Best Of Three: Flyers hold off frustrated Blackhawks, head to Chicago tied at 2-2
Series tied 2-2
[Box Score] - [Wire Recap] - [SBN Game Page] - [Chicago Reaction]
[Corsi and Fenwick] - [Head-to-Head TOI] - [EV Faceoffs] - [Shift Charts]
PHILADELPHIA -- Remember that terrible feeling you had in the pit of your stomach when the Flyers dropped Games 1 and 2 in Chicago? That, "oh, no, it looks like they've finally met their match" feeling? Guess what? It might as well have never happened. It's completely irrelevant. By virtue of their victory tonight, the Philadelphia Flyers have turned a best-of-seven Stanley Cup Final into a best-of-three.
Now, a race to four is a race to two.
And sure, the Blackhawks are going home to a United Center that will be brimming with excitement, ready for them to take another home victory and another gigantic leap towards the Cup. But one thing those Blackhawks don't have anymore is the same level of confidence. Their confidence level is nowhere near that of the Flyers at this point, that's for sure.
Sure, they mounted a pretty incredible comeback in the third period. They threw everything they had at Michael Leighton and the Flyers, and sure, maybe the orange and black even got a bit lucky.
More than one Flyer praised a higher power after the game, with Leighton saying "thank God we won" and Ville Leino saying that "it was pretty stressful at the end of the game at the bench, but luckily we won that game." Sure, luck had a lot to do with the win tonight.
But a win's a win and all that jazz, and the Flyers seem determined to learn from the mistakes they made during the latter half of the third period in this Game 4.
"I think we laid back a little bit more and we didn't forecheck the way we did in the first two periods," said Claude Giroux. "I think we have to learn from that, and obviously that's not the kind of third period we wanted. But at the end of the day, we got the win."
And that's the big picture here. The Flyers got the win. They head back to Chicago with all the momentum, regardless of the third period effort the Blackhawks put forth. In a short series, momentum and confidence is everything. The Flyers have it, and at this point, it doesn't look like it will be going away.
After the jump, some more notes from tonight's game, and of course our questions answered and the comment of the night.
Some assorted thoughts from another looooong day at the Wachovia Center:
- I've written a lot about confidence in the last couple of days. How confident is Michael Leighton? He exemplifies it right now, really. Just about 20 minutes after enduring what was surely one of the most maddening stretches of hockey he's ever experienced, Leighton was calm as ever in his postgame news conference.
Asked if he "kissed his post" at the end of the game, Leighton simply smiled and said "why?" Later, when asked a question about faceoffs, Leighton responded "So, it's obviously important to win faceoffs." He paused. Turned to Claude Giroux, who was sitting next to him silently at the podium. Gave him a bit of a stare, smiled, and continued to answer the question.
The next question, when asked about how often he looks at the clock in the final minutes of a big game, Leights responded with another smile. He chuckled a bit. "I look at the clock every 10 seconds."
- The Flyers are seriously starting to get in the Blackhawks heads. It's slowly creeping in, game after game. Asked about how physical the orange and black played tonight, Brent Sopel responded "obviously, this is what they've done all year. They're in their building with their crowd. It's expected."
Sopel wasn't the only one, but I mean, you can see it during the game. It's obvious in the stupid penalties the Blackhawks have been taking. Patrick Sharp's slash? Tomas Kopecky's high stick? Nick Boynton's slash? There's a laundry list. They're all retaliatory penalties and the Flyers are playing dirty to catch an edge. Wanna complain, Hawks fans?
- On that same note, the crowd complaining about the officiating tonight was a bit much. The Flyers had their fair share of breaks, and I actually thought the game was called pretty strongly in their favor. But while that was the low side of the crowd tonight, the rest of the behavior by the orange-clad faithful was pretty remarkable.
The building was buzzing from 6 PM when the doors opened until.. well, the people cleaning up trash around me still seem to have some magic in them. The NHL.com decibel meter might favor Chicago, but that's in no way indicative of the crowd here in Philadelphia.
- Ville Leino talked about the injury he sustained in the first period on a hit from Brian Campbell, saying that he got the wind knocked out of him and that he just needed a bit of treatment. No big deal. The Blackhawks were after Big Ville Style all night long, though, and it was pretty clear that they're trying to neutralize the one threat they haven't been able to stop by getting physical with him.
Leino had a reputation in Detroit of being a bit of a softie. Just like every other past perception people have had of him, he's proving them wrong.
- Sticking with Ville The Kid, Leino's goal put him in superb company in the organization. He passed Brian Propp for most points by a Flyers rookie in the playoffs. Wait, Leino is a rookie? Technically by the rules, sure. But does he feel like one?
"No, but guys are giving me a hard time in the locker room for that," Leino said. "I'm 26 now. I played in the Final last year and the playoffs last year. I don't really feel like a rookie, but I guess rules are rules."
- James van Riemsdyk played nine minutes, 34 seconds in his return to the lineup. His linemates and his coach were very happy with his play, but Peter Laviolette hinted that Dan Carcillo could eventually get back into the lineup. He said his reasoning for inserting JVR back into the mix was that he wanted to keep the guys fresh and involved. We'll see if he means that.
- Nicklas Hjalmarsson had a really tough game for Chicago. If that continues, it's a huge advantage for the Flyers.
- Mike Richards was Mike Richards again tonight. That first goal? Holy hell. Vintage Captain.
- Chris Pronger did not lead the Flyers in ice time tonight. Braydon Coburn did, beating Pronger by one second at 27:52.
- Remember how the Blackhawks came into the series with seven straight wins? That's all gone. They came in with a ton of road wins too. So much for that. The Flyers have now won seven straight home games in these playoffs and they're 9-1 at home during the entire postseason. Leighton is 6-0 with two shutouts in those games.
- Another attendance record for the Flyers, the Wachovia Center and hockey in Pennsylvania. 20,304 is the announced attendance, beating last night's mark. They also surpassed 1 million attendees tonight on the year for only the second time in club history.
- The Blackhawks lost consecutive games in the playoffs for the first time. Honestly, it's the first time they've faced adversity all playoff, perhaps all season, long. Another gigantic edge for the Flyers. The Blackhawks might not know how to respond to this pressure. We'll find out.
Questions with Answers
- First line. Yes? No? Much better tonight. Richards goal was awesome, Carter's goal sealed it and was awesome too. In between, the trio was pretty solid as well. They outplayed the 'Hawks top line, and that's all that matters. Work in progress.
- If JVR returns, can he be effective? If Carcillo stays, can he be effective? JVR played and was effective. He moved the puck well and generally seemed to have a good handle on the game.
- Can the Flyers continue to control play for the majority of the game? It was off and on tonight.
- Does the third pairing see any ice time? Lukas Krajicek saw a decent amount of time, 9:10 to be exact. Oskars Bartulis rode the bench for a lot of the game, seeing just 3:48 in ice time.
- Will the Blackhawks be able to find an answer for the Leino - Briere - Hartnell line? They tried by getting physical. Didn't work.
- Dustin Byfuglien looked frustrated on Wednesday. Same story? Yes. Chris Pronger is on him like white on rice. He even goes out of his way to take an extra shot now and then. There's nothing Byfuglien can do and it's wearing on him.
Comment of the Night
Marriage? Geoff – you didn’t tell us you were heading to Massachusetts with Boosh!
>> IcersGuy
245 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He said after the game that he got lucky. Missed the shot, got the bounce off of Versteeg’s back.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 5, 2010 1:36 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I heard that, but the whole sequence just looks so perfect. (Just seeing it again on NHL network). He’s got so much vision with the puck that I wouldn’t put it past him.
I thought the same thing. The sense to hold the puck and cut to the slot and shoot was pretty fantastic.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 5, 2010 1:57 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He is so patient and calm with the puck and has great vision. He knows how to move with the puck and wait for just the right moment. This guy is special
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Ooh—see the Habs article to the right? That should be in Fly By tomorrow—“Habs Fire Six Scouts: Is Claude Giroux The Reason Why?” You bet your sweet grilled cheese he is! (well, one of the reasons anyway)
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
No Fly Bys on the weekend, but good job directing people to it.
