Why all shot attempts aren't created equal

No, this isn't a treatise on shot quality. This is a post on the difference between a shot, and missed shot, and shot attempt for that is blocked.

When we look at Corsi, we treat all shot attempts as equal. A shot on goal is the same as a shot that goes 3 feet over the goalie's head. Now in terms of measuring possession (and Corsi/Fenwick after all are proxies for possession), this is an ok assumption. If a team gets 2 shots on goal and 1 missed shot in a shift, or 2 missed shots and 1 shot on goal in a shift, the line probably had equal time of possession on that shift.

However, I would argue that those two above possessions aren't equal. I think most of us would prefer the possession with 2 shots on goal over 1 shot on goal.

So the question is, can teams control the proportion of corsi events for or against that end up as shots for or against. The answer . . .


For team data, I collected all team data from even strength 5v5 from each of the last 6 seasons. I then calculated both shots for per 60 minutes per corsi for per 60 minutes (SF60/CF60) and shots against per 60 minutes per corsi against per 60 minutes (SA60/CA60). This basically is a percentage of how many corsi events (for or against) were shots (for or against). Note that both shots for/against and corsi for/against are on ice stats, rather than solely individual stats.

I then ran the correlations for the 2007-2008, 2009-2010, and 2011-2012 seasons to , respectively, the 2008-2009, 2010-2011, and 2012-2013 seasons. Basically, I wanted to see if a team's percentage of corsi events (for or against) that were shots (for or against) was a repeatable skill year to year. In other words, does knowing one year's SF60/CF60 tell us anything about the following year's SF60/CF60.


First, the offense.

r 0.702324711

Wow, that's a pretty strong correlation we have there. And with a p-value of less than 0.01, it is statistically significant as well. With an R^2 of about .49, nearly 50% of the variance in SF60/CF60 is explained via the previous years SF60/CF60.

Now to defense

r 0.735710541

Again, another strong correlation. And again, our p-value is less than 0.01.

It seems like a team's percentage of corsi events, both for and against, that end up as shots is a repeatable talent year to year, both offensively and defensively.

So now the question is, does it matter. To figure this out, I calculated the standard deviation and average for SF60/CF60 for both offense and defense, as well as the average total Corsi for and Corsi against in a full season and the league wide shooting percentage for those same seasons.

If a team was able to generate a SF60/CF60 at 1 standard deviation above the league average on offense and 1 standard deviation below the league average on defense (which would be a good thing, since this would prevent shots), than our imaginary team would come out with a goal differential of about +11.6, which is worth almost two wins.

I think this is something to look into a bit closer. I did run some numbers for forwards, using only players who played at least 200 minutes in both the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 seasons (sample size of about 350 players). I found no repeatably talent at the individual level for SF60/CF60. If this is true, we are seeing something that can only be repeated at the team level.

This item was written by a member of this community and is not necessarily endorsed by <em>Broad Street Hockey</em>.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Broad Street Hockey

You must be a member of Broad Street Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Broad Street Hockey. You should read them.

Join Broad Street Hockey

You must be a member of Broad Street Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Broad Street Hockey. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.