SB Nation Philly Editor's Pick
Finding a tough minutes center from the UFA pool
Ed. Note: Added to the front page because this is a great analysis.
With Mike Richards traded, this Flyers team is in need of a tough minutes center; someone who is going to take on the Crosby/Zajac/Dubinsky/Backstrom/Krejci opponent line and effectively reduce their scoring chances.
You could argue that Claude Giroux could fill this role, but I believe that is a waste of Giroux's offensive talents. Two season ago, Blair Betts played a minor checking role, but this changed last season as he had to carry Jody Shelley around the ice. We also don't want to see Betts playing 15+ minutes a night as well as PK time. Braydon Schenn has been touted as a "future Richards", but the idea of putting a 20 year old against Crosby does not fill me with confidence.
It is my opinion (also shared by Eric T. and Snevik, probably others but I believe we three have been most vocal) that the Flyers need a tough minutes center to take on this role, at least until Schenn has developed to a point where he can manage it. The type of role that Manny Malhotra played so well this season in Vancouver, allowing the Sedin's to start in the offensive zone 70% of the time, and Ryan Kesler to take on a more offensive role. Sure he won the Selke, but it was Malhotra that was playing all the tough minutes allowing Kesler to score goals (and gain exposure which no doubt helped in the Selke voting).
While Malhotra did everything you could want from a third line center, his cap hit of $2.5 million (which is outrageously good) is on the high side to fit in to the Flyers roster. However, there are a few unrestricted free agents that could take on a mini-Malhotra role (or a mega-Betts if you want to think about it that way), and I hope that Holmgren/Snider is considering a contract for one of them come free agency.
Glossary of terms:
Corsi Rel QoC: this is used to identify the quality of the opponents the players regularly played against
Corsi Rel: used to provide a comparison between the teams ability to control the play when the player is on the ice versus when they aren't on the ice.
OZS%: the frequency a player starts in the offensive zone for faceoffs.
FO%: faceoff win percentage
The higher the numbers for Corsi Rel QoC and Corsi Rel, means the tougher the competition and how that player performed at controlling the play relative to their teammates. The lower the OZS% means the less the player started in the offensive zone (or the more defensive zone draws they took).
I used a minimun of 41 games as a cutoff and only compared between forward positions on the same team to define the players rank.
First, a look at Mike Richards.
| Mike Richards | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| PHI | $5.75 | 0.752/5th | 1.1/5th | 46.8/8th | 49.8 | 2.08/3rd |
Richards was used a little differently last season to normal, but was still regularly deployed in the defensive zone against second line opponents. He wasn't great at winning faceoffs, but played the third most minutes of any forward on the penalty kill
Manny Malhotra is exactly the type of player required (who called that again?) to play a tough minutes role on this team and allow Briere to dominate easy competition and Giroux to play second line competition, whilst giving Schenn development time.
| Manny Malhotra | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| VAN | $2.5 | 0.615/1st | -19/12th | 25.0/13th | 61.7 | 2.45/1st |
Malhotra was excellent last season for the Canucks. He started in the defensive zone 75% of the time, against the toughest competition. His Corsi Rel shows that he was didn't control the play well, but that's expected given the role he was put in. Great on faceoffs and a lot of PK time too.
Below is a list of "tough minute UFA centers"
| Vernon Fiddler | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| PHX | $1.10m |
0.456/7th | -16.4/11th | 35.9/10th | 53.9 | 2.53/2nd |
| Marty Reasoner | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| FLA | $1.15m |
0.796/2nd | -2.9/11th | 42.0/12th | 54.5 | 2.45/1st |
| Michal Handzus | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| LA | $4m | 0.517/4th | -13.1/13th | 43.5/13th | 51.7 | 2.24/1st |
| Eric Belanger | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| PHX | $1.75m | 0.742/3rd= | 6.4/4th | 46.6/5th | 55.3 | 1.47/4th |
| Marcel Goc | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| NSH | $775k | 0.010/10th | 2.4/6th | 43.8/9th | 49.9 | 0.47/6th |
| Jeff Halpern | 2010-2011 cap | Corsi Rel QoC | Corsi Rel | OZS% | FO% | PK TOI/G |
| MTL | $600k | 0.528/6th | -12.6/12th | 43.8 | 56.9 | 2.20/2nd |
I included Goc because Snevik had expressed an interest in acquiring him, but he doesn't really fill the need.
For me, the standout is Belanger. He played the third toughest competition and was fourth best at controlling the play. He started in the defensive zone more often than not, but less times compared to some of his teammates (like Fiddler) and was excellent at winning draws. He was also on the second PK unit. As for the cap hit, assuming a small raise to $2 million would be reasonable.
Marty Reasoner would also be adequate and would probably come with a lower cap hit than Belanger. He played against the opponents top line but did not control the play well. He was also great on the draw and played on the first PK unit.
In my opinion, signing either of these two players and putting them between Versteeg and Simmonds would be better than dividing the tough minutes between Giroux, Schenn and Betts.
This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by Broad Street Hockey.
162 comments
|
Add comment
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
um
we have too many centers .. briere giroux shcenn .. thats your top three .. its locked in
Read the post and try again.