Link: http://www.habseyesontheprize.com/2010/6/3/1500429/the-giroux-fischer-fiasco-did-this
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
One of my favorite Flyers.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
yes, hes gonna be sweet
Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird
Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it
I’ll believe it when I see it.
He skates well, he can shoot hard when not under pressure (just like virtually every other NHL’er), but his accuracy is crap. Also, when he skates deep and doesn’t convert (keep in mind this happens very often), the Habs are left hanging and have to endure yet another counter-attack.
One of our friends posting from one of the Maple Leafs sites summarized his contributions really well when we we’re playing them.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Any Chicago fans looking at this.
Can you ship Goose Island beer to PA? Thanks!!
You can’t have any alcohol shipped to PA—it sucks.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
I know
Trying to figure out a way around it
Put foreign words on there
If you have a foreign language on the shipping box they won’t know any better (ask them or a friend in the area to google translate it into russian or hebrew or hindi or italian). Also, a good idea is to include something like chocolate around it.
- speaking from personal experience
I think I read that differently than you intended. ;)
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions
I meant the blue laws in PA that prevent such shipments. They suck.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
Yes, I just preferred my interpretation, at least for the next week.
Funny, many of us love Yuengling at SCH and complain that we can’t get it in Chicago.
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought Yuengling finally went national; that’s what I thought because it doesn’t taste as good as it did 10 or so years ago. It used to be so much better.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
It’s an east-coast beer now, so you can find it up and down the Atlantic coastline. But I don’t think it moves any further west than Ohio.
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
Oh. Thanks, I knew it wasn’t just local anymore, though.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
Yeah, I was able to get it in Florida last month, but not here yet.
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 3:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I probably shouldn’t tell you that I have half a case in my fridge then, right? ;-)
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
no, please don’t.
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 3:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I live in Florida has been here at the Bars on tap since 2006 I believe but is everywhere after the Phils won the world series in many pubs around here it has replaced the AmberBock.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
by Christopher A on Jun 5, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Icers is right, there are only 13 states that sell Yuengling and the westmost one is west virgiinia and they just started selling last year, I think.
I work for a company that does a lot of work with Yuengling, I’ve actually designed t-shirts and various hats for them before.
Mancrushin' on Geoff since April 20
"Good night. Good hockey."
by KreiderDesigns on Jun 5, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Being a Flyers transplant in Milwaukee right now, I’ve done some research on the range of distribution for Yuengling. Not that I don’t love the vast array of beers that Milwaukee and Wisconsin have to offer – it’s like every restaurant has to brew at least one of their own beers. But ever now and then, I get a hankering for the back-home Lager.
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
From what I understand though, only this local area gets it from the original brewery. I can taste the difference a little bit, but some people I know can really tell at the first sip which one is which.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 6, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I would like to get Goose Island
Honkers and IPA in the state PA. Is it too much too ask?
I can send you sharks with laser beams attached to their heads, but sorry, no geese.
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 3:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Lol…no sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads but there are mutated sea bass
by flyersfangiroux on Jun 5, 2010 9:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
MA does too
which i only realized after i had someone ship me a box of whiskey bottles from IL to MA (some of them open)…..while i was in law school….oops…..
by puppetmasterp on Jun 5, 2010 4:00 AM EDT up reply actions
heh
in all honesty, chicago is easily one of the best cities in the world, from nightlife to business to food to culture to all around awesomeness.
that said, so is philly. and i’m from philly, for the record
May or may not be a grandiose statement but i'll say it regardless:
This microcosm-of-life team is 2 wins away from the greatest championship triumph this city, and the Delaware Valley has ever seen. Bigger than the 1960 Eagles. Bigger than the 1974 and 1975 Flyers. Bigger than the 1980 Phillies.Bigger than the 1982 Sixers. Bigger than the 2008 Phillies. Bigger than them all.
5. NO RINK IS AS BEAUTIFUL AS OURS
6. NO COACH IS AS ORANGE-TIED AS OURS
7. NO SPORTS TEAM ON THE FACE OF THIS EARTH HAS MORE HEART THAN THE PHILADELPHIA FLYERS
Most unlikely? Definitely. Greatest? I think that would have to go to the 2008 Phillies for breaking the combined 100 season championship drought.
Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."
by Justin F. on Jun 5, 2010 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed.
But this team would go down in history as one of the most loved, because they were such underdogs and Philly eats that up with a spoon. Plus, they sort of caught us by surprise, in that they underachieved all year long, and made it this far.
This is all a big IF, however, as we still have 3 games to go. Go get it, Flyers. I very much want that silvery cup.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
by doubleh on Jun 5, 2010 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
While certainly not as big an underdog as these Flyers are, the 2008 Phillies were also underdogs themselves in that playoffs. It was alleged during that whole post-season that outside of Cole Hamels, the Phillies did not have the necessary starting pitching to go all the way and win the whole thing. That team was not the perennial NL favorites like they were a year later.
Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."
Truth. If you go back and look, Jayson Stark was the only ESPN personality who picked us to beat the Rays. THE RAYS!!!! And we smoked them.
And he doesn’t count because he’s a PA guy and a total HOMER! He actually used to live in the same development as my husband when he was still in college and living with his parents.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
That would be the one time they were favored (I also don’t count 1997 – I don’t know why many thought we would win that series with any kind of ease. We had a solid team that year, but, come one…that Detroit team was really, really good. My favorite memory from that Final was that Rod Brind’Amour scored two shorthanded goals on the same penalty – we still lost the game though, just like the other three…).
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Wasn’t that against the Penguins? Only time in that Detroit series the Flyers had consecutive goals was in game 2 from two Niinimaa shots from the point (one or both of which were deflected on the way through?), I think.
Typo (and a misremembering about the penalties) on my part. I meant powerplay goals, not shorthanded goals. It was on consecutive penalties. Brind’Amour did get both goals, though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_Stanley_Cup_Finals
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
…and I did further research and you’re right – he did do that against Pittsburgh.
I did confuse the two, and I relieved about that. I could have sworn that Brind’Amour did have two shorthanded goals on the same penalty – I just misremembered when he did it. :)
Phew!
http://www.flyershistory.net/cgi-bin/poboxscore.cgi?19970039
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
“I’m relieved”, that is…
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Really? That’s awesome! When I was a kid I would alternate daily between the Inqy and the PDN. Any time I bought the Inqy I would read Stark before anything else. He’s always struck me as a really cool guy.
is that really true
b/c Philly (as I remember it) went in with guys who could really produce offense consistently. That’s what i remember being the scariest thing about them (b/c as spectacular as Hamels was, he wasn’t out there every day).
by puppetmasterp on Jun 5, 2010 4:02 AM EDT up reply actions
nevermind, i just read the rest of the comments under the post i replied to…yeah, that makes sense.
by puppetmasterp on Jun 5, 2010 4:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Historically speaking the greatest Philadelphia team ever is without a doubt – Connie Mack’s Athletics. Here’s how good these guys were:
1902 AL Champs, 1905 AL Champs, 1910 WS Champs, 1911 WS Champs, 1913 WS Champs, 1914 AL Champs, 1929 WS Champs, 1930 WS Champs, 1931 AL Champs
$100,000 infield.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Maybe you read this but if not it’s a great piece on the A’s
Also in the 1910 and 1929 World Series the A’s beat the Chicago Cubs
Wow, I will read that tomorrow. I’m in the middle of Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract (seriously, reading it cover to cover is pretty crazy) and Ken Burns’ Baseball. Love baseball history.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions
How’s hockey history. When I went thru the list of SC champions the other day I was amazed at how far back the sport went!
As a kid those were my two favorite subjects. I used to have this things called Conlan Cards (i think thats the name) which were historical baseball cards. I loved baseball history. But I loved hockey history. I got an A in 2nd grade for a Bobby Orr diorama I made (his flying goal against the Blues).
But I think baseball history trumps for three reasons:
1) The game, as an organized form, is older. The primitive NHL era is more recent as not as interesting as the primitive baseball era (with the constant league wars).
2) The Original Six, while cool, sort of limits things.
