Broad Street Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Pros and Cons of an 18-game NFL Schedule

Thursday Morning Fly By: That's it?

Remember David Sloane?! via zimbio.com

Remember David Sloane?! via zimbio.com

Today's open discussion thread, complete with your daily dose of Philadelphia Flyers news and notes...

  • Five Reasons the NHL is in trade and free agent gridlock this summer: [Puck Daddy]
  • Jeremy Roenick was on Daily News Live yesterday, and he won't apologize for crying. [The700Level]
  • Nikolai Zherdev was on a conference call yesterday, so naturally that was the big (only) story of the day: [Flyers] [CSNPhilly] [Flyer Files]

0 recs  |  Comment 429 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I do remember Roenick saying that he was rooting for us before the series started, so I do believe him that he probably would have gotten emotional either way. I’m sure that in both cities, Chicago and here, he heard over and over again about the cup droughts on his current team; since it would have been 27 years without a cup in Chicago on the first day he took the ice with them in 1988, and 26 years here when he came to us in 2001.

PS – Is this officially the shortest fly-by ever?

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

http://www.fromtherink.com/2010/7/15/1570740/buyer-beware-simon-gagnes-injury

another gagne article. this is encouraging for trade talks “The good news is that Gagne only has one year on his deal. Since the majority of NHL teams that need offensive help are scared off by Ilya Kovalchuk’s contract demands, there might be a small bidding war for Gagne’s services” i read today that lightning and toronto are interested via espn

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Roenick

i dont really care, i understand Roenick supporting the blackhawks over the flyers (if he was) fully. Dont understand why the crying thing was addressed to philadelphia on daily news life. It was just more a general thing, everyone made fun of him for it because it was funny. Has nothing to do specifically with the flyers as far as im concerned.

At this point this thing is stupid, it was funny, now it’s over, time to move on.

Roenick’s one of my favorite players, he speaks his mind without fear, is hilarious, and played like a warrior (wired shut jaw anyone?) for the Flyers.

I’ll never forget the day the news broke the Flyers had acquired him from the Coyotes, I was down the shore, and started screaming runnning upstairs to tell my dad.

Best jersey purchase i ever made was Mark Recchi, 2nd best – Jeremy Roenick. I still wear both proudly.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 10:11 AM EDT reply actions  

if the Flyers win the Stanley Cup, I’m pretty sure I’ll cry too. seriously.

Managing Editor - HockeyOutsiders.com

by HockeyOutsiders on Jul 15, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

i cried when the phillies won on the phone with my. and i fully admitted that to my friends and everyone who has me on gchat. did not care at all.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll admit I cried at the end of the Game 7 win over the Bruins. After being so nervous and tense for 4 straight games (and all the days in between), it was a tremendous relief for it to finally end. I just collapsed on the couch and laid there for a while, completely emotionally spent.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Jul 15, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree if you never won one I think he would have got emotional even if it was a team he didn’t play for that has got to be tough think to see. No grudges here.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gagne

As for Gagne.

Yes this Kovalchuk business getting teams all hyped up about wingers, could end in something nice for a Gagne trade.

Gagne might have had his injuries and is a bit older. But he’s got a lot of things that come at a premium in any sport
- tons of playoff experience
- veteran experience in general
- purely positive presence and influence
- the guy can still make shit happen especially in the playoffs

if we can pull Quick (at only 1.8 million) for Gagne, and have some cap space after signing the guys we need to, that would be lovely. still dont like Carcillo on the first line, but we dont have enough money to do anything else and hopefully Carter and Richards working together (fingers crossed) will be enough for that line. If Car-bomb clears the way for Richards and Carter and Lavy keeps cracking the whip on his stupidity down, we should be fine.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 10:18 AM EDT reply actions  

i understand your issues with carcillo. i agree with most of them. but if you look at the richards line as one of the three scoring lines as opposed to the first line, having carcillo on it is much easier to swallow.

by isavedlatin on Jul 15, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed. i think i was unclear with my issues with carcillo on the first line early. Right now it’s acceptable, but I just feel (given cap room) this team should keep it’s mind open about finding a better top line winger than Carcillo for the future seasons.

And that still might come in the form of a Carter trade, even after Gagne. If you can move Carter for two wingers that can play with Richie, especially if those two wingers are equal around Carter’s future, probably 6 mil salary, it’s dumb to keep tying so much cap space into so many individual players, this team just simply wont be able to stay balanced at all.

Something is going to have to give, even beyond Gagne. It’s gonna be have to be either Carter, Briere, or Hartnell. And i dont see the last two being anywhere near as moveable or netting the return Carter will.

But that’s for another time.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Carcillo can’t play 20-25 minutes per game.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats why if we move Gagne, and have a bit of cap room leftover after signing zerdev and carcillo and maybe a goalie, move boosh’s salary, then sign powe.

Powe is a great utility guy, he’s so underrated. Powe has speed and can penalty kill and he can split time with Shelley on the fourth line and has enough skill to split time with Carcillo on the first line.

that’s your best answer besides miraculously finding a 1st line RW instead of Carcillo

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

No matter how much we like Carcillo, he’s no where near as talented offensively as Richards and Carter. Making him their winger will only hurt their production, regardless of how much Richards likes having Carcillo as his wing.

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."

by Grp_Cpt_Lionel_Mandrake on Jul 15, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah i’m also hoping for quick and if not quick then picks and prospects to fill farm system. Then we can go sign Turco. I’d rather Turco starting than Leights or Boosh

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we get Quick at that price we might be able to get a UFA winger to avoid the Carcillo on a scoring line problem.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

doubtfull

Gagne’s 5 mil – Quick’s 1.8 mil – Zerdev – Carcillo – Powe?

no room for any more wingers

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t sign Powe or send him down he is not needed, he is a fast skater who works hard with hands of stone he is a less skilled Nodl who we already have.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

we’ll just have to agree to disagree on Powe and Nodl. Id much prefer Powe.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

That spot is our spare forward. Carcillo is our 4th line grinder.

There are plenty of wingers available on the market who would come cheap and be a major skill upgrade over Powe to play top 9.

(pardon the spelling too hard to copy and past)
LW
Kariya, Torres, Lehitenen, Panikarovsky,Modin, Fedotenko,Stempniak

RW
Demitra ,Selanne, Guerin, Svatos, Afinogenov, Sykora

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

where are you finding this cap room?

Gagne’s 5 mil buys you Zerdev and Carcillo and a goalie which we need over a top line forward. Leighton should not be starting if it can be avoided.

also a lot of those guys mentioned are probably going to want more than we can spend.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Add Boosh and Cote Gagne’s 5 million is more like 6.7million here is some math

6.7 million – 2.5 million (our current overage) = 4.2 million

4.2 million – 1.8 million (Quick) = 2.4 million under

1.5 million for one year deal on a skilled vet winger = 0.900 wiggle room

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

your missing the point that we need Cap to sign Giroux and carter next year too. we cant afford to lose anymore then the 4.2 we’ll have

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I said one year deal do you not know what that means

the 1.5 million will come off the books next year along with Zherdevs 2.00 mill, Carcillo 1.1 milllion, O’Donnell’s 1.00 million.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

So that leaves us 5.6 mill under. and Carter should stay around 5 mill(if he gets 7, I’ll shot him, then Homer) and Giroux will get 3.5ish. leaving us 2 under to sign 3 spots.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t forget about Leino needing to be resigned as well.

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."

by Grp_Cpt_Lionel_Mandrake on Jul 15, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

5.6 million to sign or replace if the cap stays put if it goes up which you never know I suggested it would go up this year in January and got laughed at but it do so you never know.

Zherdev
O’Donnell
Giroux (sign)
Carcillo

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

it goes up if the Playoffs do well. Like the first Pitt SCF, it went up a lot, the ext year went up, but not as much, and last year went up a lot.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

My point is you don’t know. Say Leino gets crushed and concussed he did take a lot of hard hits in the finals alone. Too much head down stuff. You just don’t know but we will have options next year only have to lose one of those 3 guys. Leino, Giroux, Zherdev depending on this season that is not cap hell that is inevitable when you are a good team.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

????

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is the question there JpH?

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was

talking about the chances of the salary raising, and you went off on who were are going to resign. It boggled the mind.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

flyers are going to spend to the cap every year. they will always have cap problems bc they will always try to use all of it bc they will always want to win.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would kick a baby to get Kariya. Imagine:

Carter – Richie – Kariya
Hartnell – Briere – Lenio
JVR – Giroux – Zherdev
Lappy – Betts – Powe
Labamba (aka David Laliberti)

Pronger – Carle
Kimmo – Mez (feel free to move Mez or coburn around is you want)
coburn – O’Donall

Leighton
Boosh

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

grrr

replace Labamba with Carcillo? or what have you

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Based on the above math I give you this lineup

Carter – Richie – Kariya
Hartnell – Briere – Leino
JVR – Giroux – Zherdev
Carcillo – Betts – Lappy
Shelly

Pronger – Carle
Kimmo Coburn
Mez OD

Quick
Leighton

0.900 million in free space

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

again, we can save another 1/2 a mill by replacing Shelly with Labamba or Powe. this fucker just keeps hurting us

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

just look at that lineup though that is so solid at all levels for this year Nodl is waiting in Glen Falls I swear you couldn’t tell the difference if he wore Powe’s jersey except he is bigger

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I miss Bartulius he is in that as well.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like Nodl, but he just misses the passion Powe playes with. Powe is just like Upshall, Nodle is just a good 4-3 liner.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Powe can’t score he has 26 career points. Upshall had 32 points in 49 games last season alone.

Powe is an undrafted walk on, Upshall a former top 10 pick.

Powe is nothing.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why you hatin’ on Powe, man? You’re the second person this week to just rip on him. Not cool.

I thought we were over that when even Mario defended him awhile ago.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Powe is a top 9 forward he is a fine 4th line guy but that is it. I don’t even think Carcillo is a top 9 forward but he ranks above Powe.

If it came down to Fedotenko and Powe I take Rusty. He is due for another cup anyway.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

So? That doesn’t mean he’s nothing. He was 45th in the NHL in 4-on-5 GAON/60, second best on the Flyers. He gave up fewer goals on the PK per 60 minutes than Pavelski, Alfredsson, Drury, Laich, Frolov, Sturm, Laperriere, Umberger, Ortmeyer, Dustin Brown, Pahlsson, Jordan Staal, Backstrom, Horton, Cooke, Weiss…

He’s a very good penalty killer, which is the role he plays. Why does he have to do more than that to get some respect?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because that roster spot is for Giroux-JVR-Powe that not a PK spot that is skill spot. Lappy and Betts are our PKs and Nodl can probably do all those same things. That is what I am saying.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why are you assuming Carcillo is on the fourth line? Not only will he probably be on the first line, putting Zherdev on the third line, Powe played all of last year on the 4th.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because I am hoping Carcillo is on the 4th line where he played in the beginning of the season on that line we called Chico and the Men or something like that before Betts got hurt then Gagne etc.. Forcing Carcillo had to move up. If we start with Carcillo is our top 9 when someone goes down we are really screwed. Trade Gagne sign Zherdev doesn’t add it forward unless they get someone else.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carter – Richards – Zherdev
Hartnell – Briere – Leino
JVR – Giroux – Carcillo
Powe – Betts – Lappy

How is that bad? You can swap Shelley in during some games, but either way you want to swap Carcillo/Shelley and upgrade. Asham played in that spot all year, and he can’t score 20 goals.

