Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Is Anyone Else Starting To Question Holmgren?

So the drama of the Philadelphia Flyers continues. The new word on the street is that Nikolai Zherdev is close to signing a deal with the Flyers. If that is not mind-boggling enough, the deal is rumored to be worth around four million per season. Now in a non-cap world, this would be pretty good, but unfortunately we aren't. This is one of the few things that I (and others) have questioned over the course of this off-season.


Star-divide

First off, why would the Flyers target Nik Zherdev. He is known to be inconsistent, have an attitude and have a lack of love for the game of hockey. Yes he can help any team, but the Flyers have no reason to aquire this high priced inconsistent player, even though he has good offensive skill. Plus, where would the cap space come from? Oh yes, the Flyers are shopping there best winger and longest tenured Flyer, Simon Gagne. So in effect, Holmgren's plan is to replace Gagne with Zherdev. Is it just me, or is this just a little rediculous? What in God's name is Homgren thinking? Even though it saddens me, I can understand trading Gagne if it means getting a good goalie and sheading cap space, but to just aquire an inconsistent winger? Even if he has a heafty cap hit and may be somewhat injury prone, I would still have Gagne at 5.25 mil/season rather than Zherdev at 4 mil/season, how 'bout you? This move wouldn't even free up enough cap space to sign Dan Carcillo and Darroll Powe.

I'm not trying to bash Homgren, because he is the man who rebuilt this team after it finished last in 2006-07, but I don't understand he is trying to make numerous moves. Why brake up a team that was two wins away from the Stanley Cup? There were only three things that needed to be upgraded on the Flyers' roster: the right wing postion, defensive depth and goaltending. So far, Holmgren has completed one of the three, the defensive depth. I'm still hoping to see th goaltending get upgraded, even though Holmgren has repeatedly stated that he's in no hurry. I actually wouldn't mind to see the forward core remain the same, because they do have terrific goal scorers. But if a change was needed (which would be Gagne more than likely), it would need to be an upgrade on the wing from Gagne and/or aquire a goalie or free up enough cap space to sign Marty Turco. But if the Flyers are just trading Gagne in order to make room for Zherdev, there will be many un-happy Fans in the City of Brotherly Love.

Do you guys agree or disagree?

This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by Broad Street Hockey.

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

disagree for the moment

everyone is freaking out over speculation. no one has any idea of how it is going to play out or what the master plan is, we are all just guessing and the anticipation is surprisingly effective at making us slowly go mad.

by HankMonahan on Jul 7, 2010 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m saying if he does what I’m guessing that I’ll be pissed.

by Flyersfan94 on Jul 7, 2010 11:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah I’m not ready to question him just yet. I am a little baffled by a few things, but I’ve come to terms with almost everything he’s done so far this off season. I like the players on our roster now, I just am not happy with some of the contracts. I think we could have gotten Coburn for a little less, same with Shelley. Meszaros is a great pick up, but I think he is a little much, but we didn’t give him that contract so not our fault. The only signing I question is Leighton. It is a good market to sign a goalie. We could have gotten a better option for the price. Even if we waited and Leighton was still around he would have been about 500K less, so we would have more cap space now. I am not going to question the Zherdev contract until I find out the amount and terms. If it’s more than 2 or 3M per season then I’ll flip. I’d rather have Gagne who is a great two way player and I feel is going to have a great redemption season this year if he starts it with the Orange and Black.

My problem is with the management of the cap. Unfortunately where we are now (even before Zherdev) we are going to have to ship a big contract out. All fingers point towards Carter or Gagne, Gagne being the more likely candidate from all the talks and him waiving his NTC. Depending on who we get back and how much the Zherdev contract is, we will either improve the team nicely and fill all the holes we need. Or Zherdev will be overpriced and we would have shipped Gagne away and be right against the cap still and not be able to improve goaltending, and that will make me upset. This is speculation though, and after everything is done, all trades are finalized, and all signings are done and the season begins, we can then determine if we are going to question Homer or see all the moves he made improved this team.

