, 2010 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions
haha yeah, and then hamhuis wants more money even tho he’ll be a #5 defenseman.. it seems some people cant be pleased.
nabokov or defense? going for both people are still upset
"I'd like to thank my hands for being so great." (Freddie Mitchell)
by PhillySportsDave on Jun 27, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
With the defense the team has, the Flyers don’t need a goalie to singlehandedly win games for them — they need someone to play solidly and stop the inevitable odd-man rushes that are a consequence of playing Lavvy’s system. Leights was almost good enough to do that. Surely Nabby is good enough.
by memphisbrando on Jun 27, 2010 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d look at what you’re saying in another way. The Flyers need a goalie to not singlehandedly lose games for them, which can be a tall order with the inevitable odd-man rushes. That’s where Leighton tended to scare the shit out of me (Boucher was better here, I thought), and where I’d be far more comfortable with Nabokov in net.
I think if we can get Nabakov for 4M or so a season that would be good. I think only sign him for 1 year if that’s possible (but I won’t lose any sleep if it’s for 2 years). If you sign him for 1 year you can see if Backlund or anybody else is ready to start the season after him. Also if it’s 1 year, he turns 35 this season so if he can be signed again it will be a 35+ contract, so we could sign him again and make it an incentive laden contract (somebody correct me if I am wrong), so that could help our cap if we need him again.
Also I was wondering if what Homer is doing goes against any rules in the NHL. For some reason when I was reading this ideas similar to anti-trust laws in business were going through my head. If Nabakov is not a Free Agent yet, and his rights are with only San Jose, then is it true only San Jose can negotiate with him, right? If we actually made a deal for his rights (sent San Jose something and they gave us Nabakov’s rights) we could do this I know. But if we only have a “verbal agreement” in place like we have now, is there something wrong with that or against any rules or regulations? (Somebody who knows a lot about the rules and such feel free to explain it to me or correct me).
Not that I’m complaining, I would like him if it’s a good and cap friendly deal. I just don’t want to end up being investigated (like we were with Pronger even though we did nothing wrong with his new contract) and have this bite us in the ass later.
#1 Flyers Fan in New York
If I had to take a guess, since I think you’re right about other teams never being allowed to negotiate with a player whose rights belong to another team, the Sharks technically sent the rights to Nabokov to the Flyers for “future considerations,” and the Flyers have promised San Jose if they sign Nabokov before July 1, they’ll send their 7th round pick for “future considerations.”
by Ben Feldman on Jun 27, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Thanks.
Future considerations didn’t cross my mind at all for some reason, but that makes total sense. I knew I was probably missing something but wanted to throw that out there.
#1 Flyers Fan in New York
by Lindbergh 31 on Jun 28, 2010 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions
I think Nabby wanted like $5.7-ish million from the Sharks
He’ll have to settle for less than 5 mil because I don’t think any team in the NHL thinks he’s worth that much. Not sure if he’ll take 4 mil, though… but if you guys get him for that price range, I could see it working for you.
2 year, $4 mill a year is what I think will get the job done
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
Yeah that sounds reasonable and would be a fair deal
by JenLovesHockey on Jun 27, 2010 1:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Bobby Ryan
That news about Bobby Ryan is tantalizing. I wonder if we really could get him for a Carter trade. And I feel like Ryan would take a slight discount, to play in philly. I wonder if we should not ask for anything more than Ryan for Carter. This way we get Ryan and cap space that we can use at our own discretion towards getting a really solid 5th defenseman or a decent 3rd line RW like Colby Armstrong . Although a Carter for Ryan and Sbisa deal would be nice as well.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 4:02 AM EDT reply actions
there’s gonna be plenty of 3rd paring D that could be signed for 2 mil or less. Doesn’t seem to be a shortage of them in the open market.
Carter for Ryan works out, but I’d think that Anaheim would have to give a bunch more than an even swap. And they clearly would have the room to sign Carter to a new deal. I don’t think a GM is gonna make an offer for Carter, when he goes RFA anyway next season.
by Melt the Igloo on Jun 27, 2010 5:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Only one problem with that, though — if Ryan’s too expensive for them at <$5M/season, then so’s Carter. Money’s the sticking issue for them and Carter’s salary would do nothing to help them in that department. Now JVR might work, but do you want to take that chance? Maybe you do. I believe I’d be in favor of a JVR/Ryan swap.
by memphisbrando on Jun 27, 2010 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think Ryan’s too expensive for them; the article from Duck’s blog said they’d match whatever offer sheet he was given (this from is the same link PursuitOfLappyness posted above):
Murray said he wasn’t concerned that a deal may not get done by the end of next week, where Ryan will be a restricted free agent on July 1.
"We’re going to do what is right for the organization," he said. "I’m in no hurry to do anything whatsoever."
When asked if he’ll match any offer sheet that could come Ryan’s way or sit back and consider the amount, Murray flatly said, "If somebody wants to give him an offer sheet, we have lots of space. We’ll match."
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 27, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
JVR for Ryan then becomes a cap issue for us, because we’re trading an entry-level player for a guy looking at 4+. Anaheim have tons of cap space anyway.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions
The Flyers may end up signing Nabakov for $4 m per year, but there is NO way that is happening before July 1st. He wants to test the open market so why would he take an offer that is the bottom end of what he is seeking for less years than he probably wants. Something tells me at his age he wants more than a two year deal. (See Tim Thomas)
Also, as of today, is Bernier worth Carter…of course not, but we are living in a salary cap era and have salary cap issues. You think the Blackhawks wanted to trade away Big Buff and will most likely have to move Sharp and Versteeg? If we want to trade apples for apples, then I am fine with moving JVR for Bernier.
As for we need a veteran goalie and cannot go with a young goalie. Didn’t a rookie just win the Stanley Cup?
And, excuse me if don’t trust this organization for cultivating young goalies.
I used to be a big Nabakov fan but I watched him quit on his team at the Olympics and then not "win" any games for his team in the Conference Finals. Leighton may have faltered in the Finals, but at least he "won" (meaning his play was a major reason why his team won games) a game or two in the Conference Finals.
In the end, I don’t want to be hamstrung with the cap because of a veteran goalie who I have no faith can get the job done. With Pronger and Timonen, we need the final piece now (and I don’t know who that is, I’ll admit my preference is Bernier) and can’t wait two or three years for a cap hit to come off or for an organization goalie when this organization hasn’t developed a goalie since the mid 1980’s.
