SBN Philly: What Would Ryan Suter Cost?
Since everyone loves talking about trades, let's look at what it would take to acquire those players being speculated about. Based on history.
5 months ago
Geoff Detweiler
98 comments
0 recs |
Comments
What’s the fun in Allen?
An upgrade and the pieces to do something else if needed.
Ed Snider is a crotchety old fuck.
That is all.
But come on, man! Ryan Suter! Luke Schenn! Shea Weber!
Where’s your inner “STAMKOS!?!!”?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
Saw the Luke Schenn rumor, then saw that it would probably be JVR traded for Schenn and i was like LOL NO
Yeah, pretty much.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 1:39 PM EST up reply actions
I will be in Nashville this weekend and I can offer him a ride home with us if it helps to cut costs of getting him to Philly. Just trying to help out.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
by MJDII on Jan 12, 2012 11:46 AM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
I wouldn’t give up a top 6 guy to help out our D this year. Only way i would be ok with it is if they got someone long term who could replace Carle if they let him go or if Kimmo is going to retire after the year. Forward depth is a pretty good thing to have. I say if you go after somebody go for a solid 3-4 guy.
by asmallvictory31 on Jan 12, 2012 12:26 PM EST reply actions
For the first time I successfully navigated Behind The Net to see what I wanted. I don’t think Allen’s numbers are good (are they?) But the huge upside with him would be having a firsty/first d-pairing with Carl and Allen.
Flyers Fans: We've survived Lock-outs, Lindros and Cooperalls. If you want to get rid of us, you'll have to split an atom or two.
by KreiderDesigns on Jan 12, 2012 12:27 PM EST reply actions
Yeah, Allen’s numbers are good. He is 1st in quality of opposition, 1st in CorsiRel, and 5th in offensive zone starts.
So he gets put out in the defensive zone against first/second line opponents and the Hurricanes are best when he’s on the ice.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
Any trade would hurt
Because I love everyone on this team. Unless they can trade Lilja and Rinaldo (or Shelley), I’m going to be upset.
And while I think Harry Z and Matt Read both fill somewhat the same role, thus making one of them replaceable, I don’t want to! Leave my team alone!!
(What would help is analyzing next year’s projected costs and project cap, and then targeting who they can’t keep and trading them. But that sounds too smart.)
It's in his wheelhouse!!
Carlos Ruiz, My Nickname is Chooch.
(What would help is analyzing next year’s projected costs and project cap, and then targeting who they can’t keep and trading them. But that sounds too smart.)
That is a good suggestion, but that’s incredibly time consuming due to all the moving parts.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
Lilja, Rinaldo, Shelley, Walker, and a fourth for Weber and Suter.
Done and done.
@BSH_EricT
Writer at Broad Street Hockey
Weber, Suter, Schenn
I would put Schenn ahead of Suter but behind Weber in priority. Most likely Weber is untouchable and Suter is the same type of Dman we are stocked with (Coburn, Carle, Mezaros). Therefore Schenn is the target I like the best. To get him, I’d give up
1- 1st and 2nd draft pick and any Phantom (most likely not enough)
2- Carle, 2nd round draft pick, and a phantom
3- Byrz and a ton of money (how awesome would that be if they took that salary from us)
I don’t want to see Schenn (ours), Read, or Couterier go anywhere. I don’t mind giving up the draft picks since he is only 22 and what are the chances those draft picks will be NHL caliber Dmen. I rather take my chances on the 22 with known NHL skill.
You want Carle traded. Your point is invalid.
How does trading to make our defense weaker help the team?
It's in his wheelhouse!!
Carlos Ruiz, My Nickname is Chooch.
by Dr. Steve on Jan 12, 2012 1:28 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
free agent
Carle will want too much next season. He will be asking for more then Coburn and Mezaros. Next season we could have Schenn, Mezaros, Coburn, Kimmo, Bourbon or Gustafsson and try and sign Suter or Weber. I think our defense is not mean enough without Pronger and the combination of Carle being a free agent and adding a tough defensemen like Schenn would be a fair tradeoff. Plus Gustafsson can supply the offense from the blueline which Carle brings.