IMO I think after everything is done we will have a better team. Homer has had good off seasons so far. His first off season he completely retooled the team and we made a run to the ECF’s. I loved all of the moves he made (including the deadline deals with Forsberg and getting Biron), and all of them turned out to really benefit us. The next season, even without a lot of cap space he filled some spots and we were decent. Last season again not a lot of cap space, but we got Pronger, Lappy, Betts, Emery (who would have had a great season if he didn’t get injured), and Boosh. His off season record I feel has been pretty good so I won’t call for his head until after everything is said and done and our worst fears our realized.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

by Lindbergh 31 on Jul 8, 2010 12:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Maybe that is something he did as a bargaining chip knowing that the contract world really effect the cap if we are clearing one goalie contract to get someone like Turco to sign cheaper.

by bfrank27 on Jul 8, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Although I’ve openly expressed my, erm, distaste at Homer’s moves this off-season, I’m going to hold off from making my final judgement until he’s done.

Disclaimer: All bets are off if/when Gagne is traded.

Backing Backlund for 2010-2011

by ToddtheFox on Jul 8, 2010 1:20 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m in the same mode. While I like some of the players they’ve picked up so far, I’m not enthused by most of the contracts so far and waiting to see the final roster to make my judgement, but so far I’m leaning toward the WTH is Homer doing?

by zot22 on Jul 8, 2010 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like other people have said, you can’t really judge Homer till after the Gagne situation is settled. The way I see it is this: We already have about 1 mil for Powe and Carcillo, we trade away Gagne giving us roughly 6.5 million. We get Zherdev for less than 4 million (4 million is what he got in the KHL, he could very well get much less here considering his past) We get Turco for 1 or 2 years for some amount of money lets just say for the arguments sake 2 million. So that leaves us with around half a million dollars for Powe and Carcillo, but really only Powe because we can’t afford/don’t need to resign Carcillo with his arbitration. So .5 million for Powe. THEN we lose Boucher because were not carrying 3 goalies, so that gives us 1.4 million for Powe.

The way I see it, we lose Gagne, get a good goalie, have a great defense, and if Lavvy (which I think he most certainly can) can shape Zherdev up to be a good hockey player, we have it all.

by Wilkey on Jul 8, 2010 2:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Not entirely correct

The Flyers are actually over the cap right now (including Bartulis and Cote). They need to keep Bartulis on the roster for a seventh d in case of injury, but lets say they waive Cote. Now we have around 500k in cap space. Trade Gagne for lets say Wayne Simmonds, who is rumored to be a target if Gagne goes to the Kings. Now we have roughly 5 million in cap space. Zherdev i supposedly only going to accept and offer in the price range of 3.5 to 4 million/season, so lets say 3.5. So if the Flyers do what you say, they’ll have roughly 1.5 million in cap space for Powe and/or Carcillo plus Marty Turco, and that’s simply just not possible. In my opinion, the Flyers do everything in there power to aquire Simmonds plus Bernier or Quick, even if it means trading Carter over Gagne (which I’m in favour of). Then keep one of Carcillo or Powe, and sign Zherdev for a maximum of 3 million per season, otherwise look elsewhere.

by Flyersfan94 on Jul 8, 2010 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Carter is traded the FLyers must receive at least 2 1st round picks and a second. Anything less is a huge failure.

by tmurder on Jul 8, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many players have brought that return in a trade?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Phil Kessel, last off-season.

by tmurder on Jul 8, 2010 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

So the answer is one? And Homer not getting a return that has only been equaled once would be a “huge failure”? I disagree.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Obviously more players have brought that return. But Phil Kessel is the most recent and comparable. Both are high scoring young players who dont/didnt necessarily fit into their team’s long term cap plans. Carter also offers a better all around game and takes faceoffs. What level of return would you judge to be acceptable?

by tmurder on Jul 8, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Acceptable? A top prospect, a roster player, and a 3rd round pick would be acceptable to me. I certainly hope for more, but to call anything less than what Brian Burke gave up for Phil Kessel an huge failure is likely to disappoint.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

What kind of roster player are you envisioning, because that could include anyone from the best player on the roster to the worst?