I seriously don’t see why you’re raising expectations that you want 9 different guys to be 20 goal scorers.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

or switch zherdev with carcillo.

and have Carter-Richards-Carbomb

then late in games bring up giroux/zherdev to take carbomb’s spot with Ritchie and Cartsie….or if Carter fails on the wing you can always move Giroux back to wing and open up other possibilities

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right, but we need to upgrade that third line winger spot. Which we could have done by signing Zherdev!

Gagne – Richards – Carter
Hartnell – Briere – Leino
JVR – Giroux – Zherdev
Powe – Betts – Lappy
Carcillo

But NOOOOOOO. We had to go get Meszaros and Shelley, give our backup goalie a $600k raise, so now we have to drop our first line winger, so that we can actually upgrade the goalie position, but now we have to upgrade the third line winger spot again.

ARGH.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

So what I am getting here is that you aren’t totally on board with Homer’s quote Plan unquote…

I felt the need to spell out quote and unquote did more than just the marks themselves.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 15, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im not sure Holgren would have went after Zherdev if he hadn’t already decided he had to move Gagne.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

But what if he can’t? Is Homer stupid enough to give away Gagne for nothing? When guys make one move anticipating another will fall in line, they usually get left in the cold wondering what went wrong.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 15, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe was, before his injury, 2nd on the team in goals with 7 in 15 games. Upshall had a huge season, but mainly because he played with Doan and other good players in Phx. If you look at their Flyers numbers, they are very simaller, along with their style of play

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe is the type of 3rd/4th line player that successful teams need.

I think it’s an apples to oranges comparison to compare Powe’s points to Upshall’s last season. They were playing completely different rolls.

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."

by Grp_Cpt_Lionel_Mandrake on Jul 15, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

We have Lappy we have Betts we have Nodl we have Carcillo we have plently of 4th line guys I want a guy who can score 20 goals on my 3rd line. Not Powe.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeh thats zerdev, powe wont be playing 3rd line.

powe would platoon with Shelley on the fourth line and Carcillo on the first line.

thats pretty much the lines are setup.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

There were only 110 forwards to score 20 goals in the NHL last year. Divide that by NHL teams, and you have 3.667 per team.

Third line guys don’t score 20 goals. Powe had exactly 3 goals less than Carcillo last year, in 13 fewer games, and Powe didn’t get to play with Gagne and Richards.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

not too mention Powe wont even be playing third line it will probably be JVR, Giroux and Zerdev.

and Zerdev can score 20 so you’ll get your wish.

Powe wont be a regular on any line, he would platoon and penalty kill

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, Powe did play with Gagne and Richards for like a week or so at the end of January. But that’s just a nitpick.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right. 7.18% of his 682 minutes, or 49 minutes. Carcillo spent 23.9% of his 836 minutes, or 199.8 minutes.

Carcillo spent FOUR times as much time with Gagne and Richards.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey I said it was a nitpick.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha, yeah, that wasn’t to you. Re-reading that, I see how that could come off angry.

It was more of a “Powe still scored without as good an opportunity as Carcillo, especially considering Powe wasn’t asked to score while Carcillo was expected to net some.”

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I sense a blackout coming

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont know where you’re getting this mysterious money to sign another winger.

we need a goalie that’s not named leigton much more than another winger.

i already did the math for you.

Gagne’s 5 mil = zerdev + Carcillo… that’s 3 million. The other 2 buys you Turco or Quick for 1.8 mil if we somehow get him a trade.

there’s no room for another winger. Carcillo will have to play first line, which he’s done before with Richards.

thats why they should sign Powe, who will fight right in with the minimal amount of cap room they will have left, to fill out minutes with Shelley and Carcillo.

also as stated we’re losing Gagne on the penalty kill already, id like to keep Powe whocan penalty kill rather than lose him too. Nodl cant penalty kill. Powe has shown me more than Nodl.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

We don’t carry Boosh and his 900K if we get a goalie and we are going to cut Cote as well that is another 1.4 million right there.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

still not going to happen. I’ll be happy if they just get another goalie

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Listen, I really like Nodl, but he’s got 1 goal and 4 assists in 48 regular season games, and you’re criticizing Powe as having hands of stone? Yes Nodl has a lot of skill that isn’t displayed by those numbers, and I like both players a lot, but Nodl’s numbers at the NHL level really don’t support your argument. Neither of them is ever going to be a pure goal scorer.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly they are the same damn guy and we don’t need two of them when Nodl has a two way contract and Powe will not.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe is cheaper and arguably more important that Nodl. Yes Nodl can kill penalties but he lacks Powe’s speed and goalscoring ability. Powe might not score more than 10 goals a year but Nodl is lucky to score 5

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nodl biggest asset is speed but Nodl is cheaper because he can go to Glen Falls and only needs to be called up if injury. Nodl also filled in nicely for Lappy on the PK in the playoffs so I think he can do that well.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think Powe is fast and a better penalty killer.

Also like you said Nodl is a minor-leaguer. We need a more regular bench guy. We need a player that can regularly fill out minutes with Carcillo and Shelley.

Powe’s the guy. Nodl is a guy you call up when Powe or someone else gets injured.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I rather have Shelly as the Cote bench guy and Carcillo as the regular and Guerin/Kariya/whoever on my top line with Carter and Richie. That is better than having Powe. You have to admit that is a more potent lineup.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeh but Leightin is then your starting goalie.

not better overall team.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

no he is not again here is the math please add carefully

Cutting Boosh and Cote, Gagne’s 5 million is more like 6.7million here is some math

6.7 million – 2.5 million (our current overage) = 4.2 million

4.2 million – 1.8 million (Quick) = 2.4 million under

1.5 million for one year deal on a skilled vet winger = 0.900 wiggle room

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

other teams will sign guerin, kariya and afinegove for more than 1.5 or 1.6 million.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

But the money only counts if they’re at the NHL level, so they can demote Powe too they just have to pay him his full amount while he’s in Adirondack. And our organization has never had a problem doing that anyway.

So since it only counts against the cap when they’re up with the Flyers anyway, you can’t say Nodl is cheaper because Powe’s cap hit is going to be at least 200k less.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then you risk losing him on the callup like Metro

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that can happen to Nodl too, he loses waiver exemption not far into this year. So if he starts the year with the Flyers and gets sent down in say, early December, he’ll have to go through waivers and can be claimed.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

What I thought Nodl has a two way deal through this season are you sure about this.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

two-way deal means one salary in the NHL, another in the AHL. Whether a player has waiver exemption or not depends on a multitude of factors, of which DG surely can explain better than me.

Something about years played, games played, age, etc.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Geoff is correct, the different salaries are all a 2 way deal means. Once a player has played enough years or NHL games to no longer be waiver exempt, it doesn’t matter if it’s a 1 way contract or a 2 way contract, they still have to go through waivers and can be claimed.

Nodl signed his first SPC at 21. For that age category, once you’ve played 3 years or 80 NHL games, whichever comes first, you start having to go through waivers. This takes effect immediately once the required number of games of NHL experience is reached, so if he’s played 79 games and they waive him he’s exempt, but the day he hits 80 he starts going through waivers. Postseason games count toward that total, so Nodl has 58 NHL games as of right now. If he started the season with the Flyers and played on the fourth line, he’d reach 80 games during the 3rd week of November this year. If he’s just an injury callup, it’ll take longer to hit the 80 game mark.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's your options once Gagne's salary is cleared and Zerdhev and Carcillo are signed, and even if boosh, cote are moved

Turco/Quick/goalie + Powe + Cap room + Carcillo first line

or

Leighton starting + Nodl + Right winger (on top of Richards and Carter already on the same line) + no cap room

im taking option one. much more balanced team

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you no get that. You can have your goalie and you winger we are not going to go into the season with much cap room. That is not how we roll we spend to the cap like you said.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

and i dont see how we afford it

Boosh and Cote cleared buys 1.4 million. Other teams will sign Guerin, AFinegenov, Kariya for more

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly. it’s option one or two and I think that they resign Powe and are done with forwards and go with option one.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep.

if the argument is we can buy a 1st line winger for 1.5 or 1.6 million. that’s a nice dream. i hope it happens but i feel like the teams that need to load up on players and are way below the cap will sign them for more than 1.5 or 1.6 million

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you are saying teams are going to over pay for guys so that can reach the cap minimum. There are others out there besides those names Fedotenko for example or someone will not get 3million because the Islanders have to spend it on someone. Why didn’t they go over Zherdev for bigger money they we paid him. If we can get Zherdev for 2million we can get Fedotenko or Guerin for 1.5 especially Guerin who you can pay more and have it not count on the cap do the veteran bonus exemption.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Would you want to play for the Islanders if you have ANY other option? I mean they named their backup goalie GM …

by ic0n67 on Jul 16, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait, Powe scores 15 goals in 123 games, or 0.12 goals per game, and Nodl scores 1 in 48 games, or 0.02, so Powe and Nodl are the same guy when Powe’s production is 6 times that of Nodl? Sorry, that just made me laugh.

While they can both play on the 4th line and both can play on PK (but Powe is far more experienced at it, we’re only one year removed from Nodl’s defense being strongly criticized as something he needed to work on), to say they’re the same guy is silly.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have to defend Nodl here. His only shot came under Stevens, and wasn’t really given a clear role. Since then he has completely adapted his game to become defensively responsible. Also, I dug up the numbers before, and I’m too lazy to do it again, but I can if you want…but Nodl has a better point per game production than Powe if you look at their AHL numbers.

Nodl may be done as an offensive producer, I can’t really argue that. But I think if he got into a steady role on the team, and got a little confidence going, he could easily be a 10-15 goal guy.

But I agree the 2 guys aren’t the same, but their opportunities haven’t been the same either.

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please read this only as defending Nodl as a player. I’m not really trying to enter the debate haha.

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

First, you know I really like Nodl too. If he was on the third line with JVR and Giroux, I think he can be more than what he is. To me, he can either play that role and hopefully find 10 or 15 goals, or he can play fourth-line PK specialist and pot 2-4.

But, like you said, they aren’t the same player. You can’t compare a 2nd round pick who went over the point-per-game mark three straight years before turning pro to an undrafted free agent who’s best year was 28 points in 34 games (2nd best? 16 points in 27 years).

Nodl should have been the third-line winger from within this year, but he a) wasn’t given a great opportunity; b) was asked to change his game this past year; c) Had Holmgren decide signing Jody Shelley and Dan Carcillo would be better.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree completely…but you know I have to defend him haha…I can’t help myself. I love that little Austrian.

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why? It’s not like you have his jersey or any—— oh.

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 15, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

If it was just the one, maybe I could handle it, but when you have 2, well you just have to speak up

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just so I’m clear, I was just trying to stay within the context of chris’ original argument. I really do like Nodl, it’s just that I was railing against the original viewpoint, which was that Powe had hands of stone but Nodl doesn’t, and that they’re exactly the same; I was just trying to use the numbers to prove that one assertion about Powe incorrect. I didn’t mean for my comments to be taken in a vaccuum, and I’m sure I wasn’t clear enough about it. I know how you feel about Nodl.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe also came out favourably in the penalties drawn/taken fanpost by The Dark, and in my turnover/giveaways fanpost. Say what you want about his hands, but he does his job well.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

What break rocks?