Mourning Gagne forever.
by ToddtheFox on Jun 24, 2011 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
BOB
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 24, 2011 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Schenn is not “locked in.” We’re talking about a 19 year old kid (he’ll be 20 by the time the season starts) with 9 games of NHL experience. Admittedly, I know very little about him, so someone correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t think it would be ridiculous if Schenn were not on the opening day roster or was sent down to get more developmental time, especially if he’snot cracking it in that third-line-center role. As Todd and others have said, throwing him into the deep end against the Crosby, Ovechkin and Stamkoses of the league sounds like a recipe for disaster and wouldn’t be fair to Schenn.
Whether putting Schenn in the minors is good idea or not is an argument for another day, all I am saying is that considering Schenn a lock to be on the Flyers roster at 20 years of age and with almost no NHL experience is unrealistic.
Avidly opposed to Ilya Bryzgalov becoming a Philadelphia Flyer
@Mitchman88 on Twitter
by Mitchell Green on Jun 25, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
that makes him too old to go back to Jr’s right? I know there are overage players down there but I can’t remember if the cut off is 19 or 20.
If he’s too old to go to Jr he should stay in the AHL for at least a season.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Fairly sure this was his last junior year—he’s played two junior years since being drafted (one year finishing behind Hall and Seguin in CHL scoring, the other this past year). So his ELC clock will be ticking regardless.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 25, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Good post.
I agree that Schenn doesn’t fill that role yet. I’ve always been a fan of Jeff Halpern and I think he may be the most affordable. Leino, Voracek and Simmonds are probably gonna eat up about 7- 7.5 mil of cap space, so Halpern would fill our needs nicely for the price if we get him at a similiar cap hit. I like the 56.9 FO% and his experience on the PK. I’d go Reasoner second. Belanger’s hit may be just a little too high, but if we could fit him in then I’d go Belanger over Reasoner.
Either way, any one of the three would fit in well
If they use 7-7.5M on Leino, Voracek, and Simmonds, then they don’t have room under the cap or in the top 9 for a third line center unless you’re planning to have Schenn in the AHL this year:
CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR
FORWARDS
Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Scott Hartnell ($4.200m) / Ville Leino ($3.300m)
Jakub Voracek ($2.200m) / Claude Giroux ($3.750m) / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)
Wayne Simmonds ($1.800m) / Brayden Schenn ($3.110m) / Kris Versteeg ($3.083m)
Darroll Powe ($0.850m) / Blair Betts ($0.700m) / Jody Shelley ($1.100m)
Ian Laperriere ($1.166m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m) / Matt Carle ($3.437m)
Braydon Coburn ($3.200m) / Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
Kevin Marshall ($0.845m)
GOALTENDERS
Ilya Bryzgalov ($5.666m) / Sergei Bobrovsky ($1.750m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $64,168,928; BONUSES: $3,952,500
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $131,072
You can put Lappy on LTIR and use about 500-700k on a 13th forward. But that’s not going to get you a third line center, and even if it did you don’t have room to play him.
Why am I seeing so many people suddenly giving Leino over 3 million a year when last week it was generally agreed here he was not worth more that 2.5?
Now that we have cap space we can just piss it away? I don’t get the sudden shift in assessing his worth.
"All we want is to be treated like human beings, not to be experimented on like guinea pigs or patronized like bunny rabbits. "
"I don't patronize bunny rabbits."
His agent is reportedly asking for 4 million. Eric (or Todd, don’t remember) predicted he’d eventually be paid like Matthew Lombardi (a similar player) who is making 3.5 million. So they’re getting this according to Leino’s supposed market value – which may or may not be valid. Either way, he has now become redundant on this Flyers team and his money is best spent elsewhere.
If that Playmaker26 guy is right about Leino, there is actually a chance he won’t be back. I think the Flyers are going to try to sign him at a reasonable cap hit. If he demands too much, however, they’re going to let him walk.
Translation: If the Flyers can’t sign him at a cap hit of less than 3 million dollars then he’ll be playing elsewhere.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
Ok, somewhat makes sense then. I like Ville, but that’s a bit much for what he’s bringing. I don’t feel the need to repeat the cap mistakes of the past few seasons, even if Ville is a rock star.
"All we want is to be treated like human beings, not to be experimented on like guinea pigs or patronized like bunny rabbits. "
"I don't patronize bunny rabbits."
Why am I seeing so many people suddenly giving Leino over 3 million a year when last week it was generally agreed here he was not worth more that 2.5?
Like mikefive said, these two are not mutually exclusive. He’ll probably get somewhere around 3.5, and he’s probably worth somewhere around 2.5. This is partly because salaries are driven much more by offense than defense, and partly because UFAs tend to get overpaid because of the Winner’s Curse.
Ok, so it’s acceptable to overpay people. And yest despite all that people are mad at Hartnell and Mez’s contracts?
I do not think he’s worth 3.5. Now that we have the space does not mean we should piss it away on bad contracts again.
"All we want is to be treated like human beings, not to be experimented on like guinea pigs or patronized like bunny rabbits. "
"I don't patronize bunny rabbits."
I do not think he’s worth 3.5. Now that we have the space does not mean we should piss it away on bad contracts again.
Completely agree. But I also don’t think we’ll be able to sign him for less than 3M. And I’m not crazy about what he would mean for the lineup in terms of tough-minutes defensively-responsible guys.