It might not happen before July 1st, but if there’s one reason we can get Nabokov for less than other teams in the league, it’s because of our status as a Cup contender, when most other teams that’d be looking at him probably aren’t, I’d imagine. Is a Cup worth a million+ pay cut? I’d say so, not sure if Nabokov would agree though.
I can’t say I’ve watched enough of Nabokov to have a good feel for his play, but his stats (especially his playoff stats) look awfully appealing to me. And I can’t think of a single game we won in the finals where Leighton’s play was a big factor in the win. On the other hand, I think at least two of the losses where Leighton simply killed us.
Like you, I don’t want to be bumping up against the cap because of another veteran who won’t be with us long. But we already have a few of those guys, and we need to get a player in net to give us a shot through their last productive years of play. There aren’t many (if any) better options than Nabokov in the short term, so I’m OK with it, even if it isn’t the perfect scenario we all dream of.
the problem is
You act as if Bernier is automatically going to succeed at the NHL level. You dont know that. But what we do know is Nabokov is a solid goaltender. Not the best, but he’s solid. And we cant be waiting on Bernier or take a risk, when you you’ve got guys like Pronger or Timmonen that are on the back end of their careers.
There’s actually much more evidence that Nabokov is the final piece than Bernier. Nabokov has proven to be able to play in the NHL, Bernier hasnt.
And if you move Carter for Bernier, and Bernier isnt excellent, it’s a total bust. If we moved Carter for Bernier I’d be pissed. Too much risk there in an uproven goalie with a veteran defense that’s ready to win now.
This team has a young offensive core, but soon enough the defense will need to be rebuilt. That’s when you make the move for a young goalie.
But right now the combination you run with is young/dynamic offense+veteran defense+veteran goaltending, that’s a recipe for Lord Stanley.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions
a rookie winning the cup
just because one rookie did it, doesnt mean that every rookie can do it or that it’s gauranteed. Still not worth Jeff Carter, I want proven NHL player(s) for Carter. Niemi was an ahberration, you cant base rookie goaltenders winning cups off of the that. Also the team playing in front of Niemi was one of the sicker NHL teams in recent memory. So again the blackhawks and nieme are much more the exception than the rule
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
There have been multiple examples of rookie goalies winning the Cup. Rare, yes, but not out of the question.
There is no reason to believe that Bernier won’t succeed at this level. Is it a risk, sure, but for cryin out loud, Nabakov’s playoffs stats are overblown because he has for the most part had the better team in front of him and still has not got the job done. Why at 35, which is what he will be when the playoffs begin next year, does anyone think Nabakov will all of a sudden become a Stanley Cup winning goalie?
I would think there are more examples of rookie goalies winning the Stanley Cup rather then veterans who have NEVER won a Cup prior to mid 30’s winning their first…..Dryden, Roy, Ward (yes Cam Ward was 22 and came out of nowhere), Niemi. Name me one mid 30’s veteran who failed miserably in pressure situations who finally won a Cup at that age in the past 40 years?
In the end, I love the discussion and the important thing is whomever is in goal next Oct 7th, I will root my butt off for. I just hope Holmgren makes the right decision. I just have a hard time believing it is Nabakov.
Not speaking to the “failed miserably in pressure situations” part, but just counting recent history where goalies in their mid-thirties won their first cup, you have Hasek was 37 in 2002 and Ed Belfour who was 34 in 1999.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 27, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice catches! I should have stuck with the 35+…LOL…. Always forget about Hasek in Detroit. Was happy to see Belfour get the Cup, although the Hull goal shouldn’t have counted. The Stars still could have won either later in OT or in Game 7.
Does anyone place Nabakov in the same category as Belfour and Hasek? Belfour and Hasek had reputations for being big money goalies who loved the pressure and didn’t wilt under the bright lights. They strived under it and took their teams further than anticipated when playing with Chicago and Buffalo respectively. They needed a change of scenery with complete teams to win the up. San Jose, it could be argued, had a complete team, who for a number of reasons, couldn’t get the Cup.
I would love Nabakov to win a Cup with the orange and black, but history doesn’t tell me that it would happen.
history is just an excuse to not do something
history says something is unlikely to happen… until it does… so frankly that means nothing to me.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 7:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Bernier
i think people have way too much of a love affair with this guy, he’s all built up in people’s heads as some larger than life fantasy. It’s not happening there’s been zero talk of it, as far as I know, just let it go. Nabokov is the solution for upgrade here. Vokoun isnt coming to save the day and neither is Bernier.
Nabokov-Boosh ’10
2010 Flyers Campaign Slogan: “Flyers in the front, Sharks in the back”
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 10:27 AM EDT reply actions
Thank you for bringing some reason to this debate. The Bernier Obsession is mind blowing. It’s like everyone just forgot everything they ever knew about hockey as soon as this kid’s name came up.
agreed
totally agree with you guys. yea, his stats that have been posted on here look nice but is there ANY evidence that LA would be interested in moving him? Even if he does get traded here, and if he pans out hes gonna need time to mature. time that we dont have. i would say we have one, maybe two years of elite level production from Pronger and Timonen. we need to take advantage of those years
I hope with that new $125 mil contract Howard spends some of that money on hiring a guy to teach him how to actually make the throw to 2nd. Once Howard gets that down he will be a pretty solid fielding first basemen,.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
To all the haters:
Do the Flyers need an improved defense? Yes. But realistically, they don’t need to improve by that much. They need to re-sign Coburn and get a solid 3rd-pair guy in there. If they’re not comfortable with Bartulis’ progress, they can probably get a fairly inexpensive 6th man too, although Joonas L. might be ready for spot duty.
If the 3rd pairing is more reliable than Parent and Krajicek, then the Flyers will be fine as long as they can play that third pairing for a few minutes longer than they have every game, during the regular season AND playoffs. They don’t need Dan Hamhuis to do that. They need someone who doesn’t cost a lot and is better than Parent or Krajicek. That is not really too much to ask.
