JVR for Schenn and other Ramblings (Seriously, rambling.)
There's been a lot of talk recently about Luke Schenn for JVR. I wouldn't consider this trade without also asking for a first and/or making the Leafs take Matt Fucking Walker (MFW). After the jump Pros and Cons (my opinion of course) of trading JVR for Schenn, and other thoughts on the Flyers and some long term plans.
Pros:
1) It makes the Flyers instantly better, and really there’s no way the Schenn Brothers don’t both sign to play together.
2) If Pronger can come back for the playoffs (rumored) or next year, we have an absolutely filthy top 6 and can let Timmonen take some time off.
3) We most likely (never say never) wouldn’t be resigning Matt "Turnover Machine" Carle this off-season
4) No more playing with fire with Matt Walker and waivers.
5) Brayden and Luke Schenn will take a Neidermeyer like discount to stay with us for their whole careers.
Cons:
1) If Pronger can’t come back Luke Schenn isn’t good enough. We need a real #1, especially if realignment passes.
2) I still have faith that JVR is gonna grow up. When we were his age we were skipping class to day drink.
3) We're basically broadcasting to Giroux, Cooter, and Baby Schenn: DON'T SIGN A LONG TERM SECOND CONTRACT HERE. No one is gonna sign long term with the Flyers without an ironclad NMC, which might not mean much as we give everyone a NMC already.
4) Is he going to give us more than Matt Carle going forward? We’re basically trading a guy who plays ok defense and is strong on offense for a guy who is strong on defense but ok on offense.
Notes----
Draft:
If we trade JVR for Schenn, I'm also asking for a first. Then, I take those two firsts and I try to move up high in this upcoming draft for another young gun in our system. I would try to move our two firsts and Bob to either CBJ or EDM for their first round pick. Edmonton is so top heavy right now...they would get two picks in a deep draft to provide more to their ridiculous young core and a young NHL proven goalie. CBJ needs to continue their building (it can't be a rebuild until you build). Those two firsts and a goalie would go a long way. Someone last night said Bob is actually going to be an RFA, not a UFA, which makes me wonder if that adds to his trade value, or makes me want us to keep him even more. If the CBA has a bullet, do we say bye-bye to Bryz?
Wings:
I was wrong Scotty. You can play. You can't skate, but you can play. I'll admit when I'm wrong, you've gone from one of my least favorite Flyers to a guy I want resigned (2Y, 9M? 3Y/12?).
Could JVR losing his job to Hartnell be what killed his confidence? We can’t move Hartnell, and if JVR is that fragile he’s not gonna cut it with the Flyers anyway. Then again, if he leaves and goes on to dominate, ugh. I would like to think he’s not that mentally fragile in a sport with multiple lines. It’s not like it’s football and he’s being relegated to backup and special teams or something.
Do we re-sign Jagr? Is he enjoying playing with G enough that he’ll take a pay cut? I know he’s been a good soldier, but he’s Jaromir Fucking Jagr. Let’s be real. We either need to re-sign Matt Carle, or pick up another defenseman. (Trading JVR for Schenn really solves this, but I put my thoughts on that above).
Is Rick Nash available? If so, at what cost? Schenn and JVR? No way. Cooter/Schenn, Bob, and a first? Let's talk. JVR, Bob, and a first? I'm in.
Defensemen:
IS PRONGER COMING BACK? That weighs so heavily on our moves, and I feel like it's never discussed...we just assume a guy who almost lost an eye and has a severe concussion will come back, even though he's already a first ballot lock for the HOF, has a Hart, a Norris, and a Ring.
If we make the aforementioned JVR and a first for Schenn, will Suter be available in the offseason? If we think we can get him as a UFA should we even trade for Schenn? If we can move the two firsts and Bob for a lottery pick, would we do it before or after the lottery? If it's CBJ you do it before the lottery without a second though, if it's Edmonton we might want to see where they end up. We need a young defenseman badly. Had the Winnepeg Jets not taken the hometown boy we likely would have gotten Doug Hamilton in the draft and had our young stud to groom. Instead we made the (correct) decision to cash in our chips after a big hand and took Cooter.