But he’s better than Coburn and Mezaros. We can’t afford to lose him.
Look at it this way. If we trade Carle, we’re instantly sellers. And if we’re trading Carle, we should be going for big value in return. Carle shouldn’t require additional players to fetch a big return.
It's in his wheelhouse!!
Carlos Ruiz, My Nickname is Chooch.
I’d rather have Coburn or Mesz over Carle any day. I’m not a huge fan of Carle, though he’s played well this year. He’s made some great strides from when we first acquired him, especially with Pronger helping him, but I don’t think he’s worth more than Coburn or Mesz
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
He’s played well every year we’ve had him. If that’s not enough to convince you, then nothing is.
It's in his wheelhouse!!
Carlos Ruiz, My Nickname is Chooch.
Holy Shit.
Matt Walker is only 31? He’s been so bad for so long I had always assumed he was some guy who was relevant in the 90s and was now like…41…holy shit. He’s awful.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
by Pardini36 on Jan 12, 2012 1:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
alright so....
realistically what would be an acceptable trade for Suter (long term, not rental)? If the Flyers FO were to make it happen for better or worse?
let’s get some names and picks out there. What would you be able to live with?
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:06 PM EST reply actions
I’m a gambling man by nature so I go the 1st rounder. Then I maybe go with some D prospects, like Gus and Bartullis. Having Suter means neither of those guys are getting a shot.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
NSH will want more than our 1st (likely a pick in the 20s) + Gus and Bartulis (who would still have to clear waivers to play for them. I’m guessing at least. Maybe they take it if you attach conditional picks (2012 – 2nd round and 2013 – 1st) based on whether Suter stays in Philly.
by hebrew hammer on Jan 12, 2012 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
But that is just it they also don’t have all the leverage. It looks worse watching him walk for nothing then adding even a late first round pick and some prospects. When the headlines in NSH come out they don’t say well we got a lousy 20th pick for our all star defenseman.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
I don’t know if conditional picks like the ones I suggested are often used or not. I know they were with the Pronger deal. I guess it all comes down to the potential NSH sees in re-signing Suter. If he seems like a lost cause as a free agent, then they might accept less, but if I were them I’d hold on and let everyone bid like crazy.
by hebrew hammer on Jan 12, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
No, but a) it never comes out what teams passed on; and b) just the negotiating rights to Suter will be worth a 3rd round pick based on Bryz’s trade, and that’s if Nashville knows he isn’t returning. It could be a 2nd (Hamhuis).
All you’ve done is throw in two bottom-3 at best defensive prospects to a team that has a gluttony of defensive prospects and moved them up ~15 extra spots in the draft in exchange for half a season of their Norris-trophy finalist defenseman and Captain.
That’s a horrible proposal Nashville would never accept.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
Fuckin Sugar Coat it for me Deets!
Its Nashville. They have no budget to just pay him 6 million a year. he is gone. I didn’t know the d prospects were so plentiful in Nashville. And having a second first round pick can be packaged with their own 1st rounder for a much better first rounder. 30th or 20th, first rounders are first rounders in GM’s eyes. They could lose him for nothing. Throw them JVR if you feel so bad, he sucks anyway……tick tock tick tock :-)
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
They have no budget to just pay him 6 million a year.
Surely you said the same thing last year. And now they’re paying Weber $7.5 million and Rinne $7 million.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
I actually never even knew there was a franchise in Nashville until last years playoffs. ;-P
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
i would figure they would want a forward as well.
i would not part ways with Couterier. Vorecek wouldnt be enough. Probably would have to be like 1st rounder+Gus+Schenn/JVR?
realistically. dont know if i could pull the trigger on that. Especially that I think Gus will be good and we might lose both Voracek and Jagr. We can withstand that as long as we hold onto everyone else. That means not trading Schenn or JVR.
I’m hoping both Voracek and Jagr would want to stay and take friendlier than market deals due to the sucess both have had here as compared to the nhl teams they were with before. I mean Jagr has made good money over his career, would he just turn away from playing with Giroux who he clearly enjoys and has chemistry with.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:23 PM EST up reply actions
Probably would have to be like 1st rounder+Gus+Schenn/JVR?