And just how should the team live in A World Without Hamhuis? Why, by golly, they get a decent goaltender! Because hey, the team is going to screw up every now and again. Put someone decent in the goal who does not give up rebounds a-plenty, and you’ve already reduced your GA/G. Put someone like Nabokov on a team of the Flyers’ defensive caliber and you’ve got yourself a good situation.
As for Leighton… yes, he went above and beyond the call of duty this year. Ordinarily players are rewarded for such things, as they should be. But when those players have career years and receive lucrative contracts, wha happen? They regress unto their respective means, which yields bad results.
Since EREX21 posted the Phillies comment on the wrong page, I’ll make him feel like he did the right thing for the moment. Remember Adam Eaton? He had 11 wins with the Padres and the pre-2007 Phillies said, “Okay, that looks like a man who might be able to hold down the 3rd or 4th spot in the rotation!” That didn’t work out too well.
Different sports, yes, but I am comparing Leighton to Adam Eaton. Leighton is fine as a backup, especially on this team. The players all like him and they are used to playing in front of him. It is actually conceivable that they could do so for 30 games this year and live to tell about it. But once the playoffs come, no thank you. He did well against fortunate draws this year, and should Nabby get hurt, Leights has the experience of playing deep into the playoffs. But signing him as the starter would be a huge mistake.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
I appreciate you trying to spin my mistake on the boards…I agree with you completely though with regards to Eaton and Leighton.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
Leighton and Phillies
Since we’re talking about both Leighton and the Fightens does anyone else have a serious problem with Leighton going to the Phillies game the day after allowing the worst Stanley Cup clinching goal in the history of hockey? Thank you for completely overachieving, but c’mon. Go away for a while. That goal was one of the most shockingly inept things I have ever seen. I thank Leighton for what he did but as Ving Rhames said in Pulp Fiction “You lost your [Philadelphia] privileges” with that goal. At least for a little while. Every time I see him I become horribly depressed thinking what might have been
Not really
It was a great run and we should appreciate that. That said, it would’ve been cooler if someone like Pronger or Briere (both of whom carried us in the playoffs) or Gagne (without whom we wouldn’t have made the greatest comeback in the history of American professional sport) were to make an appearance so that Philly fans could show their appreciation.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 28, 2010 3:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Nope. He’s a person like the rest of us, truth be told, I commend him for having the balls to show his face after the way that game ended. I would certainly cheer for him and congratulate him if I saw him at the game but I don’t think everyone else would. At the end of the day, he lost us that game as much as Carter missing a wide open net. But he also got us to that game as well.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
No
Athletes have the right to go to games just like you. Regardless of how they perform
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
by PatterPoet95 on Jun 28, 2010 7:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Not a single problem with it. I have a bigger problem with treating the guy like a pariah after he was a big part of rescuing the season when we were in 14th place and with him having shut down Montreal 2 weeks earlier. He doesn’t deserve to be treated like an outcast because of a bad goal, regardless of the timing.
When the Phillies won Game 5 in 2008, someone hung a banner in the outfield that said “We forgive you Mitch”. Leights does not deserve to be branded with that same sort of stigma that Mitch got hit with after 93.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 28, 2010 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions
leights should be gone
he did a fine job, but we already have boosh under contract, to waste anymore cap space on goaltending outside of Nabby/Boosh and Blacklund would be idiocy. If they were to sign Leighton they would have to move Boosh, and I dont think thats going to happen, a lot easier to just not resign Leighton. We are better off put Leighton’s would be cap hit towards room under the cap to get other players we need.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Please
Don’t compare Leighton or anyone else to Adam Eaton.
Adam Eaton had a terrific fastball and refused to develop any other pitches to go along with it. He signed that contract with the Phils and then showed up to Spring Training 20-30lbs heavier.
Leighton may not be as talented as you’d like but he has an outstanding work ethic; he would not still be around if he didn’t. Eaton had a ton of talent and a horrible work ethic…
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
by PatterPoet95 on Jun 27, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well said.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 27, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Unrelated free agent question
Anyone know where Max Afinogenov is likely to end up? He’s a little frail, but fast as hell and has great hands. Had some rough years recently but came back in a big way with Atlanta for 24 goals and 61 points. I think it could be good if we gave him a cheapish 2 year deal and slap him with Giroux and JVR. He’d definitely be an upgrade from Asham’s cement hands, as much as I liked him.
He could end up here for a 3 year, $1.5 mill deal, though, we should still probably deal a high salary forward.
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
Thanks. Do you know if there’s actually been any talk with him or his agent? I’d like that signing, a Carter trade, and a Nabokov signing, personally. A Flyers fan can hope.
Well they can’t talk to him until July 1st, the guys they have been talking to they have acquired negotiating rights with, so on the Afinigenov front there won’t be any news either way till later this week.
I think our 3rd line would be ridiculous with JVR-Giroux-Geno but they might be a little, how do you say….. atrocious? In the defensive zone…
Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"
by Ed Van Chimp on Jun 27, 2010 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Very true point. I think Giroux’s solid defensively and JVR should be better this year, especially if he bulks up a little bit this offseason. Our defense is good enough to have a bit of a liability on the team like Max if he can mesh well with Giroux and JVR. I just really want someone with them that has some sort of offensive prowess other than Asham’s one move and occasional home run pass. The winger FA’s this year are pretty thin if I remember correctly.
Very thin, I would like to see Afinigenov on our 3rd line. Just saying that if push comes to shove Homer might not do it because he is a defensive liability and with Briere and Leino as small defensively-inept forawards already we might not need another. Who knows, I want a legit player to round out that line, I think JVR will take a big jump and with a skill guy flying down the RW, that line could be deadly.
Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"
by Ed Van Chimp on Jun 27, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions
My Ideal free agent season right now
For 3rd line RW:
Afinigenov would be nice. But I wouldnt mind Colby Armstrong or Recchi either. Colby’s numbers took a hit in Atlanta, which isnt a surprise, but i remember him being dangrous on pittsburgh, pair him with some talent, like JVR and Giroux and he can be real nice. Recchi would be a solid backup option – he’s cheap, would only be guarranteed salary for one year, can play defense, and is still a deceptive goal scorer.
If we get Nabokov at a reasonable deal. We still will have room to get that 5th defenseman and help on RW on third line with a guy like Armstrong/Afinigenov/Recchi.
If the above happens I will be very very pleased with Holgrem.
I’d also like to see us move Carcillo for cap space and re-sign Powe.