Oh I think if they definitely send Schenn to the AHL this year. I think the guy will be a stud but a 3.1 mil cap hit for a third line rookie is a little high to me for this year. I think with a few minor moves this team can still compete for a cup. Roster could end up looking a like this. I left Halpern at 600k only because I haven’t seen anything about what kind of deal he’s looking for but there’s enough cap room left to adjust the salaries
CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR
FORWARDS
Jakub Voracek ($2.500m) / Claude Giroux ($3.750m) / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)
Ville Leino ($3.000m) / Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Scott Hartnell ($4.200m)
Wayne Simmonds ($2.000m) / Jeff Halpern ($0.600m) / Kris Versteeg ($3.083m)
Darroll Powe ($0.850m) / Blair Betts ($0.700m) / Andreas Nodl ($1.000m)
Ian Laperriere ($1.166m)
DEFENSEMEN
Matt Carle ($3.437m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Braydon Coburn ($3.200m) / Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m)
Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m) / Sean O’Donnell ($1.100m)
Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
GOALTENDERS
Ilya Bryzgalov ($5.666m) / Sergei Bobrovsky ($1.750m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $62,013,095; BONUSES: $1,700,000
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $2,286,905
SOD wants to return and everything I’ve seen has said that the FO is open too it.
He obviously wore down at the end of the year and in the playoffs, but him and Mez were arguably our best defensive pair in the beginning and middle of the season. He was definitely overused during the year.
With the above roster, you could carry both Barts and either Gustafsson\Marshall. You give SOD more games off to save his legs for the playoffs and allow the young guys to get some needed experience under their belts.
O'D was hurt, too
Remember when O’D was gonna be out for 10-14 days with a knee or “lower-body” issue? Then, next game, Bart got separated from his shoulder by Upshall?
Suddenly, O’D was good to go. And he was never the same.
He’s still OK but not sure he’ll be back. Depends on cost of other targets and cap space.
by Georgia_Flyer on Jun 25, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I can agree that Mez was our best defenseman, I do not agree that it had anything to do with SOD. He’s slow, out of position and blindly dumps the puck around the boards when if he’d stopped and looked he’d realize he had plenty of time and or room to move the puck up properly instead of the erroneous give away’s he’s prone to.
In no way shape or form should he continue playing hockey. He’d be a good coach or role type guy but he’s slow old and makes terrible decisions with the puck in his own zone. Not the kind of guy I’d ever want back. All season long he did this.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
I can agree that Mez was our best defenseman,
But he really, really wasn’t.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
He enjoyed the spoils of playing on the 3rd d pairing, his numbers would have been a bit deflated if he was on the 1st or 2nd.
Exactly.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
but him and Mez were arguably our best defensive pair in the beginning and middle of the season.
They never were. They were just playing well with easier assignments.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
And really good goaltending luck.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t even think we need to go that far, because it’ll bring up questions of a defenseman’s impact on SV%, which is far from settled. I’d rather just say “they got A’s in remedial classes, but that doesn’t make them smarter than the AP kids.”
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
What Reddgie said. Great analogy.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 26, 2011 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions
NEW MASKS.
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 26, 2011 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Mike Zigomanis!!! (Or Eric Belanger …he’s honestly better.)
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
Zigomanis is good for all those faceoffs in the defensive zone that are against fourth liners, like what Konopka does and Steckel does.
Regarding Belanger, he played a lot with Doan and Whitney, two legitimately strong players against decently tough opposition every year. A little wary of Goc as well since Nashville has many good two-way forwards.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 24, 2011 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s a good point regarding the linemates. That’s probably what helps Belanger’s Corsi Rel a lot.
Reasoner spent most of his time playing with Radek Dvorak and Stillman but that was only 25% of the time, so I’m unsure how he was used exactly.
Mourning Gagne forever.
I looked at Zigomanis, but he didn’t play enough games last year for Toronto (8). That alone should tell you everything you need to know about him.
Mourning Gagne forever.
I feel he is just one of the player who hasn’t really gotten their shot in the NHL. He’s almost a point-per-game player in the AHL, but he is 30 years old. His one full NHL season, with Phoenix in ‘06-07, he managed a decent showing while playing in front of a horrid defense (and that was the year BEFORE Bryz got there). I frankly don’t understand why he hasn’t stuck.
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 25, 2011 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions
You guys have any numbers for Jim Slater (Atl/Win)? Good on faceoffs, good on the forecheck. Not sure about the Corsi or OZ% and such.
I could get them if you want, but he’s not a UFA and that was what I was primarily looking for.
Mourning Gagne forever.
Todd, where does one get these stats? Are they just sitting somewhere waiting to be read, or do you guys plug raw data into a tool (ie, spreadsheet)?
by Georgia_Flyer on Jun 25, 2011 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Corsi and zone start you can get from behindthenet.ca. Faceoff% and PKTOI/gm from NHL.com. Cap hit from Capgeek or some news outlet.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 25, 2011 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Dammit, I should have just written this as a story for the front page then I could have used pretty tables!
Mourning Gagne forever.
haha, seriously. You also could have waited until now, then gotten on top of the front page all day Saturday.
But alas, Marcel Noebels gets that honor.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I included Goc because Snevik had expressed an interest in acquiring him, but he doesn’t really fill the need.
Haha, thanks. I was kinda shocked by the competition numbers, seeing as he was getting a lot of ES TOI and a relatively low OZS%, but I think my bias for him probably inflated his defensive abilities. He might have dragged in D-zone faceoffs by heavy lifting wingers (I’ll have to go back and check how much he centered Erat or Ward).