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah like I said Powe is nothing as in nothing happens when Powe is on the ice we don’t score they don’t score. While that is a good trait to have on a fourth line guy it is not what you with Giroux and JVR your young offensive talent. Asham wasn’t good enough offensively in my opinion to play with them I rather add someone else.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think your first sentence is very accurate. Powe has a 2.42 GFON/60, tied with Gagne and better than Mike Richards and Giroux. And his GAON/60 is middle of the pack for the Flyers.

Asham had the fifth highest GFON/60 of the entire team last year, only behind Briere and Carle.

So while they may not seem like a good skill guy to have on all the time, both those guys made the most of their opportunities.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Todd proved your initial assertion wrong, but even if it was right, could it be the fact that he’s playing with Betts and Laperriere, who aren’t exactly offensive weapons? Could it be that his role in the 4th line is to play defensively and he’s sticking to that role? I don’t see how you can translate him doing a great job on the fourth line to him being competely unsuitable for the third.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 16, 2010 1:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not to speak for chrislanci but he isn’t knocking Powe for not being a more proficient point getter but merely that his talents are merited for what he accomplishes and we have six other guys doing it already just as well if not better. We just signed Carcillo, we have Noodle, we have Laliberte. We now don’t need Powe. I would actually rather have powe and asham over Carcillo but that decision is made.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 16, 2010 7:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would rather have Powe and Carcillo over Shelly and Asham but like you said that decision has been made.

by chrislanci on Jul 16, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haha, no DG, you were clear. It wasn’t really directed at you. I completely agree they aren’t the same player. They may be put in the same role on the team, but they aren’t the same player. I just like defending Nodl. Like Travis said, you kind of have to when you own 2 of his jersey’s, which is double the current total amount of Nodl jerseys owned by the rest of the hockey fans around the world. This was more so lamenting Geoff’s point. Nodl could have signed on that 3rd line in my opinion, or at least would have been given the chance to show if he actually belongs in the NHL in a point production manner. At least this way we would know, one way or the other. At this point, I don’t seem him ever being used, and hope he gets traded to a team that has at least room to give him some ice time.

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

oops

could have signed shined on that 3rd line

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Carcillo isnt our 4th line grinder, Shelley will be on that line regulary and he better be for what he’s getting paid.

That leaves Carcillo on the first line, since Richie likes playing with him and that seems to be the consensus here that he’ll play first line with richards. doesnt mean its definite but it seems to be the case.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still want this quote from Richie since it is continually brought up. And the context would even be better, b/c most players when asked will say they like playing with a guy.

Not saying this isn’t true, but it seems like so many people are assuming this with out much proof.

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

or

we send Shelly down and clear another 1.1 mill

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

we’re not sending down a guy we just signed.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I can dream though

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

everyone’s hating on shelley, but for the money we just gave him, he better play, and i want him to. I want him out so I dont have to watch things like the blackhawks and bruins take cheap shots at our places with no fear.

i was about to put a hole in my tv watching the blackhawks gun for Leino’s head later in the series, while the Flyers couldnt do anything about it and the refs were ignoring it.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

He’s not going to play in the postseason. He doesn’t solve that problem.

If he’s in the minors, Snyder is out money, but we don’t have to worry about Jody Shelley getting paid. I don’t think signing someone to a bad contract justifies compounding the mistake. (If indeed he isn’t good enough in this lineup, which I don’t think is true. I just thinking using the contract is excuse is bullshit: he should play because he’s better than the other options we have signed.)

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

were the F**KING FLYERS

when have teams ever, in our history, been obliged to take runs at us. Also, Shelly is a 3 min goon, which mean that hes only going to hit the ice if hes going to fight. so its not like hes doing any real policing out there. Also, these 3 min goons are so easily suckered. Look at Orr last year, he took a lot of penalties buy trying to start fights, and the other player didnt fight him. so for a whole 2 mins of productive ice time, hes gonna take 7 mins in penalties a game? definitely not worth it. Aslo, as an opposing player, I would be way more scared of Carcillo then Shelly. just look at him, hes a frakin psycho. Finally, Shelly would never EVER be on the ice when players like Carter or Richards or Giroux are being run at. So what the f**k would those opposing players be scared of? jack shit. At least Carcillo can play 20+ mins a game, and is on the ice when Richards is.

Plus, Shelly still gets paid but when hes in the Phantoms, it doest count against the cap.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

again

If I wanted a guy to go out there and just fight and do jack shit at everything else hockey related, I would take Cote a league minimum the Shelly at 1.1 million.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cote cant intimidate, he loses most of his fights. He just gets beat up. Cote cant enforce anything. And I think Shelley can actually play in the NHL. He’s done it for several seasons with the Ragners and Sharks. Cote is nothing more than perenniel minor leaguer who gets the occassional call up.

i dont really feel like arguing for Shelley anymore. His contract is homer’s fault. But as far as himself, wait till he puts on the orange and black and plays to find out if you like him or hate him.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

he played what, 21 games with the Rags last year? I dont hate the guy, But I dont think I can ever like him because his contract sucks major ass. His career high in points is 10, and cant do shit but play 3 mins a game and fight. Thats the reason I hated Cote so much. i would be fine with Shelly is we didnt have Carcillo, but now that we do, hes just so useless and cost too much.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

totally agree. it should have been one or the other btwn Carcilllo and Shelley

and who knows im supporting Shelley and i could end up hating him more than you. im just gonna wait and see.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not defending the Shelley signing, but let’s be fair to him… He only played 21 games with the Ranger because he didn’t get there til Feb 12th, he played 36 games with the Sharks and then was injured for 23, so it’s not like he was a scratch.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

no one’s defending the signing itself. it was awful for that money. but as far as the player and what he brings, ill wait on it.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shelley wouldnt have to be on the ice when they’re being run out, he would come out and after and take care of business.

no way anyone would be more scared than Carcillo. And they arent. teams arent intimidated by Carcillo, they are just annoyed by him. Carcillo isnt an enforcer

and as for teams being obliged to take runs at us.

the bruins and blackhawks sure didnt seem to care about our history as tough guys when they were taking shots Ville Leino everytime he was on the ice or knocking over JVR.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I dont know where your getting Cheap shots from either series. If you consider every big hit to be taking a run at somebody, then by all mean, every game theres cheap shots all over. The only real dirty teams in the NHL are Toronto, Ottawa, and……I cant name another real dirty team. And guess what, those teams blow. So your saying you’d stoop down to Torontos level? and what, be shitty for years. I wouldnt

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

dude im done defending Shelley you hate him congratulations.

if he sucks he sucks. im going to wait until he puts on the uniform and plays.

hate him now, hate him with all your heartly desire.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

No one hates him. A lot of people think he’s unnecessary in this lineup. Even that is more of a reaction to Clarke and the Era of Giant Pylons than the signing of Shelley.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

i first thought he was unnecessary in the lineup too. when i saw 1.1 million for him, i was like why are we trying to still be the broad st. bullies to win a cup.

im just tryin to be see some positive for the situation considering its happened and its not going to be undone

my apologies for trying to look for the bright side of a bad situation.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

all im saying is at least wait until he plays for the team. but apparently thats not allowed either. we have to hate him immediately and never let up.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

What people are hating on is the management of resources, which—in this offseason in general, and in this transaction in particular—has been pretty poor. That’s really all that can be judged during months when the Flyers aren’t playing hockey.

I think the reaction was to be expected, and I think there have been ample cavaets as to the extent of complaint: everyone on here will acknowledge that Jody Shelley seems to be a great guy, and have enough hockey skill that he deserves to play on an NHL lineup. As always, the real issue is Homer looking at our lineup, and throwing too much money at a problem that wasn’t really there in the first place.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re already losing Gagne as a potential forward on the PK. If you lose Powe too that’s even more PK time that needs to be absorbed by another forward.

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."

by Grp_Cpt_Lionel_Mandrake on Jul 15, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jeff Carter can do EVERYTHING he’s so good.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

scores goals …
passes pucks …
makes the date i bring to the hockey games forget I’m here …
do teammates wives (allegedly) …
stop a speeding bullet (although I assume it would only happen once … )

Now if he can only play Blu-Ray movies I would get one for my home.

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

He’s lousy at sarcasm.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Puck Daddy article’s useful, since it shows who needs to add salary, since you have to be within $16m of the cap. I checked the cap hits at NHLNumbers, since it looks like PD forgot to account for buyouts. The teams with significant gaps:
NYI (need to add $11.817m). The Islanders have 6 forwards, 2 forwards signed but without terms disclosed yet, and 3 RFA forwards, 8 defensemen, and 2 goalies.
ATL (need to add $11.294m). The Thrashers have 9 forwards, 5 RFA forwards, 6 defensemen, 1 goalie, and 1 RFA goalie.
COL (need to add $10.233m). The Avalanche have 10 forwards, 3 RFA forwards, 7 defensemen, and 2 goalies.
STL (need to add $8.552m). The Blues have 9 forwards, 2 forwards signed without terms disclosed, 3 RFA forwards, 5 defensemen, 1 RFA defenseman, and 2 goalies.
Tampa and LA need to add salary as well, but they’re almost to the floor and need multiple players, so they don’t have any real issue. These four teams are the ones that we should be looking to flip salary to (Meszaros, for example), since they need more high-cost players.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 10:55 AM EDT reply actions  

i doubt we’re flipping meszaros, homer wanted a diesel defense, he’s got it (hopefully). I doubt we’re moving any defensemen, and frankly i dont want us to, unless our plan is to get another defensemen. just adding odonnell isnt enough of an upgrade defensively. while I like the Odonnel move, i like it only as a 6th defensemen. He’s too old to solve the problem of reducing Pronger and Timmonen’s minutes. Meszaros right now solves that. Unless we get another defensemen if we move Meszo.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately, our only large contracts (>$2m) without NTCs are (in order) Carter, Pronger, Meszaros, Carle, and Coburn. If we’re going to drop salary, it will come from the defensive corps unless we move Gagne, since Carter’s apparently not in discussion right now. Of the four defensemen without NMCs, I’d prefer to deal Meszo, so that we have Pronger, Timonen, Carle, Coburn, O’Donnell, and Bartulis (plus anybody picked up) as the defense. He’s the second most expensive, and has the second longest contract. I like his potential, but he doesn’t fit into our current cap reality.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed, i would like to move Meszaros and find another defensemen.

but you absolutely need another defensemen. You cant have Pronger and Timmonen playing the minutes they did last season. And they will play similar minutes, if you just have O’donnell a 37 year old out there.

Meszo might be moved at some point in the next couple of seasons but I very much doubt its happening now.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, here are the cheap (<$1m cap hit) defensemen from each of those teams:
NYI: Jack Hillen, Andrew MacDonald, Bruno Gervais
ATL: Boris Valabik
COL: Ryan Wilson, Kyle Cumiskey
STL: none

Out of those, I like MacDonald, Gervais, and Wilson. Hillen and Cumiskey are a bit small, and Valabik’s not a good enough skater (as well as getting stupid penalties).

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

give Homer a call, like i said im on board. just dont think it’s happening realistically unfortunately.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

THN is also reporting that San Jose is looking for an experienced d-man. While Meszaros is younger, I don’t think he’s the trade bait. Cobie, maybe. Kimmo … as much as it would hurt, it also moves $6.3 million in salary. Capgeek reports SJ as having almost that much in available space … not suggesting that it’s a great move by ANY means, but maybe something Homer could shock everyone with doing. (In summary, can we just trade Carter already so this wild speculation just ends???)