3) Much better writers for baseball history. You have the awesome statistical based writings of someone like Bill James, or the really cool personal approach of authors like Mike Sewell. Hockey doesn’t have quite the comparisons.
That said, I actually prefer the Hockey Hall of Fame.
More theatrical drama in the game of baseball, because it’s a team sport that focuses on individual’s stats more than just about any other game. One guy can change the entire game. Ever notice all the best sports movies are baseball movies?
It just naturally lends itself to orators, dramaturgs and the like. We had a commish that was a poet laureate for crying out loud. The game of baseball is poetry to me, but no playoffs beat hockey playoffs and the Stanley Cup is the best trophy in professional sports.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
I also love the connections between the two sports
In 1948 goaltender Emile Francis was the first to wear a trapper – which was a first baseman’s mitt with an added cuff. Before, goalies wore the same gloves as their teammates.
Another example, in ’97 baseball catchers first started donning the hockey goalie-style masks.
And kudos Geoff for tacking Bill James’ Abstract. It’s a book I’d like to have a go at someday.
"Sorry guys, I’m not going to try and hit (Douglas) Murray anymore. It doesn’t work." - Steve Ott, Dallas Stars.
by SwisherThresher on Jun 5, 2010 3:12 AM EDT up reply actions
That 1930 team might be one of the greatest ever. Grove, Cochrane, Simmons, Foxx – four Inner Circle Hall of Famers. On one team. Wow.
For some reason, no one lets us claim those A’s teams anymore. I don’t see why we can’t.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko
Me neither, especially since we are still able to claim Connie Mack.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s New York ….they have a hard time dealing with the fact that alot of baseball historians feel the 29-30’s A’s were better than the 1927 Murderer’s Row Yankees
Ding Ding Ding!
My Grandfather was an A’s fan, so to this day I still root for the A’s (although obviously as a “second team” and nowhere with the passion I have for the Phillies).
When I was a kid I had the sweetest Philadelphia A’s t-shirt. Still have it, even if it doesn’t fit.
Awesome!
Last year the A’s celebrated the 80th anniversary of the ‘29 Philly A’s. It was an incredible promotion. I attended two games and as giveaways received a ’29 jersey and cap!
You can read about and see pics here: Throwback uniforms (though they were given a D grade, ouch!)
"Sorry guys, I’m not going to try and hit (Douglas) Murray anymore. It doesn’t work." - Steve Ott, Dallas Stars.
by SwisherThresher on Jun 5, 2010 3:19 AM EDT up reply actions
"Home Run" Baker
was a relative of mine!!!
He showed up in the World Series!
Cool. “Gentleman” Jake Daubert was my great-great-uncle, and the captain of the Reds team that won the Black Sox Series. Sounds like we’ve got a decent number of old-timey baseball players in the board family ;)
Honor is no substitute for victory.
Wow...my first COTN win.
I remember back when you first started this – back when it was called the “”http://www.broadstreethockey.com/2009/2/15/760244/nyc-beatdown-flyers-5-rang" target="new">Game Thread Roll Call". Hey, Shagg and Salmon – do you remember those days, too? Ah memories…
Still, I’d like to thank…

"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
Wow…. I didn’t come along until May of last year, but wow, can you imagine if one of the guys still had to tally up the post counts like that every thread? My goodness…..
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 5, 2010 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions
And even at that, the game thread that Travis had to count was for 89 posts for the entire game. Now, we hit that number before the game even starts!
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
I know, it gets harder and harder to keep up
by DragonGirl0583 on Jun 5, 2010 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions
i remember the good ol' days
when we didn’t have recommended fanposts. Or fanposts in general. We’re still gettin better in that regard
There’s a fancy button that does it for us now :)
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Is it Z? No wait, i know now that it isn’t because that does awesome stuff for us. I love this site!
Mancrushin' on Geoff since April 20
"Good night. Good hockey."
by KreiderDesigns on Jun 5, 2010 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions
I have no idea how that link got messed up, but so it goes. Game Thread Roll Call for those who are curious about the good ol’ days.
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
haha, I remember the contest to see who can have the most posts!
I lost…
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions
We can actually still do this. There’s a script we can run that adds up everybody’s post totals in one click. Spits out a table, too. Maybe we’ll start it at the beginning of next season and do a contest or something.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 5, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I was really impressed by JVR tonight. He started off shaky but got better as the game went along.
Anyone else think that Blair Betts is looking just a little bit off?
Yeah, a little. Lappy too possibly. They may just be playing a good line who are quick as they are too the puck. Most of the Hawks are. They seem to be holding their own most of the time
Nice win tonight Philly
I didn’t think it was the dominate performance that you guys probably felt it was, but the Flyers took advantage of every opportunity that came their way – and that’s what wins hockey games.
From a Chicago standpoint, I was actually happy to see the Flyers donkey punch (except for the final minutes) the Hawks tonight instead of the game being a coin toss that Philly won. All season the Hawks have been a team that tends to loose focus but comes back strong the next game after being embarrassed.
That being said, the Flyers have proven again that they are hard to beat at home, so I have a strong feeling this goes 7. Does it get any better than this?
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 2:11 AM EDT reply actions
game 4 was a dramatic foil to game 2.
by philiafan14364 on Jun 5, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know what the rule was, but in the postgame Lavvy was questioned about it, and apparently the teams were warned against doing it in the pre-game. Hartnell being Hartnell.
What astounds me is the comments I’ve seen from delusional Hawks fans who actually believe they have been getting the short end of the stick in terms of calls. Gagne can get a mid ice chuck on a full speed break down the ice, but Coburn can’t put his glove on a guy’s shoulder as he’s skating down the boards, when we’re already down a man. That was brutal, and the main reason the Hawks ended up applying any pressure at all.
The only thing I can say - I seriously hope that Lavvy is just playing headgames about reinserting Carbomb. I like the guy as much as anyone, but that idea makes zero sense. JVR played an excellent game, and did everything that Carbomb doesn’t do, in terms of offense, and didn’t make any defensive mistakes.
Disagree- Cobourn’s penalty was a good call and it was a dumb thing for him to do. He didn’t have any reason to clutch the jersey the way he did. The refs should call that every time regardless of who does it and when…
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
The only automatic is the stick breaking penalty. I had to watch the play a few times and it’s still marginal, and not a penalty I want to see called on any team in the SCF that is killing a penalty.
If you look at the play, the puck was going to the boards, and Coburn and Kane both went for it, with Coburn closest to the puck. Kane who is really quick, kinda ducked in an indirect path and got in front of Coburn, obstructing him from the puck. Coburn took his hand off his stick since he now had a guy who had basically injected himself into his torso in a pick-setting manner, and briefly grabbed him on the shoulder, just as Kane got to the puck and was turning towards the blue line. Letter of the rules, that can be called interference, but very few defenseman go a shift in their own zone without having to deal with a player who has gotten position in front of them. The puck ended up coming off his stick and the high winger got control of it and iced it, which is the only reason that the call was made, because Kane made a big gesture, but you could see from the play that coburn didn’t make Kane lose the puck and had he gone in for it more directly, he might have actually gotten it, although he probably would have had to deal with the backchecker.
98% of the time this season that play doesn’t generate a penalty in a 5 on 4. And yes circumstances do matter, especially when the reason you’re killing the penalty is because a guy hit his stick on the boards when the freaking whistle had been blown.
So to be clear — I thought it was a ticky tack penalty that has no place in a SCF game, where the rules are and always have been different than in the regular season. I could analyze individual plays when the Hawks were killing penalties that could have been penalty calls, but I won’t bother because I don’t think they deserved to be called, and I’d be a hypocrite for complaining about this one.
I see what you're saying
and maybe I’m letting my perceptions from one sport bleed into another, but any time you see a guy grab a fistful of jersey (which is what happened on the play), it’s probably going to get called. Kane twisted a bit, which might have accentuated it, but with the ref standing right there, seeing the white jersey sailboat due to the black glove of Coburn, I have to imagine he felt like he had no choice.
The Hartnell minor was stupid, either on the refs for calling it or Hartnell for doing the exact thing they’d been warned about. Probably more the latter than the former.
