Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Maple Leafs fans unhappy with Kris Versteeg trade

Photo

My first reaction to the Kris Versteeg trade was that the Flyers made a gross overpayment to get him, but as the night's gone on and the taste has swirled around in my mouth a bit, I'm a lot happier with the deal.

I'm pretty convinced that the first round pick (hopefully 30th in the 2011 Draft) will be pretty inconsequential, even if there is a certain stigma in going three straight years without a first round pick. Our friends (I guess) over at SB Nation's Pension Plan Puppets seem to agree with that assessment.

[A reader with a username not relevant to BSH readers] put the trade as "Stalberg, Paradia, DiDomenico for a 1st and 3rd round pick" but that hides the fact that all that has happened is that the Leafs have traded three guys that were looking to be nothing into two picks that will likely turn into nothing. In the meantime, Burke has let an established, young NHLer go. Much like the Kessel trade, we'll really only be able to judge this move down the line once the picks have been made, have had time to develop, and we see where Kris Versteeg goes.

How will Leafs fans remember Versteeg? More on that after the jump.

Star-divide

From that same story:

Versteeg had a tough start to his Maple Leafs career with just two points in his first nine games and five in his first 13 games. Since then he'd added 12-18-30 in 40 GP or a 62 point pace but his start had labelled him a flop amongst the majority of Leafs fans and the anti-Leafs contingent. Today, shock at the move was met with variations on "not bad for a third liner on a shitty team!" which just belies the ignorance that we have to confront every day.

Kris Versteeg was only behind Fredrik Sjostrom among Leafs' forward for quality of competition at even strength, he was fourth in ice-time among forwards at even strength, he was fifth in points per 60 minutes of even strength ice time. He was clearly not a 'third liner' but who lets facts get in the way of slamming the Leafs?

Sounds like there was a lot of jumping down the throat of the poor guy in Toronto after a slow start. Wait, Leafs fans and media jumping to conclusions too soon?! In Toronto?! Never! All signs point to a fresh start and a new bit of motivation being good or Versteeg. I'm personally excited to see what he can do as a Flyer. 

Comment 78 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

DAMN!

But seriously after thinking about it, I’m happy with the trade. Especially if we cannot resign Leino.

by ThePowertool on Feb 14, 2011 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Leino needs to be signed…id rather have Leino over Versteeg. Hopefully the cap will rise and Homer can work some voodoo magic and keep this team in tact. Most exciting Flyers team I have ever watched!

by BruteSquad on Feb 14, 2011 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

You’d rather have Leino over Versteeg because you’ve watched Leino for a full season now. It’s not really a fair comparison at this point.

by jrphi2002 on Feb 15, 2011 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

I say whomever wins the The Conn Smythe this season gets to stay!

by Prometheus74 on Feb 15, 2011 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Leino + Versteeg

We should really sign both. Make a deal for one of our excess fowards, or two of them. I was liking how Zherdev had been playing lately – more desire, and good chemistry w/Carter & Giroux, but he’s off that line and into the doghouse again. Probably he’s got some value for picks, which we need — and that alone would clear $2million. I’d hate to part with any of Carbomb, Powe or Nodl but it may happen.

Homer has to know that keeping Leino is just a plain good idea.

by Georgia_Flyer on Feb 15, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

You can’t just say “don’t re-sign Zherdev, there’s $2 million” because that money has already been spent on Giroux. And then you have the $3 million increase in Versteeg.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

boooo

Visit the BSH Store :: Get us on Twitter :: facebook, too!
Broad Street Hockey - SBN's Philadelphia Flyers blog. 2010 Eastern Conference Champions.

by Travis Hughes on Feb 14, 2011 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? I have a feeling this wasn’t ironic.

Flyers Fans: We've survived Lock-outs, Lindros and Cooperalls. If you want to get rid of us, you'll have to split an atom or two.

by KreiderDesigns on Feb 15, 2011 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I feel like Leafs fans are at the point where they assume that any trade their team makes will inevitably blow up in their faces.

This seems like a pretty even deal for both sides to me, at least.

by cocon1120 on Feb 14, 2011 11:39 PM EST reply actions  

Are they wrong, necessarily?

by VorAbaddon on Feb 14, 2011 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

The Beauchemin deal wasn’t bad, this one is ok.

What can't Giroux do?

by tmurder on Feb 14, 2011 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Leafs fan here.

I wouldn’t say that we are wrong to think this is a bad deal.