Centers:
Having too many centers is usually a great problem to have in the NHL, but when they're as young as Schenn and Cooter you don't want them sitting on the bench getting 10 minutes a game. Briere is reaching the point in his career where his main role is going to be powerplay and the easiest minutes (some would argue he's been there his whole career) which will open up minutes for Cooter. I see Cooter being a much better Jordan Staal. He's already a defensive presence, has the size and the grit, but he has much more offensive upside. A center quartet of Giroux-Cooter-Schenn-Talbot moving forward is incredibly well balanced. With Schenn and Cooter coming on offensively in recent months, I don't know which would be the two or three, but obviously the three gets more defensive responsibility. Schenn was labeled as the next Richie, but I think he's way more athletic and polished. Will he be as good defensively? Who knows. Cooter may already be there. Briere will be taking the powerplay time, but there's always room for another center when the other team is down a man.
One other thought...before we even consider these moves...Is Pronger coming back? If Pronger is coming back, we need a rental and then we should try to find a young #1 for the long term, and we have some time. If Pronger has told the Flyers "I'm retiring after this playoff run, I'll try to play" then we REALLY need to go after Suter or Weber.
Back to long-term...We cannot continue to thrive under our current contracts without some serious production from ELCs. Think about it…this off season JVR’s raise is basically a break even with Jagr’s contract.
Hopefully the new CBA has a few changes, and we know the Flyers and Pens will push for these, and they have major juice:
1) Amnesty on one contract. You still have to pay it, but that player doesn’t count against your cap and becomes a UFA instantly. I’m assuming this would go to Bryz unless he turns it around or some of these other changes happen, in which case it would probably go to someone else.
2) One of these:
a) An NBA style cap where a player’s current salary is his cap hit, meaning Briere and Bryzgalov and Pronger’s contracts would all have smaller cap hits moving forward
b) A NFL style cap hit with a signing bonus prorated over the life of the deal, and then the yearly pay amount is added to it...i.e. If Crosby signs a 10 year, 150M contract with 20M up front, then salaries of 20M, 25M, 25M, 25M, 10M, then 5M a year the rest of the way instead of a $15M cap hit each year he’d have cap hits of 22,27,27,27,12,7,7,7,7,7. Yes, this contract example is absurd but I wanted easy math.
c) A one DRAFTED player per team "No Cap Hit" designation…meaning theFlyers could pay Giroux or the Pens pay Crosby FAR more than any other team, the catch is you have to have drafted the guy. Would you be able to declare who the guy is each year, or would it be in the contract? Fun question
d) Some sort of revamping of the 35+ rule, as it doesn’t really do anything but cause problems. I would understand the rule if it said "any contract over X number of years to any player," but the way it is doesn’t solve anything. The Devils and Rangers and Flyers still used the loophole to get below market contracts, they just used it on younger players for ridiculously long deals. This has to be fixed.
3) I know I had one other thing I wanted to add, but I forget what it is. I'll probably put it in the comments.
Anyway, whatever trade we make has to be made with an educated guess about the next CBA.
Sorry for the disjointed formatting...this started as an email with my boy who is a Flyers fan and a minor league coach, and I tried to make it a fan post.
I need a life. BSH, you my only friend :'(
/No seriously, I live in the South now. I need my hockey fix and there are like 3 people at my job who follow hockey closely.
This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by Broad Street Hockey.
26 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You even added a jump. Friggin show off! I of course have not read it yet. I am working war and peace first. :-)
Commenter formerly known as M from Pdaddy, but still just Call Me "M"!
DISCLAIMER: Information written above may not be entirely factual nor provable with the use of complex statistics. But it may induce thought, humor and possibly laughter.
Is he going to give us more than Matt Carle going forward? We’re basically trading a guy who plays ok defense and is strong on offense for a guy who is strong on defense but ok on offense.
This, in a nutshell, is why I don’t think we need to trade for a great defenseman. Let’s find someone who can eat the sixth man minutes better than Lilja and sit pat for this year. I think that signing up Matt Carle again is a capital idea, and I think that as time moves forward we’ll have a better idea of what to do about the “Pronger Situation” ….
by alaskalovestheflyers on Jan 13, 2012 2:06 PM EST reply actions
Some interesting thoughts but a bit difficult to keep track of all the different pathways and possibilities. Are you familiar with decision matrices? They are useful for organizing and analyzing this type of information.
Dude, I cut an pasted and lightly edited a bunch of emails with my friend. I said it was rambling. If I were a contributor to this site this article would have been written very very differently. This is just some thoughts and ramblings.