This is exactly what I am saying- I think Coburn would have gotten away with his arm around Kane or whatever but when he grabbed his Jersey and held onto it for 2 or 3 second you’re going to get called and in my opinion (which isn’t worth a dime) it should get called.
I don’t really see how Kane was interfering with Coburn both were pursuing the puck and Kane just got to it first. Either way if you hold onto a guy’s jersey and lift it off his body your going to get called for holding.
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
I don’t remember having a feeling in the pit of my stomach after game 2. Even as it was ending, I knew the Flyers had been in both games, and were ready to break though at home. Mind you, game 3 was tougher than I expected. I have felt we could win in 7 from the start, and tonight makes me feel even more confident.
An Ohio fan of the Philadelphia Flyers, Carolina Panthers, Oakland A's, and Philadelphia 76ers. Strange? Yes. Very.
I actually think that now is the time
Right now the Hawks are reeling, and the momentum is going our way. The Flyers can feel that momentum has turned, and the Hawks are tight. They haven’t really faced adversity or had to dig down deep and face the possibility that there’s a team that can beat them, and suddenly, everything they thought they knew is suddenly in doubt. Niemi is clearly rattled, and not even close to the guy that crushed the Sharks. He’s never had to face this situation before, and Leighton has already faced it.
The Flyers have been dealing with this through the entire playoffs. Anyone can see that the Hawks are tight. All the pressure has been transferred, and now it’s like a 6th Flyer out there. The Flyers know they have to win one in Chicago, and I predict they are going to come out like a pack of wolves who can sense that they have their prey tired and confused.
Leighton has settled in, and been really solid the last 2 games. Sure Leino got a flukey goal, but geez nearly every Chicago goal in the last 2 games (save for the 5-3 tap in) has been flukey.
Chris Pronger is a genius — cracking people up again in the postgame press conference. The Flyers are loose, joking, having fun, and enjoying themselves, whereas the Hawks look stunned, shell shocked, and in disbelief at what is happening to them. If not for Hossa and Keith, they are close to complete meltdown.
Amen. After Game 2, I was furious, because I felt we should’ve won that game, but I knew in my gut we’d take it back to Chicago tied.
Now, I feel like we might even have the advantage. Sunday night is do or die for Chicago right now. And if anyone can go into that game and not give a fudge, it’s these guys.
Sure Leino got a flukey goal, but geez nearly every Chicago goal in the last 2 games (save for the 5-3 tap in) has been flukey.
Difference is we got bounces and played better hockey (from what I can tell)
Remember
we have only lost one home game these playoffs (Boston gm 3)
An Ohio fan of the Philadelphia Flyers, Carolina Panthers, Oakland A's, and Philadelphia 76ers. Strange? Yes. Very.
by chillicothe20 on Jun 5, 2010 4:06 AM EDT up reply actions
agreed. I never for once thought that the Flyers couldn’t beat the hawks as they were in both games they lost and just needed some luck along with Leights to gain more confidence. Leights played a great game last nite
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Its the same thing as in the Boston series. There was always something in the back of my mind that said we can still win this because the games were mostly very close. We just needed a few more bounces to go our way.
by philiafan14364 on Jun 5, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
The other problem the Hawks have
Is that Quennville just shot his load in terms of changing things around, and no matter how they want to spin it — it didn’t work. He twiddled with his D-pairs. . He moved Kane to the 2nd line. . He put Hossa up on the first line.
There’s no surprises now. Also Jeff Carter was noticeably improved this game, and now the Hawks have to contend with that line starting to gel. He may be predictable, but it’s predictable in a way where it doesn’t really help you, because he still fires that wicked wrist shot from anywhere, and as long as he keeps them on net, and forces the D to backpeddle or Niemi to freeze, the puck stays in the Hawks end.
Oh yeah definately
Jeff Carter is one of the fastest end to end skaters on the team. He has that extra gear when he’s healthy where he just takes a couple of steps and separates. He doesn’t have the same options playing wing though, so it’s limited him a bit, but I think that Richie and Gags have been adapting and they all are so focused on winning this, that there’s no question they’ll do anything they can even if that means adapting and playing a role that isn’t necessarily playing to their individual strengths.
His speed is also a huge asset on the back check. But more than anything, no matter how many goals Carter ultimately scores, nobody can question his commitment. He’s been throwing his body out there, and really attempting to produce in the winger role. I think he’s thrown more hard checks out there in this series than he threw in half the regular season.
He's got a big body
But I think he tends to not use it (at least in the regular season). When he does, he can have a huge impact, like the hit on Salmela
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 6, 2010 2:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Q constantly changes lines during games, especially when the Hawks are down. It’s a love/hate thing in Chicago when he does this. Also, Q will typically move Hossa up to the 1st line in certain situations, for example, the last minute of a period. It definitely was not anything but a temporary move since Hossa and Kane play the same position.
We actually have the Coach Q’s Deterministic Chaos Creator Line Generator over at SCH to try to determine what Q’s lines will be game to game. Take a spin:
http://paching.net/mike/sch/hawkslinegen.html
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions
You have enough depth and speed at every positon you could pull name out of a hat and still have a scary line.
and we also have Sopel
who is scary on multiple levels.
Turds!
Spaulding, how many times have I spoken to you about your language?
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jun 5, 2010 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions
That’s funny stuff. I had read a few things about his propensity to mix up the lines. I’ve never believed in the idea much, because I hated it as a player. It takes some time to get to know players, but there are also players who you just have no chemistry with, and getting pushed together usually ends up badly and frustrates everyone in the process.
Actually Lappy has mixed and matched a lot too, and I think more than a few of us have been frustrated at time. Usually it’s because there’s a crisis of confidence and things clearly aren’t working, so it sucks to experience it on so many levels.
If I was a Hawks fan, I’d certainly share your consternation, because a team as successful as the Hawks shouldn’t be in a position where you’re in firefight mode based on the perception that matchups aren’t working. One thing Lavvy has done, is recognized the simple fact that on certain nights a guy catches fire, and it’s not a bad idea to ride that, and give a guy some extra shifts. I think the main problem for the Hawks is that it doesn’t matter to us if he moves Kane around. Lavvy is going to match Pronger on Toews. This isn’t even a question mark. Kane has played pretty damn well in the series, but when you have top level D as good as both these teams, you’re going to see some substantial neutralization, and we’ve seen that. If anything, what the pundits seem to have gotten wrong about the Flyers is our depth. Everyone who knows anything about this team for the last 2 years knows that depth is the reason we are high on the team. Case in point, we traded away a guy who was getting 3rd line minutes last year in a salary dump move for Carcillo, who on Phoenix was very quickly moved up to their first line, and was until he blew out is ACL their top goal scorer.
When I saw commentators stating that the difference in the series would be the depth players, I knew they didn’t have a clue about these teams. I can’t think of another team with similar depth other than the Hawks and maybe a healthy Detroit, although Boston certainly opened my eyes in that series. Everyone knows that series turned on Boston injuries, although we limped into it without Carter and Gagne.
my god that was annoying the crap out of me. He’s been known to do that on past teams he had, and he’s done it much to our frustration during bad spells during the regular season instead of letting certain guys develop chemistry. that’s why SCH has the running joke of Q’s “random line generator”…b/c that’s sometimes what it feels like, press a button and see what gets spit out.
The D shuffling is what’s really killed us last game. you are completely right.
by puppetmasterp on Jun 5, 2010 4:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Every time Ville Leino scores
The city of Detroit collectively facepalms
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 5, 2010 3:22 AM EDT reply actions
JVR
Was JVR on the ice tonite? Agree about Betts and Lappy looking a bit off their game, I think and certainly we have to understand Lappy probably has some mental hang ups , the man is human.For anyone that thought Carter had a great game, it is illegal to smoke that stuff in Pa.A win is a win -———————-2more to go! GO FLYERS !!!!
The second goal
Wouldn’t have happened if not for a great effort by JVR
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 5, 2010 4:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Epic win
The pressure gets turned up another notch on the booger eaters from Chicago. I was taking Chicago to wilt in game 7, I’m revising that to the Blackhawks succumbing in 6 games.

Just a chew toy for the hockey gods
stay classy, philadelphia!