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

None of the Defenseman will be traded. Trading any of them would just open another hole in the lineup that Holmgren intended to fill.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kyle Cumiskey – I would never stop laughing if he played for the Flyers

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

COL could be a good trading option, although they need a D with some size, so I think they’d want Coburn. From them, I’d see if we could get one of their young RWs for cheap (Jones unlikely, but maybe Yip or Stoa, and either one of the D, or a high pick, or maybe even someone like Cohen from BU). They also could use a LW to play with Duchene, so see I think it would be good for Homer to at least see what they would give up for adding in Gagne, especially if they are taking Coburn off of our hands.

by zot22 on Jul 17, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sigh. See my posts yesterday. The day before. The day before that. I specifically mentioned NYI because they are really, really below the cap. I forgot about COL (good point, The Dark,although COL ownership may also be in transition). I did not mention ATL because they have very-bizarre ownership issues right now (makes the Preds look as secure as MTL). I knew about STL but I can’t really figure out what Davidson et al are doing right now.

Trading Meszaros will NOT “weaken” the defense very much. You’ve upgraded tremendously with O’Donnell over Parent/Kracijek/even Jones. A number of analyses on this board during the end of the regular season and playoffs showed that having Bartulis as the 2nd person on the 3rd tandem typically got the best results. Bartulis simply could not be partnered with Parent et al.

Repeating myself, this is the only “out” that Homer has that would potentially get him out of either cap, team, agent or fan jail. But it does require humility.

As I’ve posted, any other move creates problems. And the decision choice pool is shallow.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I only mentioned COL and ATL because teams MUST be within that $16m mark. If it wasn’t for the floor, I’d have been sticking with our usual suspects in LA and NAS. I’ve got no clue what will come out of those transitional teams, but they’ve got to add at least some salary.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotcha. We agree.

NAS is at $43M which is the league’s minimum, and, sadly, about their maximum.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Minor check on this. See below. If they figure out how to get rid of Hartnell, without trashing the team, I’m all ears.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love JR

But he is a big fat liar. He never stated he was rooting for Flyers to win pre-series. I heard his interviews and he basically said “well I’m on a Philly station so yes the Flyers, but wink wink nudge nudge, I will be saying the same thing to some idiots with bad mid-west accents in 20 minutes”.

"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."

by boknows71 on Jul 15, 2010 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

According to ESPN, he actually said it again on ESPN’s Chicago affiliate, ESPN 1000. Ours is ESPN 950.

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nhl/news/story?id=5205208

“I said if you had a gun to my head, I said I did have to [root for the Flyers],” Roenick said on “The Waddle & Silvy Show” on ESPN 1000. “I didn’t want to leave in 1996. If I have to choose, then I have to choose, that’s just what it is.”

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

The only thing you’re right about here is that midwestern accents are stupid.

Also, he played professional hockey for 20 years and never won the Cup. I’d say that is enough to revere the trophy to the point of tears.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wanted to mention this in case people forgot, but Powe’s RFA offer sheet is still good until 5 o clock today if the team gets someone off the roster (there’s already 23 players listed). I doubt the two sides could be all that far apart since Powe was arbitration eligible and didn’t elect it, although the team could file paperwork to extend the offer if it’s filed before 5 pm today.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

easy get cote off the roster

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

but can we still keep his wife?

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I believe she is actually no longer his wife, so I guess you’re free to set up separate negotiations.

by ohnickels on Jul 15, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

So she’s an unrestricted free agent? :-p

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Jul 15, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe she can play goalie

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

id like to put a few pucks in her net.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nobody wants to mention David Sloane in a Flyers jersey? Seriously? There’s an image of Nikolai Zherdev on the internet getting checked by David Sloane and nobody has commented on it…

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 11:28 AM EDT reply actions  

I didn’t get a chance to, busy with work stuffs. But, I figured that is why you threw it in.

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Must have been Sloane’s one and only game with the organization.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Do we even still own his rights?

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think we ever really owned them the way you own a draft pick, since he wasn’t drafted. He was that one-day pro tryout under emergency conditions guy. I hadn’t realized we gave him an AHL contract though, I missed that. But he was gone halfway through the Phantoms season, it seems.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he wound up on the Kalamzoo Wings in the ECHL. His whole situation was funky.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I checked out their roster on their website, but he isn’t listed there, however he is listed on the Phantoms.

This is weird, does anyone have some clarification? :P

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like that’s where he started the year, they loaned him, then they called him back up… Seravalli did a “Phantoms roster inventory” in February that listed him, but said he’d been scratched for the most recent game.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/frequentflyers/Phantoms_roster_inventory.html
He is still listed on the Phantoms roster if you bring up the regular season one from last year, because he only had an AHL contract. But it looks like he was scratched a lot, since his AHL player bio says he was called back up from the Wings in Novemeber but then only played 20 games for the year, and it specifically lists at least one 9 game scratch streak in January.
http://theahl.com/stats/player.php?id=3072

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 15, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly why it’s AWESOME.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

He’s not checking Zherdev. He’s transferring his defensive knowledge and skills to him. Zherdev is making that face because he’s never before experienced this “defense” and it confuses him.

"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."

by Grp_Cpt_Lionel_Mandrake on Jul 15, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

haha. If Zherdev is learning defense from David Sloane…

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

so an idea on a gagne trade since Toronto is interested. Gagne for Jonas “the monster” Gustavsson. I know it’s unlikely bc toronto wouldn’t give him up, and gagne probably doesn’t want to go to toronto but it’s an idea

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I would cry

if he went to Toronto

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s also unlikely because that will put Toronto over the cap. They could get back under fairly easily (they have 13 forwards and 8 defensemen signed), but they’d be $0.069m over the cap and need a backup goaltender.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know much about Gustavsson but I got the impression that he was a real disappointment. Granted, all his stats need to be interpreted with a grain of salt because Toronto was a poor team but I though he was supposed to be something really special seeing as there was the huge bidding war for him last summer.

@Mitchman88 on Twitter

by flyrsfrk05 on Jul 15, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

well he is young in goalie years (25) and goalies take longer to develop. He was a rookie, adjusting to playing in NA, and on a bad team splitting time with Giggy and Toskala. Toronto resigned with for 2 years at 1.35 million. Toronto is going to get rid of Kabarle and/ or Finger so don’t worry about their cap situation

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to mention his heart problems

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

he is cost effective 1.35 million, has great potential (flyers were in the bidding war), and could work well splitting time with Leights. Leights and Gustavsson>Leights and Boosh

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to mention his potentially life threatening heart problems

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to mention his potentially life threatening heart problems that seem to creep up during periods of exhaustion and talking about a coach that plays the same goalie 30 games in a row for shits and giggles

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d be sad, but I’d take that in a heartbeat (no pun intended). I suggested Carter for the Monster and Caputi a little whiel ago, but was shunned here …

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

For obvious reasons

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Such as?

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

We’d want a big return for carter.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

So maybe Gustavsson, Caputi, and a couple picks? I figure Caputi is really a prospect – NHL experience or not. I see below you propose the same thing basically …

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

but that’s for gagne…not carter

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry – my own bias there. I would much rather see Carter moved than Gagne. Actually, I’d rather see Hartnell or Briere moved, but that doesn’t much seem likely (comments below notwithstanding).

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

So maybe Gustavsson, Caputi, and a couple picks

Pass.

Tick Tock, Tomas. Tick Tock.
A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Jul 16, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Im leery of Gustavsson I cant trust a player who had heart issues last season. Suppossedly its all better but essentially you’re moving a proven Gagne with head issues for an unproven goalie with heart issues. I think I’d want a little more to sweeten the deal, cap space aside.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gustavsson and picks/ prospects?

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

speaking of gagne…it seems like he is getting constantly talked about on other teams blogs…blueshirt banter getting in on it now http://www.blueshirtbanter.com/2010/7/15/1570956/rangers-analysis-simon-gagne-is-a

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m OK with trading Gagne—nobody throw anything at me, it’s a business and the Dawkins thing already completely desensitized me to anything involving Philly sports for the rest of my life—but if he goes to the Rags, I will lose my shit.

That is all.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think we’re all accepting moving Gagne at this point, although to me the Gagne thing irriates me much more than Dawkins.

Gagne is moving because Homer failed to manage the cap right again. Everyone can hate the Eagles for not signing Dawkins. But the Broncos gave him 7 freakin years didnt they? No way in hell I’d want the Eagles to match that.

but i digress this isnt an eagles discussion forum.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, not really. Homer could move someone else, like Carter. It doesn’t have to be Gagne, especially b/c a winger is what we need. He just doesn’t want to do the difficult thing and trade someone who’s a potential superstar, even though he’s going to have to deal with this exact same situation next season (and I don’t see the cap situation getting any better next year).

Would you want the Flyers to sign Gagne to a 4 or 5 year deal to keep him here? I’m not so sure that I would.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

well ive been on record as signing a Carter trade makes more sense for both the present and the future.

And no i wouldnt want Gagne, if we kept him signed to a 4-5 year extestion. More like 3 years at like 3 million at the most, preferable 2.5 mil range.

im confused by your post are you arguing for keeping Carter or Gagne, seems like you argued for both?

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

In a perfect world, I’d like to keep both, but the cap situation won’t allow it. I was for trading Carter earlier in the year and would prefer to do that now. We have too many centers and he’s not a 3rd or 4th liner. We need wingers and Gagne fits that mold. I know he’s on the downside of his career, but I think he still has some left in the tank.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

The comments had me laughing – their walk-away point was if we asked for a top prospect or a 1st or 2nd round pick. They were willing to give a middling prospect and a 3rd round or later pick. If their management’s that stingy, the Rags are definitely out.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference between Flyers fans and Rangers fans are while both fanbases are fans of their teams, Flyers fans are actual fans of the game of hockey itself and understand how it works.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair, some of the hypothetical demands on here for a Bobby Ryan or Quick/Bernier/Simmonds/entire Kings roster trade have been pretty unrealistic.

by ohnickels on Jul 15, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

true, but a lot of them involved Jeff Carter who is a 40 goal scorer. and warrants a solid return.

the unrealistic ones involving Gagne are a product of a bit of insanity caused by the seemingly endless waiting on a Gagne move.

The only thing the Rangers have to comtemplate is how Boogard is getting what the hell he’s getting.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, I think the sentimentality over Gagne is causing some unrealistic demands. I love Simon, I really do, but he isn’t a keep him at all costs player anymore like a Mike Richards.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

You've hit the nail on the head though!

Why are our projected Gagne trades unrealistic? Why do other teams make hypotheticals that we see as complete lowball offers?

Because Gagne is worth more to the Flyers than he is to any other team in the NHL. From a Flyers perspective, it would take a miracle to get what we, the fans, want for him.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

i’m not sold on the idea that the flyers will trade Gagne for peanuts arguement as it appears there are multiple teams interested and in terms of players available I’d think that Gagne is probably your best bet for a scoring winger after kovy.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s my only hope. But so far when fans from other teams have been discussing a Gagne trade they’ve been undervaluing him a a lot, but when they see Flyers fans discuss a Gagne trade they think he’s being overvalued. That’s because he means more to us than he does to them.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

“Constrained choices” (including the need for Gagne to approve a trade) is part of the supply/demand curve problem here.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, we should be getting a first rounder, too, if all they are offering is Bobby Ryan.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I only mentioned Ryan since it was (and still is) unclear if LA will be able to re-sign him. At that point, any asset becomes more desirable than having Ryan walk away from the league.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, the Flyers HAVE to move him and so we have to be reasonable with our demands, so sayeth their commenters.