My career is based on comprehensive and coherent documentation. I would have kicked my own ass if I submitted something this awful at my job. I just didn’t have time to really put it together. I put one point in pros twice.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
Better trade: let’s trade unimpressive JVR now for playoff JVR come April. If the rumors about Reemer’s hip are true than we need to shut him down and let him get surgery. We have the depth to deal with his absence and it’s not like he’s a key part of our offense at the moment. Although, I will say that he has been much more impressive since we put him on a line with Simmonds and Schenn. They really seem to have some chemistry. If JVR can start using his size to his advantage that line could be down right scary.
Sometimes I forget JVR is only 22, because it feels like we’ve been saying that forever. I have a thought on this…
When I got to college, my coach told me “You’re no longer faster than everyone, but you’re still bigger.” I was only 18, but it was a clear message and I changed my style of play in order to succeed. JVR is still faster than everyone, but he needs to learn to use his size. He should be every bit as physical as Hartnell (moreso, actually) but has a better shot, better hands, better vision, and (duh) better skating.
JVR needs to put it together. It’s one thing to have a good playoff run (7 points in 11 games, yes they were goals, but I’ve never seen someone get a point without a goal involved) is a very good run, but it’s a shame he didn’t do that in November so he had 40+ games to grow on it, instead he had an offseason of hearing how great he is.
Broad Street Hockey's Reigning Trivia Champion
That’s the reason I don’t want to trade JVR. He’s got an insanely amazing complement of raw skills. Since his rookie year you’ve always been getting these rare little moments where JVR realises that he’s stronger, faster and more skilled than almost everyone else on the ice and starts dominating the game (that is, goes into ‘JVR beast mode’). If he can turn out that sort of performance consistently he can be a great. He’s still just 22.
Simon Gagne AND Mike Richards may move between towns, wear new jerseys and call different arenas home but, at the end of the day, they will both always be Philadelphia Flyers.
One day Sean Couturier will win the Conn Smythe. You heard it here first.
by PursuitOfLappyness on Jan 13, 2012 10:03 PM EST up reply actions
John LeClair at 22 – 19 goals and 25 assists in 72 games for the Habs.
Patrick Marleau at 22 – 21 goals and 23 assists in 81 games for the Sharks.
Ryan Smyth at 22 – 13 goals and 18 assists in 71 games for the Oilers.
JVR’s projected stats (if he plays the rest of the season similar to the first half) – 22 goals, 22 assists in 74 games.
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!
by MaximumTalbot on Jan 14, 2012 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
Matt Carle has 27 giveaways according to NHL.com. Other supposed “Turnover Machines” include Dan Boyle with 41, Zdeno Chara with 36, Shea Weber with 31, and 34 other solid NHL defensemen (Carle is 35th on the list, in other words). Suter has 23 … that’s 4 less in 40-ish games, or one every TEN GAMES. So unless you forgot the sarcasm font …
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!
Flyers’ top five players in turnovers:
Carle, Coburn, Jagr, Hartnell, Timonen. Giroux and Voracek are tied for 6th most.
What’s the unifying trait in that list? They’re the Flyers’ best players, and they’re the ones you want with the puck on their stick. The more you carry the puck, the more you’re trusted to make the right decisions, the more you’re going to rack up opportunities for giveaways.
It’s a really simple concept to grasp.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 14, 2012 6:17 PM EST up reply actions
Yes – and therefore, if one compares across the league it’s a better measure … and Carle STILL doesn’t turn the puck over that much. I mean, if someone like Rinaldo was up in the league (or team) rankings, then you could say there was a problem because he shouldn’t have the puck tah much, let alone lose it that much.
Maxime Talbot - in the Orange and Black ... better than chocolate and peanut butter!
by MaximumTalbot on Jan 16, 2012 8:36 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly.
Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999 and Matt Calvert since May 2010
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor
by Geoff Detweiler on Jan 16, 2012 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
I keep hearing the rumor that Pronger could return for the playoffs. Is this a real possibility? I know the Flyers have duped us before, but seriously- they said he was done for the season and playoffs. But somehow, this rumor of him returning for the playoffs keep popping up. Could someone out there shed some light on this for me? I am living in Bruins country and all of my Flyers news comes from BSH
Its just a rumor. His last interview he said he isnt feeling any better or worse then a month ago.
by Anders Jensen on Jan 18, 2012 4:36 AM EST up reply actions
could he be lying and just gonna say its no change till he's 100%
that way to avoid a pronger watch?
Beets,Bears,Battlestar Galactica.
MICHAEL!
Political Correctness - the belief that one can pick up a turd by the clean end.

by 






















