Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Africa Cup Of Nations Semifinal: Black Stars Ripe For Upset?

Gagne not heading to Los Angeles

Simon Gagne is on the market, but according to reports from Los Angeles, he won't be heading to the Kings.

Here's Rich Hammond of LA Kings Insider:

Incidentally, something I neglected to mention in the previous post is that according to a team source, the Kings no longer consider themselves in the market for Philadelphia’s Simon Gagne. So everything is right…back…to…square one.

The Kings reportedly backed out of the Ilya Kovalchuk sweepstakes this weekend, and there's one report saying Kovalchuk is on his way back to New Jersey. We'll see what happens, but it appears the team thought to be the front runner for Gagne is out of the mix.

Comment 127 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great news. Maybe we can keep him now!

A blog not as good as BroadStreetHockey
www.WeBelieveInOrange.com

by OrangeAndBlackk on Jul 5, 2010 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I dont think it was a Kings or nothing move, but anything is possible.

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Obviously, but he was the name everyone was hearing the most.

A blog not as good as BroadStreetHockey
www.WeBelieveInOrange.com

by OrangeAndBlackk on Jul 5, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

They were the name, not he. Oops.

A blog not as good as BroadStreetHockey
www.WeBelieveInOrange.com

by OrangeAndBlackk on Jul 5, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im sure some awful tweet will pop up soon informing us that the KHL is interested in making him an offer

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Awful as in a crazy rumor with 100% no chance of happening

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup
But I felt a senesce of doom when not one report mentioned Gagne was willing to waive his NTC for (x and Y team only)

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty sure Gagne is gone, it just won;t be to the Kings.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gange to the Ducks for rights to Bobby Ryan? i know its a bit lopsided, considering ryan is rfa and a good, young prospect, and gange is older and injury prone…any thoughts?

by flyersfangiroux on Jul 5, 2010 2:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Gagne going to the Ducks for Ryan…and whatever other parts needed to be added to make a deal like that work would be about the only scenario in which I would be ok with Gagne being traded away.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ryan is an RFA so we would have to give a 1st, 2nd rounder and I think a 3rd as well!

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not if we traded for him correct? Only if we signed him as an RFA.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

He has not signed with the ducks or anyone else

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last years RFA compensation
$994,433 or below – No Compensation
$994,434 – $1,506,717 – 2010 3rd round pick
$1506,718 – $3,013,433 – 2010 2nd round pick
$3,013,433 – $4,520,150 – 2010 1st round pick, 2010 3rd round pick
$4,520,151 – $6,026,867 – 2010 1st round pick, 2010 2nd round pick, 2010 3rd round pick
$6,026,868 – $7,533,584 – 2010 1st round pick, 2011 1st round pick, 2010 2nd round pick, 2010 3rd round pick
Over $7,533,584 – 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 1st round picks.

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Posted on the other thread - Ryan arbitration?

Sorry, I am not parallel processing today, so I read the other thread first…there was a post talking about NIemi’s arbitration, so I asked a question about Ryan’s arbitration. Anyone wishing to follow up and help out here or in that thread (section12 of CBA)? As I read it, given Ryan wants out, he would NOT file for arbitration but Anaheim WOULD but both parties in NHL arbitration have risk involved, since as I read the CBA, the arbitrator does not have to choose any amount filed (as the arbitrator would in baseball).

In any case, after the amount is settled, especially on club-initiated arbitration, the player is UFA after one year. So, Gagne for Ryan could actually be a “straight up” comparison. The above amounts are for offer sheets which might not apply in an arbitration scenario (it is possible he is not getting offer sheets as no one wants to give away all those choices).

Two of the best nights of my life.,,,October 21, 1980 and October 29, 2008.
One of the weirdest...October 1, 1970. I kept part of one of the seats.

I was in college in Boston in 1974 and when Clarke scored the OT goal in game 2 I knew that the Flyers would win the Cup since they would never lose at home.

by Bud in TN on Jul 5, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t find the other post about Niemi yet, but Bobby Ryan isn’t eligible for arbitration at this point. He isn’t even eligible for Anaheim to file for it, he would need to have 4 years of professional experience and he only has 3.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 5, 2010 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks. Never mind.

Two of the best nights of my life.,,,October 21, 1980 and October 29, 2008.
One of the weirdest...October 1, 1970. I kept part of one of the seats.