A 3rd round pick is not a reasonable offer for someone of Simon Gagne’s caliber/talents, regardless of his contract/injury history.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

doubleh

see your signature for the wits of the Rangers and their fans vs. the Flyers and their fans.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, it’s more Tortorella, isn’t it? That guy strikes me as being just a nutjob. I could be wrong.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, he is indeed a nutjob.

#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)

by Orange and Black Forever on Jul 15, 2010 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you can easily make the argument that there are dumb fans all over

to say that Flyers fan know/love the game of hockey more than Rangers fans is kinda bias no?

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lets be nice and just make fun of Leafs fans like everyone else.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

we all hate Crosby and the Penguins

we can roll with that

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hate isnt strong enough

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

As long as we are saying it here and not on your site it is home town pride, right? The Rangers fan in general is an odd bird for me in that they seem sparse. They certainly aren’t bandwaggoner’s. But they don’t seem to be at the level of of Flyers fans or Bruins fans in fanaticism. And there is that faction of turncoats that route for the Devils now, which I have always found a confusing somewhat blurry distinction. Where else did Devils fans emerge from a swamp somewhere? They had to be ex-frustrated rangers fans.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe they are isles fans?

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

That however is a clear distinction and believe it or not there is an iron clad loyal Islanders fan base who is dead anti Rangers to there very core. Those factions are as divided as Jets and Giants fans or Yankees and Mets fans.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t isles fans that became devils fans

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh I see what you did there. I still feel the Isles fans are a solid bunch and they have stuck it out through some bad shit. I believe it is exponentially more ex Rangers fans that are new life time Devils fans.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

well the reason why the walk away point was for a top prospect or a 1st round pick

is because we don’t need Gagne. He would look nice on the squad, but it isn’t a do or die move.

But you guys do have to move Gagne and if other teams don’t come calling (his cap hit, although it’s only a year, and his injury problems drive his price down) you are probably not going to get as much as you think.

I could be wrong. Just speculation

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

outside of Kovalchuk who on the market is better than gagne? there are many teams rumored to be interested in gagne including the kings, leafs, rangers, and lightning. price is going up.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh I agree

and if the price goes too high, then the Rangers should walk from Gagne.

I just don’t think he will net you guys as much as you would get for him at, say, the trading deadline.

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes maybe true but the flyers need to move him or another big contract before the season begins and around the deadline it’s harder to pull off big trades bc teams have full rosters filled out and are closer to the cap (less flexibility) and you’d rather a full season of a player over a few months

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

no I meant

that if you guys were trading Gagne at the trading deadline, rather than in a move to remove cap space before the season started, you would net a lot more.

But under the current situations, I just don’t see him getting a kings ransom

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think it really depends on the # of teams bidding. it’s not often a top line left wing that is defensively responsible and has proven he can produce in the playoffs (even while hurt) becomes available

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

well this is true

but like I said somewhere below, the Flyers not taking any cap back hurts his price as well. You will need a team who is willing to trade for him and ger no cap relief in return

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

13 NHL teams have more than 10mil in space. 5 of them are below the minimum. Some teams don’t mind the cap hit.

I agree with you, that the return we get will draw moans from a lot of Flyers fans. As long as there are at least two bidders for his services, though, we won’t have to take bottom dollar.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Rangers will have to send some money back our way they are only 4.4 million in cap space and would like to keep Mark Staal they only way they do it is to send us some cap hit back. Would Ryan Callahan and his 2.3 million dollar contract be unreasonable for Gagne?. I would take that deal.

Carter-Richards-Zherdev
Hartnell-Briere-Leino
JVR-Giroux-Callahan
Carcillo-Lappy-Betts
Shelly

nice balanced scoring

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

http://www.rawcharge.com/2010/7/15/1571105/gagne-to-tampa-rumors-with

Yet another team rumored to be interested in gagne. I count 4 teams so far that might have interest: Rags, Leafs, Lighting, and Kings. so let the bidding war begin

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

despite Homer’s random idiociy at teams. I doubt he’d move Gagne to the Rangers unless it was for something really significant.

even the Hamhuis move, which people panicked over initially because it the Pens, was one of his few calculated moves, knowing he could get a 3rd round pick without worrying about the Pens being able to sign him.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

That really was a great move. Mostly because … fuck the Pens.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

i too doubt he does it unless they offer something ridiculous for gagne (it’s possible with sather at the helm). He shouldn’t shut them out of the conversation. He should listen to offers from them and then maybe use it to up the price from another team. The only way he trades gagne to rangers is if they are the only bidder (doubtful) or they offer something amazing that homer can’t turn down

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Simon is willing to waive his no trade to go to the Rags then there is no reason for anyone to be upset that he got traded. No true Flyer would willing go to the Rags.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

What could the Rangers even offer us? Stal?

Would be great if we didn’t just overpay Coburn and trade for Mez and his albatross of a contract…albatross to everyone except Homer that is.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 15, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

package of picks and prospects.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do the Rags have prospects worth trading for? I truly don’t know. I would love draft picks, but as we have seen, Homer doesn’t seem to think highly of draft picks since he trades them out like they are illegal.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 15, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Rangers have a ton of prospects worth trading for

but none that would be included in a deal for Gagne lol

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then I doubt the Flyers have any Gagnes that would be included in a Rangers deal.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

fair enough

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because if Im him trading in the division I want to make sure its worth it. I wouldn’t pull an Eagles and trade a 10 year starter for a second round pick in the division when i can get the same deal with a team on the other side of the country.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Say the Rangers are really the only teams willing to deal for Gagne

and they offer you a 2nd round pick and Roman Horak (who is a nice mid to upper level prospect) it could get the Flyers thinking.

I just don’t know how willing other teams will be to trade for him, since the Flyers aren’t taking any salary back

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

we’ll take salary back if it’s a goalie that can start and makes less than 2.5 million/ year

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

and of the teams kicking tires on Gagne

how many have goalies like that? lol

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

well we mentioned LAK (Bernier/ Quick), Toronto (Gustavsson).

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

and if that doesn’t work will take the picks and prospects and cap space and go sign Turco

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah but Toronto isn't trading Gustavsson

and I can’t see the Kings letting go of Quick

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh well we’ll take the picks/ prospects and cap space and give Turco a call (after waiving boosh and Cote)

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really doubt either of Quick or Bernier will be moved for a couple of seasons. What good what it do LA if they traded Quick or Bernier for Gagne and then the remaining goalie sufferred a meltdown.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

If the Rangers are the only team then you’re fucked and you have to do it. But if theres another team in the west offering pretty much that same deal then you mive him to them instead of the Rangers.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

why?

he would look great in Rangers blue

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to us he wouldn’t

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah he would

look at him, he was meant to skate for the Rangers, lol

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah, he’s way too nice of a guy for that.

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 15, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you really one to be wielding the hammer of justic

on “nice guys?”

Like I say on RSR, all of Phily belongs in jail :)

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.

"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII

by Joe Fortunato on Jul 15, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

As long as all of Philly doesn’t belong in jail, we’re cool.

;)

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 15, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sweeping generalizations FTW!

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Staal would be nice, but the Rangers aren’t interested in moving him. He’s their best defenseman. But I wouldn’t want to see Prospal Gags and Gaborik ripping us a new one everytime played.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

they wouldnt if we had Staal/Carle/Timmonen/Pronger on defense.

i would trade Gagne if it involved Staal in a hearbeat even if my heart would break in the process of sending Gagne to become Ranger.

of course none that is going to happen anyways.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would do the same but you are right it wont happen.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

just for the fun of it hypothetically speaking

if the Rangers for whatever reason offered us a really good deal for Gagne, like Sather having an off the end deep moment style trade offered like Staal, again totally hypothetical

What would you do if Gagne used his no-Trade Clause and said it was because he want didnt to play for the Rangersand stopped the deal from happening.

Would you be kinda pissed at Gagne even a little or would that make you love him even more.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

how badass would that be of Simon. You couldnt hate him for hit.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t hate him because then couldn’t be any doubt he’s a true Flyer through and through. And I also couldn’t hate him because it’s well within his right not to waive his NTC. Don’t hate the player hate game.

by tmurder on Jul 15, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately, Sather is the most likely to give Simon a nine year contract next summer, so for financial reasons, Gags would probably love to go there.

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 15, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sather: “we would really like to re-sign your client, what are you looking for?”
Gags’ agent: “perhaps you should start?”
Sather: “how about…4 years, 15 million?”
Gags’ agent: “no deal Glen. We’d rather go to free agency.”
Sather: “OK then…I’ll give you 4 years, 20 million. How does that sound?”
Gags’ agent: “I think we’ll be trying the open market.”
Sather: “9 years, 72 million!”
Gags’ agent: “uhh….”
Sather: “with a no movement clause!”
Gags’ agent: “…”
Sather: “that’s my final offer.”

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rumor Alert
Just a quick update here, with the Kings now appearing to be falling out of the Kovalchuk sweepstakes it appears they are now making a play for the Flyers Simon Gagne.

Gagne’s agent has reported to ESPN that he has been given permission to talk trade regarding his client with the Kings. His $5.25 million cap hit would most definitely be more friendly to the Kings future cap situation with players like Drew Doughty coming up for contract negotiations in the next couple years.

Also the Kings would be acquring a proven playoff performer with an Olympic gold medal to his name. Gagne is a solid 30 goal, 60 point player in the NHL, and while he is not as flashy as Kovalchuk he could be more valuable to the Kings playoff performance next season.

Update It appears that Simon Gagne and Scott Hartnell could be leaving the Flyers shortly. Possibly sending them both to the Kings, no word on what the Flyers would be receiving in return.

http://network.yardbarker.com/nhl/article_external/Simon_Gagne_moving_to_the_Los_Angeles_Kings/2885997

Very Interestink.

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 3:06 PM EDT reply actions  

AND Hartnell? …… AND? … that would make the Gagne pull so much easier to swallow

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

why both? unless we are getting something amazing in return Quick plus Simmonds

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah … i though of that after the fact … only send Hartnell plz

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh, check the source.

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.

by Travis Hughes on Jul 15, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

the source is the Internets and the Internets never lie … the only thing I trust more than the Internets for an real unbiased reporting is Fox News

by ic0n67 on Jul 15, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Regardless, it’s still interestink.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

interesting in terrible way? or interesting in a-maybe-we-can-get-simmonds-and-bernier/quick way

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting in a way where we went from being short RW’s to being short LW’s?

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting in the way that I wanted to point out that he said “interestink” originally. hat’s actually not a bad term for fascination with an abomination.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was interesting, but very stupid.

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure there’s much left to say on the Gagne subject this isn’t slightly stupid.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh, true.

(Though, you did get my “interestink” reference?)

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can’t pretend I do.

by Snevik on Jul 15, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was from Laugh-in, one of the little skits was a German Solider (usually after some gag and would say “but stupid” afterwards and the way he would say “interesting” would be like if it was spelled with a K.

No, I’m not that old, but I’m kind of a TV junkie.

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 15, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I remember.

