Thursday Morning Fly By: Preach on Jose Theodore
Today's open discussion thread, complete with your daily dose of Philadelphia Flyers news and notes...
- There was a brief scare where Bill Meltzer reported that a lot of Flyers were waiver eligible this year... [HockeyBuzz.com]
- ...but our fears were put to rest: [DragonGirl's Awesomeness]
- A review of the Flyers 2011 draft: [Hockey's Future]
- Ian Laperriere shows a knack for coaching: [Philly Sports Daily]
- Remembering Branko Radivojevic: [Flyers Faithful]
- Oliver Lauridsen has a great name. And he's had a well-traveled career so far: [NHL.com]
- Is Paul Holmgren done overhauling the roster? [NHL Hot Stove]
- A breakdown of the Phantoms schedule next year: [PostStar.com]
- Why next year is scary: [Broad Street Buzz]
- Tim Panaccio is making an All-Flyers team, with players selected from every era. Up first, 1967-79: [CSNPhilly]
- Will there ever be a list of "biggest deals in NHL history" that doesn't include Eric Lindros? [NHL.com]
- The Predators officially unveiled their new home jerseys last night: [On the Forecheck] [icethetics]
- Jhonas Enroth and the Sabres are having a contract argument in the media. If Enroth wants $750k and the Sabres don't want to even give him $600k, holy crap I wish he was on the Flyers. Too late: [Die By The Blade]
- Jose Theodore gave some candid quotes about how bad the goaltending market is, including: "When July 1 comes, a lot of times it’s a gamble. You have a quick call and it’s like take it or leave it now or they’re going to sign another guy. You can’t wait for the next offer." [NHL Hot Stove]
- From the playoffs, video of Tyler Myers breaking the glass during a pre-game skate in response to a taunting Flyers fan: [Puck Daddy]
- Steve Mason has himself a new mask and it's eerily awesome: [Puck Daddy]
- Finally, a story on the difficulty the Avalanche and Islanders are having reaching the cap floor: [Puck Daddy]
456 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Now he’s getting ready for his first full professional season. With Chris Pronger’s uncertain health heading into training camp, there could be an opportunity for Lauridsen to win an NHL job. Other candidates for the last defense spots include veterans Andreas Lilja and Oskars Bartulis, and fellow prospects Kevin Marshall and Erik Gustafsson.
Isnt that alitt early for him? or he is just that hyped by reporters because of his size?
Yes, and yes.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions
As a dane I hope he will have great succes as a Flyer, but even I know that he needs atleast one year in the AHL before he should play NHL hockey.
by Anders Jensen on Jul 14, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Yup. haha
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe you guys don’t realize this, but he’s actually tall. With a long reach. Like Chara or Pronger or Myers. Are you saying those guys need to go back to the AHL too?
/This is what my life feels like lately.
This is why after 2 weeks I declared my son will be a denfencemen, because he’s gonna be tall like his dad. (I topped out at 6’6")
personally
I think the Devils and Kovalchuk should now sue the NHL for age discrimination. They’re essentially saying he CAN’T play until he’s 44.
Go Devils
by FrankG929 on Aug 9, 2010 5:15 PM PDT
yea, sorry totally forgot that if you are tall and big defensemen you dont need to practice in the AHL, you can just dominate the NHL :D
by Anders Jensen on Jul 14, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
We wanted Myers to go back to the AHL, but he didn’t let us do that.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
I’ve heard he’s pretty inconsiderate.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Dragongirls post
Where do I look?
-bob
by Rrainone on Jul 14, 2011 7:46 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Click the link and wait for your browser to load. Not sure if it will work on a mobile though.
Mourning Gagne forever.
It brings me to yesterday’s fly by. It isn’t in mobile format though.
-bob
by Rrainone on Jul 14, 2011 8:15 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Oh I see, my browser wasn’t working properly. If you wait it should bring you to that post. It’s pretty close to the end of the fly-by if you need to scroll manually.
I found it. More operators fault than the website, patience isn’t my best quality lol. Thanks.
-bob
by Rrainone on Jul 14, 2011 8:23 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Of course the goalie market is gonna suck when your Jose Theodore. Not too many teams are looking for crappy goalies.
Samesis
Yet he’s getting paid as much as Vokoun
Mourning Gagne forever.
by ToddtheFox on Jul 14, 2011 8:42 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
A) Cause Florida didn’t over pay anybody else in FA this year?
B) And Vokoun’s agents didn’t screw up at all?
Samesis
How did Vokoun’s agents screw up?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, can’t argue with that.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Theodore was coming of a 0.924 ESS% (same as Cam Ward and Martin Brodeur, better than Quick, Fleury, Backstrom, Roloson, Pavelec, Price, etc.) which was only 0.001 worse than Luongo, Howard, and Rinne.
But I guess all those guys are crappy goalies.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions
47 games played, 43 starts. 20 games more than any other goalie on his team.
Doesn’t sound like a backup to me.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I watched a lot of Caps games that year being in DC, went to several as well. He was really, really bad in A LOT of games. Let in absolutely terrible goals quite frequently
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Cool. So does every goalie. He’s not an NHL starter, just like Boucher. Except he’s better than Boucher.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
OK, but the numbers you through out were when he was a starter for Washington. He was a crappy starter.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions
A 0.924 ESS% as a starter is above-average NHL starter.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Should also add, 0.924 is what Ryan Miller did this past year, better than Kiprusoff, Howard, Vokoun, Quick, Halak, Bobrovsky, and Neuvirth’s numbers from this past year.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Enroth’s ESS was .914 but i didn’t calculate it directly so there probably roundoff error.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
It was 0.919, but only 309 shots. So nobody knows how good he really is, but it’s promising, especially when looking at his AHL stats.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
He’s not an NHL starter, just like Boucher
A 0.924 ESS% as a starter is above-average NHL starter.
So maybe ESS% isn’t quite that indicative as to who should start and who shouldn’t?
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
I should also add that that the problem I have with the comparison is that it’s based on one year of data, as Don says below. Theodore put up one year of solid ESS% playing for the President Trophy winners, but if he’s crappy that means everyone else with a lower or slightly higher ESS% that same year, even if they have much larger body of work as a solid goalie, is also crappy. I don’t think that’s fair.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Psst, he also had a pretty good year when he won the Venzina in 2001/2002 with the Habs (who finished 18 out of 28 teams that year)with a .931 ESS% and a .931 Overall Sv%. It’s not like he just had one good year for a great team; so don’t over simplify in the other direction either. GM’s have signed people for less of a track record before, so his comments on the goalie market shouldn’t be ignored.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I’m aware of that. It also happened a decade ago.
But I guess all those guys are crappy goalies.
That’s what I had a problem with. Making the jump from the market to actual quality. Unless he was speaking as a misguided sarcastic GM or something, it just seems…wrong.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Okay, in 03/04 he had a .934 ESS% haha.
Though that statement from Geoff was a bit of hyperbole, and mildly ridiculous. I just want to keep to Theodore’s comment about the market, and how they shouldn’t be ignored. Which I think you are fine with. I just wanted to point out he didn’t just have 1 good year, and that shouldn’t be a reason to discredit his statements. He was pretty inconsistent in his career for sure; some great years and some nightmare ones.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I was absolutely being sarcastic, because JpH said the market was crappy for a crappy goalie. Since he was talking about that summer, I went with the previous year’s data.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
The one-year data is absolutely not fair. But he was coming off a great year, and got nothing. For one year, he was that good. For his career, he’s an average NHL backup.
Saying he’s a crappy goalie ignores both of those things, which is the problem.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think it ignores the “average NHL back-up” part of it, which I would translate to a “crappy starting goalie,” which he was IMO. It really depends on your definition of crappy.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
This is true, but again, the “crappy goalie” comment was originally made in reference to Theodore coming off a 0.924 ESS% season.
And if Theodore is a crappy goalie, there are an awful lot of crappy goalies.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, he had a good year. It’s just that his good years were separated by 6 or 7 bad years. I guess I give him more crap because he won the freakin Vezina so early in his career, I dunno.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
He had a pretty bad 08-09, after having two bad years and an average year in Colorado.
He wasn’t good in Colorado, but three of the last four years, he’s been an average backup, with one year as an above-average starter.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Although Theo has a knack for the untimely dagger. He also wasn’t on the Caps last year…
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Did I say he was? If so, it’s that awkward time where two years ago was a year ago, and last year was 2 months ago…
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
No, I’m just wondering why the comments about his Caps tenure are relevant. Every GM saw that, and he’s signed two contracts since then.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Because Jose was talking about last offseason as well as this one in the article.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Ha. I assumed he meant this season. Commenting before reading fail. Wouldn’t the statement be just as accurate now?
Obviously, this is all speculation.
haha, it is. He was commenting on both. Saying how he knows what Vokoun was going through (he went through it the prior year) and that’s why he called up Florida this year asap.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Dude, Theodore sucks. He hasn’t been good in like 8 years.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Over the last four years, he has a 0.917 ESS%. Perfectly average NHL backup. Costing $1.5 million.