However, with all that in mind and seeing how his FO numbers stack up, I could be sold on Reasoner, Belanger, and Halpern.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
Thanks Todd very helpful.
I think Simmonds will be playing with Giroux regardless Giroux and Vorachek doesn’t seem to make some much sense as the put look to pass. Plus they have some history playing together.
There aren’t too many matchups were putting Giroux against the opponents top line would be a bad thing because many top line centers aren’t two way instead they look to get sheltered matchups because they struggle defensively. This is win win for a two way Giroux that line is better offensively and defensively they most number 1’s.
The problem is Crosby, Stamkos, Ovie type teams where one line can dominate you. I share in your concern with a rookie against them and wasting Giroux talents when he would be over matched offensively. This is where you want an experienced shutdown center like those you mentioned.
I still would prefer this role to fall on the 4th line center. You don’t have to use the whole 4th line with Shelly and all just the center mixed in for the D-Zone starts against those guys. Replacing Schenn on the 3rd line with this new shutdown guy against those teams where he would be over matched. This would give you more versatility in the lineup using the 4th line center in an up and down role and provide you with some injury insurance now that we don’t have a a Center playing wing.
I of course and Handzus bias I have his jersey and love the way he plays. He is also big enough to physically matchup with Boston’s Horton-Lucic combo at 6ft 4in 220lbs. I would buyout Betts and try to ink Handzus for cheap on a two year deal.
Why would Simmonds play with Giroux if you’re getting a shutdown center? I’d think you want Steeg/Nodl-UDA Heavy Lifter-Simmonds, allowing Giroux and JVR to play a slightly more offensive role with Vorachek.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
I’d like something along the lines of JVR-Giroux-Steeg, Hartnell-Briere-Voracek, Simmonds-HL-Nodl, Shelley (inevitable)-Betts-Powe.
Mourning Gagne forever.
I guess it depends how much Leino signs for but I was including the LBH in my mind. Have to see what the numbers look like after the RFAs sign. But I don’t think the Flyers are going to get rid of the 3 scoring lines notion because if they going to two scoring lines and a true shutdown line Richards should have never been traded.
The Buyout on Betts is nominal.
Also the big body with JVR-Giroux was really missing IMO. All those great drives to net and plays down low the JVR generated in the playoffs were in need of another big body to help pounce on the rebounds and bury all those loose pucks. How many shots and rebounds did he generate Simmonds is the perfect guy to do that on the right side.
Richards should have never been traded.
Yep.
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 25, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Plus the keep mentioning top 9 top 9 the Flyers want 3 lines that can score and no way does Schenn not make the team his 3 million dollar hit would be impossible to use as a call up.
playmaker26 was saying how the flyers want to go back to a more traditional 2 soring lines 1 energy line and a 4th line. also pretty good bet Rinaldo makes the team. FO seems to love him.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Energy line is not a shutdown line.
by chrislanci on Jun 26, 2011 8:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree – Voracek is a passer, so pairing him with a shooter at center (Briere) makes more sense. And I do agree that having a shutdown center will help, until Courturier is ready to take over.
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 25, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Gagne-Richards-Knuble got tough minutes and put up tons of points as well. I think it is more important to shelter Danny B then have a shutdown line. Basically just don’t have two lines that need to be Sheltered that would be bad.
And Schenn is listed as big as Richards 6ft 1 in close to 200lbs.
by chrislanci on Jun 26, 2011 8:16 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You’ll still need Giroux’s line to take some tough minutes regardless ala Gagne-Richards-Knuble, but why not minimize the lifting? I just don’t think you need Simmonds on that line, if for no other reason than is offensive upside is limited. Either way, Briere is protected out of necessity, and you’re figuring out how to divide the minutes after that.
Is the Schenn part in response to me? Are you just pointing out that we is capable of playing a shutdown role because of his size? I think that will be true one day, I just don’t think you need to do that right away.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
Sorry about Schenn part was on my IPHONE and I coudn’t find the comment that was arguing to put Schenn in the AHL so he can mature physically to handle top NHL competition. He is big enough. Handling tough minutes thing might be more a mental/attitude thing than talent anyway.
Have you read these? Young forwards and tough minutes. Young D and tough minutes. Not out of the question, but he’ll probably need help and likely won’t do better than break even, if that. Unless he’s way ahead of the curve.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 27, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
He will be 20 at the start of the season so that looks good for forwards. Also EDM doesn’t have the supporting D core to back up their young guys. And if I had my way a pairing Schenn with Versteeg and Cole vet Defensively responsible wingers he should be okay.
Is Schenn going to excel and the role as a rookie like Richards at 26 last season. Certainly not but Homer has made his bed filled it with a 6million dollar goalie it is now time to lie in it and hope Bryz likes being spooned.
Just because he has the potential to grow into that role in 2 or more years doesn’t mean it’s the best idea to push him into it right now.
In LA he would have gone through Terry Murray defensive bootcamp. Kopitar is a much, much more complete player now than he was when TM arrived. Now he gets thrown into the deep end, just because the Flyers need someone there? I say allow for a learning curve, and treat him like the rookie he is.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
Good post, this is definitely something we need. Would love to get Belanger for $2 million, I think that would be a great fit.
Is it assumed we’re gonna sign Leino now? It seems like everyone is including him on their rosters for next year. I think we could make better use of his $3.5 million or whatever it’ll be.
