Do The Flyers Have The Best Defense?
Last year the Flyers were considered to have one of the top defensive cores in the league. But as the season went on, we saw that the Flyers lacked some defensive depth. I still believe that even last year the Flyers had the best top four in the league, but did in fact lack a solid third pairing. But the aquisitions of Andrej Meszaros, Matt Walker and Sean O'Donnell has given the Flyers questionably the best defensive core in the entire league.
But there are other teams that have upgraded their defenses in a big way this year. There were tons of defensemen on the market this year so it gave teams the opportunity to get the right peices they neede for their defenses. Let's take a look at the top seven defensemen of teams that are challenging the Flyers for the top defense in the league.
Top 7: Dan Hamhuis, Keith Ballard, Christian Ehrhoff, Alexander Edler, Kevin Bieksa, Sami Salo and Shane O'Brien.
The Canucks got bigger and more physical on the blueline this off-season. They brought in the coveted Hamhuis (who was supposed to be a Flyer) and Ballard from Florida. The Canucks already had good, young defensemen in Edler, Ehrhoff, O'Brien and Bieksa. Salo is also a key part of the defense with his experience but has had injury issues his whole career. Their blueline may get a tad weaker before the season starts though, because a Kevin Bieksa trade seems to be imminent.
Top 7: Anton Volchenkov, Henrik Tallinder, Colin White, Bryce Salvador, Andy Greene, Anssi Salmella and Mark Fraser.
The Devils are probably the most defensively imprved team this off-season. The aquisition of Volchenkov alone was a HUGE improvement for them defensively, who will give the Devil fans flashbacks of Scott Stevens. Tallinder was another good pick-up, adding some leadership and offensive ability to the blueline. The up and coming Andy Greene will probably be on the second pairing along with White.
Top 7: Paul Martin, Zbynek Michalek, Kristopher Letang, Brooks Orpik, Alex Goligoski, Ben Lovejoy and Deryk Engelland (may be changed).
The Pens improved their top four in a big way. Martin and Michalek were big pick-ups, and combined are an upgrade from Sergei Gonchar and Mark Eaton. The place where the Pens are weak are on their botton pair. They lost Jordan Leopold and Jay Mckee as well which may affect the bottom pair. Goligoski is still unproven and Lovejoy has yet to play a full N.H.L. season. The Pens' defense is much like last year's Flyers defense, great top four with a weak bottom pair.
Top 7: Dion Phaneuf, Tomas Kaberle, Mike Komisarek, Francois Beauchemin, Luke Schenn, Brett Lebda and Carl Gunnarsson
No matter what you say, the Leafs have a very stron defensive core. The top four are extremely strong, which consists of Phaneuf, Kaberle, Beacuhemin and Komisarek. The bottom pair is still in question. Lebda was a good pick-up for the Leafs for a depth guy. Schenn and Gunnarsson are probably going to be fighting for the sixth spot, and I see Schenn getting it (at least to start with). The reason I don't mention Finger is because I believe he will be waived.
So after all analysations, I say the Flyers have the second best defense in the league. I will give the edge to the Canucks over them. I think that Meszaros needs to prove himself this year and O'Donnell and Walker will both be good, but the Canucks still are deeper. Even if Bieksa is dealt, they will still have a third pair of Salo and O'Brien with Alberts as the seventh, and that is just simply better than Meszaros and O'Donnell/Walker. Although I do believe the Flyers have a better top four.
This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by Broad Street Hockey.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m a bit confused. Is there a bottom 7? A total of 14 D-men the team flies around to every game?
by BroadStreetBully on Aug 20, 2010 2:58 AM EDT reply actions
I think you’re drastically overrating Vancouver’s defense.
I follow them fairly closely (one of my good friends is from B.C.), and none of their top-4 d-men are true first pairing guys. Hamhuis, Ballard, Ehrhoff and Edler are all solid, and every team would like to have them, but they lack a #1 shutdown defenseman. Salo’s good when healthy – but he rarely is.
The only guy you could make a case for as a #1 is Ehrhoff, but he’s more in the vein of a Mike Green/Dan Boyle/Sergei Gonchar #1 – awesome offensive defenseman, just decent at defense.
On the other hand, the Flyers have two players (Pronger and Timonen) who could be first paring guys on any team, one guy (Carle) who is in the Hamhuis/Ballard/Erhoff/Edler tier, and two guys (Coburn and Meszaros) who are young and have shown the capability of being in that tier in the past. And O’Donnell last year was far superior to Shane O’Brien.
I’d have to do some research to decide whether the Flyers actually have the defense in the league on paper (in fact, I think I will). But they’re certainly better than Vancouver.
I agree, Vancouver’s defense is not supposed to be on this list. I am not familiar with the west coast teams, so I don’t know much about the Canuks however… Considering you had the EC teams in overall ability order, I’m assuming you have the Nucks in order as well. And if you do, that has Hamhuis as their number 1? He was going to be our 5… Maybe 4. If he’s their one, get them off the list!
by orangeandblack20 on Aug 21, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
New Jersey has always had a good defense so I don’t really care about who they add I don’t get scared about them. Their team GA/G was 2.27 last year I don’t think it could really get much better.
Pittsburg is what scares me. They were 20th ranked with a 2.79 GA/G and could be improved this season making them stronger. However Gonchar was such a huge part of their offense (0.82 PT/G) and a Flyer killer so on the other hand I am glad to see him go.
The Flyers didn’t lose anything from last year but the Doomsday Pairing of Parent/Kriajeck replacing that with Meszaro’s O’Donnell two big physical guys who would be a solid 2 pair for most of the league. That is true upgrade.
NJ – Volchenkov and Tallinder are both solid, but they lost Martin to PIT
PIT – Martin and Michaelek are good, but Gonchar made their PP go. Losing Leopold hurt too. Goligoski had flashes of offensive brilliance, followed by mind numbing defensive lapses. He could develop into someone like a Gonchar. Or someone like Randy Jones.Orpik is still the guy to fear, as he hits everything hard. Martin’s best year was 37 points, Gonchar had 55 last year in only 62 games. Not sure how this is an upgrade. More like “whew” we’re still competitive.
VAN – You still list Bieksa though they almost have to move him at this point.I agree with the other comments, that’s an ok unit, but Hamhuis wasnt a #1 in NAS, and wasn’t going to be here either.
How did you forget CHI? Keith,Seabrook, Campbell,Hjalmarsson,Boynton and Cullimore deserve mention, though I think we have the potential to be better and deeper.

by 




