From our perspective, Versteeg is the kind of guy who could have contributed to the Leafs in the long term and been a part of success down the road. He’s 24, good for ~20 goals and ~60 points, and a solid two-way player who’s strong on the PP and PK. He’s also got a Cup ring that would’ve come in handy when the Leafs finally found themselves in a playoff spot somewhere in the future.

To give a guy like Versteeg up, there needs to be something good in return. A 1st rounder sounds great in theory, but when it’s a Flyers team that’s got the 2nd best record in the NHL and only becomes more of a Cup contender with this deal, it sucks. Having the 25th-30th overall pick in a shallow draft doesn’t mean a damn thing, really; besides, the Leafs are likely looking at having the 34th-36th pick anyways, so it all it means is they’ll have two picks in the same marginal range.

In conclusion: gave up a young guy who would be a decent contributor to the future for two unknowns/unlikelies in a shallow draft year. Yeah, I’d say this is a terrible trade. And, true to form, it also wouldn’t surprise me if Steeg pretty much destroyed the Leafs in the last two games we have against you guys.

Unless Burke intends to package these picks for a higher 1st rounder- and even THEN, I don’t know for sure- this trade is awful.

Visit my blog at: http://50-mission-cap.blogspot.com/
Leaf fan for life! (No, really. They gave me a no-trade clause when I was born.)

by FiftyMissionCap on Feb 15, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s an absolutely awful deal for the Leafs. He’s going to be an RFA when his contract expires so the Leafs would have gotten a first and a third for him then anyway. A young player like Versteeg for picks, in a draft that should be compared to the 1999 draft in terms of the dearth of talent, is awful.

Philly can’t lose this trade. Even if they walk away from him next year they’ll still be comensated. Abysmal deal.

A Nation of Masochists
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing - Vince Lombardi

by furcifer on Feb 15, 2011 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok, but is there truth to the fact that “he didn’t fit” with the Leafs? I know they were saying he only played maybe 12 minutes in his last game.

G, the second coming of Foppa.

by JerseyDriver on Feb 15, 2011 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m down in DC for a few weeks for work. Found a sports bar with center ice so I can watch the Tampa game tomorrow. Going to wear all my flyers gear to piss off the Caps fans and its going to be wonderful!

by BruteSquad on Feb 14, 2011 11:41 PM EST reply actions  

Down in DC……dont get shot being cute.

I default Fan Pittsburgh teams. Yea, I wrote it!

by sophiejo on Feb 15, 2011 12:32 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I work at the bar in Fairfax, VA

Hard Times Cafe, I always get the Flyers on…i tell others that my TV is pre-programmed, and can’t be changed…

by flyers13 on Feb 15, 2011 3:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Here is a little preview of what the Flyers got.

(WARNING: HIT PAUSE AND EXIT OUT AT THE 19 SECOND MARK UNLESS YOU WANT TO HEAR THAT, THAT……SONG!)

Is Paul Holmgren really bad at managing the salary cap? Does Matt Stairs enjoy getting his ass hammered by guys?
Writer at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Feb 14, 2011 11:43 PM EST reply actions  

Too late!!!!

JK I hit mute when 0:19 hit but the damn song is going through my head without hearing it. Am currently blasting some Mastodon to exorcise the earworm.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

Good bye #12, you will always bleed Orange and Black.

by Lindbergh 31 on Feb 15, 2011 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

If you don’t hit pause, you do see the replay and see how the goal from better angles, so maybe it is just best to mute the button.

Is Paul Holmgren really bad at managing the salary cap? Does Matt Stairs enjoy getting his ass hammered by guys?
Writer at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Feb 15, 2011 12:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah that’s why because I did want to see the other angles with that sweet goal, just muting it helps a lot. But I’m one of those people who can get a crappy song stuck in their head and not have heard it for months. Really, that song I haven’t really heard since the playoffs, yet it ran through my head, though the thought was put in there about it since you said song and it was at Chicago… Inception style!

But the earworm was exorcised in about 30 seconds.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

Good bye #12, you will always bleed Orange and Black.

by Lindbergh 31 on Feb 15, 2011 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Am currently blasting some Mastodon

I like you.

If these walls could speak, I wouldn't tell them anything.

by jello44 on Feb 15, 2011 12:56 AM EST up reply actions  

\m/

that is all. I’ve liked Mastodon since 2004 and I heard Leviathan because it was recommended listening in my Bass Guitar magazine. I got to meet the whole band at Ozzfest 2005 and have a signed copy of Leviathan from them. They are really cool guys, and this was before they were big. They are one of my favorite bands of the decade.