Arte Johnson! :)

#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)

by Orange and Black Forever on Jul 15, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

hey if we get Quick and Simmonds and clear 9 million and cap space with only taking on about 3 million in cap space.

we can pick up another winger in addition to Simmonds, if we get Simmonds

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would like this move a lot. but like i said we better be getting at least one wing in return.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Justin Williams? it’s a contract that kings want to get rid of and they’d give him away for relatively nothing.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was just making a joke. I’m not commenting on anymore trade rumors until one actually happens.

by DLJr on Jul 15, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember – Homer was really high on Mike Testwuide when they signed him to a two-way contract … maybe he wasn’t kidding about him competing for a roster spot with the Flyers…

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

if that’s true i want more than Quick. As many people believe Hartnell isnt good, Hartnell proved just how good he is capable of being. We would need a winger back in return it’s bad enough we’re figuring that Carcillo will have to play 1st wing regularly and Shelley would have to play 4th line with Powe platooning with both to round out minutes.

If you lose both Gagne and Hartnell you absolutely need a winger in return.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly how about Gagne and Hartnell for Bernier, simmonds, and williams (they want to be rid of him)

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

doubt we’re getting Bernier, i think they think of him as too much of the future, more likely Quick.

dont want Williams, would rather use the cap space we would have to find another winger on our own like Afinegenov – a russian buddy for Zerdhev. That would be possible with that kind of move.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

true but I just don’t see Flyers trading both gagne and hartnell. there’s just too many problems with that like needing to get a winger in return, getting two players that like Philly to waive ntc, replacing production, screwing with the magic line of the playoffs.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

true true. but that wouldnt stop homer. and to be fair while you are messing with a “magic” line, it’s not like its a line thats been together for years, there’s no guarrantee that it keeps working as well, at least not enough of a guarrantee to totally keep homer from breaking it up.

production replacing is easy.
If you got Simmonds and sign a winger for 2-3 million which we’d have the cap room, Simmonds and Quick’s salary vs. Hartnell and Gagne’s nets you 6 mil in cap space, 3 of which goes to Carcillo and Zerdev, but you have money to go get a decent wing. That would totally replace production. Just a matter of who plays with who.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

sure there’s no guarantee it keeps working but you have to atleast give it a chance. I’m saying if it’s Hartnell and gagne then they should get Bernier/Quick+Simmonds+Justin Williams in return

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

dont want justin williams, if they want to get rid of him that scares me.

id rather get a russian like afinegenov for zerdhev if we have the opportunity, or a guerin, i dont trust a player that a fanbase wants to be rid of.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

no reason to discuss this anymore unless something is actually happening. lets wait.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's not happening. we should wait until we hear something from better sources (Tpatch, tsn, Pierre Lebrun)

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

williams is injury prone and has a bad cap hit (3.5 million) thus why they want to be rid of him

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

nooooo thank you. id rather not do that trade and wait.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 15, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

i’d rather not either but since la would be us a favor, we would be doing them a favor by taking williams contract…just my thoughts. i don’t want him except as a throw in

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

But this sounds right. Unfortunately. Williams bad contract one way, Hartnell’s interminable one the other.

We really don’t know what Hartnell’s problem was. For example, no one has speculated on a financial one (like many of us had in 2008), but even that could throw you for a loop. But any problem that was so severe that it became public knowledge that you had one might entice you to waive an NMC for the right place.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we throw in Leighton (doubt they’d want Boosh) I think this is do-able for all.

Williams might eventually get waived/Randy Jones’d.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm dubious about the source, but

Maybe LAK would actually try to spread this rumor to tell Kovie “you have a deadline”. Especially if some $$ are coming back, Gagne + Hartnell might be less than Kovie.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kovie wants 10million/year…gagne plus hartnell is definitely less especially since gagne would come off the books after the season…maybe resign for less

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please oh please ...

I’d be willing to trade Gagne – as long as Hartnell went with him. The man’s a minor penalty machine. But losing two wingers, you’d better get back at least one serviceable winger in trade – no way we dress Lappy, Powe, Carcillo, Cote, and Shelley as 5 of the 8 wingers.
Ideally, (and I heard this unsubstantiated rumor this morning) Jack Johnson would like to be moved … Maybe Homer could swing Hartnell and Meszaros or Coburn for Bernier and Johnson? That’s $8 million out, and only $2 million in – and the Flyers get some serious up-and-coming talent. I’m probably just dreaming …

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Gagne +Hartnell were true, think blockbuster

Maybe, just maybe, this is why Homer is doing what he is doing. if so, I take some of what I have been saying back. He becomes Machiavelli then, rolling the dice on LAK not signing Kovie, planning this.

I think if this is true, all kinds of parties could be headed both ways, with “Flyers West” as part of the deal, with LAK having cap space, stable ownership/management and revenue. Leighton, Carcillo, Meszaros going that way. Williams, Johnson, Parse, draft choices headed here. Maybe even add Carter going there, then add Brown coming here. Not saying the latter, but just saying that putting both Gagne and Hartnell together opens up the floodgates on all kinds of wild stuff.

I’m not a “fantasy” player, but if I were, I’d be salivating right now.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

way too many moving parts.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Confusing perhaps, but tempting all the same. Like dating a redhead.

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 15, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, now! What’s wrong with redheads? ;-)

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

The firey-ness.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Meh, I’m a redhead and I’m quite level-headed most days. Besides our upside is very high.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha. Upside?

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Think of us as your “toolsy” (hate that word) ballplayer. High risk, high reward. LOL

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 15, 2010 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, I love redheaded women. Great fun – just wouldn’t want to ‘own’ one.

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 16, 2010 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nobody owns us, buddy! Ha, ha, ha.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luukko

by doubleh on Jul 16, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

plus why would they want leighton unless on of their goalies is headed this way?

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s why Leighton would be included. My point.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. But I thought Gagne and Hartnell would not happen either (and so far, it is still just Internet rumor). My point is….this creates giant possiblities if true. Not saying “all” of those mentioned are moving. But any of them could. Who knows.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

i was just confused bc you had leighton going to LA but no goalie headed to the flyers. I think the only way that Hartnell gets traded with gagne to La is if we get a goalie and winger in return

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right, but then maybe it isn’t balanced and they add one and we add one…etc. You get the idea. —→Blockbuster

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

why not dress up all the flyers in kings jerseys and kings in flyers jerseys?….oh wait they have been doing the 1st part for years now

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup. My point.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hartnell and Gagne for Bernier, Brown and pick.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

In all of our dreams.

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hartnell, Gagne, Carter, Leighton, Boucher for Bernier, Brown, Kopitar and a pick

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

you forgot to throw in Simmonds to the flyers

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm we might have to add in Meszaros then too. Also perhaps if we chuck in Coburn and JVR we can nab Doughty. So I’ve got:

Hartnell, Gagne, Carter, Leighton, Boucher, Meszaros and JVR for Bernier, Brown, Kopitar, Simmonds, Doughty and a pick. Get it done Homer!

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

ahh add Coburn from the Flyers’ side too.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know this is intended as absurdist comedy, but it actually reinforces my point. IF Gagne and Hartnell were both going to LA, that creates crazy imbalances in any kind of trade, Especially if a goalie were going to the Flyers. And since LA is not cap-constrained, or ownership-constrained, or revenue-constrained, and are Flyers-friendly, once those two are on one side of the ledger, who knows how that trade is balanced out. I’m not necessarily saying lots of headliners (like Brown) but maybe lots of 2nd-tiers (like Carcillo, Meszaros, Parse, draft picks etc.).

Yes I am old. I remember the Phils good old days and their bad old days. Course, the good old days I'm thinking of were in 2009.

Homer's Epics: An Odyssey for the Salary Cap, The Quest For the Goalie Grail

by Bud in TN on Jul 15, 2010 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do you think Frolov could be part of any exchange we have with the Kings?

#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)

by Orange and Black Forever on Jul 15, 2010 4:49 PM EDT reply actions  

not a bad thought….

which center will be learning Russian this offseason playing between Frolov and Zherdev

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure.

I’ve just been hearing a lot that Frolov won’t be returning to the Kings – just natural to think that he might be part of any package. I didn’t even consider that he would be a good fit with Zherdev, but he would be.

#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)

by Orange and Black Forever on Jul 15, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Frolov is a free agent. flyers could have had him if they wanted him

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

or could still have him

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kovalchuk here ?

If we trade Hartnell and Gagne for Simmonds and Quick a steal for the Kings do we have the room to sign Kovy with the deal we were rumored to have offered him. That would be crazy. I wouldn’t know what to think about that.

I doesn’t work unless Kovalchuk signs a super long term deal where we can average him out to 5.5 million similar to what the Hawks did with Hossa.

FORWARDS
Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Mike Richards ($5.750m) / * Kovalchuk ($5.500m)
Jeff Carter ($5.000m) / Nikolai Zherdev ($2.000m) / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)
Ian Laperriere ($1.167m) / Jody Shelley ($1.100m) / Daniel Carcillo ($1.075m)
Claude Giroux ($0.822m) / * Wayne Simmonds ($0.821m) / Ville Leino ($0.800m)
Blair Betts ($0.700m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m) / Matt Carle ($3.438m)
Braydon Coburn ($3.200m) / Sean O’Donnell ($1.300m)
Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
GOALTENDERS

  • Jonathan Quick ($1.800m) / Michael Leighton ($1.550m)
    CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
    (these totals are compiled using the bonus cushion)
    ROSTER: 22; CAP: $59.4m; PAYROLL: $60.031m; BONUSES: $0.938m; CAP ROOM: $0.307m

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 4:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Do not want Kovalchuk. I’d rather have Powe on that first line

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or Carcillo

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t really want Kovy here either but I am just thinking out load proposing hypotheticals. r

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do not want Kovalchuk

Second that. Do not want Frolov either.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

seriously…you have kovie at 5.5 million..hah that guy scoffs at 7 million

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

20 year deal averaging to 5 million he gets 12 million in the first 6 years or something that. Look at Hossa he is getting 7.9 right now and only costing 5.2.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

20 year deal? That would definitely raise alarm bells with the NHL.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

that’s insane. if (that’s a big if) the flyers were to sign Kovy it would be a for one year Hossa like mercenary deal

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am actually probably sure that homer did make a one year $7 million offer to kovy on july 1st but that offer is long gone

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe Zherdev will talk him into it.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s like saying Volchenkov will talk him into a deal with the Devils.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

i’d find it amusing if kovy signed there. I am actually hoping he will at some ridiculous # to give them cap hell and make them unable to re-sign Parise

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just do not want Kovachoke on this team. I caught enough of his act while we were kicking his and the Devils asses in the first round. I am not impressed. Go to the KHL.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was the Devils most noticable player on the ice probably because he didn’t pass the puck much. Imagine how much shots taken records we would break as a team with Carter, Zherdev, Kovy, and JVR. We would average at least 40 per game.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

He may have been the most noticeable, but I was more worried whenever Parise was on the ice

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

And they can all take turns missing the most important shots of the night while we get eliminated.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed. i don’t want kovalchoke either. he is lazy on defense and not a team player and his salary expectations are beyond absurd ($100 million over 10 years, wtf are you smoking kovy)

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed!

Just laying those contract demands on the table reeks of selfish asshole. What kind of team could be built around you when you are making a fifth of the total salary on a 22 man roster. What a d-bag.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

And for all you Paul Holmgren fans, Koivu’s contract is for 7 years, $47.25 million ($6.75/ yr avg), with an NTC!