...anarchy burger, hold the government!
by EdisonParkVinnie on Jun 5, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
ha, not like Chicago is guilty free of that.
Philadelphia Flyers/Columbus Blue Jackets...don't ask me how.
no doubt, but...
…why try to glorify a chicken-shit act? the real fans of any team wouldn’t give anymore attention to a glass-banging chimp like the cheeze-whiz eating, philly jerseyed nerd you so proudly display above…i mean christ, he looks like a little girl with little girl hands next to those hockey players!
...anarchy burger, hold the government!
by EdisonParkVinnie on Jun 6, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
What were you saying?

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 5, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
That dude (who did that) got dumped on like nothing else by media and fans
But that is not the first issue the Cubs have had at Wrigley (Dodgers-Fan Brawl in Dodger Bull Pen about 6-7 years ago), the Sox have had even worse.
The Dude with the Birds, whatever. The crap above is just that crap. At least he still made the play.
The Walls, Glass, Sidelines, Out of Bounds line need to be Hard Lines for players and fans alike, do not cross. Well then again, nobody needed to get tazered here!
ART.I§8-11; AM I-XXVII
James Madison is my Hero!
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Jun 5, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m sure the guys who attacked the ump at Comiskey would have gotten the taser treatment if the option was available.
I would have prefered good old Police Brutality
To hell with the kinder Gentler Crap for dipshits like those two, namely the father! A Good Fashioned Neck Stepping would have gotten the point across to anybody else who thinks it may be a good idea!
ART.I§8-11; AM I-XXVII
James Madison is my Hero!
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Jun 5, 2010 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions
didn’t get neck stomped but went home bloody and bruised if you remember…that’s southside, baby!
...anarchy burger, hold the government!
by EdisonParkVinnie on Jun 6, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
not my people in that house of horrors.
...anarchy burger, hold the government!
by EdisonParkVinnie on Jun 6, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I like the play by Hartnell leading up to that goal. He showed patience in waiting for the change and then found the trailer (Kimmo). Giroux did a great job in finding a nice soft spot where the hawks couldn’t find him
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions
That goal was awesome just in how efficient and high percentage it was. Kane made the defensive mistake, left his coverage, and the Flyers did the rest to turn that into a goal. Giroux ended up having all the time in the world.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 5, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Giroux is a special player. He has hockey IQ you can’t teach, vision that seems to extend around the back of his head, and some of the softest hands and insane stick handling ability I’ve seen in years. He’s an an absolute demon in the corners and around the puck in general, and yet is still able to sneak into places like a ghost.
That’s the 2nd time in the post season he’s scored a goal like that on a great pass from Kimmo. Those two guys really gel together.
Hartnell certainly set things up, and probably it’s the people that we didn’t expect to elevate, like Hartnell and Leino that more than anything have made the difference in the post season. The other people we pretty much expect to be good, and Giroux is certainly a guy that since last year, we expect to see magic from nearly every time he’s on the ice.
Game 5
The Hawks have been vulnerable at home all during the playoffs. I would love to see the Flyers win Sunday and then play Wednesday (how will will all last 3 days) with the CUP in the freaking Wachovia Center!!!!
Phigment
THE STANLEY CUP IN THE WACHOVIA CENTRE!!!
omg I think it just sunk in.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 5, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. We need to win game 5.
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Well technically he's right
Regardless of who wins game 5, the cup will be in the building for game 6.
I know but I’d rather we thinking about winning game 5 and then we can dream about flyers winning the cup on home ice
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Frankly
I thought the Blackhawks outplayed the Flyers for much of the game, not just the last few minutes. They had some huge chances early (Toews in particular) that Leighton came up big on.
Richie’s goal was phenomenal, but hardly the result of controlling play. Leino’s goal was a ridiculous bounce in a 2-on-4 (though I did really enjoy seeing Niemi continue to defend for several seconds, not knowing the puck was in the net behind him).
The scoreboard made it feel like a rout, but I think it was completely misleading. I’ll take it, of course — heck, I sort of feel entitled to one after Niemi stole two games in Chicago — but I think there’s some sharpening up that needs to be done before the next game.
I agree. Leights came up big as Hawks were dictating play regardless of what scoreboard said in the first and later in the 3rd. Flyers just made the most of their opportunities and punished the Hawks when they they had the chance. 2nd pd and most of 3rd looked better than the 1st but yes leights was leights out for flyers last nite. We need to do control play more in the first especially on the road in game 5
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Thirded. G’s goal was amazing, and Carle did exactly what I thought we needed to do, in getting to the front of net and ready for an easy rebound opportunity. And while we were a little unlucky with the iron we hit the first time we had a chance to put 5 up on the board, they got a little unlucky too later on in the same way.
We definitely need to play better, especially when it comes to when they dominate play in their offensive end. The number of times we iced the puck last night was frightening really, and showed a little frustration on our part, I think. Fortunately, I do think the Hawks are more frustrated than we are right now, and we really need to take advantage of that tomorrow night.
agreed. While we didn’t play our best (lots of icings), I think we really have them flustered. They can deny it all they like but the Flyers’ physical play has gotten under their skin and they can help but take dumb penalties. Flyers are drawing penalties really well right now and not retaliating, whereas it looks like the Hawks are getting angry, off their game, and might be taking runs at our players (see Leino). Is it me or is Campbell a dangerous hitter? I remember the hit he put on Umberger in playoffs when Campbell was in Buffulo. I’m not saying he hits dirty (RJ and Leino need to keep their heads up) but he hits hard like Richards
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Blackhawk Fan Comment of the Night
I loved this from CT over at the Fifth Feather:
“And somebody should probably cover that Giroux guy.”
Ya Think????
by Pocono Flyers Fan on Jun 5, 2010 10:35 AM EDT reply actions
here’s to hoping that Hawks fans will have nightmares about Giroux the same way that Bruins’ fans have about Gagne
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know about you but Giroux was so stealth camping behind the net I feel like Scotty just beamed him there from the bench and no one had any idea.
Go Go Gadget Gagne
What if Broad Street Didn't Fight Back? History HAS been made. 5-7-10
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
seriously I never saw him on that play either. I saw that hartnell was holding it waiting for the change and then kimmo but I thought kimmo was going to shot it, I have no idea how giroux got so alone there
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions
You could practically hear Niemi go “OH SHIT” (or the equivalent in Finnish) when he realized Kimmo’s shot wasn’t a shot at all, and Giroux had him cooked. He kicked out into a split when he saw Giroux, but it was far too late. Check it out on the replay, it’s glorious. No matter how may times you watch it.
Hahaha, agreed, can’t watch that particular replay enough. I imagine Giroux’s words during the play would have been something like this:
“Hey guys, don’t mind me, I’m just going to skate in here behind the net and stand here for a bit, I could really use a breather. Hey Kimmo, what’s going on man? Oh, you want to give me the puck? OK, go for it! Haha, suck it Niemi!”
That was beautiful.
My fave part is Giroux’s reaction, the huge smile on his face.
by JenLovesHockey on Jun 5, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Did JVR play in the 3rd period? Because if he did I don’t see the point in making a change since CarBomb hasn’t played in the 3rd or didn’t play when they went to O.T since that really wouldn’t give players a rest except JVR.
He played 2:12 in the 3rd, but didn’t see the ice in the last 13:31 until after Carter got the empty net.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions
JVR doesn’t take as many dumb penalties as Carbomb and is better on the offense, but can do really dumb rookie things on defense and turn the puck over at bad times but I still think JVR is better than Carbomb. Lavvy always shortens the bench in the third so I doubt Asham or Krajicek or Bartulis saw much time in the 3rd.
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually Krajicek was out, and basically saved the game off an attempted Hossa pass he tried to slide through the crease. Another guy who hasn’t really gotten his due, that we picked up off waivers, has been better than anyone thought, and has been pretty solid. He’s clearly considered by the coaches to be the 5th defenseman on the team, which nobody would have predicted.
But I doubt he’ll be back next year.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions
You never know, considering the cap issues. Although this is all stuff we can talk about more after we’ve drunk from the cup. Right now let’s give the guy some props… he’s playing super valuable minutes out there, and holding his own against one of the best offensive units in the league.