A bonus deal in addition to that would be a Carter for Bobby Ryan and Lucas Sbisa deal.
Ideally for me:
Gagne-Richards-Ryan
Leino-Briere-Hartnell
JVR-Giroux-Armstrong/Recchi
Lappy-Betts-Powe
Pronger-Carle
Timmone-Coburn
5th defenseman FA signing – Sbisa
G1 Nabokov
G2 Boucher
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 6:26 PM EDT reply actions
Recchi already resigned with Boston but other than that…I’d be good with your ideal off season. Though I don’t see Sbisa coming back here, as part of a trade or otherwise.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
ah
didnt realize Reccs already resigned. I threw Sbisa in there because i think he and Ryan’s salary would be comparable to Carter’s. Is there any reason else? Ddi Sbisa say something about not liking it here? I still wouldnt even be opposed to a Carter for Ryan deal straight up.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions
No, my feelings have nothing to do with Sbisa himself but more so the Ducks not giving up on yet.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
I wouldn’t mind getting our 2010 1st back either. Emerson Emet at 29 was a steal (as was Cam Fowler at 12).
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually think getting Sbisa back is the most likely among Fowler, Emet or Sbisa (not that any trade is “likely”).
You have to understand the potential marketing coup to have Emet there, a Long Beach guy, traveling down the 22 freeway to the Honda Arena (although, strangely, he was quoted as saying he’d never been to a Ducks game).
I was in college in Boston in 1974 and when Clarke scored the OT goal in game 2 I knew that the Flyers would win the Cup since they would never lose at home.
In the Fanpost asking whether Nabokov is the answer, I wrote something like too expensive, over-rated and too old. However, the more I think about it, if the Flyers can get him for the right price and the right term then I don’t really have a problem with it. I think anything over $4.5 will be too much for this team to handle capwise so it will be interesting to see how much Nabokov wants. Will he take a discount for a shot at the cup?
Also, it is a buyers market for goalies this year. Teams that are also looking for a starter this offseason IMO; Tampa, Ottawa(?), Islanders (but not going to spend too much due to Ricky D). Can anyone see Nabokov signing anywhere else?
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
agreed
Nabokov in the 2 year 4-4.5 mil a year range is what i think is acceptable, 5 mil a year is pushing it.
If Nabokov wants to prove his critics wrong, he’ll come here. And if he wants to play for a team that has a better defense than what he’s had, he’ll come here. If all he wants is to get paid and doesnt care about anything else, then maybe he isnt what we wanted anyways. I hope that’s not attitude and he comes here. But we’ll just have to wait and see
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions
We’re the only contender from that list. As you rightly state, DiPietro’s contract sinks the Isles, I’m not sure whether Ottawa would want to go with a guy like Nabokov right now, and if Nabby would rather go Tampa than Philly then…well…
Given that, maybe we can give him an offer, get a verbal agreement, but don’t sign until July 1. That way we save our seventh rounder.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, seriously I can’t see anyone else wanting someone like Nabokov. KHL maybe?
Could Homer actually do that? If someone found out that was the plan, it seems management could get in a bit of trouble.
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
its just a 7th rounder
id say lose the pick, save the trouble, and sign his ass. Homer should have other fish to fry come July 1st. If he’s able to get a deal done sooner, do it.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions
and yeh i know, you never know who could turn out to be awesome, but if we’re relying on a 7th round pick to be the next wayne gretzky, come on now… ill forgive homer for losing the pick if it means we sign nabby sooner
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough
But if that 7th we’re losing turns out to be Henrik Lundqvist. I blame you!
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions
ill gladly take the blame. haha.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Snug
Powe and Carcillo get $1mill, Coburn up to $2.5, Nabokov $4.5 and Michalek $2.2.
We don’t get a scoring RW for Giroux though
FORWARDS
Simon Gagne ($5.250m) / Jeff Carter ($5.000m) / Mike Richards ($5.750m)
Ville Leino ($0.800m) / Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Scott Hartnell ($4.200m)
James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m) / Claude Giroux ($0.822m) / * Daniel Carcillo ($1.000m)
- Darroll Powe ($1.000m) / Ian Laperriere ($1.167m) / Blair Betts ($0.700m)
Riley Cote ($0.550m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Matt Carle ($3.438m) / * Braydon Coburn ($2.500m)
- Michalek, Zybnek ($2.200m) / Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
GOALTENDERS
- Evgeni Nabokov ($4.500m) / Brian Boucher ($0.925m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
(these totals are compiled using the bonus cushion)
ROSTER: 21; CAP:$59.4m; PAYROLL: $59.810m; CAP ROOM: $0.228m BONUSES: $0.637m
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
and thats why we should move Carcillo
did you factor in the 2 million bump that every team gets this year?
i find it surprising that it’s that close, I would have thought we would have had a little more for a 3rd line RW.
Resigning Asham wouldnt be the worst thing.
Powe can do the job on the fourth line, we dont need Carcillo. He doesnt fit anywhere but sharing time with Powe on the fourth line.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep that includes the 2 million bump and it is surprisingly close to the cap. There’s no way we head into next season with a touch over 200k in cap space. That leaves no flexibility and only sets you up for Upshall/Leino deals or actions like waiving Metropolit.
I almost feel like getting a good winger for Giroux and JVR should be something we should definitely do. Carcillo on the wing of our most exciting prospect and a former #2 draft pick just feels like a waste.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions
hmmmm
man briere and hartnell’s contracts are killers. i just hope they keep the level of play up they did in the playoffs.
sucks but it looks like unless we unload Carter there’s no way we’re gonna be able to keep Leino after next season.
If the Leino-Briere-hartnell line keeps kicking, you pretty much have to move Carter. I mean its either keep Carter, or keep Leino who gets at least some money’s worth out of the biere and hartnell contracts. Keeping Leino over Carter, might almost be 3 for 1 deal.
The Hartnell-Carter-Briere line just never seemed to work.
If you move Carter’s 5 million, that could buy you two right wings. Colby Armstrong for the first line and i dont know, someone for the 3rd line.
that is tough, i didnt realize we’d still be that against the cap.
damnit.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions
resigning Asham might the best move there. I mean i would like to upgrade, but truth is I have nothing against Asham. That 3rd line played well in the playoffs. If we have to resign Asham with the cap situation, Im fine with it.