Bob/Theodore tandem would have been perfectly above-average.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Average back-up numbers + what I’ve seen from Theodore = crappy goalie.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Average back-up numbers + what I’ve seen from Theodore = above-average goalie.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions
You can’t just change my formula like that. I’ve spent years developing it.
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions
If you’re a backup goalie, you’re not an above average goalie. and above average goalie is top 15 in the NHL.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
I’d narrow it down to top 10 or even 8. There’s a ton of mediocracy in the league these days.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
So you judge average goaltenders to a date in time when you felt there were better goaltenders?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
An average goalie in the NHL is 15th or 16th best in the world…the timeline is up to the person making the decision…a guy who was an average NHL goalie for the decade could be above or below average any given year…in my opinion.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
The question has nothing to do with wanting insight on your opinion, I get it, I disagree, I’m curios about Val’s.
Absolute ranks tell me almost nothing since what separates 15 from 20 or 10 might be incredibly small…hence why I disagree with what you’re saying about average.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Yeah average over their careers, with the roller coaster effect I feel that a more appropriate numeric scaling would be closer to the top 8 to 10 would be above average, 10-20ish average and 20-30 bottom of the barrel.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
I was about to criticize you, then realized a) that’s mean; b) I should ask for clarification.
You’re saying there are only 10 above average goalies in a league where there are 60+ goalies? In your comment, there are 67% of NHL goalies below the average.
Not sure, but I think there has to be a qualifier in there that 10-20ish is “average starter” or you have to drop your average back to 25-35.
Otherwise, that’s not an “average”.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah sorry I meant average starter, I kind of assumed that was a given. That’s what I get for assuming.
And also I’m more speaking over career’s rather than small sample sizes. I realize it’s a very subjective statement since there’s always turn over but in the long run I still feel top 8-10 would be the legit above average starters.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
That’s the thing, I caught myself because I thought you may have meant that. But, as I suspected, Pardini didn’t.
That’s why I ask.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
haha, cool.
low-five
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, goalie is the only position where I would define “average” as starters only in the NHL…unless you mean “average #1 center” or something along those lines, but who is a number 1 center is much more subjective than who is a number 1 goalie…obviously some teams (the 2010 Flyers and the current Penguins) have more than one #1 center, while some teams don’t have one at all.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
So Cory Scheider isn’t even “bottom of the barrel.”
Do you see the flaws here? Some NHL teams don’t have a starting goalie, just like some NHL teams don’t have a #1 center. And some teams have numerous #1 centers.
Some teams don’t have a #1 goalie (EdmontonNewYork) and some teams have two (Vancouver, Boston, L.A.)
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Psh, we all know the Caps have legitimately below average goaltending.
Well, until they got Vokoun.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
If you’re not a starter you’re below average at the goalie position. It’s the only position that plays 60 minutes (except in ottawa) per game, so I don’t consider the average goalie to be “the best backup/worst starter.” When you look at a team’s goalie position come the playoffs, unless you’re playing…umm…us…most people would only seriously consider the starter.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
“This franchise features two promising young goaltenders, and you get to see both of them in every game!”
So Nikolai Khabibulin gets to weight down the average while Corey Schneider gets thrown out of the argument?
I’m all for distinctions between starter and backup. Starters are, as a group, better than the backups. But eventually, those bad starters fall away and the good backups move up.
In the snapshot of one NHL season, it’s incorrect to say Corey Schneider, Tuukka Rask, Jose Theodore, etc. were below average goalies simply because they played behind more established goalies. They are above average goalies by Sv% metrics, but you throw them out because it doesn’t matter how well they played, it’s that they weren’t the starter.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions
They are above average goalies by Sv% metrics, but you throw them out because it doesn’t matter how well they played, it’s that they weren’t the starter.
what about over their career’s? how would one rank a goalie who played 25-30 games for 4 seasons and would be #1 overall? Since the goalie hasn’t played as much his sample size is way smaller so a goalie who has a career that plays out over a 10 year career would be better no?
Like Brodeur for example, could anyone argue there was a better goalie in the world than him in the 90’s and early 2000’s?
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Like Brodeur for example, could anyone argue there was a better goalie in the world than him in the 90’s and early 2000’s?
Hasek?
More simply, yes, pretty easily.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Hasek is nice though, because from ’90 to ’02, he played in every season that Brodeur did and out-save-percentaged him in every one of those years, by an aggregate .925 to .911.
well I got learned. I knew Hasek would be up there but I didn’t realize he was statistically that much better
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Brodeur’s save percentages were pretty meh, and are the source of some dispute over how good he really was. That was just an unfortunate example to choose.
Hasek led the league for six straight years, including setting the record that Thomas just broke. He’s the man.
I never considered him a douche bag but that’s because my young brain couldn’t understand his accent so i had no idea what he was saying.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
We had a discussion here the other day; Brodeur is amazing because he was above average for so many years on good teams. His longevity and above average numbers to coincide with that longevity are what made him amazing. From a statistics stand point, he isn’t overly impressive.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Haha, the problem starts when someone compares Brodeur to Biron and doesn’t tell you why he is doing that…it was a fun day.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
To make perople’s heads explode!
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
you throw them out because it doesn’t matter how well they played, it’s that they weren’t the starter.
If you mean you throw them out because it wasn’t a large enough sample to properly evaluate, I’d have a minor quibble before agreeing. (That quibble being, people make bigger decisions on less games coughBryzgalovcough) But throwing them out just because they play behind Tim Thomas and Roberto Luongo is silly. They still played enough games to qualify for the league lead.
Since the goalie hasn’t played as much his sample size is way smaller so a goalie who has a career that plays out over a 10 year career would be better no?
This is the argument we had the other day, regarding Brodeur and Biron. Brodeur is great, period. But what makes him great wasn’t how well he played, it’s how well he played for that long. Which is precisely your point. Martin Biron was just as good as Martin Brodeur over the course of their careers, but one was able to stay that good for a much longer stretch of time. That’s the difference.
Like Brodeur for example, could anyone argue there was a better goalie in the world than him in the 90’s and early 2000’s?
Yeah, Hasek and Roy immediately come to mind.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah I brain farted on Hasek and Roy even, I guess I still consider him an 80’s and 90’s goalie and not as relevant. Which is my own shortcoming.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
No worries. By the time I said that, it seemed like piling on. Apologies.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I reserve to punch anyone in the face who ever tries to show statistical evidence that Andy Moog wasn’t amazing.
personally
I think the Devils and Kovalchuk should now sue the NHL for age discrimination. They’re essentially saying he CAN’T play until he’s 44.
Go Devils
by FrankG929 on Aug 9, 2010 5:15 PM PDT
But in previous generations, you’d be more willing to say top 12 are above average because there was seemingly less mediocrity? Just trying to get a handle on the though of this mediocrity in the league thing. And I would think that you would be better adjusting for that with numbers than moving overall rankings?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Funny story:
10-11 ranks in Save Percentage (not ESS%, total)
10th: Tomas Vokoun
15th: Marc-Andre Fleury
20th: Niklas Backstrom
3rd: Corey Schneider
6th: Semyon Varlamov
11th: Ilya Bryzgalov
19th: Jose Theodore
21st: Brian Boucher
22nd: Devan Dubnyk
23rd: Sergei Bobrovsky
25th: Michal Neuvirth
27th: Dwayne Roloson
32rd: Jaroslav Halak
33rd: Jimmy Howard
34th: Miikka Kiprusoff
Yes, it’s only one year, but is Jaroslav Halak a below-average goalie? Is Corey Schneider the 3rd best?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I would take that into account yea since the goalies who are above average could only be considered as such with multiple seasons under their belt, otherwise the goalie could jump into the above average with one good season.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Here’s a hypothetical.
Okay let’s say you deem average to be 14th best of goalie who started at least 42 games (28 goalies make that cut from this past year). So we’ve established your idea of average by qualify for games started and rank. This gives us a bench mark for average for an ESS% of .924 or an overall Sv% of .916.
Now can I apply this to every other goalie in the league, backup or other wise to see if they performed above or below this average? Or does the term above average only get to be applied to those that play X amount of games or are considered starters? Is it fair to say that Corey Schneider and Brent Johnson didn’t perform above league average last year because they didn’t play enough games? Because even with the raise standards of average from your hypothetical cut off analysis, they still performed well above average in both categories.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Let me amend the hypothetical: I think what Val is really trying to argue is that being 0.0001% better than average doesn’t actually make you an above average goalie. But your question is still interesting, so let’s not get sidetracked on that.
Let’s say we consider anyone within 0.002 of the average to be approximately average. Then your question would be rephrased: can we say that every goalie in the league with an ESS% of at least .926 (or Sv% of .918, if you prefer) that year performed above average? Or is everyone with under 42 games automatically considered to have had a below-average year?