This is the first somewhat realistic assessment I’ve seen. However, knowing the Preds, it would be Schenn and not JvR. See below.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
i dont like it
but unfortunately that’s the realistic deal i see.
the only way it comes down is if the Preds get scared about getting nothing when he walks, but i assume then other teams will have better offers than if the flyers offered like Gus/Voracek and picks
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
ideally and as realistic as possible id do: 1st rounder+Gus+Voracek, but I dont know if that would be enough.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
Almost certainly not enough. Working on a follow-up post.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
agreed unless Voracek starts killing it goal-wise, not that i dont recognize what he brings right now, but it’s all about selling those glamour stats to the fans.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
but it’s all about selling those glamour stats to the fans.
Assuming this is referring to “Preds fans”, this is 100% correct.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
Bud seriously, they aren’t nervous about getting nothing? Nyet, Nadda! It’s a gamble but getting a 1st rounder and JVR is like a win fall instead of nothing.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
JvR would not interest the Preds. Cap-hit too high for the talent. See below.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
Where below? Your tagline? Nothing after the year Bud, nothing. Well how about Hartnell back?
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
There now.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
Wow thats a lot of words. It’s not just fodder for comedy around here I really do have a short attention span. I’ll try and take a stab at it.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
maybe he would, just seems to have re-found himself here, gonna be interesting to see what he values at this point in his career.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
i will admit to loving big name acquisitions, so some sick part of me wants to get Suter even if it hurts, but really the best move would be a guy like Gleason/Allen.
One of those guys plus solid play from Gus/Bourdon and Bob/improved play from Bryz is all we really need
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
For some reason I want to make a hot female analogy to your line of thought. But I will leave that to reaper or The Dark.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
whatever do you mean?
Beets,Bears,Battlestar Galactica.
MICHAEL!
Political Correctness - the belief that one can pick up a turd by the clean end.
by reaper1221 on Jan 12, 2012 3:49 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
How about ....
2 first rounders and prospect package not including Schenn, Read or Cooter.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
haha, who are these “prospects” not named Schenn, Read, or Couturier?
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
shhhhhh. using the term “prospects” arbitrarily makes the trade look better. just go with it.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
You know I don’t even believe in the word prospects. We’ve gone round that block a couple of times, but yea shhhh, it’s just a term.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
Actually…
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions
This entire discussion likely misses the point
There are four things that are required for any NHL trade: two teams, and then cap implications for each team. Only one of these four is not a problem in this trade: the Preds have no cap problems whatsoever.
What we are discussing is what the Flyers would be willing to send. In my view, this is the second easiest problem. The Flyers have lots of good young forwards. The Preds need these. In this case, the Preds might be willing to trade for Schenn or Scooter AND a 1st AND Gus. However, would you want to lose these for a rental (more on this below)?
Which brings us to the “tricky two” things in this trade. First, the Preds. You have to understand that the Preds are quite fearful of completely alienating their fan base, and the relationship between Weber and the Preds is not good. Losing both of these would be potentially harmful to the franchise’s marketing in the area. So while Geoff assigns X value to the Suter trade, understand that the Preds would assign a far higher value to him. To get some idea of this, imagine if Pronger or Timmo were 27, had a $3.5 M cap hit, and were one of just 3 Flyers “stars” on the entire team. All rumors are that the Preds and Suter are in very serious negotiations; I believe if Suter is signed Weber will be allowed to walk while the Preds get the draft choices, since Weber is RFA and Suter is UFA. So count on Suter being signed, because without him, they likely don’t make the playoffs and ownership needs playoff $$$$. Failing to get him signed, any trade would have to appear as a “blockbuster” both as talent returned and as something of a mollifier to the fanbase. However, if he is not signed….