Upgrading the goalie and getting a solid 5th defenseman are the top priorities.
I’ve been thinking about the top 2 lines if they arent going to move Carter though for now.
I still dont think they should move Richards out on the wing for Carter. Richards is still better at center, his style of play and his all around ability would be a waste on just one side of the ice on a wing. And the Carter-Briere combo just have never worked right. So im thinking…
Gagne-Richards-Briere
Leino-Carter-Hartnell
Basically you’re tradiing one pure goal scoring center on the 2nd line for another. And Briere can play wing while Carter cant. I think that’s our best option.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Asham might not be ideal but, like you, I could live with him. He was solid in the playoffs. The idea next year is to win with defense and goaltending. Not having a great 3rd line isnt the end of the world. With an expected bump in JVR’s play I could see that line being average or better. I expect big things from Giroux next year. If one of his wingers is only average I dont see that being a huge problem. Play great D and get solid goaltending and hope that you get enough scoring from a great PP and two very good lines as well as an average 3rd
Good news and bad news from Capgeek; Nabokov is doubtful without further moves
The good news from Capgeek is that they already list Nabokov as UFA for the Flyers! That site is amazing.
Now, the bad news. The cap is REALLY snug. Anything more than $4 million cap hit for Nabokov and the Flyers are in trouble. Recall that AFAIK you must have 23 men on the roster (Geoff, Dragongirl or other CBA experts care to weigh in here? What happens if they only have 21? Is this a violation? )
I’ve included the cheap people folks, and a slot for “you name him” UFA defensemen at $1.5. I “assume”, given that Randy Jones got $3 million last year, you would not want to spend less than $1.5 or you might as well keep Kracijek, as that is quality level you would get. . In truth, Nodl probably isn’t here on a 23 man roster and one of the other two way defensemen are in this position of 7th defensemen (Bourdon? Lehtivouri? Marshall?) It’s your call since the cap hit would be nearly the same. Note that Cote has to be listed in a 23 man roster, rather than a defensemen, for this cap space analysis since any of the other two way D players make $300 K more than Riley.
If you want more capspace, maybe sign Asham over Carcillo – but again, that is the Hobbes choice you are facing.
One minor thing, I have put my preferred no-major-trades “3rd” line of Carter-JVR-Giroux together.
FORWARDS
Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Scott Hartnell ($4.200m)/Ville Leino ($0.800m)
Mike Richards ($5.750m) / Simon Gagne ($5.250m)/ * Daniel Carcillo ($0.900m)
Jeff Carter ($5.000m) / / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)/Claude Giroux ($0.822m)
Ian Laperriere ($1.167m) // / / Blair Betts ($0.700m)/* Darroll Powe ($0.600m)
/
Andreas Nodl ($0.850m)/ Riley Cote ($0.550m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Matt Carle ($3.438m) / * Braydon Coburn ($2.800m)
- Younamehim ($1.500m) / Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
GOALTENDERS - Evgeni Nabokov ($4.000m) / Brian Boucher ($0.925m) / Johan Backlund ($0.800m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
(these totals are compiled using the bonus cushion)
ROSTER: 23; CAP: $59.4m; PAYROLL: $60.060m; CAP ROOM: $0.093m BONUSES: $0.752m
I really expect, based on this, if Nabokov is signed before July 1 more moves HAVE to be made (the ubiquitous Carter for Ryan and Sbisa trade?), or what you see is what you get.
I was in college in Boston in 1974 and when Clarke scored the OT goal in game 2 I knew that the Flyers would win the Cup since they would never lose at home.
killing my buzz guys, killing my buzz, haha. ugh……..
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 27, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I have to agree, it’s a pretty genius way to do business. But I guess the only real way they can guarantee he’ll be a Flyer next year, before July 1 that is, is if they want to toss league max at him. That is something I highly, highly doubt.
In the end, what’s a 7th round pick anyways?
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
Lundqvist?
And really for Nabby at the moment it looks like Philly or Tampa. Unless he has no interest in proving all his doubters wrong, he should pick Philly.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 27, 2010 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough. Good call on Henrik. But now, should we factor in the odds of a 7th round goaltender being a Lundqvist?
Either way, regardless of who the Flyers may possibly land in the 7th round, he’s not going to serve the immediate role that Nabby can at this point in time. So dishing a late pick like that to hopefully repair that which is broken immediately seems like a fair trade.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
I was kidding. Henrik is a one in a thousand type of guy. 7th round picks are definitely expendable. Getting a very good starting goaltender for a 7th rounder is close enough to getting him for nothing.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 28, 2010 2:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Zetterberg? :P
Rare to come across a good player, but they do come.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions
That’s what she said…
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
Can I assume that would be the woman in the chicken suit? (Please tell me you know the story)
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
I don’t understand why there’s any debate here. Homer’s only got one reasonable course of action, and that is to send the following fax to Don Meehan, then start talking to Braydon Coburn’s agent (or Carcillo’s or whoever’s):
Dear Don,
Is Evgeni interested in being a Flyer? Here’s our offer:
2010-11 $8m
2011-12 $8m
2012-13 $6m
2013-14 $1m
2014-15 $1m
2015-16 $1m
2016-17 $1m
Let me know by the end of the day tomorrow so we can draw up the papers wednesday.
Thanks,
Paul
by MarioD on Jun 27, 2010 11:58 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
And it wouldn’t count as a 35+ contract, right? So if Nabokov retires in two or three years, the ~$3.7 million cap hit comes off the books. But what if he goes to the KHL?
by Ben Feldman on Jun 28, 2010 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Correct, a 35+ contract is when the player is 35 years old on the June 30th preceding the season in which the contract goes into effect.
Nabby turns 35 on July 25th of this year.
If he’s under contract, he has to have permission to go to the KHL, so its not like its a risk for the Flyers. If he wants to go to the KHL, and the Flyers agree to loan him, he comes off the books just like Nikita Filotav did for Columbus this past season.
It would depend on how Nabokov feels about essentially being given a three year window within which to retire. But then again, those 8 million years would look very appealing to him. And the 3.7 cap hit would be awesome.
That said, wasn’t the NHL looking to investigate cap-saving contracts like these after the Pronger deal? What happened to that?