That deal to me could be acceptable depending on who those players are. My whole point is to say that simply throwing Carter out their instead of Gags better mean the Flyers are getting good value for Carter its not just make sure whatever planned trade goes through so the FLyers have cap space.

by tmurder on Jul 8, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I should have include “anything equal to 2 1sts and a 2nd”

by tmurder on Jul 8, 2010 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well that I agree completely. Like you say below, I’d say any trade which brings in less than what his RFA compensation would be (1st, 2nd, and a 3rd) is a failure, since the Flyers could have gotten more by not trading him.

As far as trading Carter instead of Gagne, they’re clearly worth different returns, but neither should be waived.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also

Sorry also for what you said waive Boosh as well, so add another 900k to the cap space. So now 2.4 million in cap space for Turco an Powe and/or Carcillo, which also seems not possible because Turco will demand at least 2 million and Powe will ask at least 800k.

by Flyersfan94 on Jul 8, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with many above. I share the frustration of those who, like myself, aren’t able to divine what Homer’s master plan seems to be, but I’m also willing to see how his maneuvering finishes before criticizing (or praising) it.

I do think Plan A going into the postseason was to sign Nabokov or someone like him. When those goaltenders and/or their agents were too greedy in their discussions with Homer, he immediately went with Plan B, which was to upgrade and solidify the defense and re-sign Leighton. Despite the pessimism of many here, Leights with an improved defense is, IMHO, quite a workable option.

I’m much more mystified what he is doing with our forwards than with his moves with those behind the forwards. I don’t see the structure of an overall plan – I see what seems like throwing darts at a dartboard. Still, I’m willing to wait until he’s finished before passing ultimate judgement. Of course, the real proof of his moves will appear, or not, when the regular season begins.

#1 Flyers fan in England (originally from Southeastern PA)

by Orange and Black Forever on Jul 8, 2010 6:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Wait and See

Me thinks that this is far from over.

"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."

by boknows71 on Jul 8, 2010 8:10 AM EDT reply actions  

I have critisized him a lot....

But, as a lot of people here have gotten at, I’m still willing to call him a genius depending on what happens as we progress. You can’t get away from the timing of Leigths contract, it was a bad move to make before the market was revealed. The Shelley signing, to me, isn’t going to win this team a championship, and I feel the team would be just as effective signing any other forth liner for half the price (remind me again who was Chicago’s big bad fighter last year?). But, even with those two decisions, Holgrem still has a chance to make this team great. Depending on the $ amount of Zherdev, and what happens with the Gagne move, I could be saying, wow Homer, you had an awesome offseason.

I liked the O’Donnell signing, and the Meszaros trade, sure there were less expensive options out there, but I’m not as opposed to it as most (especially b/c I think he can have a huge impact on the second PP unit).

So, like I said, he could be the man after all is said and done (though I stick by always calling him out on the two mistakes I felt he made so far), we just all have to wait and see. One thing is for sure, he has made this interesting.

by DLJr on Jul 8, 2010 8:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Shelley isn’t an instigator, he is a heavy weight. There is a huge difference between the two. It was basically Eager and Burrish, neither of which are Shelley type players, and Burrish didn’t get in the line up with any level of consistency in the playoffs.

I have no problem signing Eager type players, who are being dressed for more than their fists, as your fourth line guy. Eager is a quick guy who runs around a lot on the forecheck (often illegally). Shelley is a big guy, who won’t necessarily hurt you, but has a job for one reason.

Instigators/Middle Weights are not the same as fighters/heavy weights.

by DLJr on Jul 8, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well...

Homer is gambling, he likes to do that and he probably has to cause our cap situation isnt that amazing (also due to some bad moves he made, to be honest).