The fourth problem rears its head, and it’s really the big one…the Flyers cap. If Suter is not signed, then he’s asking for $7M per year. And since the NHL cap is based on average $$$, even with extra dead years on the end there is no way to fix this to get it much less than $6M a year….and that’s all the Flyers have available for 2012-13, even before anyone else or RFAs are signed. Thus, it is impossible to get him under the cap and signed, unless multiple players are gone. You might be able to do this cap-wise with trading Simmons and/or Voracek for him, but the Preds won’t care about those players in all likelihood. They would want Schenn or Couturier.
So you gots your choices…..either you trade Schenn or Couturier AND draft choice(s) for a rental, or you do some sort of sign and trade (not sure if that’s even possible) and load up a boatload of the youngsters (like Read AND Simmons AND Voracek or draft choices) for him. Which poison would you like? As a Flyers fan, I’m passing.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
firstly i think renting Suter is dumb b/c of how expensive that rental would probably be.
also as a free agent Suter cant be afforded. plain and simple. has to be a trade.
if it’s true what you say and Suter is the guy they’re sticking with over Weber and they believe they can keep him, then i agree a trade is not worth it since they’ll be asking for the moon and new york city.
the question then is, if Weber wants out more than Suter, is there any entertaining a deal for Weber? him being a RFA makes it tougher for sure, but if the preds know he wants out, what kind of trade deal would they be looking for and under a trade circumstance could we even afford him then? probably not.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
Wow you read all that in like 8 minutes?
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
Sorry M. You can imagine the pent-up frustration I was having in today’s flyby when I could not post. :-))
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
unless we let carle walk or keep carle, but trade coburn or mesz.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
The biggest problem with a Weber trade is two-fold: (1) He is at $7.5M on the cap (2) If they just let him go at the end of the year to someone without matching, with that high a cap hit they get multiple #1 draft choices (need DG or Geoff confirmation here on the exact amount). Thus, while Suter is highly doubtful, Weber is essentially impossible, unless you were talking JvR AND Voracek (for the Flyers cap hit!) AND maybe Read/Simmonds/Scooter Etc.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
$6 mil in cap space + $5 mil in LTIR credit for 2012-13, potentially.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
Not exactly
Remember that LTIR does not count on the 1st day. So you can only sign to the actual cap, without LTIR. There is some wiggle room with 10% overage off-season and maybe throwing Schenn et all in the minors in the first day, but I don’t think that is a good idea.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
If the preds have absolutely no issue with cap space why wouldn’t they want someone a little more seasoned and up side like JVR over Cooter or Schenn that have even less track record for NHL success. Would they do either Briere or Hartenll? Established players and one an ex-patriot.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
They don’t want to pay a single cent over expected value.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
This.
(see M I can do short posts too :-))
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
Well good luck replacing the guy when he walks to the north. And good luck competing for a cup playing moneypuck. I added the money puck on the chance that it applies I have absolutely no idea what moneyball or moneypuck really means.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
I like that…moneypuck. Pretty much as you say here in TN-ville.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
Hey Bud coming down man looking forward to the game Sat night. How rowdy are these people? I am a laid back fan flying under the radar. I don’t wear jerseys or anything more then a hat with the colors.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
They will yell and stare at you if you cheer the Flyers obnoxiously, but Nashville isn’t New York. Or Philly for that matter. While I want to see the Flyguys, it’s actually quite a fun atmosphere when going there for other games.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
On TV it seems a little Capitalish. Not knocking the enthusiasm but college basketballish.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
They cheer for weird things and make me feel uncomfortable. Generally, nice and fun atmosphere. Noise level doesn’t get that high. Often people having random conversations during gameplay.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
I am assuming an array of stunning southern girls also???
Yes happily married, but not dead.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
Some, but you’re better off at any of the bars that surround Bridgestone.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
I love my wife, really. Dark haired, Sicilian spitfire. She is the prototype for me. And yes, I sleep with one eye open. But I have a total weakness for southern girls it goes against my nature but weakens my defenses. Are you from the south?
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
Nah, I’m from Philly. Southern girls are just fine by me, but if their accent gets too pronounced, I’m losing interest. Probably for the best, down here.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
Moneypuck was already used by Mirtle in the Globe and Mail.
Guess who plays “Moneypuck”? Pittsburgh, San Jose, and Detroit.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
No cups this year or the last two years in that group.