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 28, 2010 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Its a little more complicated than retire in three years.
The first $1m season, he’d be 38 years old. If he’s still playing, he should be getting less and less starts in order to stay healthy.
The Flyers should be backing him up with the goalie of the future on 2012-13, with GOtF easing into the starting duties in 2013-14, and Nabokov retiring before his 40th birthday. That’s a pretty reasonable expectation I’d think.
And, as Ben alludes to, he could always make his $22 in the next three years and ask to be loaned to Russia (where they’d no doubt pay him oodles of cash).
The only thing this deal would prevent is Evgeni Nabokov from making more than a $1m to play hockey in the NHL in the 2013-14 season (at age 38).
For reference, this upcoming season, there are only six goaltenders older than 35 years who might be in the league (most likely not legace so only 5, possibly Hedberg won’t find a job, Khabi may drink himself out of the league, there could be as few as 3):
Rolosson, age 40, $2.5m
Broudeur, age 38, $5.2m
Hedberg, age 38, UFA
Legace, age 38, UFA
Khabibulin, age 37, $3.75
Osgood, age 37, $1.4
Thomas, age 36, $5m
Good points
Now that you’ve explained it, it does seem like the best way to go for both parties. 22 million in the three years is far more than Nabby would’ve expected to be coming his way, and with the KHL option if he wants to keep playing, or the retirement option if he doesn’t, the contract appears to be a win-win for him. On top of that, hoping that the guy wants to win a cup at this point in his career, he would be able to see the benefits of going to a contender and earning his money while having a cap hit less than what Vesa Toskala was earning in the previous season.
Another question: if he goes to the KHL after 2/3 years of his contract for a season, but wants to re-enter the NHL the season after, he comes in as a UFA right? So even if he wants to continue playing in the NHL after three years, he technically can without affecting us. That’s all assuming GOtF is gradually taking over the starting role over the next three years.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 28, 2010 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Now that you’ve explained it, it does seem like the best way to go for both parties.
Unless Nabokov doesn’t want to live in Philly (cold weather) or the East Coast, or some other personal reason. But That’s the contract Nabokov is obviously looking for, and obviously should get from a number of teams. Its just a matter of which one he’d rather play for.
As for the KHL, I’m not sure if a contract runs while a player is on loan or not, but if he goes to the KHL (unless that league folds) he’s not coming back. But I don’t believe he could possibly return as a UFA until the life of his contract ends (in my proposal, July 2017). The only question really is, if he leaves in July 2014, and returns in July 2017, does he still owe three years to the Flyers or is he a UFA? I think because its a loan he’s a UFA, but that’s just a logical deduction from the word “loan”, not any knowledge.
That violates the CBA:
The difference between the stated Player Salary and Bonuses in the first two League Years of an SPC cannot exceed the amount of the lower of the two League Years. "
$8m minus $8m, good.
Thereafter, in all subsequent League Years of the SPC, […] (ii) any decrease in Player Salary and Bonuses from one League Year to another may not exceed 50 percent of the Player Salary and Bonuses of the lower of the first two League Years of the SPC (or, if such amounts are the same, 50 percent of that same amount). "
50% of $8mil is $4mil, so you can’t have him drop from $6mil to $1mil after year three.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Thats why Pronger strangely makes $4m in 2014-15. Okay.
2010-11 $9m
2011-12 $8m
2012-13 $5m
2013-14 $1m
2014-15 $1m
2015-16 $1m
2016-17 $1m
Pronger:
What’s the lower of the first two years? $8 million. What’s 50% of that? $4 million.
His salary doesn’t go down by more than $4 million in any contract year: 8 to 5, 5 to 1.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
So restructure Mario’s proposition according to Pronger’s deal / the CBA:
2010-11 $8m
2011-12 $8m
2012-13 $5m
2013-14 $2m
2014-15 $1m
2015-16 $1m
2016-17 $1m
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
That would work.
But now we want to sign a 34 (soon to be 35) year old to a 7 year contract with a $26 million contract? Consider me opposed.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
It wouldn’t be a 35+ contract, so if he retires after three years, or moves onto the KHL, the cap hit disappears. I’m sure the NHL wouldn’t be thrilled with this kind contract, but it breaks no rules.
by Ben Feldman on Jun 28, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
You’re assuming Nabokov only wants to play in the NHL for 3 years.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I already responded to that exact comment when it was posted by someone else last night.
Its a little more complicated than retire in three years.
The first $1m season, he’d be 38 years old. If he’s still playing, he should be getting less and less starts in order to stay healthy.
The Flyers should be backing him up with the goalie of the future on 2012-13, with GOtF easing into the starting duties in 2013-14, and Nabokov retiring before his 40th birthday.
And
For reference, this upcoming season, there are only six goaltenders older than 35 years who might be in the league […] :
Rolosson, age 40, $2.5m
Broudeur, age 38, $5.2m
Hedberg, age 38, UFA
Legace, age 38, UFA
Khabibulin, age 37, $3.75
Osgood, age 37, $1.4
Thomas, age 36, $5m
So unless Nabokov is completely unrealistic (and I gotta think Meehan has pointed him towards reality) he must be able to look around and realize he doesn’t have more than three years left as a starting goalie in the NHL.
Besides all of the above, that in no way is the explanation to the post you made above saying you’re opposed to signing such a deal from the team standpoint:
But now we want to sign a 34 (soon to be 35) year old to a 7 year contract with a $26 million contract? Consider me opposed.
You’re looking at a cap hit of 3.7 million and, as long as Homer keeps an NMC/NTC out of there, viable ‘escape’ routes for both the Flyers and Nabokov. This way we can sign Coburn, 5th D-man, Powe and 3rd line RW and still stay under the cap.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 28, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Please do this Homer
This, to me, is great news. I cant see any reason why getting Nabokov would be looked down upon by anyone. It looks to me to be two choices…A. Sign Nabokov for 4-5 mill. or B. go with generic shaky young guy/journeyman (ie. Leighton, Nitty, etc.). It seems to me like a no-brainer. This team is built for now. If it only takes a 2 yr/9 Mill contract I’m all for it. Please get this done Holmgren
The Jeff Carter Debate
Carter can be a potentially great player, but from what we’ve also seen he could be a major letdown as well. His effort at times can be questionable, he seems to shrink away in the biggest moments. Obviously you cant argue with his goal numbers, but at the same time when your team makes a serious run to the Cup without you it certainly opens things up for debate.