Unless he has a great camp, I would like to see Schenn get a year to develop in the AHL and we could use his money for the 3rd line center. Probably won’t happen though. But he I doubt he can handle those assignments and I don’t want Giroux getting burned out playing against the other top lines.
If Leino is signed, there’s no money or playing time for a third line center unless Schenn is in the AHL. And even if you want Schenn in the AHL for a year, unless you’re giving Leino a one-year deal, the same problem comes back next year.
This is what I was thinking
CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR
FORWARDS
Scott Hartnell ($4.200m) / Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Jakub Voracek ($2.200m)
Kris Versteeg ($3.083m) / Claude Giroux ($3.750m) / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)
Andreas Nodl ($1.050m) / Marty Reasoner ($1.550m) / Wayne Simmonds ($1.850m)
Darroll Powe ($0.900m) / Blair Betts ($0.700m) / Jody Shelley ($1.100m)
/ / Jason Akeson ($0.715m)
DEFENSEMEN
Matt Carle ($3.437m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Braydon Coburn ($3.200m) / Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m)
Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m) / Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
/ Kevin Marshall ($0.845m)
GOALTENDERS
Ilya Bryzgalov ($5.666m) / Sergei Bobrovsky ($1.750m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $62,007,261; BONUSES: $1,837,500
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $2,292,739
Mourning Gagne forever.
Lappy on regular LTIR and you are 1.1M under the cap. Two months in you’ll have payroll room banked to send Akeson down and bring Schenn up. I could see that.
The difference is that you have Nodl at 1M instead of Leino at 3M+, which would mean you don’t bank payroll room and can’t bring Schenn back up.
Akeson is here to stay!
Can you only bank payroll if you are against the cap?
Mourning Gagne forever.
Not sure what your question meant.
I meant to say “Lappy on regular IR (not LTIR)”. Once people put Lappy on LTIR and go over 64.3M, they’re not banking any payroll room and can only call up a player who makes less than whatever LTIR space they have left. You’re under the cap for real, so you can save up that extra money and use it on a deadline rental or a midseason callup or some other shiny new toy.
Schenn will be 20 in August
I read this and was thinking Schenn is too young to play in the A; but his birthday is mid-August so in camp he’ll be 20. This is good for flexibility.
by Georgia_Flyer on Jun 25, 2011 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Also wasting one year of a potentially favorable ELC year in the AHL. Clear or pay those bonuses now so they are gone for next year.
by chrislanci on Jun 26, 2011 8:11 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Rec’d.
Although I’m mad at you and Geoff for each posting 1/3 of the long article I was working on. I guess I’ll wait to write the last part and see if someone else is going to do that for me.
Haha sorry. I was actually wondering if you were going to write something similar to this but I thought I’d write it up anyway and see if anything was posted before I finished.
Did you have anyone else in mind?
Mourning Gagne forever.
Nah, you did it better.
My look at the RFA cap hits was more detailed than Geoff’s (BtN numbers instead of hockey reference), but came to the same result. My look at this was much less detailed than yours, focusing more on how/why we had to let go of Leino and less on who we should plug in.
Voracek is a perfect candidate to replace Leino, and Schenn’s cap hit is too large to fit him in regardless.
Mourning Gagne forever.
Why can’t Schenn fit?
Something weird is going on — what am I missing? Your roster has only 2M in cap room with Lappy removed, but when I put Lappy on and replace Schenn with Nodl, it fits just fine for me:
CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR
FORWARDS
Scott Hartnell ($4.200m) / Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Jakub Voracek ($2.200m)
Kris Versteeg ($3.083m) / Claude Giroux ($3.750m) / James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m)
Brayden Schenn ($3.110m) / Marty Reasoner ($1.550m) / Wayne Simmonds ($1.850m)
Darroll Powe ($0.900m) / Blair Betts ($0.700m) / Jody Shelley ($1.100m)
Ian Laperriere ($1.166m) / Jason Akeson ($0.715m)
DEFENSEMEN
Matt Carle ($3.437m) / Chris Pronger ($4.921m)
Braydon Coburn ($3.200m) / Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m)
Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m) / Oskars Bartulis ($0.600m)
Kevin Marshall ($0.845m)
GOALTENDERS
Ilya Bryzgalov ($5.666m) / Sergei Bobrovsky ($1.750m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $63,233,928; BONUSES: $3,952,500
CAP SPACE (23-man roster): $1,066,072
Heh. So…given that you have cap space for either option, do you want Schenn in the NHL or do you want Nodl on the third line?
Or is that a wait-and-see-at-camp thing?
If you do keep Schenn, do you play him out of position with Giroux or “tough minute center” just to get him exposure? I honestly don’t know. If he’s the best player not in the NHL, then he probably needs to be in the NHL, but I don’t see a spot for him.
Mourning Gagne forever.
Yeah, if Schenn’s in the NHL, I think it’s at wing. The only center spot that’s really open is the heavy lifter spot, and I don’t want him breaking in with that role.
Speaking of articles, Eric, if I could get some recommendations on BSH articles on Richards, I would be very grateful. I’m sifting through the archives, but I thought it’d be better to go to the source.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
Yeah, I posted something on Carter at the Cannon, but I don’t think we have much of anything on Richards.
Richards’ role is the source of a long-running debate on here in comments, but I don’t remember any articles that addressed it directly. Geoff has argued that Richards’ value comes from two places: achieving neutral-plus results from the toughest defensive situations, and being a great producer on the power play. Others have argued that he was our best player and was being wasted by not giving the opportunity to score more (which usually meant they didn’t like the defensive-minded Andreas Nodl on his wing).