That is true.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Game Replay
on NHL network if anyone’s interested.
Cool, thanks I’ll watch it. Had to miss the game due to a 13-hour workday :(
But anyway… GO FLYERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
by JenLovesHockey on Jun 5, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
How much ice time did Asham get last night? I don’t really remember his playing very much last night.
He probably had his normal shifts, but he must not have had the puck very often.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions
Yep – that would be about right.
Do you remember anything he did last night? I seriously can only remember his name being mentioned once all night (yes, I had a few glasses of wine, but I usually remember when people are on the ice).
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
As long as you can remember why you woke up without any clothes. The whole 4th line really had about the same ice time and they did what they do. Asham was quietly moving his feet and stirring up trouble in the corners.
Just Call Me "M"!
LOL. :)
Good – I’m glad that Asham did what he normally does.
#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)
by Orange and Black Forever on Jun 5, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow, I haven’t had much time to comment lately but the site sure isn’t missing any commenters that is for sure. During the season I would scan through the game threads for some interesting stuff but it is just not possible anymore. Keep up the good work people.
I also have noticed the enormous amount of Hawks fans embarrassing the hell out of themselves complaining about the refereeing. Especially Pronger, get over yourselves. But it is nice, after losing for so many years, to watch a game and feel that the Flyers are playing to win and they are creating their power play chances on merit.
Just Call Me "M"!
COTN
Can I at least get an honorable mention for my Ryan Parent comment…I thought I was the favorite and that was after the original COTN…haha with all the great lines that come out during game threads its hard to get a COTN…I love this site…even when things aren’t going our way I find myself LMAO at comments on the site…keep up the good work everyone!
Carle's Goal
I understand that the BH Dman (I won’t even try to spell it) momentarily played the puck, but how is that goal unassisted? He touched the puck for less than a second. It should have been assists to JVR and G, they set up the play.
He very clearly controlled the puck, then tried to clear. If he just tipped it to Carle it’d be different, but the TO negates the touches before it.
I disagree. He never really “clearly controlled” the puck, he took a backhanded whack at the puck and it went straight to Carle. I’m not sure how that’s control of the puck. Like in the NFL, for a pass to be complete, the guy has to make a “football move” to have control of the ball or he can’t fumble it.
Having done scoring at the collegiate level for 4+ years (ok, sure – it was ACHA level and not NCAA level, but I still had to review all the goals for the correct scoring), I can tell you that Hjalmarsson’s actions are enough to be considered control. Looking at the replay, he stops the Giroux shot/pass attempt with his skate, then gains control to try a backhanded clear. That set of movements constitutes control, since it was a defined effort to clear the puck that went unimpeded by another player. The clear was weak and went straight to Carle’s stick, who put home the easy goal.
Had Giroux’s initial shot/pass attempt just bounced off of Hjalmarsson and straight to Carle, then the assists would be in play. However, it was a blatant attempt to clear the puck that was done horribly by Hjalmarsson, and that’s enough to be considered “control”, therefore making Carle’s goal unassisted. And yes – it’s all minor considering the end result.
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
Great looks at the game:
Blocked shots played a part: [Hockey or Die]
Looking at scoring chances: [The Copper & Blue]
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
The more I read the comments from Hawks fans from across the web, the more I feel that the Flyers have gotten under their skins. Did they just think that this was some lowly 7th seed (from the poor East that needed a shutout to get in ) that would just roll over and give them the cup? Apparently, the Hawks and their fans didn’t scout their opponent well
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 3:20 PM EDT reply actions
FYI
a Sampling of Pre-Series comments from SCH (T-1 Day from Game)
they sound like they are more then capable of…. stopping Buff, out-muscling Hossa, out skate Keith, pin down Kane, make Toews second guess himself, …….
And they all scare me. As was pointed out the 2 way guys are up top and as long as our D can keep the other lines somewhat at bay our forwards should be able to put some chances on Leighton. Regardless, the Flyers have plenty of firepower, time to get all nervous again!
Officially scared that we might lose this
The performance I was most impressed with was the Jersey series. I think with Krecji and Sturm in the lineup you would have have had difficulty getting the 4 wins in a row against Boston. Also, the Halak you saw was not the Halak that Was an Pit saw.
There are things you could say about our road here, too—the challenged Preds, the brainless Canucks, the disappearing act of San Jose.
I don’t know, it’s one of the reasons—for me anyway—that this series doesn’t look to be like a traditional 112 point team vs 88 point team match-up. It has more the feel of a Carolin-Edmonton or a Tampa-Calgary final.
That’s why people watch sports. If it was certain we’d win this thing based on placement and the fact that no 7th seed has ever won, fewer people would watch. Sure we play in a stronger conference and have beaten tougher opponents, but Philly wasn’t really healthy up until now (hell, they’re still not 100%). People might disagree but I’d say they’re probably a 4th seed in disguise.
I do think the Hawks have an upper hand in most areas and with the style of game Philly likes to play, it should work in our favor. But you can never quite be sure what will happen.
(Though I agree, the more you analyze the opposition, the more paranoid you get)
although Philly played against some weak offenses, they played against some of the best defenses around.
I’m not expecting a goalies series. I am however predicting heartburn for this vegetarian…
Any team that is captained by Mike Richards will wear their heart on their sleeve and leave their soul on the ice. The Flyers have already shown enough resiliency that they won’t go away quietly and will fight to the bitter end especially with the Stanley Cup on the line.
Now we certainly had those among us who thought this would be a cake walk, but as you can see, it was a far cry from all. The more I read into your team while still playing MTL, the more concerned I got. I did not think this was going to be easy from the get go, hoped like a mofo it would though.
ART.I§8-11; AM I-XXVII
James Madison is my Hero!
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Jun 5, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Good point. Hawks have good smart fans over at SCH who ever said that they are a 4th seed is disguise read my mind about this team. The regular season didn’t show what this team is capable of. I have a lot of respect for posters over there as I read more and more every day. It’s the other Hawks fans trolling puck daddy and espn and the like.
by historywillbemade on Jun 5, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Well to be fair during the regular season this team was so inconsistent that all of the standard cliches apply, i.e- Dr. Jeckyl/Mr Hide, Harvey two face, etc. I imagine a documentary about this Flyers season could be called “The Tale of Two Teams…”
"Game 7's are tough... It's a game that's made for men and our guys proved to be men today." -Laviolette
I think this part speaks for itself!
fans trolling puck daddy and espn and the like.
I have commented a couple times on PD. The last time I did when Hawks fans insisted Mitchel’s hit on Toews back in October was illegal and dirty. Consensus at SCH and mine was, it was a good clean open ice Hockey hit. Sucked to watch, but clean none the less.
ART.I§8-11; AM I-XXVII
James Madison is my Hero!
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Jun 5, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t even bother reading the comments section there. If I really want fan perspective on a story Wysh runs, I’ll just read the appropriate SB Nation blog(s).
Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."
Reading Yahoo comments for fan perspective is like listening to WIP and attributing it to all Flyers fans. I don’t blame you for not reading (I’ll occasionally forget and almost immediately regret it).
Reading Yahoo comments is kinda like
Regurgitated ESPN Hockey commentary, less any resemblance of knowledge or a clue, most of the time.
ART.I§8-11; AM I-XXVII
James Madison is my Hero!
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Jun 5, 2010 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions
No surprise really
I’ve been reading pretty much all season long about how good the Western conference is, and how the east is crap with the exception of the Caps and Pens, who everyone expected to meet up in the conference championship. Love it or hate it, but it also tends to be that teams need to peak in the post season. As Flyer fans we should know better than anyone that having the best team in the regular season is irrelevant.
One problem with the NHL is that there just aren’t enough out of conference games in the season to really tell much about the other teams. The Flyers and Hawks played once this season. It’s no surprise that Hawks fans who maybe aren’t as well versed in the sport, would buy into the idea that the Western conference was just at a higher echelon. Since I live on the west coast, I see plenty of western conference games, and I’ve thought for a while how silly that idea is. In the salary cap era, the parity in the league is just about guaranteed.