Simply put this team cant keep going as is. Carter’s 5 mil can buy you 2 effective players. For a cap strapped team that’s huge. Would you rather move Briere or Hartnell first? Sure. But the reality is that probably isnt going to happen.
So you’ve got a choice, do you stay center heavy, or move Carter and get better players for your already strong center team?
Ive heard talk of move Carter to the 3rd line center in between Giroux and JVR. I think that’s a mistake. First of all are we really going to pay 5 mil a year for a 3rd line center? Secondly we’ve seen the results of the Carter-Briere pairing – surprisingly ineffective. It’s like they almost cancel eachother out because both are both are natural goal scorers.
Thats why the Hartnell-Carter-Briere line doesnt work. None of the those guys are playmakers. Hartnell’s your physical gritty, protect your guys, banger, charge the net guy. And then you’ve got two goal scorers with no other guy out there on nice making moves and distracting the opponents players.
And that’s why the Leino-Briere-Hartnell line was so effective. You had Hartnell going around hitting guys clearing space, Leino flying all over the ice, making teams worry about covering him, and then Briere can get open and be fed the puck to score, and if he doesnt, then Hartnell was there in the front of the net to put the rebound in the net. We saw it work time and again in the playoffs.
Having said all of that, it isnt like we’ve seen the Leino-Briere-Hartnell line perform all season, it was only a small sample size. Although an impressive one.
Now remember Leino’s contract is up at the end of next season. So if Leino makes Hartnell and Briere better, considering Briere and Hatnell’s contracts, isnt smarter to move Carter’s contract to be able to not only keep Leino, but maybe get another serviceable player as well.
If you lose Leino, and go back to the Hartnell-Carter-Briere line, ehhhhh, that didnt seem to work too well. If you keep Carter, it’s just a 1 for 1 deal, you keep Carter, and that’s fine, he’s a good player. But if you keep Leino, it’s almost a 3 for 1 deal. You keep Leino and you get more out of Briere and Hartnell. And assuming Leino’s raise goes somewhere in the 2-3 mil range, then you still have room to sign another player with the cap space Carter’s contract creates.
So in one breath you shouldnt trade a player like Carter for cap space. But in another breath, you’re not really trading Carter just for cap space. You’re trading Carter to keep a guy like Leino and go get another guy, maybe a RW or another defenseman.
And doesnt that help this team out more than just holding onto Carter and his 5 million contact. Between his contract, Richards, Hartnell’s and Briere’s and Gagne’s there just simply wont be room to improve this team for the future.
Even if we dont move Carter now, we’re probably going to have to in the future with the increase coming for Giroux and if we want to keep Leino.
Unless people are satisfied with Carter-Richards-Hartnell-Briere-Gagne-Giroux for years to come. Admittedly a great core, but the problem is with the salary cap dedicated to those guys plus whatever goalie we have and whatever defense we need, that pretty much leaves us with no room to ever add to it. You would just be throwing minor league-ers out there to play with them.
And as we saw with the Penguins just having a good core group of offensive players isnt enough. Even a Sidney Crosby needs a Bill Guerin.
So at some point, whether it’s now or later, something’s going to have to give. Gagne retiring will help, but that could still be a litlle ways off, and the other guys in that group arent going anywhere whether it be because of importance to the franchise – Richards, Giroux or because of contract – Hartnell, Briere, so Carter is still the odd guy out because of his contract and his trade value.
It’s not that anyone wants Jeff Carter traded, it’s just simply that realistically he might have to be traded, now or in the future, more likely than not it’s coming.
Unless Homer pulls off something none of us see coming.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 8:07 AM EDT reply actions
an addendum to clarify
my other point about the Briere-Carter pairing was that I think we’d have the same problem with a Giroux-Carter pairing. That’s just my opinion. Carter nees to have his own line and be the start, just like Briere, just like i think Giroux will be. And that’s not that I’m saying any of them are selfish, it’s just about getting maximum effectiveness out of those guys. So once again that leaves one too many centers.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Nice writeup
More people would probably see it as a fanpost though. This thread is ageing.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 28, 2010 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions
my popcorn bag for this tread is down to oily seeds and kernel crumbs
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 28, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Popcorn? What was popcorn worthy?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
There was popcorn?
You're living in a parallel universe. Do not attempt angle parking.
January 11, 1976
by TopShelfTony on Jun 28, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Until Prometheus ate it all…
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 28, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions
With Mario D back there will be plenty of popcorn for all!
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 28, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Nabakov not coming to Philly…supposedly
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
yep
his asking price is too high, maybe we’ll get his price down when he goes FA, but for now it’s looking like Leighton and Boosh.
better upgrade the defense and fast.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions
I said the same thing in another thread.
Homer really has two courses of action: 1) get a top-notch goaltender like Nabokov and hopefully be able to upgrade the defense a bit using as much creativity as he can in his future moves, or 2) if option #1 fails, sign Leighton and make every move possible to solidify and improve the defense before the beginning of the season. Frankly, I’d feel good with either option (sure, I prefer option #1, but option #2 certainly isn’t bad). Of course, the cap is going to be a major factor in the decision, so really it boils down to Nabby and his agent.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 28, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, this is where all of us need to be careful about what “permission to talk to” and “obtaining a player’s rights” mean.
Just because you have either doesn’t mean you’re going to get the player – it just means you have the right to talk to him first and exclusively for a limited amount of time. That’s all it means. I’d be happy with either Hamhuis or Nabokov, but not if the price is extortionate. If Homer doesn’t see closing the deal in a good fashion for the team, he won’t pull the trigger…and he shouldn’t.
His patience regarding the Hamhuis situation got us, ultimately, a 3rd-round pick for Parent – that’s a win. We have options besides Nabby.
Let’s trust Homer to work this out. He’s done very well recently.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 28, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Completely agreed. That Homer has given himself the opportunity to talk to two of the top pending free agents before 28 other teams is something we should be happy with, regardless of whether the deals can be worked out or not.