Yes I picked two players who were both back ups, one with “promise” the other a “journeyman”, for a reason; they were both well above both hypothetical averages. Schneider was .933/.929 and Johnson was .928/.922.
But what you boiled the questions down to is exactly the point I’m trying to get at, or more so understand. Do people want an elevated number for Sv% that would be considered averaged based on players that they deemed as starters or whatever their preference? Or do they not want to consider any back up or work horse above average in general?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
yes I am getting at that exactly. .001 is not a big enough difference in my opinion to determine above average or average.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Yes, we are all in agreement of that, no one said otherwise; but that’s not the question I’m trying to get answered by you. I’m curious as to what you think. Understand you PoV on this is very important because a lot of people think like you in terms of a cut off for what goalies should even be analyzed.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
sorry I saw that after I posted to Eric.
as for the hypothetical, is one season enough of a sample to determine above or below average?
the cut off maybe should be 5 years of starting goalie shots faced maybe? instead of just going off of sv pct first, go with shots faced? This way if a goalie has an injury year it won’t take them out of the running maybe?
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
okay, so only look at goalies that have faced enough shots to determine the average range?
Then after that, though, can I compare goalies that are below that number that might have better save % numbers, or do I excluded entirely?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I would definitely compare those goalies as well. I’m not 100% sold on an absolute shot number to determine who’s a starter though. Some teams just let up less shots ya know? So sv pct would have to be factored in for the goalies that are below the shots faced number. How that would be weighted I have no idea.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
also I’m not sure I’m arguing, more thinking out loud maybe? This is the second time now that I started a conversation and had no clue even where I was headed with it on here. hahaha oh well. I think tomorrow I may go through the records from 1990 and see what goalie’s come out on top over the course of their careers?
Crap what if they were injured and had a season or 2 or 3 where they weren’t the starter? I hate variables.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
We are all thinking out loud here, please, can you please answer the question with your personal view point.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Yeah, I’m jumping around to follow you. Sorry to bug you with the question, but it something we run in to all the time. The more I understand people’s problems with how I may present something, the better I can adjust and give them another look that will also satisfy what they want to see when analyzing something.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I wouldn’t say they automatically should be considered to have had a below average year.
To be above or below average we’d have to take in a larger sample than just one year as peaks and valley’s happen. Consistency is where the above average goalies should show that they are just that.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Yeah, so my take is that you’re shying away from saying goalies had an above or below average year in general because they fluctuate so much; you want to stick to looking at career rates and saying they are above or below average talents.
Is that about the sum of it?
That’s for careers. I’m talking about if we just wanted to to analyze 1 year, because it comes up often around here. Or are you saying no goalie should be looked at and judged in one year; which is fine, but we do it all the time here, so I’m hoping that’s not your answer.
But even if we expanded it to careers it could be the same question.
Just replace games played with games per year cut off. Would you want that cut off to calculate what you consider to be a true average (potentially inflated from what we might look at otherwise 25 games per year average might result in a lower average than the average of 35 games per year goalies)? Then from there compare every other goalie to the stricter average?
Or, would you just want to analyze the goalie that met the minimum games per year requirements?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
well a good starting point I think would be to analyze the minimum games per, then it could be expanded.
We could do it on a yearly basis but I don’t think that will give us a fair judgement on wether that goalie is above or below which is why I’d stick with the career averages.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Yeah I understand your concern with yearly numbers. But we always look to see how goalie performed that given year as well, so I was just curious about that application.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
That way would definitely tell you who was above average any given year, but what really gives you the clearer picture of an above average goalie would only be achieved with a career assesment.
I see what you mean about using the yearly and it’s important but I think personally that the life of the numbers would be more important. Which sucks saying since below average goalies can and have won the cup.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
okay, so if I can maybe summarize what you would like to see.
1. Develop a qualifier, either games/year or shots face, to determine who are starter quality goalies
2. Apply qualify for 1998 to present (so I can break out even strength numbers) and get a list of goalies to analyze
3. From that list calculate average ESS%, Total Sv%; basically what ever I want to use as my metric
4. Then for any new season compare the stats from the goalies for the current year to the calculated, weighted average from steps 1-3 to see how they compare.
Would that work for you as to what a more representative view of average for yearly comparisons?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
It would be pretty easy to do if we could agree on #1, that data is easy to get and you only have to update it once a year.
It just be nice to give both numbers so this way there is less push back. Hey here is the average save %, ok now here’s the average save % from career #1’s or whatever. So you can look at things both ways.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I like that. Makes sense and should be pretty easy to get a read on who’s doing what.
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
Problem is getting people to agree to what #1 is, and it’s a big problem haha The data isn’t the issue, and we already compare people to what average is, but that isn’t the qualified average.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
what if you went and averaged the whole of the NHL’s shots per game and went with that as the shots faced per game minimum, then used a games played to finish off picking out the starters? Use 35 games played and whatever the league average is for shots per game. Except backwards of that, use the shots per game first then pick up any goalies who missed that mark but played more than 35 games?
http://restorations.bandcamp.com/
I did. I clicked “save percentage leaders”, which sets it’s own limit. Not sure what that is, but it narrowed the field down from 87 goalies to play at least 1 game in the NHL this year to only 47.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I believe you have to play 25 games to be eligible for the save percentage leaders.
It should be a shots faced requirement, IMO, but that’s another story.
I agree on the shots face requirement.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I think next year, the Flyers should play Bryzgalov for 82 games, and in 25 games where the game is not particularly close and the Flyers are on the power play, put Bobrovsky in for one faceoff.
See if he can finish the year with a stat line of 25 games played, two shots faced, two saves, all-time save percentage record holder. IN YOUR FACE, THOMAS.
Um, I think Boston should do that with Thomas. That way he pulls a groin in the first round.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions
If I do, will I believe he can handle ~4,900 minutes of NHL action prior to entering the playoffs, where he’ll play at least another 960 (assuming he goes 16-0), without getting injured?
In short, if I accepted Bryzgalov as my savior, does that equate him to the hockey playing Jesus?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Three different responses
a) Is there any statistical evidence that goalies actually play worse or get injured more after playing a lot?
b) He has to play somewhere in the neighborhood of 3-4x more games than Vokoun to earn his salary, right?
c) Stop looking for the negative in everything and allow yourself just one minute of hope and optimism. For the first time in the history of the franchise, the Flyers finally have a real #1 goalie, can’t you just enjoy it instead of shitting all over everything the team does? I swear, even if they did sign the hockey playing Jesus for the league minimum, you’d be complaining about the length of the contract.
I like the choice c, because it’s so close to being real – and it was such a nice setup – that it makes more sense.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Parity <> Mediocrity.
The league is so much better now that perversely you consider it mediocre? Which modern goalie wouldn’t be a perennial Vezina finalist in the ‘80s, or really any previous era? Training, athleticism, coaching is all so much better that the market has been flooded and you can find good goaltending for cheap. That’s why the market is the way Theo described it. It’s not exactly news.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
You said that for Boosh and Bob too. Look what happened!
Minus cherty-two
OMB!
No, you're Ryan Lambert!
What happened?
I'm in love with the Lightning, the Flyers are my fling and I have a crush on the Flyers fans.
Dare to follow my childish, biased, petty and cheesy alter ego. Go visit my website. I will keep you updated on every Simon injury.
American Cheese, B!tch! ... #1 mission? Kill Holmgren & Decapitate Kunitz.
… becauseee.. Bob and Boosh are crappy goalies?
I'm in love with the Lightning, the Flyers are my fling and I have a crush on the Flyers fans.
Dare to follow my childish, biased, petty and cheesy alter ego. Go visit my website. I will keep you updated on every Simon injury.
American Cheese, B!tch! ... #1 mission? Kill Holmgren & Decapitate Kunitz.
Geoff I really think there needs to be discussion on the value of ESS% as the best stat for goalies. If the difference between the Venzina candidates and as you say “perfectly average” backups is 0.001 I don’t think it is the best metric.
The difference between Vezina candidates and “perfectly average” backups is not 0.001.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
in your words
Theodore was coming of a 0.924 ESS%…..which was only 0.001 worse than Luongo, Howard, and Rinne
He was 0.001 worse than Luongo and Rinne 2 of the 5 Vezina candidates.
Over the last four years, he has a 0.917 ESS%. Perfectly average NHL backup. Costing $1.5 million.
perfectly average NHL backup
Goalies are really hard to analyze by statistics some much factors into all their numbers. Team play and style etc.. Stats were used to argue Dan Ellis as a perfectly good NHL starter coming over from Nashville last year. How much is the Preds system responsible for his numbers and why was he so bad in Tampa? Backups might also get the easier matchups. MIN is also a system team and Theodores numbers are identical to Backstrom it is hard to judge goalies based on stats.
by chrislanci on Jul 14, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He was 0.001 worse than Luongo and Rinne 2 of the 5 Vezina candidates.
A) Those weren’t the candidates when Theodore had a 0.924 ESS%
B) There are 5 candidates for the Vezina?