The worst thing for the Hawks fan, many of which probably have no idea about this, is that this is a complete one shot for them, in regards to the talent level of this team, given their salary cap issue for next season.
the good news is that the flyers have outcoached and outplayed the hawks for the past two games.
the bad news is that the flyers still have to win in chicago.
still, the flyers take the next game and the hawks will fold. the flyers win, and they get a two day break and get to play at home again.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
audio highlights
just want to put it out there that i’ve been reading this site alot over the past three months but have just now finally felt the urge to post. i think this series is a toss up. i honestly have had no idea what to expect heading into the last four games,and i dont know what to expect for the next two/three. i’m expecting this thing to go 7 with the way the series has been so dead even…my question is does anyone know if the flyers WIP audio highlights are available online? i’ve seen them posted on here before but i can never find anything on google
Leights
Leighton was pretty good yesterday, but that Campbell goal was baaaaaaaad. Hopefully he learnt that his job is to stop pucks and not worry about the man crashing the net.
New Zealand's 4th best Philadelphia Flyers fan
I agree with Morganti in that right now, in a 3 game series, Leighton is the better goalie and just like Brodeur, Rask and Halak (The hottest goaltenders in the playoffs until they played the Flyers), Niemi is looking soft and confused.
Just Call Me "M"!
Brodeur really was not red hot before the Flyers series, was he? Rask and Halak definitely were, but Brodeur is clearly on the downside of his career and I do not recall him ever getting into a groove that reminded people of the Brodeur in his prime, especially towards the end of the year.
Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."
Hey Travis
How was Carter’s goal awesome? All you writers think if JVR skates up and down the ice a couple of times he had a great game; even if he only plays hard in the offensive zone( when he has the puck). Everyone says he is great because we spent a 1st round pick on the guy.He needs some time in the AHL to learn to play and act like a pro.( compare his comments when he had to sit ;to Carcillo’s comments ,Dan is a team guy.Plus you all act like Carcillo is old—-he is 25.)I also think JVR has way to high an opinion of himself at this stage of his career . GO FLYERS
Also, I don’t think anyone here thinks JVR is great or has ever called him great. In fact, I think he might be wrongfully criticized because he was the number 2 over all pick and everyone expects him to like Patrick Kane but maybe not as good. I will admit, I have often times slammed JVR and to this day I still don’t think he will ever be anything more than a 2nd line winger, which to me, as the number 2 over all pick he should be more than that.
As for Carcillo, his biggest role is to get under the skin of the other team and with what Pronger has been doing both on and off the ice, he is being a big enough agitator for both of them. JVR brings more skill to the team than Carcillo does. I still don’t understand why JVR doesn’t park himself in front of the net and try and pick up a garbage goal but I am not the coach so whatever.
Go Go Gadget Gagne
What if Broad Street Didn't Fight Back? History HAS been made. 5-7-10
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!
As the number 2 overall pick….. He isn’t. He may have been drafted there, but that was one of the worst drafts in the past decade. He was simply the 2nd best of the bunch after Kane and if you look at the other players in that class it is pretty obvious to see we should be happy with who we picked. Sadly we were a year too early for Drew Doughty and a year too late for Staal, Toews, Backstrom or Kessel.
Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"
Did you know...
…Rick Nash scored only 39 points in 74 games in his rookie year.
Let’s not give up on the kid yet.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 6, 2010 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions
oh and Nash scored 41 goals in the next season
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 6, 2010 3:01 AM EDT up reply actions
So your problem with JVR is that he doesn’t know how to play or act like a pro, plus he has way too high an opinion of himself?
JVR’s comments when he was scratched:
“When you lose, obviously you want to try to shake things up,” van Riemsdyk said. “I don’t know, the decision is up to him [Laviolette]. In the playoffs, the level goes up every game. It’s still a learning experience for me, it’s my first time here. It’s my first season still, I’m learning everything that goes on our there.”
Carcillo’s comments when he was scratched:
“It’s tough. It’s hard not to be [ticked] off, and if you’re not [ticked] off, there’s something wrong with you. Everybody wants to be playing at this time of the year. You battle the whole year to be in this position. […] A couple guys know it could have been them, and it makes them amp up their game, and I think that happened [in Game 4]. Every guy played really, really well, and we came out with a huge win, and that’s the biggest thing right now, getting wins. It’s a bit of a pride thing. It’s a tough pill to swallow. But you’ve got to come to the rink with a good attitude and work hard and just hope you get another chance.”
I fail to see how one guy is a pro and the other isn’t. And this was his comment after last night:
“Well, [Laviolette] didn’t say anything out of the ordinary,” he said. “He likes to let things marinate overnight and usually save his comments for the next day. I felt I did some good things. I think I skated pretty well, and obviously I was a little rusty on the first couple of shifts, but after that I settled in and played a much better game.”
I don’t understand the criticism.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Stop overhyping JVR
I mean, look at how you writers go nuts about him when all he did was skate around a little:
James van Riemsdyk played nine minutes, 34 seconds in his return to the lineup. His linemates and his coach were very happy with his play, but Peter Laviolette hinted that Dan Carcillo could eventually get back into the lineup. He said his reasoning for inserting JVR back into the mix was that he wanted to keep the guys fresh and involved. We’ll see if he means that.
Geez, can you please wait for JVR to do something before you rave about him like that?
haha, TRAVIIIIIIIIIIIIS!
Get off his d**k.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions
To your first question, he made the Hawk defenseman (Keith?) look pretty silly when he beat him along the boards. He danced right around him.
Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. Got goaltending? Searching since 1987.
by Travis Hughes on Jun 5, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions
a) JVR basically created that second goal.
b) He’s still learning the NHL game, and more importantly he’s still getting conditioned to the long season. Next season he will have had a full offseason to develop and be conditioned for the full season. Let’s not forget that for the early part of this year he was the only rookie at above a PPG. When he’s good, he looks VERY good. He just needs to turn those flashes into a bit more consistency.
c) What were wrong with his comments after being sat? Nothing more than the disappointment of a 21 year old getting benched in the SCF…
d) High opinion = high expectations. He said in the offseason that he wanted to make the team out of training camp. Yeah you can call that a high opinion. But guess what he did: made the team out of training camp. I think one of the problems he might have had is that his aim this year was to make the team, and he got that pretty early, and then maybe didn’t know what he was meant to be doing for the year, what role he was meant to be playing on this team.
e) No-one says he’s a great right now, but to say he hasn’t got potential to be one is wrong. His stats aren’t all that different from guys like Rick Nash and Eric Staal in their rookie years.
f) Mike Green only plays hard in the offensive zone, people still call him a great.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 5, 2010 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Eric Staal is actually a really good comparison. Staal had played three years in the OHL before getting drafted, jumping straight to the NHL at age 19. JVR played two years with U.S. National team before getting drafted, spent two years at college, jumped straight to the NHL at age 20. Staal had 0.38 ppg his rookie year, JVR had 0.44.
The difference, and this might be a big one, is that Staal followed up his rookie year with a 1.00 ppg season in the AHL during the lockout. He has since been a 0.9975 ppg (yes, he’s a ppg) player in the NHL. JVR won’t/shouldn’t get that year in the AHL, but good comparison.
Look for my really long story contexualizing JVRs season in between Games 5 and 6.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 5, 2010 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for telling me you're writing that
I was going to make a fanpost defending JVR after the season was over. But now that you’ve said that I’ll just post my additional thoughts in the comments; saves me the effort of a long fanpost.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 5, 2010 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions
haha, it’s pretty long. I probably won’t hit everything you want to say, mainly because I compare him (not just this year) to 4 other forwards drafted in 2007 who have played at least 55 NHL games.
It will be up Monday so as not to interfere with more important things, like Stanley Cup Finals Game 5.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions
OK that seems to be the makings of an interesting read. Personally I also stubbornly refuse to believe that the only time the Flyers finish last in the league the draft is only one man deep. The other no. 2 picks in this decade have been: Dany Heatley, Jason Spezza, Kari Lehtonen (but JBo following), Eric Staal, Evgeni Malkin, Bobby Ryan, Jordan Staal, Drew Doughty, Victor Hedman and probably Taylor Hall/Tyler Seguin. That’s a pretty nice list. But not all of them showed their true ability in their rookie year.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 6, 2010 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions
That's Philly
If we have a problem, it’s the expectations we place on players. JVR is a pure rookie this year, and one with no AHL experience. He took a different path, and for that, there are people who will never forgive him apparently, even though he’s 22 years old. He’s played very well this year, learned a lot, and dealt with a really tumultous season where the coach was fired. WTF do people expect?