Absolutely right. Homer gave himself and his team an edge in negotiations with Hamhuis and Nabby. It seems pretty clear to me that Hambuis was never going to be a Flyer and he will end up in Vancouver as the worst kept secret ever. As for Nabby, he wants to test free agency and that is his right. Maybe once he does that and realizes that there are really only two – three teams vying for his services then maybe he will come back down to Earth on his contract demands. If not, and we don’t sign him then let’s work on improving the defense. Though I truly would prefer an upgrade at goalie.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
Vokoun
okay just pure spitballin’ here.
if Vokoun were on the market, what would it take?
Carter + Coburn + 3rd round pick?
What’s Vokoun’s contract?
Im just curious
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Honestly, if it took that, I wouldn’t make that trade. I actually want Coburn staying here. Even if we upgrade the goalie with a guy like Vokoun, this team can’t afford to downgrade the defense.
Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
agreed mostly
but if you move Coburn, then you would have his contract space to sign another defenseman, and have the bit of cap room we have now that we are planning on using to get a 5th defenseman. Of course it’s not automatic to be able to sign a 4th and 5th defenseman.
It is tough going into the season, with the fans, players, everyone knowing, that goaltending is an issue, with the vision of the last goal of the Finals going through Leighton’s wickets as soft as can be.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
95 percent of me agrees we shouldnt do that kind of trade.
it’s just going to be killer not upgrading the goalie for the mentality of everyone
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
damn. Vokoun is getting 6.3 million.
even though he’d be the best upgrade, we wouldnt have any room, even with trading Carter’s 5 mil away, to get a 5th defenseman or improve on the RW.
There’s just no solution out there right now.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
if we dont get Nabokov
i can seriously see us headed for a Carter for Vokoun deal at the trade deadline. The Panthers are going to be looking to move him and we’re gonna we desperate for a goalie.
the next few weeks, and then at the trade dealine could get a little nuts.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jun 28, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
i agree with this. from a pure mentality and confidence standpoint i dont think we can possibly go back to Leighton. Even though they’ll never say it, the team will never be able to trust Leghton again after the game 6 debacle
Notes on Nabby (from an SJ fan)
Hey guys. I thought you might find the links below regarding Nabby of some interest. Fair or not, he, like most goalies, bears the greater burden of a loss than most of the rest of the team in the public eye because the goal that lost the game had to go by him. Many of us understand that hockey is much more complex than that. Statistics don’t cover the whole story, they just scratch the surface.
Rarely is there a goalie that is universally liked and appreciated. Nabby is about as close as they get, though. He’s gotten us to a shitload of playoffs, after all.
With that in mind:
1. A statistical Analysis of Evgeni Nabokov via The Shark Infested Blogger
2. Evgeni Nabokov’s profile at hockeygoalies.org. (not the most current, but covers dozens of his most stellar moments).
And finally, if you want a more personal take on him, check out Ivano M’s take on the Fear the Fin sister site here on SB Nation (Ivano M is FTF’s Russian Correspondent).
For those interested, Nabby’s tie to #20 is through his father, whom also wore #20 during his professional career in Russia. So that may be a point of discussion between whomever wishes to sign him, and Pronger’s and Nabokov’s agents….oh, wait…they’re the same guy (grin).
One of my best personal memories of the guy is watching him dance in the goal in the last SJ-DET game in the playoffs this year…a little bittersweet, as it turned out to be his last victory as a Shark.
Favorite replay, though, is this save vs Richards in that insane 7-period game in the 08 playoffs. Best damn hockey ever. Both goalies were playing out of their minds, but this was insane.
Here’s a still, in case you missed it (it’s been my wallpaper for years now):
(Coutesy AP/Getty Images)
If Nabby ends up in Philly, I’ll be spending a lot of time here and following how he does. If the impression I give is that Nabby is my favorite player in the NHL, that would be correct. And I (and several others) are going to miss him like hell next year in SJ. Seeing him go was like watching Old Yeller get shot in the end of that old Disney movie. He’s been here so long, it’s hard to see The Tank without him.
"Never start a fight, but ALWAYS finish it."
Bleeding teal since 1997
Thanks for this. That save on Richards (Brad, for those of you wondering) was absolutely sick and definitely one of my all-time favourites too.
“Quick as a cat, Nabokov plays an aggressive style. Loves to come out to challenge shooters. Unfortunately, he has been inconsistent. He piles on the highlight-reel saves only to allow weak goals from time to time. At this stage in his career, and for some time still, Nabokov is considered a backup goalie.
I guess this report from 2000 still is a bit true, unfortunately.
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
Check the Shark Infested Blogger post...
…it’s a little more fair than the stats alone.
Also, the Habs SB Site had a great writeup on playoff goaltending, stats, and how all bets on stats are off in playlets season:
http://www.behindthenethockey.com/2010/4/12/1404784/playoff-goaltending-and-hot-goalies
"Never start a fight, but ALWAYS finish it."
Bleeding teal since 1997
by Noctro on Jun 29, 2010 1:22 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Great Material
Dose Ivano M have any perspective or insight on the possibility Nabakov will decide to play in the KHL instead of the NHL?
Im pretty confident that if he plays in the NHL we can get him to wear Orange and Black
What I dont know and am starting to worry a bit about is the offers from the KHL
bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!
by Prometheus74 on Jun 29, 2010 1:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Doubtful. Nabby wants his name on the cup.
He’s mentioned that more than once. Also, while the salaries are great (er…borderline insane), level of play in the KHL is lower,as is the prestige—stepping backwards isn’t something he’s into.
"Never start a fight, but ALWAYS finish it."
Bleeding teal since 1997
by Noctro on Jun 29, 2010 6:07 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I remember that save. That was the first game I watched on my new HD TV in college. That game was epic.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 29, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I had a friend in Dallas during that game...
…the next morning he called me and said “I ****ing hate you guys! I’m never going to another game against the Sharks! Do you have any idea how much my ass hurts for 7 periods of Hockey in that American Airlines Center seating?”
We both had a good laugh over it.
"Never start a fight, but ALWAYS finish it."
Bleeding teal since 1997
Sidenote:
You do realize that your GM is gunning for both of the goalies that were in that game, right? ;-)
"Never start a fight, but ALWAYS finish it."
Bleeding teal since 1997
Eh, I wouldn’t saying “gunning for” so much as “interested in”, but yeah, that much has sunk in.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 29, 2010 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