I was in college in Boston in 1974 and when Clarke scored the OT goal in game 2 I knew that the Flyers would win the Cup since they would never lose at home.

by Bud in TN on Jul 5, 2010 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t Ryan under contract still for next year? So the Flyers could trade for him right now and not have to give any of that up yet.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ahhhhhh… you are proposing we trade Gagne for the unsigned RFA player
Id love it,
but why would the Ducks give up a potential 1,2,& 3 round pick from someone else signing him?

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well I wasn’t saying it was logical for the Ducks, I agree, those picks are certainly worth more than say a guy like Gagne…but what about Gagne and Carter? There are certainly holes to a trade like that…huge holes, sink holes in South America big, but it could be done.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

No way is Ryan worth Gagne and Carter

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really? I would think so since Carter and Ryan are both RFA at the end of next year. Trading Gagne just free’s up more cap space, that would allow them to replace one winger(Gagne) with another(Ryan) and then have cap space to go after a goalie or a winger to replace Carter. Or resign Carcillo and Powe.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I still don’t want us to spend money on an old goalie. Just let Leighton start.

A blog not as good as BroadStreetHockey
www.WeBelieveInOrange.com

by OrangeAndBlackk on Jul 5, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I like the general idea, but I’d think we’d want a pick back, or another winger.

by Snevik on Jul 5, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe just Carter alone.

A blog not as good as BroadStreetHockey
www.WeBelieveInOrange.com

by OrangeAndBlackk on Jul 5, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I wouldn’t have an issue with Carter for Ryan.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

My thoughts on why Homrer insists Carter is definitely not being traded right now

Carter will be worth so much more during the March Trade Deadline
And we get to have him play for us during that time,
He is our leading scorer the past few years.
By then we will have a real good idea if he will be a Flyer for a Long time if he is better off on another team

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Makes sense…but if this team is in the hunt during the season as we expect them to be…how could Homer justify trading Carter?

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That can not be answered until we see what moves happen next.
Do we get a Goalie?
Do we end up with Cap space to we can make a November trade incase of injuries?
and son on.

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

question

What is different about the March Trade deadline? Is it just that teams would be trying to finalize their rosters before the playoffs?

by deisel on Jul 5, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well at that point teams are trying to get the final piece for the playoffs, others are selling off players that they no longer want or need. Some teams get desperate and are willing to over pay, others get desperate and are willing to sell off assets for a less than stellar return in hopes of having cap space or other things such as draft picks.

Essentially the trade deadline allows teams to either A: Increase their chances of success in the playoffs or B: For those who don’t think they will make the playoffs, set themselves up better for the following season.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks! Very helpful.

by deisel on Jul 5, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anytime.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

With how much Jeff Carter sucks, why would the Ducks do that?

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

For starters Carter doesn’t suck. He’s actually pretty good. I strongly dislike him but he is a good player and has a lot of talent.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know, I was being facetious (don’t take it personally, the Carter hate drives me crazy).

If you offered Carter for Ryan Bob Murray would say yes before you finished speaker.

Last year, in the season that supposedly made Carter a pariah, he scored 2 less goals and 3 less points in 7 less games, despite playing with worse teammates and against better competition.

Plus, if he walks after next year, you likely get either 2 firsts, a 2nd and a 3rd or 4 1sts.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

We would definitely want more than just RFA Ryan for Carter. Maybe Sbisa?

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 5, 2010 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s a difference between “Ryan for Carter” and “Ryan for Carter if they throw in a highly regarded prospect.”

Even then, it’s very arguable as to whether Bobby Ryan or cap space and draft picks is a better choice.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

yea, thats why i suggested it, i would only be comfortable trading gags for ryan, cuz ryan is origionally from the area, and he is a young talent that can be developed, i dnt want anymore older players, and i think i want this youg golie situation to play itself out.

by flyersfangiroux on Jul 5, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

could we....

be trading gagne ffor a 1st, and use our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd to sign Ryan, which would mean we only lose a 2nd, because we have Pitts 3rd and (insert random team here)’s 1st. Not likely, but could happen.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 5, 2010 3:20 PM EDT reply actions  

i dont think so, unless they have an agreement with Anenheim, i know this point has been made multiple times, but it sours relationships between gm’s to poach other teams RFAs.

by flyersfangiroux on Jul 5, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

why?

the term “free agent” means tat he’s free to go anywhere that wants him. It’s not Homers faut that ana can’t get him to sign there. And the do get all those picks anyway. I just don’t see how they can get mad at us if we offer him a contract.