In 3 years, I think JVR will be an elite player. He’s been on a really short leash this year, and adapted pretty well. The Flyers are not your average NHL team (duh) especially when we have Claude Giroux centering our 3rd line.
That’s a fantastic point, one that I entirely agree with. Except the connotation surrounding people never forgiving him for going to college. Maybe they won’t, maybe should, maybe they shouldn’t have to. But there’s no denying he took a path that was more for personal reasons than professional reasons. I still don’t know why he picked UNH (I’ve heard him say the standard ones), but he turned down Major Juniors, the AHL, Boston University, and Boston College (at least) to go to UNH.
He’s insanely talented, but he did not choose the most challenging hockey arena to hone is craft. Like I said, maybe people should forgive him for that, maybe they shouldn’t have to, maybe they won’t. But it’s something that isn’t being talked about that probably should have at the beginning of the year. Why did he choose UNH over all those options?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Geoff,
So I’m somewhat biased, but I played my college hockey in that league, and there’s really no difference in going to UNH where he was the focus of the team or went to BU or BC, where he might not have been. He was matched against the top line players of those other teams, because they are all in the same league.
It’s good quality hockey, but the game is obviously very different from that played in the AHL, and the season is just a fraction. The conditioning programs are good, but they aren’t what they are in the pros. I have no doubt that JVR will work on his explosiveness and plyometrics in the same way that Giroux did in the season before he came to the Flyers. At the same time he’s also learning what it requires to compete with the best in the game, and ostensibly, next year he’ll know earlier on what type of system the team is going to use.
I should also remind people that there wasn’t a player on the team that wasn’t struggling with the Lavvy system, and I also agree with MarioD that even that system was tweaked when they implemented the left wing lock.
Well, I"ll take your word on the UNH v. BC/BU debate since I’m really only going off of names. JVR may have been the focus of UNH, but a number 2 overall pick should have been the focus wherever he went. Maybe BC/BU wouldn’t change their style to fit him, but he should still be planned around. But that was just one thing.
He choose college over Juniors and professional, which was really the worst of the three choices for his professional development. But he’s definitely doing pretty well despite that. I am torn between wanting him to spend the summer working out and wanting him to rest for 6 weeks.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I definitely see your point, but like Gizmo says, it’s far too soon to say he isn’t worthy of that category. I may not see that potential in him yet (Malkin? Staal? Doughty? really??) but it’s too soon to say he’s not that good.
Either way, man did we get screwed in that lottery. Patrick Kane is a bonafide stud.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions
He is definately impressive with the puck, and I also think he got a huge boost from the Olympics where he got to go against the best of the best, and did really well. There’s no doubt he’s one of the best young american players, but with that said, he’s not going to jump up beyond what he’s doing now. JVR on the other hand could put on 20 lbs of muscle and go into a whole different stratosphere from where he is now. I’ve seen this happen a lot with tall guys where they need to fill out a bit.
If I recall correctly
When people were talking back in 2007 about the draft, some said Patrick Kane could step in and be your scorer straight away, because he was ready for the NHL game. On the other hand, JVR needed to grow into his frame and learn how to then use that frame in the faster bigger NHL. JVR had the greater risk associated with him, as there was a possibility he just can’t adapt, but he also had the higher ceiling. I don’t see any reason to give up on that ceiling from what we’ve seen this season.
And yeah Malkin especially really shouldn’t be counted as a no. 2. In any other year apart from 2004 (Ovechkin) and 2005 (Cindy) he would’ve gone no. 1.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 6, 2010 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, that’s fair. But Kane has three straight 70-point seasons in the NHL after coming straight from Juniors. That’s crazy. (Yeah, I thought of the Kia commercial)
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Unfortunately for Carcillo, I think that he’s still gimpy (undisclosed lower body knee ) that I wouldn’t be surprised to find requires some post season work. I could be wrong, but the Dan Carcillo we’ve seen the last 2 series since he hurt his knee, is not the guy that was playing on the 1st line 2 months ago, or even the guy who potted the OT winner in the NJ series.
You can’t look at it purely on the basis of whether or not you think JVR was great or not. The important thing is that a player has to play a role. This in my mind is all on Lavvy. JVR hasn’t set the entire year, and while his head tells him that JVR is a better fit on the 3rd line centered by Giroux, his heart wants to put Carcillo in, because Lavvy relates better to Carbomb than JVR.
Lavvy was a tough as nails grinder type guy as a player, and so he appreciates the way that Carbomb plays the game. That’s all irrelevant, because with JVR on the Giroux Asham line, it’s just a better line that with Carbomb who didn’t play with those guys whatsoever in the regular season.
Worse yet, EVERYONE has seen the videos floating around of Carbomb snapping his head back to try and sell penalties, and he’s probably top 3 on the NHL refs shit list. It’s too bad, but it’s a problem of his own making plain and simple.
Putting that stuff aside, Carbomb is most effective in a dump and chase scenario where he can go in first on the forecheck and crunch somebody. When he was 100% healthy, he as putting in some monster energy shifts, where it was not a surprise to see him throw 2 – 3 monster checks in a single sequence, and when he was doing that he was doing it as well as anybody I’ve seen. It’s an incredible skill, one that JVR doesn’t currently possess, and could certainly receive a master class from Carcillo in. However, again, that guy hasn’t been playing since he got hurt. He just doesn’t have the same speed, and explosiveness that he had during the regular season, which is again why I suspect he’s gimpy.
Regardless, that is not what the Giroux line does, and quite frankly it’s a waste of Giroux’s talent to have to try and modify the entire offensive strategy of the line to fit Carbomb. Carbomb is most effective as the human equivalent of a body puncher. When he’s been most effective it’s going in, setting the physical tone for the game with a lot of hits, which over time wear out the other team, and make opportunities for other players. The Giroux line just isn’t that type of line, and none of us should want it to be, because having a 3rd line like ours is one of the reasons we’re within tasting distance of the cup. It’s a lot better to force a team like the Hawks to have to back peddle and work off the cycle, and eat up time in their offensive zone. JVR complements that because he’s a good skater, and good stick handler, and does well with the puck on his stick.
Compare that to Carbomb who isn’t comfortable carrying the puck, and rarely cycles, because he’s usually busy crushing guys on the boards so that other people can come in and pick up the puck.
While this isn’t Carbomb’s fault, trying to put him on a line he hasn’t played with, and doesn’t match skill wise, is a complete mistake, and I think this was absolutely obvious in the outcome of game 4, which is the first game we actually controlled. So to be clear, it’s not about JVR by himself, but JVR playing on a line with 2 guys he has played with for the last 3rd of the season, and who he has established some chemistry with.
If Lavvy wants to play Carbomb, then he should be playing with the 4th line, but then you’d have to sit either Lappy or Powe, both of which Lavvy knows he can use on the PK, whereas Carbomb doesn’t have that in his repetoire. No surprise really, because Carbomb is the reason that those guys have had to be out on the PK half the time (lolz).
by Gizmoitus on Jun 6, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I was about
to give you a rec and massive praise for that entire post, which said a lot of really great stuff, but you had to end it with “lolz”. Unacceptable. No rec for you.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
Because I’m not as discriminatory as Geoff.
"I did my walk of shame this morning and everyone was so much nicer," she said. "People were inviting me to parties at 9 a.m."
haha, well played.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 6, 2010 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions
It seems to me that often when we get the puck and are trying to clear it from our defensive zone that we slam it along the boards and it get s stopped by their point men who seem always to be there. Anybody else see this?
That’s my one question. Otherwise I think our guys have the heart and soul and talent to win tonight. GO FLYERS!

by 





