C) Miller won the Vezina that year with a 0.928, Bryzgalov came in second with 0.928, Brodeur came in third with 0.924, Nabokov came in 4th with 0.928, and Anderson came in fifth with 0.926.
D) Miller had a 0.919 Sv% on the PK, which was unsustainable (look at this year), hence why he won the Vezina.
E) You really think people who vote on the Vezina vote on who the most talented goalie is, or do you think they vote on who had the best year, regardless of talent?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
First that’s not the difference between Venzina and average/backup. And second…
DIGR (Defense Independent Goalie Rating). Full paper here. Even with further analysis there just isn’t a huge spread in the numbers from average to Venzina (.9115 to .9285, or 17 goals every 1,000 shots, or 3 wins every thousand shots). So there is an obvious gap, but it isn’t this ridiculous chasm.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Thanks for that Don looks interesting. I am like that that article is acknowledging shot quality. And that Rask and Vokoun of two years ago are some of the few goalies who actual save percentage is higher than predicted by the DIGR rating. Which would indicate to me and correct me if I am wrong they face weaker shots compared to the rest of the NHL.
I would say they benefited from the distribution of shots they faced.
The one draw back with this, it takes a lot of time. For discussions on here, ESS% is still a great starting point and is something everyone can understand.
Another improvement here could be type of shot, which other people are working on. There is a lot of stuff being done on this, unfortunately, it’s all time consuming.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
My bad this does have shot type in it. I’m getting my damn articles mixed up.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
What’s most infuriating is that the teams certainly have all of these stats and far more. I wish they’d just release what they know…but it’s proprietary obviously. No one would want to give up that competitive advantage.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
What stats? This analysis includes shot type and location from publicly available data. What numbers are you looking for? Or are you saying they have team scorers that keep a more accurate count of shot location and type then the ones that get scored and show up on NHL.com and ESPN.com?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
We know they count scoring chances and odd man rushes, for example, because announcers periodically announce the totals. So why not tabulate and publicize that data?
And it’s safe to assume they keep other data that they don’t give to the announcers, though I wouldn’t really expect them to share something that other teams might not have.
Actually, there was an interesting Business Week article a few months ago about how much sports statistical data is how available via video (sounded like modern day Gilbreth research). Almost all of this is proprietary.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Yes, I’m asking what he wants here for this, or if he is making a general comment and didn’t bother to look at the DIGR paper.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I wasn’t saying I wanted anything, what I’m saying is that professional sports teams spend a lot on statistical analysis and they keep it a closely guarded secret for as long as possible. NBA Teams, at least according to Bill Simmons, used to have something called a “Super Stop” which involved stopping a player, getting the rebound, where it was on the court, etc. I’m sure the NHL, MLB, NFL, Premiere League, etc do the same.
This type of player analysis is a full time job for a lot of guys who get their PHDs in stats from the best programs in the world (hence the yearly sports stats conferences at Sloan School of Business). I am not asking for a stat from you guys (sorry if it came across that way), I’m saying I wish I knew the stats the teams themselves use to analyze players and prospects.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
So general comment.
And I’m not confident about how much analysis is done in hockey at a truly advanced level yet; there definitely weren’t those types of jobs out there 6 years ago in that league (not to say they didn’t hire consultants).
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Are you assuming the job/position was publicized? If I had a guy creating these stats for me I would want him to remain as anonymous as possible so that other teams couldn’t hire him away…
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
I’m talking a bit from personal experience here as I was aware of jobs in other leagues.
But to continue on a more hypothetical line, if I needed a guy creating these stats I’d have to go looking. I would look at universities and firms specializing in statistical analysis. So there is a degree of publication of the job.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
More accurate measurement and more nuanced models, I’d say. I’m sure they also do things that just take raw man power like track puck battles won/lost.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Oh yeah, I have no doubt. I just wanted to know if he was referring to the paper (because all of that was publicaly available already), or if he was just making a general statement. Turns out it was a general statement.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Thanks for linking this. I’ll have to look more closely at it later due to work time constraints today, but this looks pretty interesting.
It is very interesting, and a great step forward. A wish they only took it for road games as we have seen a lot of stuff on shot locations having a home scorers bias. But it’s definitely a step in the right direction.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I mentioned something about this and how we need some sort of stat for a goalie’s stats in 3rd periods of 1 goal games to determine “clutchness”
There’s a difference between “clutchness” and “talent” though. They would say two different things.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
To me, clutchness and statistics are incompatible.
According to the radiolab episode on stochasticity, the only event in sports that can be considered an outlier is DiMaggio’s hit streak. We perceive late 3rd period goals in such a way that they’re magnified in our minds. There’s no propensity for being “clutch.”
Nuke away.
I wouldn’t say they are completely incompatible, but yes, I agree. As far as DiMaggio’s hit streak being the only outlier… I disagree. There are lots of outliers, like Tim Thomas’ 2010-11 season.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
So, if you simulate a Tim Thomas season say, 1000 times, you’d expect his .938 save pct. to be 3 standard deviations from the mean? I doubt it.
BTW, I admit regular sv pct is not the ideal stat, but just to illustrate the point…
Probability of a .922 goalie (his career save percentage) saving at least 1699 out of 1811 shots (as he did last year) is 0.36%. As you say, it’s not the ideal stat, but that happens to be pretty close to three standard deviations away.
I think it’s 0.48% p>=1699, not just >, but that’s not to take away from the excellent point you’ve just made.
Oops, yup, I grabbed the wrong line from the calculator. I guess you can tell you’re in an extreme part of the curve when moving the cutoff by just a single save changes the probability by 33%.
I’m probably wrong about this, but seeing as Thomas has had very inconsistent seasons in the past, both good and bad, wouldn’t his standard deviation be much greater than that of the run of the mill .922 goalie?
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
His observed standard deviation is larger, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s inherently more variable. Maybe he’s just the coin that happened to come up heads a few times in a row and then tails a few times in a row.
That’s basically what the analysis is about — if we start with the null hypothesis that every event is on its own and players aren’t uniquely clutchy or streaky, random stochastic results will still cause some players to have more extreme results than others. Under that hypothesis, how likely is it that pure random chance from a player whose game doesn’t actually vary at all would cause a result this extreme?
For Tim Thomas, it’d happen about once every 200 years, which sounds pretty unlikely and might lead you to reject that original hypothesis and assume that he is in fact a streaky goalie. But if you start thinking about there being several goalies at his talent level, each with several years of data, it becomes less clear whether this is a true outlier or just an unusual occurrence.
Almost certainly not — five other teams have won all of their games except one, and at least 15 more (probably more, but they’re harder to find) have won all of their games except two. So the undefeated season doesn’t look like an outlier at all.
They are, but it’s not statistically unlikely that someone would do it. The Pats came darn close a few years back, and there have been plenty of other teams that have almost done it. It’s not patently absurd, particularly since those Dolphins played a shorter season, which made it easier to win every game, since there were fewer chances to lose.
Bob.
This is Tversky and Kahneman’s research.
In my view, the complication is that we often observe the player regressing (positively, or “progressing” if you will) at the time we are watching.
I personally think that there will eventually be observations that modify the T and K research.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
It was that high? That surprises me. But hey, learn something new every day.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
I guess I have low expectations of Jose “Three-or-more” because of the general disgust with him among Caps fans. I should know better than to listen to them.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
I sat behind the net in one game he played last season, and I came away impressed [place incredibly-small-sample-size caveat here]. It made me wonder if he was being overlooked.
I wanted to add him as a sub to my fantasy team. No dice.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
Pekka Rinne was fantastic on my fantasy team this year, as was Ryan Miller the year before. Down the stretch this season, when I needed some points to help in the playoffs, Al Montoya did respectably.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
Goalies are so tough. I was in a 14 player H2H where goalie stats made up 40% of the categories. I carried three, two regular starters I drafted, plus I picked up Bob the first day I could waive.
But Hiller went down after the All-star break, and that almost sunk me. There was very little left on the waiver wire, even in the way of occasionally-used backups. Some people had 4 goalies or more. I had Lindback for a time, but even he got picked up early on.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
Very good pickups.
I think half of the struggles I had with my team go back to wanting to draft Bryzgalov in the second round, having him go one spot before my turn, and feeling panic because I didn’t know who I really preferred after the first 6 guys on my goalie list. Rudy’s team on autodraft picking two goalies in a row also messed things up.
I should have gone Rinne!
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
I like how the Sabres threw 27 million at Leino but won’t give an extra 150 or 200k to a pretty promising young goaltender who’s already been important for them.
I was reading on hockey buzz and all the buffalo guys over there don’t want to pay 1 million for him, they all want to unload him. I’ll take him.
-bob
by Rrainone on Jul 14, 2011 8:53 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
They’re dumb.
However, more than a million, and he’s gone.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Yeah I mean the Sabres do have a pretty huge negotiating chip in the fact that they have Ryan Miller in front of him, but 750k – 1mil seems perfectly reasonable.