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 5, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont wanna bore you with hypothetical sitautions, but…say richards was once again an RFA, and we believed that he would become the future of our organization, we had made an acceptable offer, but a team with more cap space made a larger offer, and he ended up signing with them, the organization and the fans would be in an outrage, and it might just put a bitter enough taste in the mouths of the flyers organization to prevent future negotiations with that team, or we might try to poach some of their free agents, and the whole situation would escelate…back to reality, say they wanted to keep Ryan, but we singed him, they recieve the compensation, but still need a quality top 6 foward, Carter turns RFA next season, and they end up making an offer for him, and signing him. We would still recieve compensation, but not as much as Ryan b/c of the payscale, and they would be recieving (in my opinion) a better all around player.

by flyersfangiroux on Jul 5, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s the business of the game, if he wants to sign the contract somewhere else? Fine, I’ll take those draft picks.

You ain't a has-been, if you never was.

by jello44 on Jul 5, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

but now were are getting to the funny waters of different business perspectives

What is good business for the owners, and GMs is not always good business for the players.
and vise versa

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

We don’t have a 2nd Round Pick so we can’t make any RFA offers of that size. Unless we get it back from Phoenix.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correct.

We need our 2nd round pick back. Perhaps trade our 2025 one (is it still available?) for next year’s one?

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 5, 2010 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe they will trade Carle instead. That would make financial sense—Mezsaros could move up and play with Pronger and the team could find a cheap #6 defenseman for the third pairing. There might be enough to sign Turco, too.

by memphisbrando on Jul 5, 2010 4:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Carle might not be quite enough, because you also need the space for Powe and/or Carcillo, unless you want Cote on the fourth line.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

eff that

matt carle better not being anywhere. and as for the 6th defenseman that’s odonnell for just next year, after that he’s gone.

i want matt carle here for a while. waive carcillo’s ass. just keep powe for the 3rd line to play with giroux and jvr. shelley and lappy and betts will make up the fourth. carcillo is pointless now that we got shelley.

if we move carle b/c of this i would be furious. that said, i doubt it’s going to happen. homer went out and built the d like this and he’s not about to subtract from it.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

getting rid of carle would be a significant downgrade imo of our defense. he’s one of our top 3. he better not be traded anywhere.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

we would be in so much of a better position had we not wasted 1.1 on f-ing shelley.

I want to keep Gags as much as anyone but financially its him or carter, and carter is much more valuable to the team at this point.. he’s younger, the leading scorer, and is worth much more in deals down the road.

"I'd like to thank my hands for being so great." (Freddie Mitchell)

by PhillySportsDave on Jul 5, 2010 6:30 PM EDT reply actions  

You lost me Homer, if we're not getting a goalie upgrade... then?

i hope we dump Carcillo now that we got Shelley, just dont see the point in having both of them. Shelley will intimidate much better than Carcillo on the fourth line with Lappy and Betts.

Powe needs to be resigned because we’re already short on wings even with Gagne. We need Powe on the third line with JVR and Giroux. That’s a nice trio.

No need for Carcillo.

I honestly dont see the reason to move Gagne unless we’re upgrading the goaltending. To move Gagne for just another winger seems kind of dumb. I know he’s been injury proned, but look at what he did in the playoffs and considering his tenure here.

I was okay with moving Gagne if it meant upgrading from Leighton. But we’re not going to do that than why swap a winger for a winger, especially a Flyer for all his career.

The smarter move is to move Carter who right now would have to be a converted winger.

I dont know what we’d get in return for Gagne that would be a good winger fo the top line. Carter seems like he would net something much better.

If all they want is a right winger. Just move Carter for Bobby Ryan straight up. Or move Carter for a winger that is still first line caliber (but is only in the 3 mil range) and still get a goalie and re-sign Powe.

Just dont see what moving Gagne by himself (especially if not to the Kings where I thought we might be able to get Simmonds for Gagne) is going to get us.

I understand that Carter is younger and a better value to the team (scoring wise), and maybe worth more at the deadline, but then I dont see why you move either Gagne or Carter?

Just hold onto the top line as Gagne-Richards-Carter.

And at the deadline if you want to move Carter for something big then do it.

But if all this is, is about cap space for finding a winger to replace Gagne, then I dont get it. Do we have enough cap space to just resign Powe. I dont care about resigning Carcillo, waive his ass if thats the solution.

Just not seeing the point in moving Gagne right now.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 8:42 PM EDT reply actions  

If Carcillo can truly accept the responcibilities of a grown up hockey player he can become a good player.
If, and I repeat If, Carcillo dose this, the Flyers have can turn him into an important player.