P.S. I’m listening to Crack The Skye. I love how each of their albums get better and better, and Crack the Skye really has this amazing sound to it that I can’t even describe, I love albums I can’t describe and don’t sound like anything I’ve ever heard before.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

Good bye #12, you will always bleed Orange and Black.

by Lindbergh 31 on Feb 15, 2011 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s about when I got into them, from Leviathan, I’ve been hooked ever since.

I only got to see them at the TLA, and that was before Blood Mountain. In fact, I think that’s when they announced they had signed a bigger record deal.

If these walls could speak, I wouldn't tell them anything.

by jello44 on Feb 15, 2011 1:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I only have seen them once live unfortunately. I was going to see them when they were with Dethklok up here at Irving Plaza in the city, but I didn’t have the extra money for the ticket, which sucks because that’s a smaller more personal venue. I’ll see them at some point in the future too. I’m just stoked for whatever they come out with next.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

Good bye #12, you will always bleed Orange and Black.

by Lindbergh 31 on Feb 15, 2011 1:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Ya know Chelsea Dagger isn’t a bad song … just saying

by ic0n67 on Feb 15, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t like the song even before the playoffs due to those stupid Amstel Light commercials. Hearing it during the playoffs whenever Chicago would get one past Leighton only added to my disdain for the song.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

Good bye #12, you will always bleed Orange and Black.

by Lindbergh 31 on Feb 15, 2011 1:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t mind it from Caps games and the Amstel Light commercials. After the Finals, however, it makes me want to hurt things.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Feb 15, 2011 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

You guys sound like Canucks fans with your hatred for that song.

If both you and the Nucks make it to the Finals, I suggest it get played after EVERY goal in BOTH arenas. Just sayin.

Visit my blog at: http://50-mission-cap.blogspot.com/
Leaf fan for life! (No, really. They gave me a no-trade clause when I was born.)

by FiftyMissionCap on Feb 15, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s terrible.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

If both you and the Nucks make it to the Finals, I suggest it get played after EVERY goal in BOTH arenas from every loud speaker and PA system in Chicago and it’s surrounding areas.

There fixed.

Geoff has Boosh, Mike's got Powe, Nodl is all mine!
Is this the right room for an argument?

by DLJr on Feb 15, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s more like it! Twist the knife for them while they’re sitting at home.

#1 Flyers Fan in New York

Good bye #12, you will always bleed Orange and Black.

by Lindbergh 31 on Feb 15, 2011 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

BOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

this.

Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!

by hintzy64 on Feb 15, 2011 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

According to posters at SCH, this play sums up Versteeg pretty well. And this is another interesting play from Versteeg.

The first video has a Chelsea Dagger warning. The second does not as it occurred in San Jose.

Is Paul Holmgren really bad at managing the salary cap? Does Matt Stairs enjoy getting his ass hammered by guys?
Writer at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Feb 15, 2011 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry if this was already discussed, but was there any truth to that Erik Cole rumor not too long ago? He hasnt been doing too shabby this year either. Who would you rather have had? Both Versteeg and Cole have won a cup and have similar stats in terms of points this year. Upside with Versteeg he is young.

by BruteSquad on Feb 14, 2011 11:56 PM EST reply actions  

Eric Cole is such a showman. I feel like s personality is all the Flyers are missing right now. I mean yea, Pronger this and Pronger that, but he’s the media’s darling. We need a player who’s dynamic and down right cocky on the ice if only to stir things up a bit. That’s what I think when I think about Cole becoming a Flyer.

I default Fan Pittsburgh teams. Yea, I wrote it!

by sophiejo on Feb 15, 2011 12:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Versteeg over Cole

IMO. Mainly because KV is so versatile and because he’s younger.

by Georgia_Flyer on Feb 15, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I can only speak for myself, but the assumption that the draft picks will result in “nothing” is quite frustrating. Although the draft can be considered weak, the trade speaks volumes on organizational philosophy. Burke’s “accelerated rebuild” clearly wasn’t working, as there are a variety of key cogs missing for the team to succeed. The trades in the past two weeks have netted the franchise Lupul (meh, overpaid but should be gone by the time the team is relevant again), Gardiner and three draft picks. Clearly there has been a reorientation towards youth and a true rebuild.

Even if Burke’s original plan to be a playoff team last year had worked, the team would have likely had to surrender more future assets for “win-now” type players if there was to be any real success in the playoffs. I’m sure many of my fellow fans would agree that a perennial contender at the price of 2-3 years of rebuilding is far more preferable to a few years of mediocre playoff teams with early exits.