I think the complains about Shelley are kinda unfair, I would love the sign at a lower salary, in the Atlantic division you’re going to need an enforcer to protect the likes of Giroux, Leino, Briere and such. Cote cant skate, cant pass, cant shoot and more importantly cant fight anymore, he is just a punchbag, he is willing to fight anyone but he doesnt scare any of them. Shelley can still fight and can take the occasional shift without hurting your team too much. Got to agree 1.1m/3y is way too much, but there wasnt much available (Boogard wanted more, and I think we definetly asked about him too).

Meszaros has the talent to be a top pair guy, but needs to get back on track…he might be a steal or a bust, O’Donnell is a solid 5th/6th.

Also notice that all these guys can hit, playing Philly wont be a breeze.

Zherdev…well…he is more skilled than anyone on our roster, I suppose Homer hopes he will show some determination this time around, I doubt Zherdev is happier travelling all around frosty Russia to play in KHL, he will get his chance, pretty big gamble…hope Homer isnt wrong…we didnt had much chances to keep Gagne next year anyway, consider Giroux, Leino and Carter are next in line for a new contract and theres no chance they are going to trade Hartnell unless JvR (or someone else) shows he can do the dirty work in front of the net.

by FireTheWalrus on Jul 8, 2010 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you follow what I’ve posted in other threads, I have repeatedly stated that I like Shelley (he is already one of my favorite guys in the league as a person), and I’d be fine with him at 650K. However, he costs $1.1mil, and to me that’s taking out money on an unneeded luxury. If true fighters are demanding over $1mil, just don’t pay them, they aren’t needed to win in this league.

And has anyone ever considered, that if the Flyers dress a skilled lineup, the other team might scratch their fighter for someone that can better keep up with the speed and skill of the Flyers line up. You can make teams adjust to your lineup, you don’t always have to adjust to theirs. I feel like no one ever brings that up. Do you remember last year, when we laughed at Colton Orr for being an idiot, then we complained when we tried to dress a big line up to match Orr being an idiot the next game. There isn’t any need for that. The guy won’t ever leave the bench in a close game to play against your skilled guys. And if the game is out of hand on the scoreboard, just play your lesser lines more. And frankly, I’d be fine if you absolutely had to dress Cote in those games, b/c all you need is someone to be punched in the face in those situations, b/c that’s all it takes to get their tough guy off the ice, someone willing to be punched in the face.

by DLJr on Jul 8, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

wait
the deal is rumored to be worth around four million per season.

Where are you getting that # from? Link please. I realize that was his arbitration value after his year with the Rangers (2008-2009), but who has said that they’ve heard this is what the deal is for? In general, I’ve noticed you’ve made several claims like this — you ought to cite your sources to be credible.

Also, I always question Holmgren — in that, I wonder what moves he’ll make, why he’s made the moves he does, etc. But, in the end, I’m usually happy with the moves, and Holmgren is right an awful lot more than he’s wrong.

by Alon on Jul 8, 2010 8:34 AM EDT reply actions  

His number came from PuckDaddy and is simple the reported number Zhederv is looking for. I doubt that is what teams are offering him, but it’s the only number that has been thrown out there to really analyze thus far. But again, it’s just a reported firgure that he is looking for, nothing more, nothing less.

by DLJr on Jul 8, 2010 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

fantastic

Thanks for the info, ’tis all i wanted.

by Alon on Jul 8, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I also believe that he was making $4 mil over in the KHL last year. I’m not sure where I read that, might have been on BSH somewhere, but that along with the PuckDaddy article are where I would guess that number comes from. I’d put him on $2.5 to $3 if he comes back to the NHL.

"Chris Pronger sneaked in the back door...banged it home."