Shelley will protect guys like Leino, JVR and Giroux*
He will keep Lappy from sacrificing himself, and keeping that helmate and sheld on.
He will have a defined roll and that will help Lavi continue in his plan re-defining Hartnell and Carcillos rolls from troublemakers into full time playmakers.

Carter might have some personality issues he needs to work on, but since he has been the Leading Scorer on out team the past few years, I say lets give him a few more months to try and adjust into a real team player.

I wont make a case for the pros of trading Gagne away.
Homers the GM
I would do thing differently, but no one ever called me on the phone to ask my opinion, much less offered me a ton of cash to run the team

*Giroux is one tough and strong MOFO !!!! but its good to know Shelly has his back!

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Simon Gagne for Wayne Simmonds and cap space to get Nabokov/Turco would be nice. Although id still hate to lose Gagne.

And im not sure if the Kings would do give up a guy like Simmonds for Gagne. Maybe Carter for Dustin Brown instead? The flyers would still get the cap room they’d need to go get a goalie.

If we’re not getting a goalie out of this, where it’s Quick or Turco or Nabby. Then I just dont get moving Gagne.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reports from people like Panotch say the cap space would be used for three things: re-signing Powe, re-signing Carcillo, and going after Turco/Nabokov (probably Turco, because he’d be cheaper). The first two are the priority, the last one is secondary — everything, of course, depends on what kind of NHL salary the Flyers would be taking back, if any.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or they could have not signed Shelley and had the cap space to resign Powe and maybe Carbomb if they made another move such as releasing Cote.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

…Sure, but it’s too late for that.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wasn’t Kovalchuk supposed to sign by the afternoon?

Let’s start our own irresponsible rumor.

I heard that Columbus is going to make an offer to Anttii Niemi and then trade him here for Kimmo Timonen.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but that stuff came directly from Kovalchuk’s agent on Twitter. A short bit ago he tweeted no contract would be announced tonight.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point.

We can also pretend I’m Niemi’s agent. Lebron’s agent went to my law school. Niemi would be a step down.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last I heard he was considering a 7 year 60 mil deal from NJ…I guess he hasn’t signed yet as I have not heard anything is official.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

The latest is apparently that the Thrashers are now back in the mix.

I really wanted him to go to LA so that Nitty could shut him down multiple times a year.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol, I think anything these teams leak to the media are just smoke screens. They have to serve some purpose other than just announcing pure intent. Regardless, I think (and hope) Gagne will be around until at least the trade deadline. I don’t know if it would make sense to move him then, as it largely depends on how the season is going and so forth, but that could be a way to coup some value for him if they don’t plan to re-sign him after this season.

by J. Wil on Jul 5, 2010 8:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Nabokov and the KHL’s SKA couldn’t come to an agreement, according to his Russian agent. The Flyers really might be able to swoop in and get him for a good price, should they clear the cap space.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Hopefully patience pays off. I wish they would just sign him and then figure out how to get under the cap between now and October.

Looking forward to the Kevin Kolb era.
5-8-10...the day the Purdue Boilermakers basketball team won the 2011 NCAA Championship!!

by EREX21 on Jul 5, 2010 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m kind of with you there, with one reservation in that if we were to sign Nabokov before moving Gagne or Carter, other teams would know that they’d really have us by the balls (as if they don’t already, really, as far as the cap is concerned).

In my ideal world, we’d trade Carter for picks and cap space, sign a legitimate right winger, and pray one of the other goalies accepts a lowball offer. Oh, and give Cote and Shelley their walking papers and tear up their contracts.

by CTFlyer on Jul 5, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

awful

the fact that resigning Carcillo is more of a priority over a goalie is absurd.

whatever we trade Gagne before, we better get a winger in return, and a good one, thats all i have to say.

otherwise we should just waive Shelley’s ass and resign Powe and Carcillo. and let Carbomb play the 4th line, like i thought he would before the shelley move.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 9:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd

rather Carcillo and Powe over Goalie, but I’s take Gagne over all three

Pilgrim: Be gone pest, and give me the Bird

Yakko: We'd love to but the FOX censors wouldn't allow it

by JpH89 on Jul 5, 2010 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

big hole at the 3rd line right now

if we dont resign Powe or Carcillo, we got nothing there right now. Nodl? yeeeeeesh. Find room for Powe please.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Depends what you get back for Gagne, but yeah. Assuming you don’t get any NHL talent back for him, your NHL depth chart looks roughly like this:

LW:
Hartnell
JVR
Carcillo (RFA)
Shelley

C:
Richards
Briere
Giroux
Betts

RW:
Carter (?)
Leino
Powe? (RFA)
Laperriere

Which is why it makes more sense to move Carter and get a natural right winger, but we’ve gone over that before…

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

still think we should do the Carter for Ryan swap and lock down Ryan long term. Having him and Ritchie on the first line together – you cant go wrong there. Bobby Ryan is right there, and for as much a headache as he’s causing right now. I would find it hard to believe that if you offer them Jeff Carter they would turn it down.

of course that doesnt solve the cap room problem. Still say Gagne for Wayne Simmonds is your best bet if they want to move Gagne.

Unless you do Carter for Dustin Brown. Or Carter for Simmonds and Quick.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 9:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: if you offer them Carter for Ryan, they’ll accept and hangup before you can admit you’re joking.

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

if you value Carter that much so be it. But if he sucks on the wing and we have no place to put him, it’s not going to be a “good problem” during the season.

Carter for Ryan + 2nd/3rd rounder?

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, we’re going to trade a guy who, as supposedly awful as he was last year, for a guy who only scored two more goals and three more points in 7 more games? While facing worse competition? With better teammates?

In the playoffs, playing mostly on the wing and on one (and then two) broken feet against the best competition in the league, Carter put up a line that over the course of 82 games would still translate to 34 goals. One less than Ryan actually put up in 81 games in the regular season.

Was Carter actually MarioD? Is that why 99% of this blog hates him?

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now that you mention it....

I have never seen them in the same room together at the same time!!!

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wasn’t Carter also a Stevens guy too?

We’re through the looking glass here people!

by The DTrain on Jul 5, 2010 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stage 3 of Grief

ANGER & BARGAINING-

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

31 NHL players, including the #Flyers’ Dan Carcillo, have requested salary arbitration.

Here’s hoping the Flyers simply walk away from whatever the judge decides his salary should be, making Carcillo a free agent.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 10:03 PM EDT reply actions  

So the CBA minimum offer sheet for Carcillo was $984,375; how much do we think he’s trying to demand? I don’t think he’s worth giving too much more than that.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 5, 2010 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like the Flyers wouldn’t have signed Shelley if Carcillo wasn’t demanding something more than $1.1 million per year.

Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by Ben Feldman on Jul 5, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

True. Others here might think he’s worth more than that, but I think the $1M neighborhood is more than fair.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 5, 2010 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree on $1 million. Lappy gets $1.16 million and Carcillo isn’t worth more than that to the team. He eventually might be but not at this stage

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually this might legitimize the Shelley signing

if we would have had to end up giving Carcillo, what Jodi Shelley is getting. I would rather have Shelley on the fourth line and not Carcillo. Shelley’s definite ability to intimidate and protect his teammates is better than Carcillo’s occasional showing of skill and ability to not really intimidate but just annoy.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Car-bomb just might be getting Homer off the hook, if Homer would just let him walk. But signing both Carcillo and Shelley is just so dumb to me. Id rather have the cap space. Keeping them both makes no sense.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

And the Rangers cant afford to sign him!

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Signing Shelley over resigning Asham, depending on what Asham wanted, also seems dumb to me

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Especially considering Asham earned $640,000 per year for the past two years. Two Ashams = one Shelley

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

possibly. but as long we get Powe back, I think putting Powe with Giroux and JVR will be very interesting to watch and a potential upgrade over Asham.

I can live without Asham if the bottom two lines are JVR/Giroux/Powe and Lappy/Betts/Shelley. Thats fine for me.

I still maintain that Shelley, although perhaps high priced, is someone the Flyers might need. We havent had a guy to guard our skill guys since Brashear.

In the playoffs when teams like the Blackhawks and Bruins got pissed, they took a lot of liberties banging around our skill guys, and the only answer we could offer was Carcillo, which was no answer at all.

I still say give Shelley a chance. Everyone hated Carcillo before he put on the uniform, and now there’s plenty of Carcillo jerseys.

the moment Shelley beats the crap out of Matt Cooke after he takes a cheap shot at JVR. I think this fanbase will be singing a different tune.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, I’m all for having the closest thing the modern day NHL has to an enforcer (the thought of someone beating the crap out of Cooke brings a smile to my face), but christ, did we really need to pay them $1.1 million a year? I’d much rather have Carcillo instead, but that’s just me. Hell, I think Brashear probably scored more goals in his career than Shelley…

by CTFlyer on Jul 5, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he wants to go to arbitration, than he can Dive and make a mockery of himself wearing another jersey!