While the picks could very likely end up being players who never even set foot in the AHL, they could also be players who, if developed properly, could end up contributing to a much more concrete team than the fragile mess the Toronto Maple Leafs are today.

by scrambles the death dealer on Feb 15, 2011 12:47 AM EST reply actions  

That you still use ‘accelerated rebuild’ shows you’re not really paying attention to the actual moves that Burke has been making. This isn’t about ‘re-aligning’ philosophies. It’s a bad deal. The Leafs traded a 24 year old player that is going to have had back-to-back 50 point seasons for a 44% chance of a player that will play 100 games in the NHL. That’s what a first rounder represents.

Burke traded a definite young NHLer that was contributing for a shot at the possibility that a pick will be as good as Versteeg in 3-5 years.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Feb 15, 2011 1:24 AM EST up reply actions  

As a Flyers fan, born and raised in Toronto watching the Leafs, I’m with PPP on this one.

by ThePowertool on Feb 15, 2011 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed, am i the only one that thinks holmgren bends teams over?? i think he threatens to beat them up

by Myers9 on Feb 15, 2011 1:31 AM EST up reply actions  

This is fascinating

Since most of us BSHers are whining about how Homer is always over the cap, never has draft choices, has blown off signing Leino, and has a disaster in progress at the AHL level.

I’m beginning to agree with Travis that the original venom the trade received from both sides is a sign at how “fair valued” the trade was.

OTOH, Homer took a team that was dead last in 2007 into the Conference finals in 2008 and the Cup Final in 2010. What exactly has Burke done with the Leafs?

Set your JVR in 2011.

by Bud in TN on Feb 15, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

OTOH reply: Even Holmgren admits that “dead last” team had a shit ton of talent.

Obviously, he didn’t use that exact phrasing, and he is generally a “credit others” type, but that “dead last” team wasn’t nearly as bad and barren as the Leafs.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously it is no longer an accelerated rebuild

But this was the philosophy prior to this year’s failure. The trades this week demonstrate that a more orthodox rebuild is underway, which is much less risky. Toronto has too many holes to succeed anytime soon and draft picks are one way of filling those holes.

If first round picks have such little value, why are they traded at all? Why was Tomas Vokoun traded for picks? Or Pronger? A first round pick is the best way to acquire talent. You assume that all players’ futures are set in stone before they are drafted. The vast majority of players drafted in the first round are adequately talented, and end up failing for other reasons such as being rushed to the NHL, or incompetent coaching. It is partly up to the organization to ensure prospects are groomed for success.

Versteeg was contributing very well on the third line, however his salary also contributed to one of the most overpaid third lines in the league. Considering the amount of money tied into the defense, it doesn’t make sense to have an overpaid third line on a team struggling to score. Toronto needs elite, although expensive, talent complimented by good, cheap players on entry level contracts, which can only be acquired through the draft. It is very reasonable to find players equally as productive as Versteeg in the first round, and third round picks have value as well.

If the draft had not been perceived as being so weak, would the deal frustrate you to the degree it does? Regardless, this deal cannot be evaluated until the picks have been made and developed.

by scrambles the death dealer on Feb 15, 2011 2:39 AM EST up reply actions  

If you look at the advanced stats, Versteeg was more than a “third-liner” for you.

Today, shock at the move was met with variations on “not bad for a third liner on a shitty team!” which just belies the ignorance that we have to confront every day.

Kris Versteeg was only behind Fredrik Sjostrom among Leafs’ forward for quality of competition at even strength, he was fourth in ice-time among forwards at even strength, he was fifth in points per 60 minutes of even strength ice time. He was clearly not a ‘third liner’

And it’s speculated that next years draft is going to be a very, very weak. So those late picks are thus speculated to be of lower efficacy than those of other years.

by phinally on Feb 15, 2011 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

He played on the third line

Therefore he is a third line player. If you bothered to read what I wrote, I said “Versteeg was contributing very well on the third line”.

The draft certainly isn’t labeled as next 2003, but I’ve read reports ranging from “terrible” to “unpredictable”. However, I spoke to an Edmonton Oiler’s scout at an Ottawa 67’s game who diagnosed the draft as not being very deep, but having many players who would be drafted in later rounds whose careers would far surpass those of some of the top 15 players. Although this is always the case, he emphasized that there was much more potential for surprise.

by scrambles the death dealer on Feb 15, 2011 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course there’s potential for surpise. When all the predictions are saying that this draft is going to be awful a success from anyone would be a surprise.