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow that is a doozy.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 15, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did I miss the relevance of that comment or did you think you were really over on the wilderness or something.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, not getting you.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is exactly what my point was also.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK: In the context of all the cap calculations for possible Flyer roster scenarios on BSH, and the comments on Paul Holmgren and cap calculations; when I saw the CapGeek info re: the Wilds’ cap situation now for 2011-12 I thought it provided an interesting backdrop to the threads here.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

like I said. if you want amusement when it comes to the cap look at chicago…enjoy cap hell hawks.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but the Hawk situation has been trashed over pretty well so this was a little different.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Minnesota has 17 players signed for $50.5 mil.
Philadelphia has 14 players signed for $45.1 mil.

3 additional players for $5.4 mil, or ~$1.8 mil per player. Hmm. Are we really laughing at Minnesota?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 16, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

And Minnesota isn’t making the playoffs but yeah they have cap space. YEAH for Cap space and an early start to summer.

by chrislanci on Jul 16, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

We’re not going to have any cap space. We also won’t have some of the players that are in the team this season. But choose to ignore it, fine by me.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 16, 2010 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is inevitable the cap prevents you from keeping a team together. I understand we are going to lose somebody. But trading Carter now for cap space is losing Carter this season not next. It is the same thing just one year earlier.

by chrislanci on Jul 18, 2010 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which all goes back to Holmgren’s mismanagement of the cap. He could have had one more season (at least) of Gagne AND Carter. Now, he has Zherdev and Carcillo, forcing him to move one of them (Gagne).

Even if he isn’t going to re-sign Gagne, he effed up.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 18, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am reserving Judgment until the Gagne trade is complete. So far trading Gagne already got us Zherdev and I am assuming a goalie Turco depending on what else comes back that might be a really good trade considering we were going to get nothing for him next summer.

by chrislanci on Jul 19, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I make it 16 for $49.9 mil for Minny:

Koivu $6.750
Havlat $5.000
Bouchard $4.080
Cullen $3.500
Latendresse $2.500
Nystrom $1.400
Clutterbuck $1.400
Brodziak $1.150
Staubitz $0.575

Zidlicky $4.000
Burns $3.550
Schultz $3.500
Barker $3.083
Zanon $1.933
Stoner $0.550

Backstrom $6.000

Parrish buyout $0.928

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 16, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

aren’t you missing Harding’s new contract?

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those figures are for 2011-2012?
BTW, I wasn’t laughing at the Wild, I just thought it was interesting in view of all the BSH threads/comments re: the cap this year.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 16, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, they’re for 11-12.

And it definitely is interesting, i hope you weren’t put off by the remark. Wasn’t meant to be direct to you.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 18, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d be looking for a Harding trade.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 16, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

what’s his salary? is it worth trading for him?

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

He just signed for $1.5 million with the Wild

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 17, 2010 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I got the “Did I miss the relevance…” part. It was the “did you think you were really over on the wilderness or something.” part that puzzled me. Should have been more specific.
BTW, what does M from Pdaddy mean, if it’s not private or anything?

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

On Puck Daddy I am merely “M”. And it was taken when I got over here and neither Travis or Geoff could look out for a brother. So I chose this and there actually should have been a space between P and Daddy but it never got in there. What a mess. At least my handle isn’t Penguinsfan when I am not really a penguins fan anymore but I was….confusing.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

:-p

Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.

by penguinsfan on Jul 16, 2010 1:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

And Wilderness is the SBN Wild site. It was added for comedic purposes only.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks, all becomes clear. Pretty obvious I’ve never been to the Wild SBN site I imagine. Not that I haven’t watched their games, but I’ve had “issues” with Mr. Lemaire for a long time and just never went there as a result. Time to change that I guess.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

i like the wild. they are the only recent expansion team that will never have to face questions of contraction…b/c shocker here…they put the team in a place with hockey fans

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

What a concept. Revolutionary.

by TopShelfTony on Jul 15, 2010 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Lightning should be immune by now, given that they’ve never been under 15,497 since 2001. For comparison, the Islanders have never been above 14,930 during the same timeframe, and the Devils have averaged about Tampa’s minimum attendance. The TV numbers are still bad, but so are the local announcers.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 15, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

True, but 15,497 is only 78% capacity of Tampa’s arena, and they have the lowest ticket prices in the league as of this year. Devils tickets cost more, and the arena is smaller, so the Devils are at 88% capacity. There’s no real excuse for the Islanders though, they’ve got a terrible arena, but the TV ratings are suffering too. I guess I try to take in all those other factors when I look at these numbers…

As for the Wild, I agree with Todd, their numbers are insane.

The Wild has sold-out all 409 games played in club history, including 369 regular season contests, 27 preseason games and 13 playoff matches. Minnesota’s sellout streak is the longest current streak in the NHL.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 17, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hahaha I just reread that I blatantly used the wrong name in my agreement above, my apologies historywillbemade!

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 17, 2010 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow. crazy contract. It’s always refreshing to laugh at other teams for bad contracts and possible cap hell…if you want some good times go over to Second City Hockey and watch hawks fans try to find a way to scrap together a roster and be under the cap…it seems like they don’t want to admit over there that they are going to have to trade Sharp

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

They are hysterical over there. They are still in denial that they are even in cap trouble at all. “Oh as soon as we bury Huet in the minors all is well, were fine.” They still don’t seem to get it after half the team left and they have only 100,000 to sign 7 guys.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

it’s like they are stuck with two AHL lines over there and they’re not even using their top AHL talent to fill out the lines b/c it’s too expensive. at least none of them are delusional enough to think that they can trade campbell but they all seem stuck with the idea that Patrick Sharp is coming back and i’m not sold on that happening

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is almost impossible for him to come back, especially after the Hammers resigning. They should have taken the picks for what is going to be a very expensive 5th dman that they just cant afford. Even if they do bury Huet, what is to say that Niemi doesn’t get four million and they have to get rid of him also to sign 8 roster spots and no goaltenders at all. It is still a very interesting situation to watch. And it begs the question would you suffer this mess for a cup? I might say yes.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dunno if i’d suffer that for a cup. no other cup team in the post-lockout era has had to do. the flyers if they won wouldn’t have had to do that.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to mention that Seabrook’s 3 million per deal ends at the end of next season. More pain coming up.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

They might actually struggle for 3 or 4 years before they right that salary ship. They are going to have to make tough decisions regarding Kane if it gets really bad.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

It will depend on how stubborn Bowman is (if it gets that bad). In the end it’s because of their superstars that they both won the cup and had to gut their team afterwards. I reckon after all they’ve done, they would want to hold onto that core of superstars for as long as possible, no matter how helpful it could theoretically be if they get a big return in a trade for one of them.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

JR

Think everyone should lay off him. The only people that really can comment on who he was supporting and on the legitimacy of him crying after the cup was raised in the Stanley Cup Final are people who have actually played in the NHL. I’m pretty sure going on a cup final run builds a bond between a group of players and a team that is hard to break. That’s what JR did in his career with Chicago. He shouldn’t be needing to defend himself…

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 15, 2010 8:19 PM EDT reply actions  

And he made Gretzsky’s head bleed. Did you see that mikey.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

rec’d

Its not me its Roenick he’s good.

by chrislanci on Jul 15, 2010 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is he brown? Oh sure now I am the asshole. Our boy is all growsed up.

Just Call Me "M"!

by M from Pdaddy on Jul 15, 2010 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is he clean, Mikey? If he’s clean, invite him in.

by Snevik on Jul 16, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/Kovalchuk-and-Kings-Closer-but-NOT-Done—Possible-Gagne-Teams/1/29360
Again not that this is a valuable source but here’s what Eklund had to say tonite about Gagne trade destinations: Oilers, Isles, Lightning, Bruins, and Kings are interested. I’d say even if Oilers and Isles are interested that Gagne won’t waive his NTC to go there. Bruins have cap problems so count them out as unlikely. Kings: well we know the story with that one, so no need to repeat it. We’ve also heard that Toronto might be interested (they too have cap problems but those could be taken care of once Kabarle is traded). We’ve also heard about the possibility that the Rags might be interested but that would have to be an overwhelming return or the only offer for that one to happen b/c that would be within the same division. I’d also heard somewhere that the Canadiens would be interested as well, but they too don’t have much cap space and still need to resign Price.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 9:31 PM EDT reply actions  

ok so i can add the Flames and Ducks to that list of rumored destinations via Eklund (not a reliable source) last night : http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=29341
so here’s the list so far of possible teams that might be interested in Gagne:

La Kings
New York Rangers
Oilers
Islanders
Flames
Ducks
Bruins
Leafs
Lightning
Montreal

right now out of those teams I’d say that LA, Toronto, and Tampa are the most likely destinations given that these teams were mentioned in various more reliable sources. LA makes the most sense for all parties involved.

by historywillbemade on Jul 15, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe we should just start a list of teams that aren’t interested in Gagne:

Flyers
Blackhawks

Anyone else?

by Snevik on Jul 16, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Its such a shame Homer jumped the Gagne on signing Zherdev since now we have no bargining power in getting good value in return. Homer knew what he was doing that there will be plenty of interest in Gagne if he was made available and the fact we are over cap really wouldn’t matter much.

by chrislanci on Jul 16, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

What interest? Just because other writers are writing posts on it doesn’t mean Glen Sather and Steve Yzerman actually have interest.

And I don’t see how you can say putting ourselves in a position where we HAVE to trade somebody and choosing a player with a NTC to move doesn’t hurt your bargaining power. Not only do teams know that you have to accept something, thereby starting negotiations with an incredibly lowball offer, they know they have limited competition since Gagne won’t accept a trade to roughly half the league.

Trading Gagne at the draft is better (teams don’t know you have to move him) and trading Carter is better (you can send him to Edmonton, for chrissakes), but instead, you’re just saying it doesn’t matter. It does matter. It’s poor management.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 18, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can theorize that Gagne’s value was higher at the draft but that was before Marleau and Pavelski were resigned and I doubt GMs wanted to take on salary before the market hit because they didn’t know what players were going to be getting.

You are also assuming Gagne won’t accept a trade to over half the league.

Gagne has value because he has only one year left on his deal. Teams cap that will blow up next year with entry level contracts ending can get Gagne as a rental for this year and free up money for the cap the following year.

If we get real good value in return for Gagne I expect you will be righting an apology piece to be featured on the site. Titled Sorry Home I Over-reacted.

by chrislanci on Jul 19, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

But it’s also easier to assume Gagne’s value was higher at the draft because teams wouldn’t have already committed all their cap space yet. There may have been potential suitors at that time that just can’t take on his salary now.

I personally don’t expect an apology piece from anybody. Even if we get a ideally perfect return, the situation was not handled well in the public eye.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 19, 2010 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Options

Based on the teams report above I quickly gathered a list of reasonable forwards that we could acquire for Gagne. These guys make under 2.5 million and could easily be 20+ goal scores on our 3rd scoring line as the upgrade to Asham.

The only goalie that we could get that would save us the cap space would be Quick so I am going to focus on wingers.

We did trade Lindros in the division remember so anything is possible.

To upgrade goalie we would then waive or include Boosh and Cote ink Turco.

Callahan NYR
Downie TBL
Trent Hunter NYI
Simmonds LAK
Wheeler BOS
Pouliot MTL
Kulemin TOR

Hard to find reasonable options on other teams.

Wheeler and Calllahan are probably the best of the most likely bunch being that Simmonds and Poullot are long shots since they are so young.