If you guys want someone who doesn’t mind playing for the minimum, you can have Bacashihua!
The other guy in the AHL (Leggio) actually outplayed him but Enroth is probably a better goalie.
Plus Leggio wasn’t drafted (and doesn’t have a contract) so its not like he’s making the team.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
But that would mean trading Bob for Enroth (at least in practice).
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions
But that gives us another million in cap space, or we have Bob. It’s a win-win. The offer sheet wouldn’t cost us any picks, and then we could make a deal.
Minus cherty-two
OMB!
No, you're Ryan Lambert!
I was checking DG’s post on offer sheets as well as capgeek and I think you’re quite right. We could sign Enroth to the 725K that he wants and the while the Sabres could match, it would put them over the cap for now. We don’t lose any picks, remain under the cap, and don’t have to trade a player immediately.
This is a good point. I tried to keep my CBA FAQ as factual as possible and not insert my opinion too much, but there is a very distinct old boy’s club mentality amongst NHL GMs that limits how often players are poached by offer sheets.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
there is a very distinct old boy’s club mentality amongst NHL GMs that limits how often players are poached by offer sheets.
I think that’s also due, at least in part, to the economic factor. Ken Holland presented his argument against offer sheets in that way, and they make sense to me.
He said to have any hope of poaching a player, you are forced to overpay in order to get their team to walk — and in the cap world, you need contracts to deliver value. Add in the draft picks, and the cost goes even higher.
Of course there are certain situations where a team is cap-strapped, and might not match for those reasons. But when it comes to big name players, they’d sacrifice in other areas to keep them.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
Teams overpay for UFAs though, by the nature of an auction.
You might not want to pay quite as much for a RFA because of the draft pick compensation, but in a pure market you’d still offer the near-UFA-rate contract just so the team couldn’t get him at a bargain discount RFA price.
Except that then that new contract gets used in arbitration in the future, and therefore creates leverage that drives up all of the RFA prices, so your competitive advantage lasts a year or two and costs you a market situation that is beneficial to all owners.
Teams overpay for UFAs though, by the nature of an auction.
Yes, and in my view, teams should try to limit overpaying for contracts as much as possible. This is why I think shrewd GMs are more interested in addressing major needs via trade, or only having one or two judicious UFA adds.
Most offer sheets have been an exercise in futility, though. So at least the UFA market has the no-strings-attached thing going for it.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
Of course they should avoid overpaying when possible.
But assuming the trade market is reasonably efficient, you won’t be able to add talent there, just swap talent. That may improve your roster a little, but if you want to really elevate your team, you’ll need to either trade away future value (picks and prospects) or sign free agents.
If you are already near the cap (or self-imposed budget), then it’s a very different story. But if you have money to spend, free agents are the only way to really add to your team — sure, you’d rather have developing prospects who you could pay a fair salary to, but given that you don’t, overpaying for free agents isn’t necessarily bad.
Anyway, my original point wasn’t on the pros and cons of signing free agents. It was really that there is a benefit to an offer sheet that isn’t a “ha, they can’t match this huge overpay” offer sheet. You can write a “I think this is what he’s worth” offer sheet and if a few teams do that, the team that owns his rights will be forced to either let him go or match the UFA-auction-overpay price.
But assuming the trade market is reasonably efficient, you won’t be able to add talent there, just swap talent. That may improve your roster a little, but if you want to really elevate your team, you’ll need to either trade away future value (picks and prospects) or sign free agents.
I won’t make any assumptions about market efficiency — weird trades happen all the time. But if you have more of one kind of asset, the cost of swapping that for something you need can be very nice. Of course, the market doesn’t always oblige, but neither does the UFA pool.
The Kings were in the position of having to upgrade their top 6 through free agency, and that’s expensive if you win or lose. If it gets to the point where you are desperate to add talent, and FA is the best or only option, I think your chances of success start to narrow. You just have to hope that you don’t take on too many of those contracts (Hossa to the Hawks was good, Campbell to the Hawks was kinda bad), or that the dead-weight years on them aren’t too long.
It was really that there is a benefit to an offer sheet that isn’t a "ha, they can’t match this huge overpay" offer sheet. You can write a "I think this is what he’s worth" offer sheet and if a few teams do that, the team that owns his rights will be forced to either let him go or match the UFA-auction-overpay price.
Oh, I see. Well, historically, they have been matched. Doug Wilson’s move against the Hawks was probably a good one, but that’s a very specific set of circumstances that he was exploiting. It’s pretty clever to target them, but they got Niemi rather than Hjalmarsson. It will be interesting to see how it turns out.
In Dinglebarn We Trust -- JftC
I don’t think we would mind exceeding the cap this summer….in less we trade somebody, we are bound to have that happen. I believe Darcy’s plan is to bury or trade Kotalik and Morrisonn (~$5 mil) by the start of the season. Signing Gragnani, Sekera, and Enroth while placing those two in the AHL or trading them would make us just barely be under the cap.
On a side note, this dance near the cap ceiling is really strange to us…how do you all manage it every season?
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
With much weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Bob.
by The Dark on Jul 14, 2011 12:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It may not cost picks, but I doubt Buffalo lets him walk for nothing. So it would have to be something.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I really like the road Preds jersey, the yellow one is okay. Though I’m not a fan of the font used for the numbers.
I'm in love with the Lightning, the Flyers are my fling and I have a crush on the Flyers fans.
Dare to follow my childish, biased, petty and cheesy alter ego. Go visit my website. I will keep you updated on every Simon injury.
American Cheese, B!tch! ... #1 mission? Kill Holmgren & Decapitate Kunitz.
The yellow is going to take a lot of getting use to, and I like the roads a lot more; though I miss the silver. I only own 2 Preds jerseys, but I don’t think this is going to convince me that I need a 3rd. The number font has grown on me since I saw the first pictures of the jersey a little while ago.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Agreed, about the yellow. Though it shouldn’t take long for me, considering my home town team has been wearing yellow & blue since ever haha. As for the font, I don’t know… I guess I like more classic look.. like Flyers use, or the Lightning. Just… simple.
I'm in love with the Lightning, the Flyers are my fling and I have a crush on the Flyers fans.
Dare to follow my childish, biased, petty and cheesy alter ego. Go visit my website. I will keep you updated on every Simon injury.
American Cheese, B!tch! ... #1 mission? Kill Holmgren & Decapitate Kunitz.
Apparently it’s supposed to be guitar strings across the numbers? I agree, I don’t like it. I do, however, love the piano keyboard inside the collar.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
The guitar string thing is an alright idea when you add in the guitar pick shoulder patch; but I still worry about how it’s going to show up on TV.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Food For Thought
I’ve always said you need both the stats AND your own eyes to give you the complete picture of what a player brings to the table. The above discussion of Jose Theodore brings this thought to my mind once again.
Remember when Fehr and Balanced did this back in June? I really think a metric needs to be developed which measures this, because as useful as ESS% is, it doesn’t tell the whole story. In other words, there’s no way in hell you’re going to convince me that Jose Theodore is better than Ryan Miller. At all.
Going back to Fehr’s document, I calculated Michael Neuvirth’s Soft Goal Against Percentage at .155. Out of the 110 goals he let in this past season, 17 were considered “soft.” Obviously, the lower one’s SGA% the better. If this were done as objectively as possible (as all stat-measuring should be) then I think it would be quite revealing.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
Yeah ESS% is the best we have currently, maybe DIGR takes over that, but everyone recognizes how flawed it is. But for everything we have to compare goalies, that seems to be the best thing we have that represents their skill level.
I don’t think we need much food for thought on it, everyone recognizes it as flawed, but it’s generally accepted to give a good starting point for a comparison and discussion.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Now if we can just convince Geoff that it is, in fact, a starting point and not an end-all …
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!
by MaximumTalbot on Jul 14, 2011 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions
You don’t need to convince me of this, as I already believe it.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
And yet the way you use it often suggests otherwise…
Simon Gagne may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home but, at the end of the day, he will always be a Philadelphia Flyer.
Mike Richards may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home but, at the end of the day, he will also always be a Philadelphia Flyer.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jul 14, 2011 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I would disagree with this, but I can’t much argue how you interpret things.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2011 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions
If people think I’m a stats-only, no context, one stat is infallible guy, me arguing that I’m not isn’t going to change that fact.
So I’m going to abstain from trying to prove that I’m not Bill Conlin’s alternate universe twin.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 15, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Right, but because of its flaws, it means there is room for improvement… just like when the league stopped relying solely on GAA and started measuring Save Percentage.
If people can measure how many shots are directed at each net when a certain group of skaters are on the ice, people can also measure how many softies each goalie lets in over the course of a season. If I weren’t starting grad school in the fall I’d try it myself with the Flyers.
Do you see what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps?