Flyers Television Play-by-Play Man: Jim Jackson

by Psy09 on Jul 8, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Csn Philly

Go on to csnphilly.com and the artcile that is titled “Flyers close to deal with Zherdev” states that he is asking that price, so if they’re close to a deal, the salary must be in that ball park.

by Flyersfan94 on Jul 8, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes but I just read this " the Flyers are close to signing Zherdev, reportedly for less than $3m a year." via Sarah Baicker (csn reporter) on twitter

by historywillbemade on Jul 8, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good

Then that’s great, a good pick-up at that.

by Flyersfan94 on Jul 8, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really hope is contract isn’t even over 3M. If it is that much we could have signed another player of equal or better value for that much. Maxim Afigenov (sp?) anybody?

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

by Lindbergh 31 on Jul 8, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Frankly, they’re the same player – except Zherdev is 24 while Maxim is like, 30+. Ancient, in NHL years.

by penguinsfan on Jul 8, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

plus Zherdev has potential to score more than afinogenov

by tmurder on Jul 8, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

“Is Anyone Else Starting To Question Holmgren?” Since the day he was named GM. A perfect example of a company guy who was the last man standing at the end of another unsuccessful regime.
As for Gagne it is time to move on if you can.

Just Call Me "M"!

by MJDII on Jul 8, 2010 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah

who needs stanley cup appearances?

by Alon on Jul 8, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sometimes though, I think, if Homer wasn’t a Flyer guy through and through, then would he have done what he did in the 2007 offseason? He basically turned this team around from the worst in the league to amongst the final four in the space of one season through some aggressive signings of established players. Another GM might’ve just said: “time for a multi-year rebuild”, stocked up on the draft picks, and right now we’d be talking about whether our lineup led by JVR, Doughty and Tavares is playoff calibre next season. But the Flyers wanted to get right back into the thick of things, and they did. Of course it was also helpful that Richie and Carts developed the way they did.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 8, 2010 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm inclined to trust Holmgren

He did what he had to do to bring us back to relevance. Personally, I’d rather make the playoffs every year than be the worst team in the league for several seasons in order to stockpile high draft picks (ala Pittsburgh, Chicago and Washington). Under his tenure we’ve made the ECF twice, and came within two games of winning a Stanley Cup. Most of his moves have worked out so far (no one could have seen that Emery injury coming) and he’s managed to improve the team every offseason despite being right up against the cap. I say have faith in him until we start routinely missing the playoffs.

by Kyle_Martin on Jul 8, 2010 6:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll be stunned if it comes to that.

by Kyle_Martin on Jul 8, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s all well and good if he had a solid assistant. I’m not saying John Paddock or any of the others he had are crap, but Homer tends shoot first, ask questions later. The Phantoms are terrible, the team has no salary cap space, and he doesn’t use the leverage he has appropriately.

If he had a good number-2, I’d be okay. But he just makes too many short-term decisions for me.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s a valid criticism. I generally don’t like trading a bunch of prospects/draft picks, but again, it nearly brought us a cup this year. Sometimes when you have an opportunity to win now, you have to make a few short term moves. You’re seeing that w/ the Phils too.

by Kyle_Martin on Jul 8, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

But Homer also refuses to trade guys like Carter and Giroux who are both young guys, so he’s clearly not only thinking short term.

by Kyle_Martin on Jul 8, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I reject the notion that holding onto Carter is the best decision, let alone one that is best in the long-term. Plus, do we really (not that you are, mind you) need to give him credit for not trading Giroux?

While we’re at it, starting JVR in the NHL last year was a very short-sighted move. Even though I defended the decision after JVR’s pre-season, would anybody have been upset if he started in the AHL? I don’t see how I’d even object to that since two weeks prior I said he should start in the AHL.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

What nearly brought us a Cup? In the last two years, he’s traded three first-round picks and two second-round picks. That got us:

Steve Eminger and Jacob De Serres (1st round pick), Patrick Hersley and Ned Lukacevic (Gauthier and a second), Dan Carcillo (Upshall and a second), Chris Pronger and Ryan Dingle (two first round picks, Lupul and Sbisa).

How many of those are good “win now” trades? One. Exactly one.