Both NYR and BOS will need to send some cap hit back to us to fit Gagne so moving Callahan and Wheeler is not completely out of the question.

by chrislanci on Jul 16, 2010 9:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Boston is probably a bad rumor and 99% unlikely. they may have called and said hey homer take tim thomas off our hands and homer promptly hung up.

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

i doubt we take any forwards back for gagne, unless they are prospects that won’t be on nhl roster. flyers forward positions are likely filled at this point with the only likely transaction going forward would be to resign powe. now I can still see us signing Turco though.

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

how do you not understand that our 3rd scoring line is already set?

JVR-Giroux-Zerdev

Shelley is our 4th liner with Lappy and Betts. Car-bomb is 1st line with Richards because he’s played decently with Richards. He’s not a first liner by any means, but that’s where he fits in this line-up.

Gagne himself will not net us any NHL ready players. None of the ones you listed anyways.

Clearing his cap room will buy us Zerdev and Carcillo. That’s 3 million of Gagne’s 5 million.

The other 2 million goes to Turco.

Clear Cote + Boosh buys you 1.4 million. That’s not enough for any right wingers I want on this team. Guys like Guerin, Afinigenov, Sykora, Kariya, etc. will sign for more with teams that need to fill out roster space.

we’re better of just holding onto that 1.4 million/using some of it for Powe to help fill out minutes for Carcillo and Shelley

In order to get better on defense and get a better goalie than Leighton because of Holmgren screwed up by over paying Leighton and overpaying for defense and signing Shelley…

we’re replacing Gagne with Shelley and Zerdev on offense. That’s about what it comes down to.

The only way we get NHL players back is if we move someone with Gagne. Like Hartnell.

For as much negative as you can say about a Gagne-Hartnell package with Hartnell’s stupid play and Gagne’s injury history, they also carry a very positive upside that was demonstrated in the playoffs, if both are at their best, they both can be difference makers. That package can be worth something.

 

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

now i would much prefer a Gagne+Hartnell deal if it nets us Quick and one of the Kings wingers, than just signing Turco, but it is what it is. And then having actual cap room to be able to go after Guerin or Afiningenov.

although a part of me would actually be a little worrysome (believe it or not) to watch Hartnell go after his performance of the last game of the Cup where he dominated the ice.

this is where im glad i dont have to make those decisions

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t want to see either go, but Homer needs to get a goalie and whether that goalie is Quick/ Bernier or Turco I don’t really care, but if Homer does nothing about goalie tandem then he should be fired.

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

you hit the nail on the head. Gagne will not bring back NHL roster players (unless Homer can fleece LA for a goalie). The only moves coming are likely signing Turco and resigning Powe once gagne is gone while waiving Boosh and Cote

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just saying...

WE HAVE NO IDEA what the lines will be. Sure we can speculate, but how is everyone so sure the lines will be A, B, C, and D instead on W, X, Y and Z. Seems silly to argue over line combos, especially since the team isn’t even Cap compliant yet.

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

if there's a major trade, you're right, but..

we do have an idea if it’s just Gagne moving.

highly unlikely that the 2nd line gets split up. Expect Giroux and JVR to be on the 3rd line, they played well together, and Giroux’s large and deep skillset is much better served at center. JVR is still coming into his own, he should be no higher than 3rd line. Zerdev is likely a better fit to play with those two and he’s a bit of a risk to start, so you dont want to chance putting him on your 1st line, especially with Richards and Carter who you need to score and need to gel. So put Carcillo there, at least Carcillo and Richards are already familar with one another. So the only adjustment is Carter playing there.

So while we dont know, it’s highly likely that a big trade aside, we do know how the lines will look.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

You have ideas, I have ideas…but the thing is we don’t set them.

To be as bold as:

how do you not understand that our 3rd scoring line is already set?

Is a bit ridiculous considering you don’t set the lines. I like that line, but that doesn’t mean that’s the line. Again just saying, kind of a silly thing to argue so much over when the roster isn’t finalized (still don’t know the return), and you have no clue how Lavy is going to play them and how they will mesh in camp.

Also, I’m still waiting on your quote from Richie saying he likes/wants to play with Carcillo. Everyone keeps referencing it, but I have yet to see any proof. And even if it’s a quote in response to a question, that would be his obvious answer, of course he would say he likes playing with the guy. So again, I want that proof since you are one of the people who have brought it up. I’m not saying it isn’t the case, I just want to see it.

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe because the lines im suggesting either meshed to get us to the cup or they've already played together before

we have some clue.

Carcillo and Richards have played together.

The 2nd line played great and was huge in our run, you’re gonna split that up all of a sudden?

Is JVR suddenly a first liner?

Im just doing it based on how the fact that the lines meshed in a way that got you to a Cup Final. Common sense says you try to keep chemistry.

Chemistry is the most important thing in any sport, when you find it, you should make an effor to keep it.

As for the Richards likes playing with Carcillo, im just citing what’s been said by so many people on here. Ask them where they got it.

Im organizing the lines the best according to common sense and past history, it’s not that hard to understand.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

my ideas for lines are based off Lavy's ideas

it’s not like im pulling this shit out of nowhere. you act like I got Giroux Shelley and Briere on the first line together.

and it’s not just my ideas for lines, there has been a large consensus here that Zerdhev will play 3rd line and Carcillo first line. We dont know for sure.. and that line about “how you do not understand…” was arrogant, thats my bad

but myself and most people are just making predictions based off what’s worked previously, makes sense to keep certain lines and players together if it’s worked before, no?

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t think my point was that hard to understand either.

I’m NOT SAYING YOUR LINES DON"T MAKE SENSE. Heck I agree with you with them.

Here is what I am saying. To argue the line combos like they are beyond any doubt is silly. To say the 3rd line is already set, even if I agree with you and it makes sense to me, is silly. Look, I love to disagree with Chris, that’s what 99% of my posts consist of on here, i just don’t think you are Lavy in disguise, and you don’t have to shoot someone down with

how do you not understand that our 3rd scoring line is already set?

Oh there is another post, yeah all I’m sayign was the arrogance thing. Look I agree with your thoughts, but you just came off a bit bad, and trust me, I always come off as a jerk to Chris I think, so I don’t blame you. It just seems silly to be so certain over the lineup with one major move still to come (even if that move doesn’t bring back any forwards, it’s still a major move). Also, you have no idea how the organization views Carter. I still don’t. I want him to play the wing, but who knows if that’s what Lavy/Homer want. It’s very likely Grioux could get moved to the RW, even though I don’t want that. That’s all, there is so much uncertainty, when you say the 3rd line is set, you sound kind of silly.

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

and if they move Giroux to a wing

we should all be pissed because his diversified set of skills and his style of play is way more suited to center than Carter. Carter is decent at faceoffs, that’s about it for him as a center, everything else he brings can be done on the wing. He doesnt have Giroux’s physical style of play, isnt as good defensively, and has nowhere near the ice vision.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I saw, I just had typed the first half of the response, then saw your post and then address it with the second half. Look no one is more arrogant or jerky to responding to Chris than me. It seems we disagree 99% of the time. So this is basically pot and kettle. I just didn’t see the point in arguing over hypotheticals at this point, even as much as I agree with you.

Sorry about it the disagreement, didn’t mean for it to create an argument or make you feel like I was trying to say your line combos were bad.

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

all good, basically the argument just helped me pass time at work, so it worked out for me.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you continue to watch, I’m sure you’ll see one of the discussions between Chris and I where I clearly black out for a portion of it. You’ll sit back, laugh at it, and I’ll say you’re welcome. I’m sure in some way Geoff will lead me right in to the trap as well, I think he takes pride in the fact that now that MarioD is gone, I’m the only one that blacks out on here.

by DLJr on Jul 16, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

As BOBW alluded to, we already have a 20+ goal scorer on our 3rd line – Nikolai Zherdev has scored 20+ goals three times in his career. Either Giroux or JvR could easily do it as well next year, given that they had 16 and 15 goals respectively, and are still developing players. Given that there were only 110 players that scored 20+ goals last season, to have more than 3 or 4 is uncommon; to have one on your third line is downright rare. To have the possibility to have two or three is absurd.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jul 16, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

and to get right down to it

a 3rd line of JVR-Giroux-Zerdev

is pretty incredible considering the talents of Giroux, what JVR’s potential is and that he was the 2nd overall pick and then you add a sniper on there.

The Flyers already would have one of the most talented 3rd lines in the league

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

i’m pretty sure that line would be a top line on bad teams.

by historywillbemade on Jul 16, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

until Homer proves me wrong I am confident we are going to get a forward in return. I don’t see Carcillo coming in on the 1st line for 25-27 minutes per game.

1) He played up there yes but do to injuries and a lot the time. Lavvy platooned another wingers in there and spotted Giroux at times.

2) Secondary scoring was something the Flyers were trying to address at the deadline last year so I believe Homer sees the need to address secondary scoring.

3) I think Draft Picks and prospects are more valuable than RFAs theses teams are having trouble signing. Gagne with 1 year remaining on his deal as a good contract to pick for some of these teams that are or will be in cap trouble as there entry level contracts expire.

Even if Zherdev plays on the 3rd line I think a big body net presence Knuble type on the top line would be better than Carcillo who is not worth playing as our number 1 LW with Richards and Carter.

by chrislanci on Jul 16, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed about Carcillo on the first line

but you have more faith in homer than the rest of us. I dont see us getting another winger.

If we do. that means probably moving another winger in addition to Gagne, so if you dont want Car-bomb first line that means we would need a winger in return for that trade and to go sign one. Not impossible, but unlikely

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 16, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see us signing or keeping Powe I think he is the odd man out at this point. I am not sure where things stand with RFA and qualifying offers but I don’t see Powe, Cote or Boosh coming back.

by chrislanci on Jul 18, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.
Start posting about the Flyers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Headshot-phillies_small
2010/11 BSH Fantasy Hockey Details
Carcillo_small
Solution To Long-Term Cap Issue
Self_portrait_avatar_small
UPDATE: BSH vs. Japer's and Flyers Prospects Game
Photo_3_small
2011 and Carter
Small
QOD Reflection Time
Carcillo_small
Do The Flyers Have The Best Defense?
Self_portrait_avatar_small
UPDATE: BSH vs. Japers' and Flyers Prospects Game
Subgenius_small
The Flyers 09/10 Stanley Cup Playoffs, expressed through the CotN
Assholeheart_small
Off-Topic: The Garrett Klotz Argument Thread
Carcillo_small
All-Decade Flyers Team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 82 48 27 7 103
Pittsburgh 82 47 28 7 101
Philadelphia 82 41 35 6 88
New York Rangers 82 38 33 11 87
New York Islanders 82 34 37 11 79

(updated 4.12.2010 at 9:21 AM EDT)

SBNation.com Recent Stories

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +25 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

CHICAGO - APRIL 07: Antti Niemi #31 of the Chicago Blackhawks takes a break during a game against the St. Louis Blues at the United Center on April 7, 2010 in Chicago, Illinois. The Blackhawks defeated the Blues 6-5. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) +3 updates

Antti Niemi Reportedly Signs One-Year, $2 Million Deal With Sharks

Photo +3 updates

SB Nation's Mock NHL Expansion Draft: Introducing Our Two New General Managers

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

Headshot-phillies_small Travis Hughes

Staff Writers

Think_sc_cropped_small Geoff Detweiler

Me_minus_kbond_small Ben Rothenberg

D150_small Teemu H

Designer

Self_portrait_avatar_small KreiderDesigns