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah, I can’t say I was a fan of all of Danny’s antics, but ultimately, he’s ten times the player Shelley is. If we’re willing to pay Shelley $1.1 million a year, I would’ve been OK with paying Carbomb $1.5 million. Not saying that’s my ideal scenario, but if it came down to Shelley at $1.1 or Carcillo at $1.5, it’s an easy choice. For me, anyway.

by CTFlyer on Jul 5, 2010 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. As far as actually playing hockey, despite his antics, Carcillo is better. Shelley may be the better heavyweight, but $1.1 is crazy.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well since Carcillo might want more than Shelley, and whatever more “skill” Carcillo brings than Shelley, to me isnt enough “skill” to outweigh what Shelley can bring as a straight up enforcer. If we’re having to pay either Shelley or Carcillo 1.1 million. Id rather have Shelley. But that’s just me. I dont have a problem with Carcillo, but I’ve never been a Carcillo-guy.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

im much more intrigued by Shelley and how upset Rangers were at losing him, and how everyone outside philly felt it was a mistake for the Rangers to not keep Shelley, than keeping Carcillo.

I think Shelley is going to win over the fanbase, despite the 1.1 million. Just my gut feeling.

I mean Carcillo wanted what Shelley got or more, than that would have meant moving Gagne or someone anyways. Or not signing Sean O’Donnell (which I really like that singing for one year).

The crux of this whole problem isnt Shelley’s 1.1 million in my opinion. It’s Leighton’s 1.55 million. That was Holmgren’s (big) error

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough. I’m not a huge Carcillo fan either, but given what the NHL is today, I’d generally choose the more talented player over the heavyweight 8 days a week. Put simply, I think there’s far less of a need for an enforcer than there ever has been, and $1.1 million is a hell of a lot to pay for that position, but there’s little sense in rehashing that, at this point. Money probably better spent elsewhere, and I don’t see Carbomb going to arbitration changing that.

by CTFlyer on Jul 5, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

And what can Shelley bring as an enforcer?

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

the health of guys like Ville Leino who was getting the crapped kick out of him with no fear retribution. I was fearing for Leino with the way the Blackhawks were blaintaintly going after him and we had no one to get them to back off.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you’d dress Shelley for a playoff game then? I mean, I’d be OK with him playing in the regular season, but to waste a spot in a playoff game just to enforce if necessary?

Need I remind you of our premier playoff enforcer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhx2R41OaBE

by CTFlyer on Jul 5, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes

absolutely dress him. I want Shelley on the fourth line all the time with Lappy and Betts.

Powe will be on the 3rd line with Giroux and JVR.

maybe you want Nodl out there the 4th line in the playoffs, or you’re forgetting our somewhat thinness on the wing, now that Asham is gone.

I want the 3rd and 4th lines to be JVR-Giroux-Powe and Lappy-Betts-Shelley.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who plays with Mike?

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carter and Gagne right now. And its Leino-Briere-Hartnell of course.

If you’re suggesting Carcillo on the first line no thanks. he’s no 1st line winger. I’ll take my chances with a healthy Carter on the wing. If we’re setting for Carcillo on the first line then that’s a problem.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats why if they move Gagne, they need a winger in return. We’re already short on the wing as it is. And Carcillo on the first line, if we do that again, i might just puke out of disgust.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not suggesting that, I’m saying that if Gags moves then there are no wingers. Whatever we get out of Gags, because it is essentially a salary dump, they shouldn’t be adequate to skate with Mike

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats why it cant be just a salary dump

if we move gagne we need a winger in return. If we dont get that than Homer really did screw us.

There are good wingers out there that the salary difference btwn their contract and Gagne still buys you Powe and a goalie. Or at least Powe.

Simmonds is just the best example because he’s extremely cheap right now and very solid with a lot of upside.

If they dont get a winger back in a Gagne trade, then the whole thing is an epic fail.

They’re better off just going with Leighton and putting someone like Nodl on the third line, then moving Gagne. Id rather have a hole on the 3rd line than the first line.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

They’re better off just going with Leighton and putting someone like Nodl on the third line, then moving Gagne. Id rather have a hole on the 3rd line than the first line.

This is what I think anyway. My opinion is a biased battle between my hatred for Leighton and my love for Gagne.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 5, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t tell whether you’re trying to talk yourself into Jody Shelley, or you actually believe this shit.