And that’s not even getting into his free agent decisions and roster choices.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eminger turned into Matt Carle.

by Kyle_Martin on Jul 8, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

When coupled with Downie…

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who was playing a Carcillo-esque role here. He wasn’t going to last long.

by Kyle_Martin on Jul 8, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

So a first round pick for Steve Eminger and a third is a good deal? What are you getting at?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d say a first and steve downie is worth Matt Carle and a 3rd… Not that Downie isn’t better in TB, but he wasn’t gonna be that guy here. And let’s not forget Jeff, he basically turned Forsberg into Kimmo, Hartnell and a 3rd round pick.

Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"

by Ed Van Chimp on Jul 8, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jeff=Geoff. I am losing my mind.

Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"

by Ed Van Chimp on Jul 8, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just a quick correction:

He turned Forsberg into Parent (1st rounder), Upshall (1st rounder), Kimmo, Hartnell (1st rounder) and a 3rd round pick.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 8, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s not to say I disagree with you Geoff. In fact I think the cap and the farm are the two major holes in his list of GMing achievements that he needs to show us he can get around. I’m personally a big fan of stocking the farm with 1st round picks to form a steady stream of entry-level players coming into the NHL when older players retire or you lose players to free agency. The Pronger trade worked. Some of the other trades involving 2nds especially are a bit suspect.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 8, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

And we aren’t even talking about the Meszaros trade, which is yet another example of terrible management.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, but that’s not the trade. He gave up a 1st round pick for Steve Eminger and and a third round pick. Just because he eventually swapped Eminger and Downie for Matt Carle doesn’t mean the first trade was a good one. It was a terrible trade. Further, the fact that all it took to get Carle was a third-pairing defenseman and a role player shows you exactly what Matt Carle was worth at the time.

It was a terrible trade that he corrected down the road. Which is further proof that he’s a short-sighted GM.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what he's done this offseason

Maybe he just gets his tactics from Eastside Hockey Manager 2007. In that, a winning formula can consist of loading up on free agents so you are way above the salary cap and then salary dumping as much as you can by chucking big players away for picks. During my period of addiction to that game, I even traded Luongo from the Flyers for picks to clear up cap space, and it worked out all OK in the end.

But the problem with that is it’s a game.

Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger; Briere, Betts and Pronger;
Our team is so much stronger
We've got Briere, Betts and Pronger...

by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 8, 2010 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha, yeah, real life is tricky like that.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.

by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 8, 2010 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I did stuff like that all the time. I once had 7 of the top 16 draft picks in Madden because the first off-season I signed all the old vets who were still out there in the game that were still rated like 88(usually wayyyyyyy to high for them) and traded them away promptly.

Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"

by Ed Van Chimp on Jul 8, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

i always trade my 1st round pick (knowing it will be a low pick) midway through the season for a crappy team’s 1st rounder. I also traded for Pedro Feliz and Brad Lidge long before they were Phillies that helped us win world series

by historywillbemade on Jul 9, 2010 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Claude_doop_small
Max Talbot: Quietly Defying Your Expectations

Recent FanPosts

Small
Should the Flyers consider buying out Bryzgalov contract?
Nfs_pic_small
Bachelor Party in Philly
Small
Stop whining about shoot outs.
640_flypen_thrillainphila_small
PLAYING WITH CAPGEEK ROSTERS
Flyers_small
Shootouts
Small
What is the Flyers Defensive Philosophy?
Clarke-tee_small
Roller Pick-Up Game Feb 25?
Assholeheart_small
"Be Excellent to Each Other!" (in Keanu Reeves voice)
Claude_doop_small
Goalies and Back-to-Backs
Clarke-tee_small
BSH OPEN ICE 3/17

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Screen_shot_2012-01-09_at_12 Travis Hughes

Associate Editors

67865_878600804923_14200876_46395212_2220_n_small Geoff Detweiler

Headshot2_film_grain_small Ben Rothenberg

Soccer_face_small Eric T.

Contributors

163830_478172269164_824914164_5517468_4313370_n_small ToddtheFox

Clarke-tee_small KreiderDesigns

D150_small Teemu H