Go look at this paper on Defense Independent Goalie Rating. It might give you something you like more.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
But at the same time, ESS% is better than people give it credit for; Geoff gets himself in trouble cherry picking a year of data, then people run with it and say well that’s idiotic that Teddy is that close to Miller. Well he isn’t, you just need to look at his career numbers and not cherry pick.
Context is a glorious thing. But again, it’s flawed.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
you just need to look at his career numbers and not cherry pick
Exactly this. We know goalies’ numbers vary a lot from year to year. It’s not at all unreasonable that Theodore might have had a year where he performed at the same level as Miller (at least to within our ability to measure), but with the larger sample size it’s clear that he’s not the same kind of talent.
Circling back to the original question though, it was about his contract, and then we’re left guessing to what extent GMs pay on recent performance and to what extent they pay on career numbers. He was coming off of a good year, which may or may not mean that he would be treated like a good goalie on the FA market.
Oh, also, since I agreed to be blamed for Geoff’s errors yesterday, I guess I should apologize that he wasn’t a little more clear about the distinction between coming off of a very good year and being a very good goalie.
And as Geoff’s normal translator, I apologize for not pointing that out to everyone for him. I blame the bright yellow of the new Pred’s jersey that was on my other monitor at the time I was reading through the comments.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I like the yellow but that’s mainly because im a sucker for anything that looks like Team Sweden’s hockey jersey.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
I’m not good at these distinctions, but the fact that people assume I’m arguing Theodore is as good as Miller makes me really sad.
They think I’m that dumb/stubborn? Ugh.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
“No no no, we don’t think you’re that dumb” goes on my list, right behind “no dear, that dress doesn’t make you look fat.”
Well, I think Geoff is an intelligent, thick-headed, tall, scraggly, technically inclined, and stick figure like man with a caricature-like need for attention and to have other people think he’s right.
Was that better?
/Just kidding Geoff, you’re only a stick figure compared to my fat ass.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
What a PP SV PCT as stupid as that sounds the most difficult shots to stop probably come against a PP unit and therefore the goalie with the best ability to stop those shots has the most skill.
Because PPSv% fluctuates so much from season to season that it’s not view as a repeatable skill.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
I think this might not be true if we had the 500 PPs a year like we got in 05-06.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Most goalie stats fluctuate goaltending in general is all other the place. Only one or two goalies are truly consistent top 5 year after year. Look at Miller from this playoffs 2 shutouts and a bunch of 4 goal games same for Roberto. And the there is also the once ubeatable GIguere and now Tim Thomas goes from 5 million dollar backup almost buyout to the second coming of Bernie Parent and the savior of Boston.
So let's lock one up for 9 years at $5.67 million!
I’m not joining this argument, I’m not starting a new one, I’m making a snarky comment that Don will be angry I made and will make kcrebs post another “Geoff is a petulant child” comment.
You’ll all get over it.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I absolutely agree with that goalies aren’t worth it. Brzy could suck and some new rookie can steal the cup this year.
To rationalize the signing and make myself feel better I believe the following…
The odds of 2010 happening again where the Flyers get the right matchups in the playoffs, don’t have crucial injuries and have a goalie that is playing extremely over his head in Michael Leighton and Boosh when he came in is extremely unlikely.
Having the same goalie who can be consistent each year is a positive. And Brzy even playing at his worse season save percentage 0.906 still gives you a chance to win. Compared to pinning the season success taking chances on has beens and journeymen, backups, undrafted free agents or 21 year old rookies who at their worse give you absolutely no shot to compete.
Of course this is all a mute point if BOB develops as we hope. But I am tired of hoping we as Flyers fan have been there hoping Boosh would be the next face of the Flyers net, then Esche, then Nitty and that Ray Emery can return from exile. I was even hoping Michael Leighton could be a late bloomer and completely do a 180 for his career over last summer. It hasn’t work.
Brzy might not be a our savior but he does solidify a major hole he doesn’t have to be perfect or Tim Thomas amazing he just has to be consistently good and give us a chance every playoff game. The exact same thing Miller provides to Buffalo a confidence that you have a chance to win every game.
All the said gambling another season on Nabakov and BOB could have worked a been a lot cheaper but the key word there is could have. Brzy provides more certainty as much as any goalie can provide.
Remember when Fehr and Balanced did this back in June? I really think a metric needs to be developed which measures this, because as useful as ESS% is, it doesn’t tell the whole story. In other words, there’s no way in hell you’re going to convince me that Jose Theodore is better than Ryan Miller. At all.
I agree whole-heartedly. I’d love to get a Soft Goal metric, but it takes work. And to clarify, I’m not trying to convince anyone that Jose Theodore is better than Ryan Miller. He’s not, and I don’t believe he is. But saying Theodore is a crappy goalie ignore that he had a really good 09-10 and is an average NHL backup not costing much at all.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Just to give you guys an idea, I coded all those goals over the course of two nights, only a couple hours a night after work. Maybe 5 hours total. All the goals are on NHL.com and if you do it during the season it would take even less time to keep it up. Putting together the spreadsheet took a bit more time, but it was more manageable than I anticipated. An issue I could see with doing it over the course of the season is evolving standards. Doing it in two sittings I think I was able to keep a more even standard. J.P. had the men-on-ice data, so that was a pretty sweet addition. I have no clue if any PHI fans keep that stuff, but I’m sure it’s not exactly easy to keep track of. I’d love to see other teams start to do this.
Thanks for the shout out, mikefive.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Unless Travis has started it, it’s my plan for August. Do you think having the men-on-ice information was useful?
Mourning Gagne forever.
I hadn’t planned on having it but when I showed J.P. he told me he could import it. It allowed us to look at who was getting lucky/unlucky in terms of soft goals. In particular, Alzner had the highest soft-goals-on-ice number and he was also a stud for us defensively, so his numbers really should have looked better.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I won’t lie, I looked at two games of Bryzgalov and tried to do it, but when I saw what I thought was a soft goal and heard the announcers say “that might have deflected”, I rewound 4 times and quit.
I just can’t find accurate videos for me to even trust myself, so I’m not going to be able to handle other people questioning my accuracy. I’d love for someone to do it, you say it isn’t a lot of work, but it would take me far too long.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Well you’re doing it wrong. If you see a point shot that might or might not have deflected, go to the score sheet. If the guy who took the point shot has the G, then it wasn’t deflected. If a guy that was somewhere around the slot (or just didn’t take the point shot) has the G, then it deflected. Deflections off of the D are tougher but the G’s and D’s reaction is usually a good giveaway.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
It was a defender and I couldn’t tell from the regular angle.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
My problem would be that I’m a goalie apologist, so I’m less likely to call a goal soft.
Mourning Gagne forever.
A lot of us are. But I’d constantly be fending off bias questions, and if I’m not even comfortable with my attempt at non-bias, I’m not going to argue that.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Stupid and Jealous is no way to go thru life Blutarsky
http://www.pensburgh.com/2011/7/12/2271782/68-excuses
My favorite is #30. You know, since Crosby has been so close to eclipsing those numbers in the pre-concussions years.
"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."
@boknows71
Gotta say, Iaughed at a couple. But yeah, most were pretty silly/bad.
personally
I think the Devils and Kovalchuk should now sue the NHL for age discrimination. They’re essentially saying he CAN’T play until he’s 44.
Go Devils
by FrankG929 on Aug 9, 2010 5:15 PM PDT
That’s a pretty low blogging ESS%.
"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."
@boknows71
57- The Flyers hometown makes a delicious cream cheese.
Which is, in fact, made in NYC.
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!
by MaximumTalbot on Jul 14, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions
We slowed down the frame rate of the video, and we can confirm that it was a puck from the ice that shattered the glass and not a 9-volt thrown from the front row at the players. You know, for clarity’s sake.
Oh for fuck’s sake. Wysh is such a tool.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
LOL. I knew that statement wouldn’t go over well. Myers practically just flicked it at the glass and it spidered…that pane must have been pretty close to breaking to begin with. I thought when it happened that Myers blasted a shot into the glass.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
Not gonna lie, I’d pay to see Myers in Orange and Black. (Based soley on seeing him in the playoffs… yeah I’m that shallow a fan…)
personally
I think the Devils and Kovalchuk should now sue the NHL for age discrimination. They’re essentially saying he CAN’T play until he’s 44.
Go Devils
by FrankG929 on Aug 9, 2010 5:15 PM PDT
Since Geoff didn’t provide a link, I will…
Controversy in Toronto: local radio host is accused of a homophobic slur, but really when he said “a 3rd of July parade guy”, he didn’t mean the gay pride parade that was held on July 3rd, he meant partying in general.
/Not sure exactly where to put the sarcasm font, but there should be some in there somewhere
“Partying”? That’s a pretty lame attempt at explaining it.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
I really didn’t feel like starting that argument here…
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Better than arguing about the pros and cons of Jose Theodore, IMO.
by Eric T. on Jul 14, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Is calling someone gay a slur?