In retrospect, I’m a little surprised I don’t recall a “see, this is what I’m talking about” article from Geoff. But I don’t think he ever laid it all out in a post; instead, it’s buried in thousands of comments on the daily link dumps.
OK. I do have other articles on tough minutes forwards, where he always pops up. But thanks for letting me know.
Unless Geoff wants to write one now? I don’t know what would work as bribery. (The potential for arguing against Richards haters…? Woo woo)
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
haha, are there RIchards haters?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, not real hockey people. But aren’t there some fans going on and on about “leadership” and “locker room issues”? Partying, etc.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
I thought drinking was a long standing tradition in Hockey. I remember seeing that the team in ’74 or ’75 wore black armbands when their favorite bar burned down.
To be fair, if it starts to impede their ability to play it’s a problem.
"All we want is to be treated like human beings, not to be experimented on like guinea pigs or patronized like bunny rabbits. "
"I don't patronize bunny rabbits."
by Mike B on D on Jun 26, 2011 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Eric, since we stole your idea, why don’t you write one fro JftC? haha
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Belanger's 2010-2011 Cap Hit???
I’m confused… Capgeek says his 2010-11 cap hit was $750,000, but here you guys say it’s $1,750,00?
Good point. I’m certain Belanger signed for really cheap, after he had that contact dispute with the Caps.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 25, 2011 4:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Enjoyed the read
Do any of the mentioned players have a Lappy-like aura that could help the team in addition to on ice skills?
by Hans S on Jun 25, 2011 4:08 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Leino should go
I don’t see a role for him on this team anymore.
It's in his wheelhouse!!
Carlos Ruiz, My Nickname is Chooch.
This. And I used to really like Leino. Voracek is less expensive, better with more upside. You need 4 top 6 wingers: Voracek, Simmonds, JVR, Hartnell and Steeg are 5 of them. Yes I class Simmonds as Top 6. When LA put him in the Top 6 he did a good job. But you don’t need Leino on this team.
Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 25, 2011 4:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes I class Simmonds as Top 6. When LA put him in the Top 6 he did a good job.
I’d still say he’s kind of a tweener, but he does put up more points with better linemates.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
In reality, Simmonds will get time on both 2 & 3. Lavy is like that. And Simmonds can handle it.
by Georgia_Flyer on Jun 25, 2011 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Possibly. The reports are that he plays (and models his own game) like Mike Richards. But his physical frame isn’t strong enough yet to handle the beating – that’s the major concern. Personally I see Schenn as the replacement for Briere for the second line, and Corturier as the third line center (in a few years).
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 25, 2011 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions
What was Mike Richards’ rookie season like, just out of curiosity? To me it looks like he needed some time to become the player he is today.
I think Schenn may have a bit more potential on offense, and he is going to develop into a good two-way forward. But Richards probably has the edge on defense.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
34 points in 79 games, 11 goals.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 25, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Let’s give Briere the tough minutes against the top lines and top D-pairings (e.g. Zdeno Chara).
Peter Laviolette approves of this plan.
Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home, but at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jun 25, 2011 8:18 AM EDT reply actions
What about Madden, Todd?
do you poop on parties professionally, or do you just do it as a hobby?
by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Jun 25, 2011 10:14 AM EDT reply actions
He’s 38, which was why I didn’t include him, but….
Corsi Rel QoC: 0.546/2nd
Corsi Rel: -7.9/9th
OZS%: 33.6/12th
FO%: 51.0
SHTOI/G: 2.27/1st
Cap hit: $1.25
He seems to fit the bill also. I’d still have concerns over his age.
Mourning Gagne forever.
I was just curious. There were implications that there was a shortage of favorable centers, But I kind of disagree. There’s 4-5 guys out there that could come in and fit until Schenn gets back
do you poop on parties professionally, or do you just do it as a hobby?
by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Jun 25, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s actually a pretty good year to try and find a center to fill that role, but whether the Flyers think they need to find someone for that position is another question.
Mourning Gagne forever.
Also: What about Drury? I heard he was bought out because he wanted a significant amount of cash. Perhaps his demands go down?
do you poop on parties professionally, or do you just do it as a hobby?
by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Jun 25, 2011 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
...
Apparently, Drury can’t be bought out because he has a “degenerative condition” in his left knee that would "render him medically unable to play next season." The Rangers are trying to figure out what to do about Drury’s situation.
Blue Shirt Banter has a great chart to help us understand the situation facing the Rangers and Drury:

Avidly opposed to Ilya Bryzgalov becoming a Philadelphia Flyer
@Mitchman88 on Twitter
by Mitchell Green on Jun 25, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions
So….. Briere was obviously the best signing of this offseason now. The 3 biggest names on the open market (ans that the Flyers had to land one of) was Briere, Drury and Gomez. I seem to remember a bunch of grumblings about Briere being the worst signing of the bunch, obviously not true.