It still makes no sense trading a 20+ goal 60+ point guy for a chance at a “surprise”

A Nation of Masochists
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing - Vince Lombardi

by furcifer on Feb 15, 2011 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

It certainly makes no sense if the Maple Leafs had intentions of winning anytime soon, but that seems to be a very unrealistic goal. Toronto got very fair value for Versteeg, although some might have wanted a package closer to contributing. If there is any reason to be disappointed with the trade, it is for this reason – any contributions, barring another trade, are a few years away. The value is unquestionably there though, and those assets can be moved along if needed, as Burke is attempting to do with the third.

by scrambles the death dealer on Feb 15, 2011 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

If the draft had not been perceived as being so weak, would the deal frustrate you to the degree it does?

This draft is being compared to the 1999 draft. Tell me. How many players from the bottom end of that draft are contributing at a 20+ goal pace? There’s a better chance to draft a Nick Boynton or Barrett Heisten (who?) than a Martin Havlat.

A Nation of Masochists
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing - Vince Lombardi

by furcifer on Feb 15, 2011 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Philly made out like bandits by the way. Versteeg’s put up 30 points in his last 40 games playing against the second toughest competition among Leafs forwards.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Feb 15, 2011 1:25 AM EST reply actions  

The reason that I am somewhat unhappy with this trade (I’m not going to be so bold as to assume I speak for everybody) is because Versteeg takes available cap away from resigning Leino, not because the picks were more valuable than the return. I personally believe the the Leafs got robbed on this one (I lose more respect for Burke with almost every move he makes).

by ThePowertool on Feb 15, 2011 1:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Stop worrying about Leino. He is here this year and we have no clue what the future holds.

by phinally on Feb 15, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I'm gonna like this guy
  • Third on Maple Leafs in assists (21) and shots (128).
  • Maple Leafs have posted a 12-0-2 record when Versteeg scores a goal this season.
  • Missed two games (Jan. 13, 15) due to upper-body injury.
  • Played in 200th career NHL game and collected an assist Dec. 16 at CGY.
  • Missed game Oct. 28 at BOS due to back injury.
  • Registered first Maple Leafs goal and assist Oct. 9 vs. OTT. Also collected five penalty minutes (fighting major) to record a “Gordie Howe hat trick” (Goal-Assist-Fighting Major).
    source
  • His plus/minus has gone to shit since being on the leafs (+15, +8, -13 over the last 3 seasons… the first two were with CHI obviously)
    source

Hexwall.

by Philly4Cup on Feb 15, 2011 2:30 AM EST reply actions  

also, forgot to say something about his 2 injuries this season… I wonder what happened.

Hexwall.

by Philly4Cup on Feb 15, 2011 2:31 AM EST up reply actions  

OMG sorry

I thought this was a flyers board… and I’m really stoned

Hexwall.

by Philly4Cup on Feb 15, 2011 2:41 AM EST reply actions  

LOL

Set your JVR in 2011.

by Bud in TN on Feb 15, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I LOVE this! We are a juggernaut! Let the red lights burn and the league cry in terror. The line combinations are freekin mind boggeling!
Although we could still do with some more GRIT!!!!!

by Gonzotatcics on Feb 15, 2011 2:43 AM EST reply actions  

If you want grit you could always scratch Zherdev and Nodl to make way for Shelley and Carcillo….I’d rather not think about that though. I would love to just trade away Shelley and Carcillo for nothing just to be assured that we’re going to continue the season playing with a super stacked lineup instead of a potentially stacked one that we are mindboggingly stopping from being stacked.

Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.

by PursuitOfLappyness on Feb 15, 2011 3:55 AM EST up reply actions  

not a flyers fan, but i think i’d like them better if they traded away shelley & carcillo ;-)

by delta on Feb 15, 2011 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Good job fleecing the Buds.

Ugh, this trade makes me sick. Still, how can you not applaude a team when they make a steal of a trade like this.

I’m going to miss Versteeg as a Leaf – trust me – you guys are going to love him. Pardon me, but it’s 8 am and I think I need to start on this fifth of vodka.