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
I’ve never been completely sure about that as it seems to be context-related. (especially complicated because gay is a synonym for happy, stupid English language)
But implying that all gay people are pansies = slur.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
I think this is one that’s heavily dependent on tone and situation. I have gay friends, and we can joke about it specifically because we’re friends (and have been for years). In this case, the context (“he is not what you would call a rugged, truculent, testosteronic, guy”), plus the rampant homophobia within major sports, both suggest that it was intended as a slur.
Bob.
Sooooo
Anybody else frustrated by the fact that this team seems to be really good at drafting/scouting and yet we never hold onto our picks…. What could have been, what could have been! Sighhhhh
Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"
From facebook
Flyers announce that they have signed Tye McGinn to an entry-level contact.
So, that makes 50, doesn’t it?
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
Quick! Someone talk about slide-rule eligibility!
personally
I think the Devils and Kovalchuk should now sue the NHL for age discrimination. They’re essentially saying he CAN’T play until he’s 44.
Go Devils
by FrankG929 on Aug 9, 2010 5:15 PM PDT
Wait, where does that put him? He’s not under 20 or over 20. What about the “is 20” people?
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
by Chemistry66 on Jul 14, 2011 11:49 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He’s 21 according to the NHL (yay for League Year!)
Bob.
by The Dark on Jul 14, 2011 12:37 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
QUANTUM TUNNELING TIME!
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
It’s Chem. We all know she didn’t actually mean it.
We each responded with our own flavor of snark, from stat (ha, he’s really 20.03 or more) to CBA (he’s 21 in League Years) to science (it’s a singularity!)
I would have made it a little more snarky even, but I’ve been in and out of the lab today.
Damn stupid 20 minute centrifuge runs.
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
I thought DG told me we were at 49 earlier this week, but I forget. I’m nowhere close to an expert on these things.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
Yea I remember that too, I’m trying to figure out where the last one would be.
by hebrew hammer on Jul 14, 2011 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
It was 49 on Tuesday because Tye McGinn was already in the list. We signed him last week. http://phillysportsdaily.com/flyers/2011/07/06/flyers-sign-tye-mcginn-to-entry-level-deal/
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
+1 for Kalinski who was given a QO, but is still shown as an RFA on capgeek. Guess he just needs to accept.
by hebrew hammer on Jul 14, 2011 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Actually that QO has expired by now, unless the Flyers asked the league to give it a later expiration date. They have to negotiate a new deal.
What can't Giroux do?
It’s July 15th, though, not 14th.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
10.2.a.iv: A Qualifying Offer shall automat ically expire at 5:00 p.m. New York time on July 15;
It’s just that it’s gotta be the 15th here, not anywhere.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Totally cool, no worries.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I know it’s off-topic but if anybody hasn’t read the SI article about Chooch, I highly recommend it. A fantastic read. If you don’t love him even more afterwards, you are not a human being.
"Can I refill your eggnog for you? Get you something to eat? Drive you out to the middle of nowhere and leave you for dead?"
by PraiseMartyMoose on Jul 14, 2011 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
Here's the link
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1188164/1/index.htm
"Can I refill your eggnog for you? Get you something to eat? Drive you out to the middle of nowhere and leave you for dead?"
by PraiseMartyMoose on Jul 14, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Flyers should have signed him instead of Bryz.
"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."
@boknows71
Sniffle. I was cutting onions, I swear.
I'm a left-hander in a right-hander's body.
by LeepinLizardz on Jul 14, 2011 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions
What’s new people? I don’t feel like reading through all these comments. Someone give me the jist of what’s going on?
Flyers Fans: We've survived Lock-outs, Lindros and Cooperalls. If you want to get rid of us, you'll have to split an atom or two.
by KreiderDesigns on Jul 14, 2011 12:35 PM EDT reply actions
Yesterday, Geoff gave me an official BSH warning, that was fun.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
For cereals? Why?
Flyers Fans: We've survived Lock-outs, Lindros and Cooperalls. If you want to get rid of us, you'll have to split an atom or two.
by KreiderDesigns on Jul 14, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
OMG, what did you do (in best Chris Farley voice)?
What kind of plane is it? Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big ol' Tylenol.
I was undermining his masthead authority. He properly put me in my place for I don’t have the power to make a text message in a red box appear on his BSH webpage.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Don’t make me warn you again.
Drunk with power!
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn’t I just bow to your masthead power?
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
It was your tone.
/wags finger
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Trust me, you’ll know when I’m using a tone with you…like for instance, now.
I HAVE to be mad because you keep saying, "why you heff to be mad?" in every other post.
Wow, that sounded just like my dad.
“I’m not yelling. You’ll know when I’m yelling.”
Know what he hated? When, after accusing him of yelling, I repeated that line right as he was about to say it. Made me laugh.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
We signed Steven Stamkos. See here.
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
by Chemistry66 on Jul 14, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Lauridsen is overrated, Vokoun may or may not suck or be average or be awesome, Chooch is awesome at baseball, DragonGirl is awesome at life, and Geoff is a malfunctioning robot.
Bob.
by The Dark on Jul 14, 2011 12:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
#2 seed Giroux loses to #7 seed Kane? Rubbish
Also, at worst Kane should be a #3 seed
by mantis toboggan on Jul 14, 2011 12:48 PM EDT reply actions
How are there two players from the same franchise? Also, one could only think where Richie would have ended up on this thing. Sigh
Flyers Fans: We've survived Lock-outs, Lindros and Cooperalls. If you want to get rid of us, you'll have to split an atom or two.
by KreiderDesigns on Jul 14, 2011 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
How the hell is Jordan Staal a 3? Also why don’t they give him a J. in front of Staal? They put a P. in front of Kane for Patrick who is easy a shit to differentiate from Evander Kane, but You don’t get a J. for Jordan Staal who is a lot harder to differentiate from Marc, his brother. Lastly, no one is starting a franchise with PK Subban he shouldn’t have even been on the bracket.
What can't Giroux do?
Required Habs folk hero otherwise Montreal would be contractually obligated to riot.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Need an opinion...
So I was planning post CBA chapter 4, Salary Arbitration later today….. Should I go ahead with it, or am I posting them too fast? Do we think people need a little more time to catch up?
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
Avalanche at the Floor
Well, well, conspiracy theorists who believe that Puck Daddy gets his only good ideas for a column by reading BSH got more ammunition. Weirdly, even his specific take was pretty much the same as the one I posted in the flyby the other day: everybody but Colorado and the Islanders have a way to get to the floor, there seems to be no path for the Avalanche, and maybe the Islanders will try to get away with not reaching it (which I said as a joke but he seems to take seriously).
But the most interesting part of his column to me is one I’d like to hear comments from DG and others. As opposed to me, Puck Daddy has access to the NHL offices. He asked HQ about whether there really would be no penalty for NYI to not reach the floor, and their response to his question was fascinating:
Heard from the NHL on this theory above. They said it’s not accurate: “Teams simply are not permitted to play games unless their roster fits within the floor-to-ceiling range.”
Is that true? Wouldn’t that decision have to go before the arbitrator, given the possible NHLPA impact? Or is this somehow in Brandon Shanahan’s sphere of influence?
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Well,technically they can reach the floor using Performance Bonuses, even if they don’t end up paying them. They’ve done this in the past; finishing under the floor because Tavares didn’t earn them all.
But they have to be exploiting that loophole to do it. Let me look for the actual wording.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
But I’m more interested in the other question as Puck Daddy put it: what if they just defy the league?
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Can I have some time to get the wording, please? I know the CBA well but I don’t have perfect recall
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions
While DG is looking that up, the NHL can declare you circumvented the cap and take actions up to including forfieting all your games for the year.
He could also fine the team up to 5 million per circumvention (which counts against the cap if Gary Bettman wants it to.)
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Yeah, I thought of cap circumvention after I posted.
I still wonder about the bonuses issue then though, even if it is for a few games. I’m guessing the league would say “You forfeit!” and then separately the NHLPA would petition the arbitrator to claim bonuses.
DG, on second thought, this is probably a moot point, don’t waste your time on this one. Put this in the Sept 30 to do list if nothing else happens.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Ubiquitous pointed to right clause, I was just working on assembling the wording.
However, it should be noted the fine in Article 26 counts against the cap by ‘reducing the club’s payroll room’. The definition of “Payroll Room” is the space between the club’s averaged salary and the upper limit; so depending on the league’s interpretation, a fine that counts against their payroll room doesn’t necessarily help them get to the floor.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Thought it should be noted GB bent those rules for the Kovalchuk contract fine so there’s nothing saying he can’t do it again.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Of course. The rest of that clause insists that regardless of the amount of the fine, the club needs to take whatever action necessary to get back into compliance with Article 50. So no matter how Bettman wants it to count, the Isles would still be forced to get back within the payroll range and above the floor.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Big picture FYI
This whole discussion of cap circumvention, which Ubi and DG reminded me of, just reinforces that Puck Daddy doesn’t understand the CBA, since it was his comment that there would potentially be no consequence to NYI avoiding the cap that brought up this discussion.