Now with Drury being a UFA ( http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog/puck_daddy/post/Rangers-buy-out-Chris-Drury-who-bows-out-with-c;_ylt=AqlHSmotwX.WFkNCgSyymMl7vLYF?urn=nhl-wp8229 ). If he did have a clean bill of health would this be the guy to throw a small contract at and hope he can be the shutdown guy? I would think he would have to be put through the paces, maybe invite him to training camp like we had done with Betts, Guerin etc.?
by blackandorange on Jun 30, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Not sure if he can be that shutdown guy, but he’s good to throw out in the defensive zone against lesser competition, if nothing else.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jul 1, 2011 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
I've been a fan of Belanger for a little bit now
would be perfect as the shutdown man here until Schenn is ready
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
I think the logic of this article is faulty. The insistence that the Flyers need a “shutdown” center ignores that for at least 50% of the games the desired match-ups are subject to the whim of the other team’s coach. I mean one can argue there are situations where the other team has to fall into a match-up and there are still 41 games where the Flyers can dictate matchups. But I think it would be a disaster if Schenn is NHL ready and has to compete for time with another center. After “resolving” the center question you want to throw us in it again.
you must not have watched the Bos Phl series huh? At home the Flyers were out matched by the Bruins, so yeah you 100% need a shutdown center.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
You say that as if a shutdown line is unusual.
Richards, JStaal, Malhotra, Bergeron, Datsyuk, Marleau, etc. All of these guys are routinely deployed against (and succeed against) the top scoring lines on the opposing team. The matchups are slightly tougher to control on the road, but remember that most changes don’t happen at faceoffs, so whether you’re at home or on the road doesn’t matter for trying to get matchups.
The insistence that the Flyers need a "shutdown" center ignores that for at least 50% of the games the desired match-ups are subject to the whim of the other team’s coach
You’re ignoring the huge parts of the game when the opposing coach can’t dictate who is on the ice. Regardless, if you have a defensive zone draw, chances are you’d put out Betts or Giroux rather than Briere. What I’m saying is if the Flyers have another option to take those draws (or get deployed defensively on the fly) then you free up Giroux to play a more offensive game and reduce the load on Betts.
Getting rid of your tough minutes center doesn’t resolve the issue, it creates one. Just look at the Oilers, lots of young prospects that have had to play tough minutes before they are ready for it and failing. If Schenn can step into the NHL and play good defensive minutes against the best players in the league then that would be fantastic, but I’m not putting money on it happening.
Mourning Gagne forever.
For some reason the Flyers recently (Stevens and Lavi) don’t seem to try to force matchups on the road. The other teams do it to us constantly and we just seem to accept the matchup when on the road. That is one point that I thought that Hitch did a masterful job. Maybe Lavi will work on that during the offseason to add to his game?
Phigment
But we had a really good road record. Possibly until mid-February, but after that everything sucked. Relatively speaking.
by Georgia_Flyer on Jun 25, 2011 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I think a luxury the Flyers had was not having to worry all that much about matchups. Just keep Briere away from top lines: any other forward line should be able to handle any minutes given to it.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 26, 2011 3:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Versteeg on the “Tough Minutes” line? I don’t think so. I would rather have Carcillo or Powe on the “Tough Minutes” line.
Tough minuets doesn’t mean the players have to be tough. Powe would be good, Versteeg would be……ok(he DID kinda suck at it last year), Carcillo, again, would still not be ideal. Upshall would be great. Broos laich, Bergenheim, Handzuse would all be good too.
Samesis
Bergenheim
THIS.
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 27, 2011 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he’ll get overpaid in FA
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 27, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
You’d rather Dan Carcillo try to face Alex Ovechkin than Versteeg?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 26, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
I would.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 27, 2011 3:05 AM EDT up reply actions
hahaha
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 27, 2011 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Powe is a give away machine against skilled players. He is best left to 4th line versus 4th line matchups. He is NOT a shutdown defensive player!
Phigment
Darroll Powe had 12 giveaways all year, according to NHL.com … that doesn’t sound like a give-away machine to me. By comparison, Nodl had 29 in 14 less games.
Maybe it should read "reformedpenguinsfan" since I have retired my Lemeiux jersey ... and purchased an Orange and Black Pronger jersey.
by MaximumTalbot on Jun 27, 2011 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Versteeg has a track record of playing tough minutes to a draw. Carcillo, losing the possession battle to bottom-6ers.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 27, 2011 3:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Another option what about signing Eric Cole and letting Leino walk replacing him with Vorachek. Schenn can then be paired with Cole and Versteeg. Even if Schenn isn’t a Selke Canidate that line should be able to handle tougher matchups. Cole also adds even more size to the lineup to combat Boston’s big guys.
I still feel JVR-Giroux-Simmonds will get the toughest matchups similar to how Knuble-Richards-Gagne was used a couple years ago.
by chrislanci on Jun 26, 2011 8:06 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I guess my only question is why that’s preferable to signing someone to take the tough minutes off a 20 year old. I don’t think that lineup looks that bad (assuming Cole’s hit is reasonable), but the experiment here was try and find ways to save Schenn from that crucial of a role in his rookie year.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
I am more for throwing him into the role for the start best way to learn is on the job and with good supporting cast I think he can do fine at the role splitting it with Giroux’s line. I don’t want to waste the ELC years in the AHL I don’t want him playing wing, though drafting Coutier that might make more sense because is potentially a better shutdown center with even more size down the road. Coutier is probably a year or two away and maybe makes the team in time for Danny to be bought out who knows.
Most importantly I think is very important to clear Schenn bonuses this season. So we have the room to resign Carle, Coburn and JVR in the offseason.