I'm not a bandwagon Colts fan. I was there when Jeff George got drafted. That mustache still haunts my nightmares.

by AB_Positive on Feb 15, 2011 8:01 AM EST reply actions  

i know it’s not saying much but leafs fans in the yahoo sports article are happy to get rid of him. not sure if they’re just butthurt (which is most likely) or if they see something in him that the chicago fans didn’t see in him for 3 years. the blackhawks fans want him back. this could also be part of the fact that he was a player that helped to win them a cup. i know that many people on the yahoo article blogs are idiots and really don’t know much at all about hockey.

i say good move for now but i want to see him for a few weeks and get some chemistry with new and better line mates that he had with the leafs before i really say i’m happy with it. yes we picked him up cheap but if it costs the flyers, leino, i’m not going to be happy at all about it.

by hbcivicsi93 on Feb 15, 2011 8:19 AM EST reply actions  

you should be excited to get a player like him. i expect nothing short of an ECF appearance out of the Flyers now….

by delta on Feb 15, 2011 10:19 AM EST reply actions  

I have been to Maple Leaf Nation

and they are NEVER EVER happy and biatch and gripe about everything. They are never happy unless they are unhappy and complaining.

FLYERROB ! YOU STAY AWESOME FLYERS FANS ! www.naawayland.com Robert Wilson

by FLYERROB on Feb 15, 2011 1:08 PM EST reply actions  

But, we’ve had a lot to bitch and gripe about in the last six years. The unhappy has outweighed the happy by far. Try missing the playoffs for six successive seasons, and still being about 2 seasons away from making it again, at least 3-4 from being anywhere close to a contender in the postseason, and being able to be all sunshine and happiness. We still try to find the silver lining, but it ain’t easy.

That said, if you’re referring to ‘Leafs Nation’ as those idiots who call in to Andy Frost’s show and whine about how we don’t trade for Sidney Crosby, then you can’t honestly believe that’s representative of an entire fan base. Don’t go all Howard Berger on me here.

Visit my blog at: http://50-mission-cap.blogspot.com/
Leaf fan for life! (No, really. They gave me a no-trade clause when I was born.)

by FiftyMissionCap on Feb 15, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Very well said.

Not directed at Rob, but it’s amazing how many people give Chicago fans shit for deserting their team despite being run by the worst owner in the NHL, then turn around and give Toronto fans shit for (correctly) voicing displeasure and STILL showing up.

Again, not you Rob, but it’s almost like Flyers fans love shitting on other team’s fanbases regardless of facts.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it fair to give Chicago fans shit and have a little bit of a crush on Leafs fan?

by Snevik on Feb 15, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

haha, good question.

I say neither deserves shit.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I would add the Bruins fans into that mix as well.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Feb 15, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? I say they do. haha, but I don’t have a reason other than “They’re Boston fans”

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I personally would add them to the list of fans who have had to suffer through horrendous ownership along with the aforementioned Chicago and Toronto.

BOILER UP!! 2010-2011

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Feb 15, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not familiar with that part of their history. Early 90’s?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know if they were mismanaged anytime recently...

But their unceremonious exit at the hands of the Flyers last year is certainly the most hilarious and monumental collapse in NHL playoff history. For this reason they should be mocked and pitied for enduring such a disaster.

by scrambles the death dealer on Feb 15, 2011 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Can we give Pittsburgh fans shit? Cuz’ winning 2 cups one decade and then deserting the next, regardless of how bad the teams were, seems…gutless.

Aristotle was not Belgian, the principle of Buddhism is not "every man for himself", and the London Underground is not a political movement.

by doubleh on Feb 15, 2011 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, definitely.

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Feb 15, 2011 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

All the Philadelphia Flyers news and commentary that's fit to print.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Flyers-orange-crush_small
NHL Draft 2012: Options on defense in the first round

Recent FanPosts

Patal_small
Andrew Johnston Scouting Report: A first-hand look at the Flyers newest prospect
Small
What being a Hockey fan means to me.
Small
Could Parise and Weber be in Flyers' future?
Mick_jagr_2_small
SB Nation app
Small
Hockey Stick Help
Copy_of_137494800_slide_small
The 2011-12 Philadelphia Flyers season in GIFs
37938_10150235117290484_539355483_13709206_6888144_n_small
Ilya Bryzgalov has chance to take shot at Flyers fans, does
Small
Can the Flyers win the Cup with Bryz?
Carcillo_small
Flyers in the Off-Season

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Screen_shot_2012-01-09_at_12 Travis Hughes

Associate Editors

67865_878600804923_14200876_46395212_2220_n_small Geoff Detweiler

Headshot2_film_grain_small Ben Rothenberg

Soccer_face_small Eric T.

Contributors

163830_478172269164_824914164_5517468_4313370_n_small ToddtheFox

Clarke-tee_small KreiderDesigns

D150_small Teemu H