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
No Cups in two years!
DOESN’T WORK!
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 3:37 PM EST up reply actions
Goaltender, not quantifiable under normal player standards. Its a soft spot for all GMs
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
Right, but there’s an example of Nashville paying millions over expected value.
Another example of them spending over expected value: Mike Fisher.
Another example of them spending over expected value: David Legwand.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions
Agree on Legwand, totally, i’ve posted before they overpay on re-ups.
I’m meh on Fisher though. Not that much of an overpay.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
No, and I don’t think Legwand is a terrible contract either. But I think they both are getting more money than they are providing in on-ice value.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 13, 2012 8:22 AM EST up reply actions
I doubt they wanted to give him that contract. Holding on to assets (that your fans can already see the performance of) is different than acquiring them.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
They why did they? They turned Mike Dunham into a legit starting goalie. They made Dan Ellis look like an All-Star. They have Anders Lindback ready to be the next Pekka Rinne.
Terrible, terrible contract.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 12, 2012 8:40 PM EST up reply actions
I know they have a good goalie coach, and I’m not saying the contract was good. I’m saying they overpaid him because the Predators have fans they need to keep buying tickets. The premium was for avoiding the reputation that they won’t be able to pay young stars
At least, that’s my opinion on what went down, but it’s an internal discussion, so maybe I’m wrong and they just overvalued him. Either way, they wouldn’t want an overvalued JVR.
Keeping alive the old Vaudeville joke, "I'd rather be dead than play Philadelphia."
I get what you’re saying, but that isn’t justification for paying Rinne that money (how about Weber?).
Further, I’m sure they wouldn’t want to trade Weber or Suter, you can use the same “overpaid to avoid reputation/have fans they need” rationale for taking on JVR in a trade for one of them.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 13, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
Note that I’ve already posted that the bizarre Rinne signing is even more bizarre from a Nashville perspective.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
There’s no way we’re moving Schenn or Coots + a 1st for a rental in Suter. Now if you’re talking Weber… I’d do it. There’s no guarantee that Suter even signs with the club, so why give up so much for a guy that could walk at seasons end?
There's only one sports team that owns my soul - The Philadelphia Flyers.
Weber will cost far more. See above.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
Sure he’ll cost more, but no one has said by how much. JVR, Carle and 2 firsts?
There's only one sports team that owns my soul - The Philadelphia Flyers.
swap JVR with Couter or Schenn. and then pass on the deal.
by bleedorangewhiteblack on Jan 12, 2012 3:22 PM EST up reply actions
NSH would want Couter more than JVR I would guess.
Couter and a 1st if I were NSH.
If I were philly JVR, Bourdon, 2nd or 3rd pick
This post kinda summarizes it all. Trade not likely, and if it is, not necessarily good news.
GMAT verbal section question, Philadelphia sports version.
In 2015, which one of the following will prove to be a better investment?
(a) Ilya Bryzgalov's contract (b) Ryan Howard's extension (c) Mike Vick's extension (d) Greek bonds from 2009 (e) Papelbon's bloat deal
If the Flyers trade either of Schenn/JVR/Couturier/Voracek for a rental defenseman who will likely ask for too much money at the end of the season I’m going to rip my hair out.
Think of it this way: if the Flyers trade Schenn + 1st rounder + Gus for Suter and then overpay Suter to keep him in the offseason they’ll have to let Carle go. So it’s actually Schenn + Carle + Gus + 1st rounder for Suter and we’re strapped with another big contract. Fuck that. Keep our young stars. Seriously, if you want to trade Schenn/JVR/Couturier/Voracek wait till they emerge as star players and then you’ll get real value for them (maybe a high-profile prospect, a 1st rounder, and a 3rd rounder…like the Carter/Richards trades).
Simon Gagne AND Mike Richards may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home but, at the end of the day, they will both always be Philadelphia Flyers.
One day Sean Couturier will win the Conn Smythe. You heard it here first.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jan 12, 2012 6:30 PM EST reply actions