I am on board with your logic but I am still ALSO concerned with the offense lost with Richards and Carter gone. Cole brings back some of the goal scoring, some of the leadership and playoff experience and continues to add size to the lineup. If I am not bringing back Leino and instead signing a shutdown center the offense is going to be pretty thin this year. Much thinner than I would like it to be. And why there are Centers available in this exercise to take those minutes away who it is going to cost too much on the offensive end to do so unless you get one who would regularly play on the 4th line and then get spotted in for D zone draws and matchups when needed.
question about Malhotra
Is there anyway to breakdown of how he was used. My question is was Malhotra’s line used against the tough matchups or did Malhotra get used like the anti-Jagr and play with a variety of wingers spot shadowing the other centers when defense was need and pretty much take all the defensive draws?
You can do it game-by-game if you want: http://timeonice.com/H2H1011.html?GameNumber=20002&submit=Go
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jun 27, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
He played a lot with Torres and Hansen. Took about 6 d zone draws per game at 5v5, ~36% of VAN’s 5v5 D zone faceoffs.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Jun 27, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
All of your options are gone now
Todd haz a sad. So does Bud in TN.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Last offseason I wrote a fanpost about how there was a good chance to pick up a decent goalie cheaply, and we ended up with Leighton.
Mourning Gagne forever.
So you got a cheap goalie decently?
I am perplexed – NOW WHAT? There’s lliterally nothing left. Can’t even sign Gagne as a decent winger top help shelter Talbot at center. I just don’t know.
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!
by MaximumTalbot on Jul 2, 2011 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Buffalo has 19 players and have 1.3 million in cap space what are the chances of getting Gaustad as our third line center. He has one year left at 2.3 million. Hes an unresrticted free agent next year maybe that is enough time for Schenn to develop into the third line center we want him to be.
Line would be something like
Hartnell Briere Voracek
JVR Giroux Jagr
Simmonds Gaustad Nodl
Shelley Betts Talbot
I hated Gaustad in the playoffs last year, but I did say I would Like him on the Flyers. This lets Schenn develop more. You can call him up mid season if you like. I would think with Schenns money off and replacing it with 2.3 Plus the cap space you already have available you could add a better 6th defensmen in case pronger is not ready.,
I’d love to see (and by see I mean explain to me) his advanced statistics because, at face value, I like this idea.
Avidly opposed to Ilya Bryzgalov becoming a Philadelphia Flyer
@Mitchman88 on Twitter
by Mitchell Green on Jul 4, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t really understand all those statistics. I just watch the game. I am not one of those people that claim those stats don’t mean anything, I just don’t really understand how it all works. I just watched Gaustad for a small sample size of seven games. I liked his physicality. I liked when he went in the corners he more than often came out with the puck. I liked him in the face off dot. I liked that he was willing to block shots. I liked his size 6’4" 229lbs, and he didn’t seem slow. I don’t know if a trade like this is possible. I know Buffalo is heavy on the wing and light at center, but I know they are right up against the cap and I don’t know how atttched they are to Gaustad. I just remember watching him, and him pissing me off a lot. I don’t even know if he is a shut down center, but I do know he is more defensive minded than offensively talented. Maybe someone else can do all of the advanced statistics.
10th in Corsi Rel QoC, 7th in Corsi Rel, last in OZS%, 57.4 FO%.
He’s basically a better version of Betts, someone who will face off against weaker competition in the defensive zone and beat them. I think his size makes a big difference though, especially against someone like Briere.
Mourning Gagne forever.
With a dirt cheap contract, he’d be great insurance if/when Betts gets hurt. Plus, he is a pretty tough bastard.
Avidly opposed to Ilya Bryzgalov becoming a Philadelphia Flyer
@Mitchman88 on Twitter
by Mitchell Green on Jul 5, 2011 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, there goes that idea. Konopka signed with the Senators today — 1-year deal for $700,000.
Konopka also ranked fourth in the NHL with a 57.7 per cent faceoff success rate.Well, that sure would have been nice to have on our team . . .
Avidly opposed to Ilya Bryzgalov becoming a Philadelphia Flyer
@Mitchman88 on Twitter
by Mitchell Green on Jul 5, 2011 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions
The only remaining free agent center left is ...
CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR
FORWARDS
Scott Hartnell ($4.200m) / Daniel Briere ($6.500m) / Jaromir Jagr ($3.300m)
James Van Riemsdyk ($1.654m) / Claude Giroux ($3.750m) / Jakub Voracek ($2.250m)
Maxime Talbot ($1.050m) / Vaclav Prospal ($2.480m) / Wayne Simmonds ($1.850m)
Tom Sestito ($0.550m) / Blair Betts ($0.700m) / Andreas Nodl ($0.845m)
Jody Shelley ($1.100m) / Ian Laperriere ($1.166m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kimmo Timonen ($6.333m) / Braydon Coburn ($3.200m)
Chris Pronger ($4.921m) / Matt Carle ($3.437m)
Andrej Meszaros ($4.000m) / Oliver Lauridsen ($0.650m)
Andreas Lilja ($0.737m)
GOALTENDERS
Ilya Bryzgalov ($5.666m) / Sergei Bobrovsky ($1.750m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $62,092,262; BONUSES: $1,700,000
CAP SPACE (23-man roster): $2,207,738
And you still have enough cap space to bring up Schenn if (or when?) Vinny gets hurt. Not entirely sure that those wingers fit Vinny’s style though …
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!

by 
