I call it shit because it involves Darroll Powe on any line but the fourth when he’s not even signed yet, Jody Shelley dressing in the playoffs without the assumption he’s a liability, and the fact you’re dressing thsoe two lines up as passable when they are worse than what we had last year (with the bonus that we get to pay them more money).

by Snevik on Jul 6, 2010 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I gave up

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 6, 2010 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, I forgot about that assist.

by Snevik on Jul 6, 2010 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lappy cant be dropping the gloves anymore either

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

And we dont want Hartnell throwing gloves around

bread. butter. cheese. VICTORY!

by Prometheus74 on Jul 5, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Car-bomb just might be getting Homer off the hook, if Homer would just let him walk.

There is also the possibility that Homer was on the ball and knew the negotiations with Carcillo were going nowhere and just signed Shelley instead.

#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)

by Orange and Black Forever on Jul 6, 2010 5:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think the arbitrator has to grant a salary higher than a certain threshold before the club has walk-away right. I’m working on figuring out the specifics for that at the moment, because that’s one of those “adjusted” numbers

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 5, 2010 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, according to CBA 12.10 it’s $1.04M+ increase % of average salary (not cap) each year since 2007, I’m thinking ballpark around $1.3 or 1.4?

Would that mean that they could not walk away if the arbitrator awarded, say 1.2 and the limit was, say, 1.3?

There is something of a “get out of jail” card where they can walk away from one award anyway (if that is still enforecable). (12.10.c).

Two of the best nights of my life.,,,October 21, 1980 and October 29, 2008.
One of the weirdest...October 1, 1970. I kept part of one of the seats.

I was in college in Boston in 1974 and when Clarke scored the OT goal in game 2 I knew that the Flyers would win the Cup since they would never lose at home.

by Bud in TN on Jul 5, 2010 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

After re-reading it all about a million times, it seems like the threshold is about 1.6M after adjustments. So it would appear that the answer to your question is yes; if the arbitrator hypothetically awarded Carcillo 1.4M, it looks like the Flyers cannot walk away.

And I don’t think 12.10.c is an actual “get out of jail free” card, it’s just a limit on how many times that walk-away provision can be used. Parts (a) and (b) tell you to go look at part ( c ) to get the limit, so to my eyes part ( c ) does not appear to circumvent the monetary restrictions in (a).

If somebody wants to take a look at 12.10.a and 12.10.c and add in a third opinion on that language, it would be appreciated.

by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 6, 2010 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Enforcers in the new NHL

Look i agree with the sentiment that you dont want to pay a guy just to be an “enforcer”, especially in today’s nhl.

So if you’re not going to do that. You need to find a really tough guy that can still act as an enforcer and protect your guys but still has skill. That’s tougher than you think to find.

And I dont think the Flyers had anyone like that, including Asham and Carcillo.

So while Jodi Shelley as strictly an enforcer isnt the best option, we still needed someone to be able to go out and make a statement from time to time and protect guys.

Even with our improved defense, you cant leave that up to a guy like Pronger. And I dont want Lappy or Hartnell doing that either, especially not Hartnell. That just leads down a bad path for him of more penalty taking.

If the Flyers had a more heavyweight/intimidator with skill, than yeh thats what you would rather have, then Jodi Shelley. But we didnt have that.

If Carcillo was more of an intimidator and heavyweight than what he is, along with his skill level, than I would rather keep him over Shelley. But Carcillo just want doing that job.

Enforcers dont really work that well in the NHL, but you still need someone to keep teams from going after your guys without fear of retribution.

If the Flyers had a heavyweight guy with any level of skill (Like what we had with Brashear) than that’s obviously better than just paying a guy like Shelley to be a straight up enforcer.

But you still need that enforcer presence in some form. We saw the need for it in the playoffs. It was quite weird to see the Flyers actually getting pushed around for once. And annoying. Watching guys like JVR and Leino get cheap-shotted and knowing the team couldnt do anything did not sit well with me.

Unfortunately the FLyers didnt have a Brashear anymore, we had two choices. Carcillo who is Brasher minus the enforcer or Shelley who is Brasher minus the skill.

With the skill level this team already has, im taking the “Brasher minus the skill” in Shelley, to protect the skill guys that you’re really relying on.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 10:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Carter Bashing

too much going on. People are basing their opinions completely on one season. I know that nobody had an issue when he was scoring 46 goals the previous year. Lets give the kid a chance to play another full season and redeem an only slightly above-average season.