This also reinforces Hintsy’s point about columnists below. :-((((((
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
He’s technically correct because there’s only a penalty if Gary Bettman says so. (Or possibly the NHLPA but i’d have to defer to DG on that one.)
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Ah. I see you were talking about your comment above. I was talking about how PD is giving out bad info (your comment below).
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Well the wording in Article 50 is not ambiguous at all. In 50.5:
The Team Payroll Range provisions do not permit Clubs to have Averaged Club Salary that is below the Lower Limit.
And again in 50.5.c.i:
(i) Lower Limit. No Club shall, after commencement of the regular season, be permitted to have an Averaged Club Salary that falls below the Lower Limit for that League Year.The mentions of the upper limit give you a little bit of wiggle room, but not the lower limit. That goes straight to the circumvention article, basically, because the team is not in compliance with Article 50.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Right. Which means PD is wrong. Again. Just like the Philly columnists. Ugh.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
PD wrong? SAY IT AIN’T SO!
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
I think they must have edited the article, because i don’t see the part where they say Snow might try to just not reach it.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
PD quotes reader Sue Natanr:
LA was in this position a few years ago, it looked like they wouldn’t hit the floor. People were asking what the penalty would be, fines, forfeiture of games, etc., and all that’s in the CBA is that they would be ineligible for revenue sharing. Well, the LA — and the Isles — are ineligible for revenue sharing because of the markets they play in. No team that plays in the 4 largest media markets can be eligible for revenue sharing. For teams like the Isles, it’s a penalty without any meaning.
He then asks the NHL about it as an “update to an update”. He does not consult the CBA himself, and he did not think of cap circumvention (which Ubi immediately did, and I did after 3 seconds of thought). Thus, at minimum, PD is spreading inaccurate rumors (back to Hintzy’s point)
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
I imagine they’d be disqualified for not having a valid roster.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
So they’ll win just as many games, sell just as many tickets, but spare their players the embarrassment of having to live through those 6 months on the team.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
ZING!
Proud provider of the PECO Power Play.
by coheedandtbs on Jul 14, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey, good news!
Yes. RT @stevekennedy817: @BroadStBull Do you think Pronger will be healthy this season?
Crystal ball says no injuries!
Given our beat writers’ penchant for jinxing things, they should be larning to keep their mouth shut when asked those sort of questions.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
FTFY
Given our beat writers’ penchant for jinxing things getting things wrong, they should be learning to keep their mouth shut when asked those sort of questions.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
FTFY more
Given our beat writers’ penchant for jinxing things getting things wrong, they should be learning to keep their mouth shut when asked those sort of questions. have been fired and replaced years ago, yet here we are.
Lightning strikes once, Hextall strikes twice!
So this means next thing we hear pronger will have broken something in a freak snowblower accident?
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
And by “freak snowblower accident” you mean that Scott Hartnell was near him and tripped into him while he was using one.
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
Snowblowing in July can be dangerous….
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
Snowblowing in July probably has a different definition than what is commonly known.
What kind of plane is it? Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big ol' Tylenol.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snowblowing
I actually knew this as a “snowball,” but I guess it makes sense that this would be the verb form of such.
What kind of plane is it? Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big ol' Tylenol.
Seems like a lot of work just to humiliate someone.
What kind of plane is it? Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big ol' Tylenol.
Regarding the Isles and Avalanches. Is it possible to tear up a contract of a young good player and give him a healthy pay raise, like you can do in NFL?
Take the Isles they have a player like Frans Nielsen there is one of the better defensive forwards in the NHL and he will be an UFA after next season.
and that is the reason why we will see somebody we never heard of before get a giant deal because some teams or very young and cheap but cant give em contracts yet to reach the salary floor.
by Anders Jensen on Jul 14, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
We’ll probably see some sort of trade. The Caps need to deal at least one player to fit Alzner in.
What can't Giroux do?
They don’t need to move that much. I’m not saying they won’t move him, but NYI doesn’t fit the profile and the Caps aren’t forced to move him right now. I think he stays.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
And without him we have no second line. When was the last one-line team to do damage in the playoffs? Regardless of Vokoun one line won’t cut it. And who is going to give us a second line engine for Alex Semin? Nobody. So we’d have to move him for futures (and less than fair value) and then try to swap the futures for a second line engine. Unlikely.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Nah, You’ll just see Dale Tallon give lots of guys you know are just good contracts that say very good or great.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I still don’t understand why he handed out so many years. I’m sure more than a few of those guys would have been happy enough with 2 year or 1 year deals at those salaries.
What can't Giroux do?
hahaha, this.
Except, don’t tell that to the Panthers fans.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jul 14, 2011 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
The three more they have than the NY Islanders.
So…3.
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
by Chemistry66 on Jul 14, 2011 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
In other unrelated news...
I’m now the Flyers writer for hockeytracker.net
I’d like to thank you guys because this wouldn’t be possible had I not had this site to vent my Flyers feelings.
OMB!
Flyers writer at hockeytracker.net
Look the Bryz signing is actually a joke
Short of trading for Ilya Bryzgalov, there’s virtually nothing the Jets could do to short-circuit their honeymoon period with Winnipeggers.
What can't Giroux do?
That’s it! NYI will trade for Bryz to get to the floor! After all, NYI doesn’t have a #1 goalie, are they?
Oh, wait.
In preparation for NHL free agency, thinking of changing my screen name to Bhudde in 10OC.
Thought this may be of interest. Previously, the only Quakers jerseys available were quite expensive ($150+), but I saw this seller from Singapore selling this one on Ebay. A couple of days left on the auction, and the bidding is up to $28. Clearly, this isn’t going to rival a high quality jersey, but it’s interesting nonetheless.
Sarauj, Latvija!
Seriously OT
But I just need to vent about Harry Potter. I am so sick about hearing about these movies and books. Thank God this stuff is ending.
What kind of plane is it? Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big ol' Tylenol.
I want to see the movie.
Eventually.
Just to close out a story from my childhood (since it was such a huge part of my life when I was in middle school).
But seriously. All my friends on Facebook are like “OMG I’m in line for the movie and I’m dressing up and blahdeeblahdeeblah”. I just want to headdesk.
Assistant Masthead Power Person on Down Goes Spezza as ItsAFez66
I'm the Pronger. DUH, WINNING.
Chem and Gus to the restaurant.
Ian Laperriere (EE-an luh-PAIR-ee-YAIR), proper noun
Definition: Bad-assery on skates
I feel same, except the part about HP being a part of my childhood. Was old when they came out and am even older now. But I have friends MY AGE who act like these books/movies are the goddamned Beatles. I’ll just go back to my wine and adult magic shows replete with nudity, drugs and copious amounts of sex and cursing, thankyouverymuch.
What kind of plane is it? Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big ol' Tylenol.
Teams are permitted to be up to 10% over the cap limit during the offseason, as long as they are cap compliant by the start of the regular season. With Coburn’s extension, that cap hit doesn’t begin until the 2012-13 campaign.
But there is something called "tagging", and that is that a club cannot be above the current upper cap number for the next season. According to CapGeek, the Flyers have just over $1.5 million in space with 22 players signed for the upcoming season. But they have in excess of $17.25 million with 15 players under contract for 2012-13. Coburn’s deal would put those numbers at 16 players inked and more than $13.25 million with which to work.
Throw in the fact that Holmgren has the task of working on an extension for van Riemsdyk – whose $1,654,166 entry-level deal expires after the upcoming year, which would make him a restricted free agent next summer – and that $13.25 million could dwindle very rapidly.
So it could just be that the team wants to save the news of the Coburn deal for the dog days of August, when all of the free agent frenzy has completely died down and any kind of hockey news is more than welcomed.
Or it could mean that Holmgren still has his designs set on something else, and needs to wait until the scenario plays out.
This isn’t a reason to delay announcing an extension until August. Is that the evidence that a move is coming?
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
Not necessarily. Capgeek’s numbers aren’t really showing the official offseason calculation, anyway; because I don’t see them counting the 1% of Holmstrom and 1% of Gustaffson and Leighton/Backlund/Walker, etc. The offseason cap calculation is very different, but with the 10% overage has to count all that stuff I mentioned. That’s due up in the CBA FAQ shortly, next week-ish.
Capgeek’s posted numbers are more about projecting what the roster and cap situation is for the next regular season. If you go look at their FAQ, you’ll see a brief explanation of how the offseason cap is calculated; but then you’ll also notice that isn’t what they’re displaying as the cap room at the moment. It’s not really worth it for them to write code for their engine to calculate it the proper offseason way, because 90% of the people wouldn’t understand what the heck it all means, anyway. People want to build rosters for next year, not all of their visitors want to understand nuances that would just get in the way.
Warning: Arguing the NHL CBA with me could be hazardous to your mental health. Proceed at your own risk.
by DragonGirl0583 on Jul 14, 2011 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