I think we’re getting a little selfish and spoiled if people really “don’t like” Jeff Carter. He is still developing.

by NYflyGUY on Jul 5, 2010 11:02 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

agreed. I havent been bashing him. But i think ive been admittedly harsh on him. I just hope Carter can play wing, thats all. Thats really the bottom line for me.

If they can move Gagne (still is going to be painful to lose him, but probably necessary) to get a winger like Simmonds from the Kings for the first line and cap space to sign Powe and a goalie. Then as long as Carter can play wing, i think this team can do very great things.

by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jul 5, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

100% agreed, and I do not want to trade Carter, he is still part of the future of the te, and although I love gags more, Carter is the better option to keep for the future success of the team

by flyersfangiroux on Jul 5, 2010 11:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Why not Carter and Mesazos/Carle and a goalie (Leighton?) for Brown, Parse/Simmonds and Bernier/Quick?

Wouldn’t LA jump at this? Doesn’t this solve everything?

Yes, in this scenario we’ll have cap problems next year. But happy cap problems and a position of strength (people to trade). Only possible impediment is LA’s increased cap, but they were going for Kovie (!) and this would be less. You even sign Turco. Carcillo assumes an arbitrator award, but maybe he goes away too if you want Nabokov (but I’m not sure why you would in this scenario).

Maybe throw in Laliberte or a draft choice.

Here is the cap geek. I assume Carle goes and Bernier comes. But I prefer Meszakos to go, obviously. In that case, maybe Parse comes back. Note that Bernier/Boosh/Backlund are nearly interchangeable salary-wise.

I’ve been harping for Carter for Ryan, but this makes way more sense. Of course, in this scenario without Turco or Carcillo we would still have space to sign him (though no one to trade him for, other than Brown).

FORWARDS

  • Brown ($3.125m) / / Simon Gagne ($5.250m)Mike Richards ($5.750m
    Daniel Briere ($6.500m) Scott Hartnell ($4.200m) / /Ville Leino ($0.800m)
    Claude Giroux ($0.822m) / / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)/ Simmonds ($0.525m)
  • Darroll Powe ($0.572m))Blair Betts ($0.700m) Ian Laperriere ($1.167m) /
  • Daniel Carcillo ($1.200m) / Jody Shelley ($1.100m) (NO COTE!)

DEFENSEMEN
 Chris Pronger ($4.921m)/Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m)
Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m) // Braydon Coburn ($3.200m)
Sean O’Donnell ($1.300m) / Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)

GOALTENDERS

  • Turco ($1.800m) / Brian Boucher ($0.925m) / * Bernier ($0.900m)
    CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
    (these totals are compiled using the bonus cushion)
    ROSTER: 23; CAP: $59.4m; PAYROLL: $57.344m; BONUSES: $0.938m; CAP ROOM: $2.993m

Two of the best nights of my life.,,,October 21, 1980 and October 29, 2008.
One of the weirdest...October 1, 1970. I kept part of one of the seats.

I was in college in Boston in 1974 and when Clarke scored the OT goal in game 2 I knew that the Flyers would win the Cup since they would never lose at home.

by Bud in TN on Jul 5, 2010 11:58 PM EDT reply actions  

I say Gagne for Simmonds, sign Nabby/Turco, keep powe & carbomb, trade/waive Boosh and Cote, cross fingers and hope Carter can play wing

by historywillbemade on Jul 6, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really think if the Flyers trade Gagne, they’re gonna feel some serious heat from the fans. Gagne has been with them his whole career. I understand that’s rare and some people feel is stupid but, he has done some amazing things on this team that has made him one of the favorites of the team. How can anyone forget game 4 against boston? game 7 against boston? I know there’s many more but those two always comne to mind. Yeah he gets injured alot but when he comes back, he comes back on fire. Gagne is one of three of my favorites, and I know I’ll be devastated if he ever leaves. And I think many people feel the same as well.

by BriereFan321 on Jul 6, 2010 10:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Claude_doop_small
Max Talbot: Quietly Defying Your Expectations
Img_5355_2_2_small
Helping the Rangers fans: Final Planning Thread

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Screen_shot_2012-01-09_at_12 Travis Hughes

Associate Editors

67865_878600804923_14200876_46395212_2220_n_small Geoff Detweiler

Headshot2_film_grain_small Ben Rothenberg

Soccer_face_small Eric T.

Contributors

163830_478172269164_824914164_5517468_4313370_n_small ToddtheFox

Clarke-tee_small KreiderDesigns

D150_small Teemu H